An obscure verse in 2 Thessalonians may conceivably lead to World War III.  OK, it sounds sensational and implausible, but hear me out.

The following is taken from my book Armageddon (Simon & Schuster, 2023), edited for this occasion.

******************************

Evangelical Christians historically have believed that the Bible predicts the future, that many prophecies are being fulfilled in our day, and that they will continue to be fulfilled until the end comes when Jesus returns from heaven in judgment on the living and the dead.

One thing that needs to happen is that the Temple in Jerusalem needs to be rebuilt.  The end cannot come before then.  And so they can appeal to the prophecy of Ezekiel:

They shall live in the land that I gave to my servant Jacob, in which your ancestors lived; they and their children and their children’s children shall live there forever; and my servant David shall be their prince forever.  I will make a covenant of peace with them; it shall be an everlasting covenant with them and I will bless them and multiply them, and will set my sanctuary among them forevermore.  (Ezek 37:25-26)

The patriarch “Jacob” (also known as “Israel”) was the grandson of Abraham; he had twelve sons from whom sprang the “twelve tribes of Israel.”  These tribes conquered the Promised Land centuries later, but they were driven from that land as punishment for their sins. Ezekiel insisted God would restore them.  And importantly, he would “set my sanctuary among them forevermore.”

Ezekiel is referring to things that would transpire in his own day, soon after the Babylonians conquered Judah, destroyed the temple, and sent many Jews into exile (586 BCE).   Ezekiel predicts this exile would end and that the sanctuary (that is, the Jerusalem temple) would be rebuilt.  As it was.

But evangelical readers can point out that Ezekiel indicates the sanctuary will stand “forevermore.”  The second temple built after Jews returned from exile in Babylon was destroyed 500 years later by the Romans.  And so, in the evangelical reading, the prophecy has not been fulfilled.  That must mean that it will be fulfilled in our own future.

And more details are provided in 2 Thessalonians, which can be read to show that before the end comes, Israel has to have full control of Jerusalem and, in particular, the Temple Mount.  The problem, of course, is that that the Temple Mount is a sacred site for Islam as well, home to the Dome of the Rock for the past thirteen centuries.  The Dome is located over the site of the original Jerusalem Temple.  For the prediction of 2 Thessalonians to be fulfilled, the Temple needs to be rebuilt there, which means the Dome has to go.

As we have seen, the book tries to explain to readers that the end of the age will not come right away, nor will it happen without warning (contrary to what Paul himself says in First Thessalonians, 4:13-5:11).  A foreordained sequence of events must happen first.  The events involve a mysterious figure, “the lawless one,” who will rise to a position of power. This figure is often identified by readers as the “Antichrist” and the “beast” of Revelation (666), even though he is not called either in the passage:

Let no one deceive you in any way; for that day [the “coming of our Lord Jesus Christ”] will not come unless the rebellion comes first and the lawless one is revealed, the one destined for destruction.  He opposes and exalts himself above every so-called god or object of worship, so that he takes his seat in the temple of God, declaring himself to be God.  (2 Thess. 2:3-4)

The author then indicates that this figure cannot appear yet because a restraining force is keeping him at bay (2 Thess 2:6).   When that is removed, “the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will destroy with the breath of his mouth, annihilating him by the manifestation of his coming” (2 Thess 2:8).  That sounds very much like the Final Battle between Christ and the Beast as described in Revelation 19:17-20.

Since American Christians who support Israeli control of Jerusalem far outnumber American Jews, it is no wonder that Israeli politicians have long pushed for evangelical support, starting in the 70’s at just the time the evangelical prophecy movement reached a fevered pitch – when Hal Lindsey, Jack van Impe, and Timothy LaHaye were all preaching that the end was almost here.  For these modern-day prophets, one piece left in the puzzle remains: the temple has to be rebuilt and Israel cannot face the opposition alone.

What matters most, though, is that before this destruction takes place, the Antichrist figure will take “his seat in the temple of God,” declaring himself to be God.  That obviously cannot happen until the temple is rebuilt.  Jesus therefore cannot return until Israel assume full control of the Temple Mount.  There can be no question, then, about whether or not to support Israel to expand its reach into the Palestinian territories; that was what was promised Abraham “in the beginning.” And there can be no question about whether or not to support Israel in the heart of Jerusalem itself. It must destroy the Dome of the Rock and rebuild the temple for the foreordained “the end” to come.

Since American Christians who support Israeli control of Jerusalem far outnumber American Jews, it is no wonder that Israeli politicians have long pushed for evangelical support, starting in the 70’s at just the time the evangelical prophecy movement reached a fevered pitch – when Hal Lindsey, Jack van Impe, and Timothy LaHaye were all preaching that the end was almost here.  For these modern-day prophets, one piece left in the puzzle remains: the temple has to be rebuilt and Israel cannot face the opposition alone.

This is not a marginal religious belief held by a tiny slice of American Christendom.  It is held by millions, all of them able and encouraged to vote.

You don’t need to be a prophet yourself to figure out what will happen in the Middle East if Israel decides to take over the Temple Mount, destroy the Muslim holy sites there (Al-Aqsa and the Dome of the Rock), and rebuild the Jewish temple.  Many Americans would rejoice.  But it would send the Middle East into chaos and uproar and the literal big guns would almost certainly get involved.

2 Thessalonians could well be prophetic, even if not in the way its author had in mind….

Over $2 Million Donated to Charity!

We have two goals at Ehrman Blog. One is to increase your knowledge of the New Testament and early Christianity. The other is to raise money for charity! In fact, in 2022, we raised over $360,000 for the charities below.

Become a Member Today!

2025-06-09T11:03:59-04:00June 11th, 2025|Paul and His Letters|

Share Bart’s Post on These Platforms

25 Comments

  1. MicahLayne June 11, 2025 at 10:58 am

    Armageddon is on my shelf waiting to be read, along with The Triumph of Christianity, and How Jesus Became God. Which one to do I crack open first? Hmm … decisions, decisions.

    • BDEhrman June 18, 2025 at 1:23 pm

      Completely depends on what you’re most interested in!

  2. kirbinator5000 June 11, 2025 at 12:40 pm

    I’d like to suggest three possible ways evangelicals might interpret 2 Thessalonians—hopefully steering clear of World War III in the process:
    1. The Partial Preterist View: This interpretation holds that the tribulation has already taken place, and the “lawless one” taking his seat in the temple refers to the Roman desecration and destruction of the Jerusalem temple. According to this view, the only thing left is for Christ to appear in glory.
    2. The Temple-as-Body View: Paul teaches that our bodies are temples of the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 6:19–20). So when 2 Thessalonians 2:3–4 speaks of the “lawless one” taking his seat in the temple of God, it may be referring to a false messiah who will captivate people so completely that he metaphorically takes residence in their hearts—the true temple of God. In this sense, the deception is spiritual and internal, not about a physical building.
    3. The Samaritan Temple Theory: Some historians and critical scholars argue that the Samaritans, not the Jews, may have preserved the original holy site. If Mount Gerizim was in fact the legitimate location for God’s temple, then perhaps the “lawless one” will take his seat there—at the true temple site that has long been overlooked or dismissed.

  3. jblakers June 11, 2025 at 12:44 pm

    Seeing news stories that the use of AI is giving some older dates for the Dead Sea Scrolls. Are these stories reliable? If they are older, is that important?

    • BDEhrman June 18, 2025 at 1:26 pm

      We’re talking a few decades, not centuries; I’m not sure what big difference that makes — but I haven’t looked into it much yet.

  4. JBresler June 11, 2025 at 8:31 pm

    I think no Israeli government will ever be so reckless to destroy the Dome of the Rock or build a temple anywhere else on the Temple Mount, so I’m not worried that the evangelical interpretation of the 2 Thessalonians prophecy might be fulfilled. (Of course World War III could still happen for other reasons).

    • BDEhrman June 18, 2025 at 1:28 pm

      I’m not either; but that is hisotrically one of the main reasons for evangelical support of the nation of Israel.

  5. fishician June 11, 2025 at 9:12 pm

    But Jesus told his disciples the temple would be destroyed and rebuilt in 3 days, referring to himself (John 2:19-21). Why do evangelicals expect a physical temple rather than a spiritual one, namely, the church, which is thought of as the body of Christ?

    • BDEhrman June 18, 2025 at 1:28 pm

      When I was an evangelical we thought that Jesus’ predictions of the temple’s destruction had a double meaning.

  6. Ph32152 June 11, 2025 at 9:53 pm

    I know this is all make believe anyway, but what does Israel say (or think) about needing a descendent of King David to be the ruler?

    • BDEhrman June 18, 2025 at 1:29 pm

      The modern state of Israel is not anticipating the return of a Davidic king. Individual Jews may be (though none that I know)

      • AngeloB June 24, 2025 at 6:33 pm

        Orthodox Jews believe that.

  7. Theorb June 12, 2025 at 1:59 pm

    Since 2 Thessalonians has themes similar to Revelation, is it possible the author had access to Revelation, and that 2 Thessalonians post-dates it?

    • BDEhrman June 18, 2025 at 1:33 pm

      The themes are similar in some ways but different in far more; since there aren’t any allusions of one to the other or any passages that are worded the same, there’s no reason to suspect one knew the other. (You could find tons of key differences, but just to pick one, “the man of lawlessness” is not called the “beast” in 2 Thess, and is portrayed very differently.)

  8. Corvino June 13, 2025 at 5:17 pm

    If one listens to Netanyahu and his officials, they sound like they really mean it. They really believe they are entitled to the whole of Jerusalem because their Bible says so.

    I wanna ask a question, professor: do you think that the religious element used by these politicians is just the excuse to do something unacceptable (like seizing land) or they genuinely believe that by doing so they are fulfilling prophecy as they relentlessly say? Do they believe it or pretend for political goals that got nothing to do with God?

    • BDEhrman June 18, 2025 at 1:37 pm

      It really depends on the person, and even with one person or another it is almost impossible to know what they really think.

  9. Serene June 14, 2025 at 2:59 am

    You are doing important work, Dr. Ehrman.

    The “forever” language is how the hegemons of Canaan wrote, too. Could that just a coincidence? How do Bible scholars understand the sculptures of Ramses II with the epithet of The Good God” in Israel, or the artifacts of the Rulers of Retjenu in Avaris, when the Bible doesn’t seem to mention them anywhere?

    I’ve been recently fascinated by Jesus’ connection with fishing, and the typical diet of a First Century Judaean/Galilean without that livelihood. They were land-locked, so iodine was minimal – that makes a 10-15 point IQ difference just by itself: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15734706/

    (I also wonder if *that* is why Enki is associated with fish and wisdom.
    Coincidentally, Judaea’s neighbor, the Nabataeans had a ridiculous amount of seafood in their middens for a kingdom in the desert.)

    If we wanted to find documents to prove a **peaceful** First Century Christian movement – that may be an inspiration that can change current events, I think we’d be looking for artifacts not just in the 7 Churches of Asia. We’d be looking in:

    • Mount Sinai – because per Mandaeans, that’s where Jesus resided. (happens to be Nabataean territory)

    • the newly found Masada tunnel (on the border of Nabataea)

    • underground Nabataea, like the Edessa border of Midyat (the current dig: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/huge-underground-city-refuge-early-christians-turkey-180980090/)

  10. pstrst June 14, 2025 at 11:57 am

    I take it that Evangelicals don’t accept that 2 Thessalonians wasn’t written by Paul? How do they reconcile the differences between the letters Paul authored and the ones he probably didn’t?

    • BDEhrman June 18, 2025 at 1:44 pm

      Generally they think the differences are either exaggerated or picayune or can be interpreted away.

  11. AngeloB June 15, 2025 at 7:11 pm

    It is pointless to predict when and how the end times will occur!

  12. Upozi June 18, 2025 at 9:31 pm

    What would rebuilding the Temple mean? Would it mean using exactly the dimensions indicated in Kings? Would it mean re establishing the sacrificial rite? That is difficult to imagine and I understand contrary to current Judaism. If the prophecy merely means the building of some sort of sacred building on the Temple Mount to the god worshipped by the Jewish nation – well – there it is, as we speak, and has been quietly standing there for centuries. And, like the original Temple, it was built by a non-Jew.

    • BDEhrman June 22, 2025 at 12:11 pm

      For most of these people expecting it, yes, it would mean building it according to the specificaiots of Scripture. Fundamentalist groups in Israel have actually gathered all the requisit building materials for it.

  13. sLiu June 20, 2025 at 1:40 pm

    “Since American Christians who support Israeli control of Jerusalem far outnumber American Jews, it is no wonder that Israeli politicians have long pushed for evangelical support”

    When I lived in Shanghai, there were very public Americans who supported freedom for Xinjiang & Tibetans. Life is rough most everywhere. So I told others: I greatly cherish my neighbors who may be also from Xinjiang & Tibet [Han & Shanghainese were very superior & NIMBY attitudes].

    They built modern Shanghai & we could live on the cheaper with their labor.

    Upon returning to USA, many folks who ID with Evangelicals are very anti-certain folks as Trump has indicated from 2015 who he is leader of.

    Thank you Dr Ehrman for your insight & generosity!

  14. Serene June 24, 2025 at 12:35 am

    ʻ”He opposes and exalts himself above every so-called god or object of worship, so that he takes his seat in the temple of God, declaring himself to be God.” – 2 Thess

    It seems like a warning about another Antiochus Epiphanes (r. 175-164 BCE), who *did* do this in the Second Temple?

    “Now on the fifteenth day of Chislev, in the one hundred forty-fifth year, they erected a desolating sacrilege on the altar of burnt offering.” – 1 Maccabees 1:54-56

    Josephus explains this desolating sacrilege as Antiochus’ erection of Zeus Olympos inside the Second Temple (just slightly different from Herod the Great erecting thuhree temples worshipping Augustus). What they’re now finding in the artifacts is – Antiochus Epiphanes, meaning “God Manifest” was repping *himself* as the manifested-on-earth image of Zeus. Zeus was even made to look like him. Lordty.

    But what if Crazy Antiochus knew how Yahweh got his start?

    John the Baptist’s Mandaeans say that Abraham abandoned the god Hayyi Rabba for Adonai (Yahweh), and that John the Baptist and Jesus returned them to the worship of Hayyi Rabba (yes, I know, they criticize Jesus).

    Maybe there are favorable and unfavorable houses – like Nero bad, Antiochus bad, Bityah good, Ptolemies good.

  15. Serene June 24, 2025 at 2:20 am

    I wonder if Antiochus made a presumption that Yah/Yahweh, like himself, might have also originated as deified king worship.

    Take Deuteronomy 33:22

    “YHWH came from Sinai, he rose from Seir, he shone forth from Mount Paran…”

    Compare:

    “I am Iah, who rises in the East and shines in the sky…”

    Rises then shone [in the East], sounds like the same formula?

    What may be plugged in to the formula is that Sinai, Seir and Paran are the three places where archaeologically, the first full four-letter Tetragrammaton inscriptions are found.

    I found that Iah quote today here: https://www.scribd.com/document/683345140/The-Moon-God-Iah-in-Ancient-Egyptian-Rel-1

    This quote is a royal human given words to say *as* Iah. Interestingly, the Hyksos used the Yah spelling variant. And while Bithiah, meaning daughter of Iah, is the “daughter of Pharaoh” in the Bible, Rabbinical Judaism considers Bithyah with the -yah to be the same person.

    What I’m tryna say is the “forevermore” language in Ezek is typical of hegemons.

Leave A Comment