I mentioned in my previous blog that I am reading through the page proofs of my scholarly book Forgery and Counterforgery: The Use of Literary Deceit in Early Christian Polemics. And I suggested that I might give a few extracts to give some idea of what the book looks like. Much of the book is hard hitting scholarship that only inveterate philologists could love (or like). I can give a taste in later posts, if anyone’s interested. But I start off on a light note, in part to get people interested (even scholars have to be interested!). I open with the following anecdote. If you’ve read my popular book Forged, the final part will sound familiar. This is how I would (and do) do the same bit for a more scholarly audience. (I have not included the footnotes here)
************************************************************************************************************************
Heraclides Ponticus was one of the great literati of the classical age. As a young man from aristocratic roots he left his native Pontus to study philosophy in Athens under Plato, Speusippus, and eventually, while he was still in the Academy, Aristotle. During one of Plato’s absences, Heraclides was temporarily put in charge of the school; after the death of Speucippus he was nearly appointed permanent head. His writings spanned a remarkable range, from ethics to dialectics to geometry to physics to astronomy to music to history to literary criticism. Diogenes Laertius lists over sixty books in all. Ten others are known from other sources. Few texts remain, almost entirely in fragments.
FOR THE REST OF THIS POST, log in as a Member. Click here for membership options. If you don’t belong yet, join!
Bart, why do you classify “Forgery and Counterforgery” as scholarly? It it simply because of the detail or does it presuppose previous certain knowledge? I loved Forged and am thirsty for more. What kind of problems could a novice run into with the new one?
Yes, it presupposes, in good chunks, a lot of background knowledge. But you should definitely think about getting it when it comes out. Parts are completely accessible to just about anyone, I should think (as in the bits I’m posting here).
In “Forged” you mentioned that all of the known cases of ancient forgery were looked upon badly, even mentioning (at least) one case where the forger was publically chastised for it. I, for one, would like to see more specific examples of this. You mentioned it in “Forged” and I have encountered it myself that apologists claim forgery was an accepted practice (e.g. in honor of their teacher). It would be nice to have specific counter examples. Are there any examples at all of the reverse, i.e. where the forger was not rebuked?
You will need to read my book! There wsa not just one instance of a forger being chastised. Quite the contrary!
It rings quite differently from your books “Forged.” I previously had more sympathy with Heraclides. I see that this story probably played out in the fourth century BCE. Does your book contain examples of similar stories that is later than the writings of the New Testament or even concurrent with the origin of the New Testament writings?
Yup. But the book isn’t really about these stories — it’s just a way to set things up.
When I pre-ordered this I thought that it had the same layman approach I loved in many of your books, and when I read the word scholarly I got scared however I did find this extract interesting and I am looking forward for the rest of book.
Be thou not afraid….
Good! You should think about buying it. It’ll make great birthday presents! 🙂
The last forgery you mentioned, by Galen, kind of reminds me of the Sokal Hoax.