I promised to return to the lyrics of the parody song “Fifty Ways to Forge a Gospel” I wrote several years ago and explain all the references in it. Here is that post. The annotated lyrics follow, with my comments in square brackets. The names, as in the original song are mostly chosen by rhyme. But each line has an allusion to an actual canonical or extracanonical work that could be considered a “forgery” in one of the many senses of that word.
50 Ways to Forge a Gospel
VERSE
At a York symposium, Bart Ehrman said to me
[I attended the 2015 York Christian Apocrypha Symposium, presenting on the Gospel of Jesus’ Wife. Bart Ehrman gave the keynote at the conference on the subject of his book Forgery and Counterforgery. At dinner after his lecture about the different kinds of forgery, he and I were chatting and I said jokingly that it would make a good parody song, “50 Ways to Forge a Gospel.” He laughed, but I’m pretty sure he didn’t think I’d actually write it!]
Don’t try to whitewash it, just call it forgery
[There is a long history of scholars using terms like “pseudepigraphy” and writing about the subject in ways that suggest that forgery was widely accepted. Ehrman makes the case that isn’t so.]
I’m all for nuance, here’s an argument from me
There must be fifty ways to forge a Gospel
Don’t tell me they had no intention to deceive
When Jude used Enoch we can see what he believed
[The letter of Jude in the New Testament quotes the book known as 1 Enoch and shows every sign of believing that it really does come from Enoch.]
And who knows who Jude was or what tangled web he weaves
[Jude or Judah or Judas is supposed to have been one of Jesus’ brothers, but we do not know who actually wrote the letter that goes by that name.]
There must be fifty ways to forge a Gospel
CHORUS
Claim that he wasn’t dead, Fred
[An allusion to The Passover Plot by Hugh Schonfeld and similar alternative accounts of what happened on Easter morning.]
Find his childhood pal, Sal
[An allusion to the novel Biff, a modern work that is arguably in the same genre as many ancient extracanonical Gospels, even if much more recent.]
Write an apocryphon, John
[There is an ancient text called the Apocryphon of John.]
It just takes a good tale
Dialogue with the Savior, Xavier
[A reference to Dialogue of the Savior, an ancient pseudepigraphon.]
Have Jesus laugh from the sky, Guy
[In some extracanonical Gospels Jesus mocks those who think they crucify him, since God has substituted someone else in his place.]
Write “my wife” on papyrus, Iris
[This is a reference to the Gospel of Jesus’ Wife, a modern forgery on a piece of old papyrus.]
Then say it’s for sale
VERSE
Bart said the ancients knew
Just what it meant to lie
[Ehrman’s work challenges the idea that one could acceptably write in someone else’s name in ancient times.]
To fabricate and call it
tribute wouldn’t fly
This kind of thing was enough
To make Tertullian cry
[Tertullian accused one of his contemporaries of forging the Acts of Paul and Thecla. Ironically, many modern scholars simply take Tertullian’s word on this matter!]
About the fifty ways
People then as now
Did not like to be had
To say you wrote something
You didn’t was still bad
I realized Bart exposed
an academic fad
There must be fifty ways to forge a Gospel
Fifty ways to forge a Gospel
CHORUS
You can claim that you’re Matt, Pat
[Whether the Gospel of Matthew was written by someone named Matthew is unclear. There are also other possible works that may or may not go back to Matthew, as well as ones that are attributed to Matthias, hence the use of “Matt” which could be short for either.]
Or pretend that you’re John, Ron
[There are works attributed to John both in and outside the New Testament whose authorship is uncertain.]
Hint you travelled with Paul, y’all
[Ehrman and others view the “we” passages in Acts as an attempt to imply that the author had traveled with Paul, even though this was not the case.]
And you’ll be home free
Make some angels say “Hark!”, Mark
[The reference here is to the infancy accounts that expand on Mark’s narrative, alluding to a famous Christmas carol.]
You might want to use Q, too (or should that be “Q2”?)
[The pun is on Matthew and Luke using a lost source, Q, which some scholars think they can not only identify but further analyze in terms of layers of expansion in that earlier work.]
Add a whole second book, Luke
Let someone else make it three
[I alluded here to the possibility that the author of Luke-Acts intended to write a third volume, with room left for others to come along and fill in those stories, whether claiming to find Luke’s “lost third volume” or merely narrating further acts of apostles.]
Have Jesus teach ’em discreetly, Dmitri
[Many pseudepigraphal works have Jesus offer secret teaching not recorded in the canonical Gospels.]
Call it Gospel of Truth, Ruth
[A reference to the Gospel of Truth, a Valentinian work.]
Add in the Demiurge, Serge
[The identification of the creator deity from Genesis as demiurge, a figure inferior to the supreme God, is a trademark of Gnosticism.]
Gnosticism galore
Have them kiss on the lacuna, Petunia
[This refers to the spot where the Gospel of Philip says that Jesus loved Mary and kissed her frequently on the…and then there is a hole in the manuscript! I discuss this is my book What Jesus Learned from Women.]
Add it to Codex Tchacos, Jackos
[Codex Tchacos included the long-lost Gospel of Judas. It came to light via the antiquities market but is judged an ancient forgery rather than a modern one, showing how complicated this topic can get.]
This might need a new chart, Bart
If there’s this many more
Here are some other links also relevant to this topic:
2019 Interns on the Forging Antiquity Project
A book chapter I wrote about the Gospel of Jesus’ Wife and what forgery has to do with the Digital Humanities can be read online. The Gospel of Jesus’ Wife was in the news again a while back (HT Jim Davila).
Making the Mysterious ‘Dialogue of the Savior’ Not So Mysterious
Of related interest, see the section on pseudepigraphy in Dustin Smith’s book review of James D. G. Dunn’s book, Neither Jew nor Greek: A Contested Identity (Christianity in the Making vol.3).
Fake Aristotle Fakely Rails Against Fighting Inequality
I somehow completely missed that my endorsement of Bart Ehrman’s textbook on the Bible was used! It is authentic and not a forgery! It perhaps also should be said as a final note that this parody of “Fifty Ways to Leave Your Lover” by Paul Simon might be judged as a “forgery” depending on how one defines that term. But for those who may not have gotten the joke thus far, here’s the original…
This question is about the Acts of the Apostles, so only indirectly related to the above. BTW, “50 Ways …” is very cool!! Last Sunday at my church the passage about the early Christian community living together, sharing everything, selling their goods and giving to the apostles (Acts 4:32-35) was one of the scripture readings. I got to wondering how realistic that picture is, knowing that Acts was written 50 or so years later and being aware of the conflicts between Acts’ content re Paul and what the latter says in his letters. What is the scholarly consensus on how accurate Acts’ renditions of the early church are?
Most critical scholars think that Acts does have some historically accurate material, but a *lot* of legendary accounts as well. If you do a word search for “historicity of Acts” on the blog you’ll probably find a bunchy of posts on it.
The tune for Paul Simon song American Tune is from a german work called Oh Sacred Head now Wounded.
In this case I’m glad he forged it.
I think Paul Simon would approve of your added creative acts enough to issue license…or at least not sue you silly like they did George Harrison on My Sweet Lord if you ever make a big score, Lor. (refers to the evil android brother of Data)
Were there people who guessed that Daniel was a forgery?
Yes, probably the first who did so explicitly was Porphyry who wrote in the 3rd century.
Good afternoon, is there any way for a lay reader like me to see evidence for the supposed Q gospel for example is there any detail? Is it possible that Luke used Matthew and Mark as its source and just change some things around?
You might start by looking at my discussion on teh Synoptic Problem in my textbook, The New Testament: A Historical Introduction…. At the edn of the chapter I give bibliography of other books to look at to go into greater depth.
Professor, is there a list on the blog of all NT books considered pseudepigraphon? I have an informal list of 13 (starting w/ Ephesians & ending with Jude). I’d list more but character limit. TYVM!
If you mean “books written by someone claiming to be a famous person when in fact he knew full well he was someone else” (!) (that is, what today we would call a “forgery,” the following would normally be in the list: 2 Thessalonians, Ephesians, Colossians, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, James (probably), 1 and 2 Peter, and Jude. Other books were written anonymously and are (falsely) assigned, by tradition, to authors who almost certainly did not write them, e.g., the four Gospels, Acts, Hebrew, 1, 2, and 3 John.
As someone who has written lots of song parodies, I just have to congratulate James McGrath on his excellent work. I found the repurposed song delightful. As someone long fascinated by the topic of this blog, I also have to thank him for his enlightening annotations to his parody. This was a standout contribution in every way and truly brightened my day.
Thank you for this kind comment! I hope you’ll share some of yours with me, whether here or on my own blog!
I just watched your YouTube video and checked out your blog for the explanations behind some of the verses. Are you familiar with Rabbi Sacks and Jewish theology? I ask because Bart’s research exposing all the shenanigans Christians have used in the fabrication of the NT and still do in their evangelical zeal really got me questioning the sincerity of Christian claims to be a source of absolute morality and the only true source of God’s revelation to mankind.
So after reading your blog where you mention you still identify as Christian, I was quite surprised – even though you qualified this feeling as just being a part of the social environment that you grew up in.
In any case, for a current Jewish view of the Messiah here is a text from the office of Rabbi Sacks
https://rabbisacks.org/faith-lectures-the-messianic-idea-today/
Sacks begins “However, what you can say without shadow of doubt is, in answer to the questions ‘Has Moshiach (the Messiah) come?’, the Jewish answer is ‘Not yet’. However, in that very ‘not yet’ are two monumental assertions.”
I refer you to the link for the 2 assertions and attendant reasoning.
it really made me question the implications in calling oneself ‘Christian’ and anti-Semitism.
Thank you for your comment. I have said that my being a Christian is, among other things, due to the context I grew up in, but that is not the only reason. I agree with you, as a Christian, in questioning the notion that Christianity provides absolute morality and the only source of divine revelation. Your view of Christianity seems to be shaped pretty much entirely by modern conservative Christianity, which thankfully isn’t the only option nor has it ever been, despite it being the one many today think of as the definitive form of the religion for some reason. They have clearly been very good at marketing their brand!
Dr. any comment on the unpardonable sin. did Jesus believe in satan and the devil? Or did the authors misinterpreted Jesus words. How can a loving God not forgive a so called ‘sin’? Say for a time someone does the unpardonable sin but afterwards he ‘repents’ or asks for forgiveness? Would this person be forgiven by Jesus?
What does this have to do with the topic of this post?!
I believe Ehrman does think Jesus believed in Satan– since most first century Jews did. Ehrman doesn’t think Jesus believed in hell, however.