20 votes, average: 5.00 out of 520 votes, average: 5.00 out of 520 votes, average: 5.00 out of 520 votes, average: 5.00 out of 520 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5 (20 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading...

Could Moses Write Hebrew?

As you may have noticed, on a number of occasions I get asked questions that I simply can’t answer.   I received one such question this week, about the history of the Hebrew language.  Here is how the questioner phrased it:

What is our earliest evidence for Hebrew as a written language? I’ve been to apologetic seminars where they say it’s long been said by atheists that the Hebrew Bible can’t be trusted because the Hebrews didn’t have a written language until well after the stories in the OT would’ve taken place. The evidence that the Hebrews had a written language in close proximity to the Biblical stories is based on pottery evidence and things of that nature. I’m sure these are topics you are very familiar with and I’d appreciate your take.

 

It’s actually amazing how many topics I’m not familiar with at all!  So, not knowing the answer, I asked a colleague of mine who is an expert in Hebrew philology, Joseph Lam (he teaches courses in my department in Hebrew and other Semitic languages, and on the religion, culture, and literature of the Ancient Near East, and in Hebrew Bible; his office is across the hall from mine).   I simplified the question to get the heart of it.  This is what I said in an email to him.

 

Joseph,

Someone has asked me the question below.  Damn if I know!  I don’t need a long exposition, just a basic answer will do (some kind of inscription?)

 

What is our earliest evidence for Hebrew as a written language? 

 

Here is his very helpful response.

It depends on what you define as Hebrew. We have a number of inscriptions from Palestine in the late 2nd millennium/early 1st millennium BCE (which is when Hebrew mostly likely branched off as a distinct language from the broader “Canaanite” family of languages), but early Hebrew and Canaanite are difficult to distinguish from one another, especially in short inscriptions (sometimes a single word). For a long time the standard answer was the Gezer Calendar from the late 10th century (900’s) BCE, but I now think that text is better described as Phoenician or common Canaanite. Others would say the more recently discovered Khirbet Qeiyafa ostracon (11th/10th century), but there are various oddities to that text that make it difficult to classify. There are also a number of short inscriptions from Tel Rehov that have been dated archaeologically to the 10th/9th centuries. The upshot is, there are a number of candidates from the 10th/9th centuries, but certainly by the 8th century we have many more unambiguously “Hebrew” inscriptions.

 

For more detail, I would recommend to your readers the following online article (and the article to which it responds): https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/biblical-artifacts/inscriptions/what%E2%80%99s-the-oldest-hebrew-inscription/

 

As a follow-up, I said/asked the following:

Fantastic.  Just what I needed.  The questioner was not a scholar, but an interested lay person, who was especially interested in the question of whether, if there was a Moses living in say the 13th c BCE, he would have been able to write.   Do you have an opinion?  (I myself  don’t think there *was* a Moses, but still,  assuming there was…)

 

Here is Joseph’s short and very interesting response.

If there was a Moses, raised in the Egyptian court, he probably would have learned to write in Egyptian! The texts of the Pentateuch, whoever wrote them, are NOT in 13th century language; they are in classical 1st millennium Hebrew. Whatever a hypothetical 13th century Moses wrote, whether in Egyptian or Canaanite or something else, that’s NOT what we have preserved in the Pentateuch.

 

I regularly answer questions on the blog (or get someone else who actually knows answer them for me!).  If you belonged, you would get all questions and answers, as well as numerous other posts, every week.  So if you don’t belong, JOIN!!!

 


Journeys to Heaven and Hell: A Sketch of My Project
My New Scholarly Project

76

Comments

  1. Avatar
    brandon284  April 3, 2018

    Is the 13th century when Moses was *living* and leading Israel out of Egypt in the Hebrew text? At least that’s when the text situates these events?

    • Bart
      Bart  April 4, 2018

      Yup, that’s the usual dating.

      • Avatar
        brandon284  April 4, 2018

        Thanks. How is the dating established exactly?

        • Bart
          Bart  April 6, 2018

          Long story. It has to do with accepting the kingdom of David around 1000, and reasoning backwards from the lenght of the period of judges to establish the time of the “conquest”

  2. Avatar
    craig@corbettlaw.org  April 27, 2018

    Fascinating discussion on this topic, thanks to all.
    In my History of Christian Thought, Dr. Mallard, quoting the text, once said, “In the Greek the word is (I don’t recall which word it was). But that doesn’t matter much, since Jesus didn’t speak Greek.” Summarizes the difficulty perfectly.

  3. Avatar
    jdh5879  June 14, 2018

    If members of the blog want to learn more about the Hebrew Bible, Christine Hayes of Yale University has an excellent course available on Youtube

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mo-YL-lv3RY&list=PLh9mgdi4rNeyuvTEbD-Ei0JdMUujXfyWi

  4. Avatar
    Coreyb  August 4, 2019

    Greetings Bart, I was just wondering what the majority of your colleagues conclude about the existence of Moses and other major biblical patriarchs (like Abraham). You’ve mentioned before that alot of your colleagues agree with many of your views (including believing christians), so im interested in the perspective of those (Christian scholars) in particular.

    • Bart
      Bart  August 4, 2019

      My sense is that the majority of critical scholars probably think there was *someone* named Moses around whom masses of legends accrued, but that there really was some kind of person back there behind the legends. I myself think there was not, that it is legend all the way down. The “evidence” for Moses is nothing at all like the evidence of Jesus and his apostles, for example, in the NT.

You must be logged in to post a comment.