
Has anyone seen this…and is familiar with it? Curious what Bart has to say…
** you do not have permission to see this link **
My good friend and colleague Barrie Willson and I have been working for six years on a book. Today, that book is the subject of a ** you do not have permission to see this link **in the Daily Mail.
Barrie is one of the world’s preeminent New Testament scholars. Our book is called The Lost Gospel: Decoding the Ancient Text that Reveals Jesus’ Marriage to Mary the Magdalene. It’s published by Pegasus (in the UK through Norton and in Canada by Harper Collins). It tells the story of the meeting between Jesus and Mary Magdalene. It describes their marriage and the meaning of their relationship for their original followers. Not only that, it tells the previously unknown story of the politics behind the crucifixion. The official launch takes place at a press conference on Wednesday November 12th at the British Library in London.
In the meantime, even before the press conference, the international press has started a buzz. Besides the Daily Mail and the ** you do not have permission to see this link **.
I’m not allowed to reveal too much before Wednesday, but what we’re talking about is a 1,450-year-old manuscript written in Syriac (Christian Aramaic) that’s been in the British Museum and later in the British Library since November 11th, 1847 (our press conference, coincidentally, is on November 12th). Basically, as we argue in our new book, Barrie and I believe that this is a lost Gospel that tells a story that pre-dates the four Gospels of the Christian cannon. It’s a Gospel before the Gospels.
The man who sold this manuscript to the British Museum in 1847 was Auguste Pacho, native of Alexandria, Egypt. He got the ancient text from the Macarios monastery in Egypt. Incredibly, there are two cover letters still appended to the manuscript. They date to the same time as the text itself. One of the almost 1500-year-old letters was written by a man who translated the Syriac manuscript from an even older Greek version. In other words, the manuscript in the Rare Book section of the British Library is as old as any Gospel, and it may be a copy of a copy of a first-century document. Meaning, it may have been penned by one of the original followers of Jesus.
We provide the first ever translation into English of this Syriac manuscript. The translation was made by one of the top Syriac scholars in the world, Professor Tony Burke of York University, Toronto. Not only that, Professor Burke translated – also for the first time – the two letters that accompany the manuscript. Our book consists of the Lost Gospel in translation, our commentary and the decoding of the text. Not only is the text a revelation in itself but, taken together with the canonical Gospels, other historical texts and the latest in archaeology, The Lost Gospel acts as a key to understanding previously incomprehensible aspects of the life and crucifixion of Jesus. For example, in our manuscript, Mary Magdalene is the main star – not Jesus. In this Gospel, she is called “The Mother of Virgins” and “Our Lady”. Can it be that these titles – today associated with the Virgin Mary – originally belonged to the wife, not the mother?
Before the book has even come out, some have gone on the offensive. For example, one Oxford University professor has already decided that it’s nonsense. It took us six years to write this book. It’s taken him only a few seconds to dismiss it – without so much as seeing the cover. He must have telepathic powers. No wonder he teaches at Oxford. The Church of England has also dismissed the text even before knowing what text we’re talking about. Theological agenda? I think so.
In any event, now it begins.
I’ve seen mention of the book and at first planned to read it, however when I saw that they have to “decode” the text, it is a warning that the book may be interesting or fun to read but is probably not actually a gospel before the gospels. There are other books that “decode” texts like the Dead Sea Scrolls that the authors believe to be very important but no other scholar follows their lead.
Here’s a link by the Washington Post from a couple of days ago.
** you do not have permission to see this link **

Simcha is an snake oil peddler. He’s entertaining and seems like a likable guy, but he’s still a snake oil salesman. He’s the same guy behind “The Naked Archaeologist” and “documentaries” such as “Finding Atlantis”, “The Lost Tribes” and “The Lost Tomb of Jesus” among several others. In the latter he created the theory that the only known crucifixion nail ever known to have been found in Israel just happened to be one that was used on Jesus. He burned so many bridges with reputable archaeologists (I feel especially sorry for Dr. Gabi Barkay getting sucked into Simcha’s world of conspiracy) on “The Naked Archaeologist” that the the only people he can find to work with now are conspiracy theorists. I can’t believe so many national news outlets are giving coverage to this latest tripe from him. A lot of people claim he’s anti-Christian (he’s an orthodox Jew), but I hardly think that’s the case. In my opinion he’s just a man trying to make a buck trying to swindle as many people as he can into believing his hokum.

John Dash said
Has anyone heard how Jacobovici’s court case against Joe Zias is going? I just don’t get how responsible scholars and researchers get tangled up with Jacobovici.
The trial is still ongoing. Here’s a story from a couple weeks ago on it: ** you do not have permission to see this link **.
BDEhrman
FreedomBen
evgendob
Robert
1 Guest(s)

