As I pointed out yesterday, the “Gospel of Peter” that we have today, discovered in 1886, is unfortunately, only a portion – the only surviving portion – of what was once a complete Gospel. But was it a complete Gospel? Or was it only a passion Gospel (like the later Gospel of Nicodemus) that gave an account only of the trial, death, and resurrection of Jesus? That has long been debated.
I discussed one intriguing view of the matter some years ago on the blog, as follows:
In recent years a German scholar named Dieter Luhrmann has argued that other portions of the Gospel of Peter have shown up, in very small fragments of papyrus discovered in Egypt. It is a controversial claim. The most interesting possibility, for me, is a papyrus fragment that Luhrmann published called Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 4009 (it is the 4009th papyrus published from the huge find of papyri in the trash heap of ancient Oxyrhynchus Egypt).
To understand why this *might* be a fragment of the Gospel of Peter requires a bit of tricky background ( I hope it’s not too hard to follow. Stay with me!). The papyrus is…
FOR THE REST OF THIS POST, log in as a Member. If you don’t belong yet, YOU DON’T KNOW WHAT YOU”RE MISSING!!!