The first part defines Criticism. It looks like the Author wants to pick on some Blog’s members and accuse them of being carrying on facts or supposed facts without even tainting them with their feelings.

The fact is that everything is borrowed from somewhere else, nothing is original. Renowned philosopher U.G. (read “iuggi” by his friends) Krishnamurti explains this in clear words: “The knowledge–that is all that is there. The “me”, “psyche”, “mind”, “I”, or whatever you want to call it is nothing else than the totality of the inherited knowledge passed on to us from generation to generation, mostly through education. […] All this is not to say that we can know anything about thought. We can’t. You become conscious of thought only when you make it an object of thought, otherwise, you don’t even know you are thinking. We use thought only to understand something out there, to remember something, or to achieve something. Otherwise, we don’t even know if thought is there or not.”

The second part talks about the lies brought up by the Israeli Government in order to cover the Eichmann plot. But the point is about truth. If Argentine and the World Community accepts at the end, the story, who cares how things were really carried on. Along with Reality, a parallel highway is covered by humans, an arbitrary one.

When Jules Feiffer is asked why he does refute to understand the sign “I like Eich.” as an ironical sign, Jules affirms that even a signifier has its moral limits of interpretations. He is covering the same ground as the Israeli Government.

So moral necessity becomes the measure of arbitrariness in nature.

And by converse, since arbitrariness is affirmative and denies any answer or contradiction, anyone is left speechless.