16 votes, average: 4.94 out of 516 votes, average: 4.94 out of 516 votes, average: 4.94 out of 516 votes, average: 4.94 out of 516 votes, average: 4.94 out of 5 (16 votes, average: 4.94 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading...

Did Matthew Copy Luke or Luke Matthew?

In this thread, which is supposed to be on the lost writings of early Christianity that I would most like to have discovered, I can’t seem to get away from Q,   Several readers have asked a pointed question about Q.  If you recall, Q is the hypothetical document that contained principally sayings of Jesus, that was evidently used by Matthew and Luke (but not by Mark) in constructing their Gospels.  The logic is that if Matthew and Luke both used Mark (which the vast majority of scholars agree about), then one has to explain why they have so many other materials (mainly sayings) in common not *found* in Mark.

I have pointed out that Matthew does not seem to have gotten those sayings from Luke or Luke from Matthew, and so they both most have gotten them from some other one-time-existing source.  That is what we call Q (for the German word Quelle: Source).  But some readers have asked WHY it is unlikely that Matthew got these sayings from Luke or Luke from Matthew.   It’s a bit tricky, and I need to simplify a bit.   But I’ll try to explain as follows.

This is partly drawn from my discussion in my textbook on the New Testament.   The argument that follows is actually used (in the book) to establish Markan Priority – that is, the view that Mark was prior to the other two Synoptics and was used by them as a source.  But as I’ll explain, the same argument is often appealed to as evidence that neither Matthew nor Luke got its sayings material from the other.  It has to do with the sequence in which this sayings material appears in both Gospels.

Here is what I say in the book:

THE REST OF THIS POST IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.  If you don’t belong yet — C’MON!!  JOIN!!!  It doesn’t cost much and every penny goes to charity!

You need to be logged in to see this part of the content. Please Login to access.

 


Q and the Passion Narrative
Q and The Gospel of Thomas

61

Comments

  1. Avatar
    RAhmed  November 6, 2019

    Have you ever commented on the similarities between Luke and John on your blog? I never knew about these until I read John Barton’s History of the Bible recently.

    Also, have you talked about the development of Q itself? From what I understand, Q itself is considered to have early and later material within it.

    • Bart
      Bart  November 7, 2019

      Q, yes; Luke and John, no. Interesting similarities. Years ago I was on a PhD dissertaiton committee for as student arguing that Luke was dependent on John!

      • Avatar
        RAhmed  November 7, 2019

        Fascinating. Perhaps sometime you could write a blog entry on that subject 🙂 I’d love to hear your thoughts. Thank you.

You must be logged in to post a comment.