11 votes, average: 4.55 out of 511 votes, average: 4.55 out of 511 votes, average: 4.55 out of 511 votes, average: 4.55 out of 511 votes, average: 4.55 out of 5 (11 votes, average: 4.55 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading...

The Triumphal Entry as a Distorted Memory

In my previous post I provided an excerpt from Jesus Before the Gospels where I summarized the New Testament accounts of Jesus’ “Triumphal Entry.”  Here is the second part of that two-part post, another excerpt, where I call this tradition into question, arguing that it cannot be right historically and that it must, therefore, represent a distorted memory.

It is important to recall that “memory” is not simply a recollection of what we ourselves experienced (what you had for dinner last night; the name of your first-grade teacher; etc.).  Memory involves anything that you “call back to mind” (the literal meaning of “remembering”).  It can be factual information (what is the capital of France?), even of something you haven’t experienced (e.g., if you have never been to Paris); it can be a shared understanding of a person from the past (Einstein; Karl Marx), even if you never met them.  And it can be a recollection of a past event even if you were not involved.   Such as the Triumphal Entry, to pick one example out of countless trillions.

Christians “remember” the event every Palm Sunday. But is the event itself an accurate memory?  Was there really a Triumphal Entry?

*************************************************************

The very broadest gist of this memory is no doubt true.  Jesus must have come into Jerusalem one way or another.  But the Gospels’ description of the event is highly implausible, and precisely for the reasons I started with.   The Roman authorities were…

The Rest of this Post is for MEMBERS ONLY!  If you don’t belong yet, shell out and join up!  It costs little but gives lot.  And every penny goes to help the needy.  It’s good very everyone!!!

You need to be logged in to see this part of the content. Please Login to access.

 


Irritating Amazon Reviews
The Memory of Jesus’ Triumphal Entry

46

Comments

  1. Avatar
    Apocryphile  June 16, 2017

    Re. my above post: I see your point, but I don’t think anything about the chronology of Jesus’ last week in Jerusalem can be taken as ‘gospel truth’ (esp. in light of John putting the temple incident toward the beginning of his gospel, and the other gospels putting it during his last week, and obviously not citing exact dates, as we would do today). Also, perhaps the reason Jesus wasn’t arrested right away (the evening of the ‘triumphal entry’) was because Judas didn’t know exactly where he would be until right before the ‘last supper’? Something to consider, esp. if Jesus knew he was on the the chief priest’s hit list, as he almost certainly would have.

You must be logged in to post a comment.