What sounds nonsensical to you is the correct interpretation for Richard Fellows (see his post here in this same article).…
On The Book of Acts is NOT RELIABLE! The Negative Case
I guess one counterargument to the point that Acts and Paul sometimes disagree is: how do we know that Paul…
On Is the Book of Acts Historically Reliable? The Negative REBUTTAL of the Affirmative Case
The book of daniel is deffenetly historically 164bc but can it be lingisticly dated there?
On Is the Book of Acts Historically Reliable? The Negative REBUTTAL of the Affirmative Case
This is great news for me, I had wanted to make it. I hope to ask your opinion on the…
On ANOTHER March Platinum Webinar! Did Jesus Really Mean It?
If Daniel 7- 12 was written 160bc how it possible that the latest manuscripts waere written down about 100 years…
On Is the Book of Acts Historically Reliable? The Negative REBUTTAL of the Affirmative Case
Hello, Bart! 1. When you were deconverting going through that difficult time, who and/or what helped you and comforted you…
On Is the Book of Acts Historically Reliable? The Negative REBUTTAL of the Affirmative Case
Dr. Ehrman, I should've been a bit clearer....you say that Paul's mention of the Last Supper is traditional material, yet…
On Important Literary Features of the Book of Acts
Hello Dr Erhman Off topic of the Book of Acts , my sister whom I've never met is named Tirzah.…
On The Book of Acts is NOT RELIABLE! The Negative Case
Bart, you are still not answering the question. What in 1 Thess is inconsistent with the idea that Paul was…
On Important Literary Features of the Book of Acts
The negative team is relying on logical fallacies that put Luke in no-win situations. If Acts is inconsistent with other…
On Is the Book of Acts Historically Reliable? The Negative REBUTTAL of the Affirmative Case