THIS IS A CONTINUATION OF MY REFLECTIONS ON MY RELATIONSHIP WITH BRUCE METZGER, MY MENTOR. SEVERAL PEOPLE HAVE ASKED WHAT HIS VIEW WAS OF MY LEAVING THE FAITH. I’LL DEAL WITH THAT DOWN THE LINE. (AS IT TURNS OUT, IT’S VIRTUALLY A NON-EXISTENT PART OF THE STORY….)
In graduate school different professors have different approaches to evaluating and grading term papers. Some professors are completely anal about it and insist on correcting every mistake, rewriting every sentence, and reformulating every idea. Not many are that way, thankfully, since doing all this takes an enormous chunk of time (and a very large ego). I never had a professor like that, but I have known some over the years. Others make extremely judicious and helpful comments, sometimes at great length. My teacher Paul Meyer was like that at Princeton Seminary. The comments he made on our papers were in depth, always on target, and superior in quality to any of the scholarship we read all semester in the class. Meyer never published much himself – he threw himself into his students instead; we always threatened to extract his comments from our papers and to publish them as articles for him.
Other professors (at the other extreme) say almost nothing on the papers – just give it a grade, with maybe a remark on the front page….
FOR THE REST OF THIS POST, go to the Members’ Site. If you don’t belong, NOW”S YOUR CHANCE!!