Bart Ehrman Blog Readers Forum

A A A
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Min search length: 3 characters / Max search length: 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_TopicIcon
Help me locate a quote
Avatar
tgeorgescu

26 Posts
(Offline)
1
April 22, 2021 - 3:31 pm

Help me locate this quote: “This isn’t simply the approach of “liberal” Bible professors. It’s the way historians always date sources. If you find a letter written on paper that is obviously 300 years old or so, and the author says something about the “United States” — then you know it was written after the Revolutionary War. So too if you find an ancient document that describes the destruction of Jerusalem, then you know it was written after 70 CE. It’s not rocket science! But it’s also not “liberal.” It’s simply how history is done. If someone wants to invent other rules, they’re the ones who are begging questions!”

It’s from ehrmanblog.org. I copied long ago (around 2014) to Wikipedia and I cannot find it anymore. I know that Bart Ehrman’s post had typos, perhaps that’s why I don’t find the post anymore. If I remember well, it was Ehrman’s reply to a comment from the blog.

Avatar
Robert
7240 Posts
(Offline)
2
April 24, 2021 - 10:35 am
Avatar
tgeorgescu

26 Posts
(Offline)
3
August 1, 2024 - 11:49 pm

Found it: ** you do not have permission to see this link **
24 January 2014, 10:24

Avatar
Stephen
4766 Posts
(Offline)
4
August 2, 2024 - 12:45 pm

The work of textual criticism continues unabated it seems. If you correct the typos is that a scribal corruption or correction? Ha!

Avatar
DavidFord

1599 Posts
(Offline)
5
August 2, 2024 - 5:20 pm

BDEhrman – January 24, 2014 at 10:24 pm
** you do not have permission to see this link **
If you find a letter written on paper that is obviously 300 years old or so, and the author says something about the “United States” — then you know it was written after the Revolutionary War.
So too if you find an ancient document that describes the destruction of Jerusalem, then you know it was written after 70 CE.
It’s not rocket science!

_Redating the New Testament_ (1976), 369pp. by John A.T. Robinson, on 14
** you do not have permission to see this link **

Bo Reicke begins a recent essay with the words:
“An amazing example of uncritical dogmatism in New Testament studies is the belief that the Synoptic Gospels should be dated after the Jewish War of AD 66-70 because they contain prophecies _ex eventu_ of the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans in the year 70.”
[B. Reicke, ‘Synoptic Prophecies on the Destruction of Jerusalem’, in D. W. Aune (ed.), _Studies in New Testament and Early Christian Literature: Essays in Honor of Alien P. Wikgren (NovTest_ Suppl. 33), Leiden 1972, 121-34.]

Is it the case that the book of Daniel “describes the destruction of Jerusalem”?

Forum Timezone: America/Indiana/Indianapolis
All RSSShow Stats
Administrators:
BDEhrman
FreedomBen
evgendob
Robert
Top Posters:
Steefen: 7957
Stephen: 4766
Porphyry: 1922
godspell: 1827
DavidFord: 1599
BJH1960: 1342
brenmcg: 1184
Colin Milton: 1142
JAS: 948
Jarek: 936
Newest Members:
Npetro
Apocryphon
Blusoul24
warren.bernauer
Andrew Rilstone
3442
ZK02HSF
SignOfTheTimes
Nbo
ninanina
Forum Stats:
Groups: 2
Forums: 13
Topics: 2639
Posts: 47565

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 65
Members: 66124
Moderators: 0
Admins: 4
Most Users Ever Online: 3559
Currently Online: Serene, Steefen, Tjalling
Guest(s) 32