One of the most intriguing passages of 1 Thessalonians is also  both the most widely referred to (these days) and the most universally misread.  It is the passage that conservative Christians cite to support the idea of the coming “rapture,” when Jesus will allegedly arrive from heaven to take his followers out of the world before the appearance of the Anti-Christ and the horrendous period of disaster and “tribulation” that must take place for seven years before the Final Day of Judgement.

The “rapture” is one of the firmest beliefs of conservative evangelicals.  And it is not found in the Bible.

Here is what I say about it, in relation to 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18 in particular, in my book Armageddon.

*********************************

 

Here is an interesting factoid that, in my experience, almost no one knows:  No one had even thought of the idea of a “rapture” until the 1830s.   Of the many, many thousands of serious students of the Bible throughout Christian history, who pored over every word – from leading early Christian scholars such as Irenaeus in the second century, to Tertullian and Origen in the third, to Augustine in the fifth, to all the biblical scholars of the Middle Ages up to Aquinas, to the Reformation greats Luther, Melanchthon, and Calvin, on to, well, on to everyone who studied or simply read or even just heard passages from the Bible – this idea of the rapture occurred to no one until John Nelson Darby came up with the idea in the early 1800s (as we will discuss in chapter 3).

Even so, back in my fundamentalist days, I too was completely certain the rapture was in the Bible, right there in black and white.  The key passage was 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18, a letter by the apostle Paul to his converts in the city of Thessalonica, written to provide assurance and comfort because they were about “those who have fallen asleep.”  That’s a euphemism in the Bible for “those who have died.”  When Paul converted the Thessalonians, he had taught them that the end of the present age was coming very soon: God was about to bring a utopian world to the world, the glorious kingdom of God. Now, some of the Thessalonians had died before this could happen, and the survivors were very upset: had those who were no longer living lost out on their chance for the coming kingdom?back in my fundamentalist days, I too was completely certain the rapture was in the Bible, right there in black and white.  The key passage was 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18, a letter by the apostle Paul to his converts in the city of Thessalonica, written to provide assurance and comfort because they were about “those who have fallen asleep.” 

Paul writes to assure these people that they do not need to “grieve as the others who do not have hope” (that is, the non-Christians; 1 Thessalonians 4:13).  When Jesus returns from heaven, the very first to be rewarded will be the believers who have already died.  They will be raised up from their graves to meet Jesus on his way down; then those still living on earth will also rise up to meet him in the air.

That’s the rapture, right?  It sure seems to be if you read the passage with fundamentalist eyes:

For we tell you this by a word of the Lord: we who are living, who are left until the coming, of the Lord, will not go before those who sleep.  For the Lord himself will descend from heaven with a cry, with the voice of an archangel, and with the trumpet of God — and the dead in Christ will rise first.  Then we who are living who remain will be taken up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air.  And so we will always be with the Lord.  (1 Thessalonians 4:15-18)

How can this not be referring to the rapture?

To begin with, it is important to read the passage, and all passages of the Bible, in context – a point I will be beating like a drum throughout this book.  Paul certainly did believe Jesus would be returning from heaven and it would be soon.  The key, though, is to understand Paul’s explanation of what will actually occur at that second coming.

Throughout his writings Paul insists that Christ will return in judgment.  Jesus was crushed by his enemies at the crucifixion, but he is coming back to annihilate them.  His return will bring destruction to everyone who has not accepted the good news of his salvation.  The “saved” will survive the onslaught and be rewarded with glorious bodies that will never again be hurt, sick, or die; they will then live forever with Christ in the coming kingdom (see 1 Corinthians 15 and 1 Thessalonians 1:9-10).

I want to pause here to discuss something seemingly small that will help us understand Paul’s this passage and every other passage in the Bible.  Our Bibles today have chapter and verse divisions.  These are extremely helpful, of course, since without them it is very hard indeed to tell someone where to find a passage.  But the authors did not write in chapters and verses. One problem with our having them is that they make us think that the next chapter (or even verse) is changing the subject.  But Paul would have written the first sentence of what is now 1 Thessalonians chapter 5 right after the final sentence of what is now chapter 4 (quoted above), without skipping a beat. In these next words, he indicates that the coming of the Lord (4:13-18) will bring “sudden destruction” for those not expecting it (5:3).  Christ will be like a “thief in the night” (5:4).  This is not a reassuring image.  The robber comes to harm, not to help.  But the good news for Paul is that this harm will come only to those who are not among Jesus’ followers; his faithful will survive the onslaught, “For God has not destined us for wrath but for salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ” (5:9).

So what does Paul mean in 4:17 when he says that Jesus’ followers will “meet him in the air”?  It can’t be a “rapture” that removes his followers from the world before the long-term tribulation.  Jesus is not coming to provide an escape for his followers but “sudden destruction”  for his enemies.  Then why are his followers floating up to meet him?

The Thessalonians, reading this letter in 50 CE, would have had no trouble understanding.  As scholars have long suggested, Paul’s description of Jesus, the “Lord,” coming to his “kingdom,” uses an image familiar in antiquity.  When a high-ranking official, such as a king, arrived for a visit to one of his cities, the citizens would know in advance he was coming and so prepare a banquets and festivities.  When the long-awaited king and his entourage approached, the city would send out its leading figures to meet and greet him and before escorting him back to their town with great fanfare.

For Paul in 1 Thessalonians, that’s what it will be like when Jesus comes.  He is the King coming to visit his own people, who will go out to greet him.  In this case, though, he is not coming with his entourage on horses; he is coming with his angels from heaven to destroy his enemies.  And so, to greet him, his followers – all of them, not just the leaders – will be taken “up” to “meet him in the air.” But this escort would not remain in the air any more than, on earth, the king’s welcoming committee would remain outside the city walls.  They would accompany him back to earth, where he enters his kingdom and rules forever, in a paradise provided to his chosen ones, now that all others have been suddenly destroyed.

There is no “rapture” here, no account of Jesus’ followers being taken to heaven to escape a massive and prolonged tribulation on earth.  The same is true of other passages used by fundamentalists who insist that the rapture is taught in Scripture. Another popular verse – we used to love this one – is Matthew 24:39-40: So too will be the coming of the Son of Man.  Then two will be in the field; one will be taken and one will be left.  Two women will be grinding meal together; one will be taken and one will be left.  Keep awake therefore, for you do not know on what day your Lord is coming.

We took the verse out of context as a pretty obvious reference to the rapture, where some will be taken out of the world and others abandoned for long-term misery.  If we had read it in context, however, we would have seen that this is the opposite of what Jesus was teaching.  In the verses right before the passage (Matthew 24:38-39) Jesus likens the coming of the Lord to what happened in “the days of Noah,” when only Noah and his family were saved in the ark when the flood took away – that is drowned — everyone else. In this passage, then, it is the people who are “taken” who are destroyed; those “left behind” are the ones who are saved.

Both Matthew and Paul warn their readers that they need to be alert because Jesus is coming soon.  But how soon?  When Paul talks about this coming day of judgment, he speaks about the reward that will come to Jesus’ true followers, both those who have already died, who will be raised from the dead, and those who are still alive.  Notice that Paul appears includes himself among the living at the time.  When he speaks of the two groups, he refers to “those” who are dead and “we” who will still be alive.  It’s a point worth emphasizing.  These New Testament authors who speak of Christ’s return thought it was to happen in their own day.

Over $2 Million Donated to Charity!

We have two goals at Ehrman Blog. One is to increase your knowledge of the New Testament and early Christianity. The other is to raise money for charity! In fact, in 2022, we raised over $360,000 for the charities below.

Become a Member Today!

 

2025-06-03T09:22:19-04:00June 4th, 2025|Paul and His Letters|

Share Bart’s Post on These Platforms

40 Comments

  1. Defendthetruth59 June 4, 2025 at 6:55 am

    It seems to me that when Jesus entered Jerusalem on Palm Sunday–he was doing a similar thing-his followers laid palm branches in the street to welcome their king into Jerusalem. good point?

    • BDEhrman June 7, 2025 at 10:29 am

      I’m not sure I understand your position. “Palm Sunday” is called that because of this incident; it didn’t exist earlier.

      • Defendthetruth59 June 7, 2025 at 3:44 pm

        I just meant what you and NT Wright have said–it was customary for the people to escort their returning King back into the city. The people escorted Jesus into the city because they thought he was their King (Messiah) You said that was a customary practice in antiquity. Of course this did not happen earlier. I’m just saying that contrary to a pre- Trib rapture–Jesus being greeted into Jerusalem by his followers is a mini-example of what Paul was describing at the end of time in 1 Thess 4

  2. TomTerrific June 4, 2025 at 8:19 am

    Essays like this are a big reason I subscribe.

    Wonderful material wonderfully said, Professor.

    Also, your Mis-Quoting Jesus that came out yesterday was a gem.

  3. NachoGoro June 4, 2025 at 10:00 am

    Dear Bart, I recently read a passage of NT Wright which surprised me, regarding Mark 14:62 from his “Jesus and the Victory of God”:

    “Jesus is not, then, suggesting that Caiaphas will witness the end of the space-time order. Nor will he look out of the window one day and observe a human figure flying downwards on a cloud. It is absurd to imagine either Jesus, or Mark, or anyone in between, supposing the words to mean that.”

    I unfortunately lack more context and the book is unavailable to me. It is the first time I encounter such an abrupt rejection of what seems to me like the most obvious reading of the passage, and from a well repected scholar. I think a literal interpretation would also suit Mark 13:30.

    Do you give any weight to this idea that Jesus in Mark is not talking about a coming of an Earthly kingdom but instead of signs that will let people know he has ascended?

    • BDEhrman June 7, 2025 at 10:32 am

      No, I think Wright simply wants to explain away a obvious problem by saying Jesus didn’t really mean it. One could say that about anything one knows isn’t right (anything you think makes no sense that Paul or the book of Revelation explicitly says, e.g.)

  4. jhague June 4, 2025 at 10:48 am

    “…his followers – all of them, not just the leaders – will be taken “up” to “meet him in the air.”

    1. Did Paul make this stuff up and people believed him? I understand that most of the people he was saying this to were not educated but they certainly had not seen anything like this before.
    2. Wouldn’t the Gentiles who had some education tell Paul he was speaking foolishness?
    3. And they would tell the others not to listen to him?
    4. If Paul wasn’t the one making this up, where did he get it? It seems that Paul would change his message or make something up to suit the questions at a particular time.

    • BDEhrman June 7, 2025 at 10:34 am

      It may seem so weird it’s just a crazy idea someon is making up, but the idea of a future judge of the early coming from heaven leading to an overthrow of the current order and a new world ruled by God had been around for a long time — and is still around today among millions of people, who wouldn’t find Paul’s views weird at all.

  5. RD June 4, 2025 at 11:46 am

    If Paul thought that the Kingdom of God would be on earth, I wonder why he would not have had the believers divinely transported to a place outside the city walls of Jerusalem to meet Jesus rather than “in the clouds?” The “in the clouds” idea raises questions in my mind.

    During NINT 24, in the Q&A following Paula Fredriksen’s presentation, I asked if Paul’s view was that the coming Kingdom of God would be located in the cosmos somewhere, rather than on earth. Her response was “Yes” and that in Paul’s view the Kingdom of God would be “celestial,” not “terrestrial.” She also said “Bodies of pneuma, pure spiritual bodies don’t stay in the realm below the moon. They ascend.”
    If Dr. Frederickson is correct, then maybe in 1 Thessalonians 4 Paul was thinking that the believers would continue “up” to the heavenly kingdom after meeting Jesus in the clouds? And that maybe after the “rapture” Jesus himself would continue down to earth to bring judgment and destruction per Chapter 5? If so, maybe J.N. Darby was on the right track after all with regard to a “rapture” event?

    • BDEhrman June 7, 2025 at 10:37 am

      She and I disagree on this (whether Paul thought the kingdom was celestial or terrestrial), but in either case, she decidedly does not think Paul is talking about a rapture of believers out of the world before a period of tribulation for all those left behind.

      • RD June 7, 2025 at 12:12 pm

        Reading through the “undisputed” letters, I couldn’t find where Paul definitively said that the Kingdom of God would be on earth. Maybe I missed it. In 1 Corinthians 7:31 he said, “For the present form of this world is passing away,” implying maybe that the earth will continue to exist but be changed to include the Kingdom of God? But then in Philippians 3:20 he said, “But our citizenship is in heaven, and it is from there that we are expecting a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ.” Your thoughts?

        • BDEhrman June 18, 2025 at 9:43 am

          No, I don’t believe he specifies where it will be; my sense is that this is because the apocaylptic view generally held that the world would be transformed back to the way it was at the beginning, rather than blasted out of existence. When he says our “citizenship” is in heaven, he means our allegiance is to be with God, not with things here on earth.

  6. clopez70 June 4, 2025 at 12:38 pm

    Are Elyon and Yahweh the same God?

    Hello professor Ehrman.

    In Deuteronomy 32:8-9, the Most High (Elyon) apportioned the nations according to the number of gods.

    Then, in verse 9, it says, “The LORD’s (Yahweh) own portion was his people, Jacob his allotted share.

    The footnote of The New Oxford Annotated Bible estates:
    The LORD’s own portion, NRSV has added “own” in order to identify Yahweh with Elyon and avoid the impression that Yahweh is merely a member of the pantheon.

    Isn’t that presupposing that that has to be the case?

    I’m not a native English speaker, but a plain lecture indicates to me that they are separate beings. Why call the same entity to different names in the same paragraph? Maybe I’m missing something here.

    What are your thoughts?

    Thanks a lot.

    • BDEhrman June 7, 2025 at 10:38 am

      The Hebrew Bible uses a number of terms (and one name) for the God of Israel, and they all refer to the same God.

  7. Jon1 June 4, 2025 at 2:37 pm

    Bart,

    You wrote that 1 Thess 4:13-18 intends the dead “will be raised up from their graves to meet Jesus on his way down; then those still living on earth will also rise up to meet him in the air,” but how do you know the passage does not intend the dead will be resurrected, and then “together” with those who never died they will *all* rise (at the same time) into the air to meet Jesus? The passage says, “…the dead in Christ will rise first. Then we who are living who remain will be taken up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air.”

    • BDEhrman June 7, 2025 at 10:39 am

      Because it lays the scenario out sequentially: first them, then us.

      • Jon1 June 7, 2025 at 2:22 pm

        What leads you to conclude Paul’s use of the word anistēmi in the phrase “the dead in Christ will rise first” includes the resurrected dead being taken up into the sky? It seems Paul could intend in this phrase simply that the dead are resurrected first, and then according to what Paul says next, the resurrected dead and those who never died are “taken up together” into the sky. Why is your reading more likely; isn’t it at least a toss up?

        • BDEhrman June 18, 2025 at 9:46 am

          It’s because the dead rise first THEN the living who are “caught up together with them to meet the Lord in the air.” They all appear to be up in the air to greet the Lord on his way down.

          • Jon1 June 18, 2025 at 11:14 am

            I’m sorry Bart, I feel like I must be missing something because you seem to be just stating your opinion about this verse, not why your opinion should be preferred. The passage says the dead “rise” [anistēmi] first. As far as I know, anistēmi just means resurrected from the dead, not transported upward into the sky, and it seems to me that the subsequent phrase about those who never died being “caught/taken/snatched up together with them to meet the Lord in the air” can just as easily mean that everyone (both the resurrected dead and those who never died) are all transported upward into the sky *at the exact same time*. Why is your interpretation more likely than the other? I’m not just interested in the answer for the sake of this one passage; I’m also curious how top end scholars like yourself treat opinions that differ from their own when the evidence, at least as far as I can tell, doesn’t point one way more than the other.

          • BDEhrman June 22, 2025 at 11:52 am

            Ah, sorry I’m not being clear, but I’m not sure how to make it any clearer. The first thing that happens is that the dead are “raised up”; that can indeed simply mean raised from their graves, but then what follows is key: the living are THEN raised up TOGETHER with the dead to meet the lord in the air. All of them go up to the air. The dead and the living. The point Paul seems to be making in context is that the Thessalonians do not need to grieve over those “who have fallen asleep” (i.e., died) because they will have priority. They will be the first to rise up and then the living will rise up, all of them in the air to greet Jesus. First the dead. Then the living. It’s sequential.

          • Jon1 June 22, 2025 at 12:33 pm

            1] Paul says those who are alive “will by no means PRECEDE those who have died,” he does not say the dead will have “priority” (as you put it). Given this, how can you tell if Paul thinks the previously dead will go up into the air *before* those who have never died instead of together with them at the *exact same time* (after the dead have been resurrected from their graves)? It’s ok to say it’s a toss up and I’m having a really hard time understanding why you won’t acknowledge the ambiguity of this passage.

            2] But in fact I think the passage actually favors my interpretation just by virtue of the fact that Paul says those who are alive will by no means “precede” those who have died instead of just plainly saying the dead will have priority. Also, why would the dead have priority anyway. Is this idea reflected in anywhere in Paul’s letters?

          • BDEhrman June 30, 2025 at 12:11 pm

            1. OK, if what I’m saying doesn’t make sense, there it is! I can’t say it any more clearly. But no reason you have to agree if you’re prefer not to. (By “priority” I mean simply that they go prior to the living)

            2. No, Paul never addresses this issue elsewhere.

          • Jon1 June 30, 2025 at 12:43 pm

            You’re stating your opinion perfectly clearly and I think I understand your position perfectly. I just don’t see where the passage itself says the dead go up into the the air “prior” to the living. Thanks for trying though. Maybe someone else who reads this comment can try explaining it to me.

  8. Steefen June 4, 2025 at 7:22 pm

    Dr. Ehrman,

    With the connection of Mark being associated with Peter and Luke being associated with Paul, how is it that 1 Peter 1:1 is writing to the Galatians (the province of Galatia)?

    1 Peter 1: 1
    Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, To God’s elect, exiles scattered throughout the provinces of … Galatia …

    Did the author of 1 Peter know he was writing to one of Paul’s church?

    Steve Campbell
    Author of Historical Accuracy, March 2021
    Jesus is Decius Mundus (Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews 18.3.4)
    referencing Decius Mus, 295 BCE (History of Rome, Books 8-10 by Livy)

    • BDEhrman June 7, 2025 at 2:21 pm

      One of teh most interesting features of the book is that if Peter’s name weren’t given at the beginning, everyone would assume teh letter was written by Paul! The theology and themes are entirely Pauline….

      • Steefen June 10, 2025 at 1:02 pm

        Someone in the Bart Ehrman Forum is asking about your response.
        QUESTION: Is Galatians for the Gentiles and 1 Peter for the Jews?

        FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONS:
        1) Why weren’t there Pauline churches in Sepphoris, Damascus, and Babylon in Parthia?
        For Paul, he stayed only within the Roman Empire and did not go into the Parthian Empire?
        You talk of the Jerusalem Church, why wasn’t that made broader to include Babylon?

        Thank you,
        Steve Campbell
        Author of Historical Accuracy, March 2021
        Jesus is Decius Mundus who sacrificed himself for the world (Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews 18.3.4)
        referencing Decius Mus who sacrificed himself, 295 BCE (History of Rome, Books 8-10 by Livy)

        • BDEhrman June 18, 2025 at 1:19 pm

          How do we know where there weren’t Pauline churhces?

  9. RussR June 5, 2025 at 10:30 am

    I read “Armageddon” a couple of years ago, and it was enlightening read. You discussed the Left Behind series of books and explained how it’s a modern interpretation and doesn’t line up with what the original meaning of Revelations. However, among many of the Christians I know, it seems these books have only hardened their views on Revelations. It’s almost as these books are now scripture to most of these Christians. To paraphrase the Borg from Star Trek, “Argument is futile”.

    • BDEhrman June 9, 2025 at 11:10 am

      Yup. You might check out the book Rapture Culture about that.

  10. Wayne June 5, 2025 at 11:09 am

    Question: In 1 Thessalonians chapter 4, Paul talks about a trumpet sounding and the dead rising; he talks about the same thing in 1 Corinthians 15:50-53. He also indicates in Corinthians 15:24 that when this happens, then comes the end, and the kingdom is handed over to God the Father. Furthermore, Paul talks about the destruction of the wicked in 1 Thessalonians and destroying all power and dominion, even death, in 1 Corinthians 15. So, I guess my question is, shouldn’t 1 Corinthians 15 negate the idea of the Rapture, a secret snatching away of Christians, which would then necessitate a third coming? I am loving this string of articles! I’ve been thinking a lot about Thessalonians; I’ve been reading it a couple of times even before this article, and I love how you can draw out these great, overlooked details!

    • BDEhrman June 9, 2025 at 11:11 am

      Yup, both passages, read carefully, negate the idea of a rapture.

  11. jblakers June 6, 2025 at 2:06 pm

    I’m very new to the blog. Is it true that in Acts, the stories of Peter and Paul end relatively abruptly and if so have you covered this before? By analogy, I can’t imagine a description of JFK, written at least 20 years after his death, to not mention the grassy knoll.

    • BDEhrman June 9, 2025 at 11:17 am

      Yes, I’d say the purpose of Acts is very different from a biography of JFK. One of the major themes of the book is that the Christian mission, and Paul himself, simply cannot be stopped by human effort, since it is the Spirit who is controlling the mission. The author ends the book with Paul victorious preaching the gospel from prison; it would be contrary to his purposes to end it with his enemies destroying him. With JFK it’s very different. (So too with Jesus!)

  12. kirbinator5000 June 7, 2025 at 2:43 am

    Does the similarity between Paul’s discussion of the end times in 1 Thessalonians 4 and Jesus’ teachings in the Olivet Discourse suggest that Paul was familiar with Jesus’ apocalyptic preaching about the end times?

    • BDEhrman June 9, 2025 at 11:21 am

      Not necessarily. There were numerous expectations of teh coming apocalypse among Jewish teachers at the time.

      • kirbinator5000 June 9, 2025 at 9:58 pm

        What exactly does Paul mean in 1 Thessalonians 4:15 when he says, “we say this to you by the word of the Lord”? In Galatians 1:12 and 2 Corinthians 12:1, he talks about receiving revelations from the Lord, but here he uses a different phrase—“by the word of the Lord.” Doesn’t that suggest he’s referring to a known teaching or saying of Jesus himself, perhaps something specific Jesus taught about the end times?

        • BDEhrman June 18, 2025 at 1:17 pm

          I wish we knew. There are obviously a range of options: It could be a saying of Jesus (during his life) that Paul had heard; it could be his general sense of the kinds of things Jesus said; it could have come from a prophecy spoken by a Christian prophet in a worsihp service; it could be a word / idea that he believed Christ had revealed to him directly; and I suppose there are other options!

          • kirbinator5000 June 18, 2025 at 11:08 pm

            Setting aside what can be historically demonstrated, I’m curious to hear your personal thoughts on the following points:

            1. Given Paul’s association of apocalyptic teachings with Jesus’ sayings and the strong correlation with the Olivet Discourse, can we attribute the Olivet Discourse’s content to the historical Jesus?
            2. Did Paul have knowledge of Jesus’ apocalyptic teachings?
            3. Does 1 Thessalonians’ passage enhance the credibility of the Olivet Discourse as a genuine teaching of Jesus?

          • BDEhrman June 22, 2025 at 12:28 pm

            1. I don’t see any evidence Paul knew of Jesus’s Olivet Discourse. 2. If Paul did know Jesus’s apocalyptic teachings, he at least gives no indication he did. 3. No, I don’t see the connection.

            I’d say two Jewish teachers born, raised, and working in different parts of the world speaking different languages at different times who both have apocalyptic views were not necessarily connected with each other, since many thousands of Jews had similar apocalyptic views without knowing the specific teachings of other apocalyptic Jews in other places.

  13. sLiu June 12, 2025 at 2:18 pm

    remarkable!

    We have to live “properly” always because no one knows also when he/she is gonna die. & that no one can figure out!

Leave A Comment