No, the geometric structures in Space section did not go over well at all. The geometric structure is geocentric. As such you would have to explain the evolving and dissolving structure of the Zodiac. Humans are at least 40,000 years old. In our current world history the star points are not fixed. At one time the zodiac of the stars were dots that connected to images of the zodiac. 12-wedge, geocentric Zodiac evolved. 12-wedge, geocentric Zodiac precisely formed. 12-wedge, geocentric Zodiac dissolved. 12-wedge, geocentric Zodiac precisely formed could act as a Natal chart and hold steady over the lifespan of the geocentric perspective. /// The sacred geometry section gets a Yes from me. I think that is remarkable, something all should know.
Before you demonstrate HOW astrology works you must first demonstrate THAT it works.
Humans (Homo Sapiens) may be a quarter of a million years old.
All Zodiacs (there are more than one) are arbitrary patterns imposed upon reality not derived from it by observation.
Astrology assumes our planet has a privileged position. All you have to do is move your observation position a few light years away from its current point to result in different patterns. The stars themselves are in motion. Ten million years ago the night sky was different. Ten million years from now it will be different.
This video is a bunch of crap.
The sacred geometry section gets a Yes from me. I think that is remarkable, something all should know.
The Math that supports Astrology as presented in the video of the original post is tight.
No one in this forum thread has posted anything of value against the Math.
The resolution of the original post passes. It is worthwhile of our world view and inclusion in our interest in Science.
= = =
Now for my constructive criticism of the Math.
The Math is applied to the Western Zodiac of say the last 3,000 years.
We know the species Modern Humans has lived for 40,000 to 120,000 years.
= = = =
CORRECTION:
The earliest fossils of anatomically modern humans are from the Middle Paleolithic, about 200,000 years ago such as the Omo remains of Ethiopia and the fossils of Herto sometimes classified as Homo sapiens idaltu.
Anatomically modern humans evolved from archaic humans in the Middle Paleolithic, about 200,000 years ago. The emergence of anatomically modern human marks the dawn of the subspecies Homo sapiens sapiens, i.e. the subspecies of Homo sapiens to which all humans alive today belong.
= = =
Double check if the current Western Zodiac is 3000 years old.
From the earliest of times, the zodiac has been universally used to predict or reflect characteristics of personality, whether from the Chinese, Mesopotamian, Indus Valley, Egyptian or any other culture, echoing the ancient philosophy ‘As above – so below’… what we today call astrology.
Lascaux Cave
French researcher Chantal Jègues-Wolkiewiez has further proposed that the gallery of figurative images in the Great Hall represents an extensive star map and that key points on major figures in the group correspond to stars in the main constellations as they appeared in the Palaeolithic leading to the remarkable suggestion of a direct transfer of information for over 17,000 years.
The classical map of the sky, with the 48 Greek constellations, was derived from at least two different pre-Greek traditions. One tradition comprised the 12 signs of the zodiac, with several associated animal constellations, all of which developed over 3,200-500 BC in Mesopotamia in a religious or ritual tradition. These were taken over by the Greeks around 500 BC.
Source: The origin of the zodiac ** you do not have permission to see this link **
= = =
Back to my constructive criticism of the Math.
The Math is applied to the Western Zodiac of say the last 2,500 years.
We know the species Modern Humans has lived for 150,00 years.
We have risen to advanced civilization in, say, 12,000 years.
Let’s say over the past 200,000 years we have more than ten 12,000 year periods.
Was there another rising to civilization? Was there an Atlantis or Lemuria advanced civilization?
What was the zodiac and constellations 200,000 years to 2,500 years ago?
The computer programmer is saying when humans look at the sky from Earth, the circle of view needs to be divided into 12 sections.
Use a base 8 for starters. Fractal Sacred Geometry would be the underpinning Math for connecting the geocentric perspective to the astrological outputs such as character of the individual (natal charts) and character of relationships (composite charts), etc.
The programmer goes into the masculine-feminine characteristics of the 12 sections. Did that hold true 200,000 to 2,500 years ago as it does now?
Double check if the current Western Zodiac is 3000 years old.
From the earliest of times, the zodiac has been universally used to predict or reflect characteristics of personality, whether from the Chinese, Mesopotamian, Indus Valley, Egyptian or any other culture, echoing the ancient philosophy ‘As above – so below’… what we today call astrology.
Lascaux Cave
French researcher Chantal Jègues-Wolkiewiez has further proposed that the gallery of figurative images in the Great Hall represents an extensive star map and that key points on major figures in the group correspond to stars in the main constellations as they appeared in the Palaeolithic leading to the remarkable suggestion of a direct transfer of information for over 17,000 years.
The classical map of the sky, with the 48 Greek constellations, was derived from at least two different pre-Greek traditions. One tradition comprised the 12 signs of the zodiac, with several associated animal constellations, all of which developed over 3,200-500 BC in Mesopotamia in a religious or ritual tradition. These were taken over by the Greeks around 500 BC.
Source: The origin of the zodiac ** you do not have permission to see this link **
= = =
Western Zodiac based on Mesopotamia 3,200 BC yields 3,200 BC + 2017 = 5,217 years, not 3,000 years old.
BDEhrman
FreedomBen
evgendob
Robert
1 Guest(s)