Bart Ehrman Blog Readers Forum

A A A
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Min search length: 3 characters / Max search length: 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_TopicIcon
The Gloria
Avatar
DavidNeale

1 Posts
(Offline)
1
July 14, 2017 - 10:36 am

I’m a complete novice when it comes to New Testament history, and have only just joined the forum. (I’m an immigration lawyer in England and don’t have any background in Greek or ancient history, although I’ve always been very interested in theology. I was raised Christian but have been an atheist for several years. A lot of my work now involves representing Iranian converts to Christianity, in which a knowledge of theology occasionally comes in handy.)

One thing that suddenly occurred to me last Christmas, and of which I was reminded when reading Dr Ehrman’s posts about the history of the KJV and the Textus Receptus. Many apologies if this is a really silly / obvious / trivial question (like I said, I’m a complete novice). The Gloria in English, in liturgies, hymns and so on, is sometimes rendered as “Glory to God in the highest and on Earth peace to men of good will“, and sometimes as “peace, good will to men“, or (in hymns) various other permutations. This seems to be a more than trivial difference in meaning. (A Christmas musical we performed when I was in primary school turned it into “All Glory be to God on high / And to the Earth be peace / Good will henceforth from heav’n to men / Begin and never cease.”)

Of course I’m familiar (as most people are) with the text from the Vulgate, “Gloria in excelsis Deo et in terra pax hominibus bonae voluntatis,” and I understand that the Latin is clearly “…men of good will”. So I wondered why the difference. I checked online and found that the Greek is Δόξα ἐν ὑψίστοις Θεῷ καὶ ἐπὶ γῆς εἰρήνη ἐν ἀνθρώποις εὐδοκία. I don’t read a word of Greek, but I asked a friend who is a classicist and she confirmed that this is unambiguously “…peace, good will to men.” Is this just a translation error in the Vulgate? Or do different Greek manuscript sources of the NT say different things? Does it have any theological implications?

Forum Timezone: America/Indiana/Indianapolis
All RSSShow Stats
Administrators:
BDEhrman
FreedomBen
evgendob
Robert
Top Posters:
Steefen: 8282
Stephen: 5058
Porphyry: 1994
DavidFord: 1932
godspell: 1827
BJH1960: 1588
brenmcg: 1184
Colin Milton: 1142
Judith: 1041
JAS: 948
Newest Members:
aditya090
bossnash
Jason Conrad
njp
rdescafano
WanaxLukos
cksyno
Vilchkov
AdrianAas
Sparafugle
Forum Stats:
Groups: 2
Forums: 13
Topics: 2683
Posts: 50243

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 65
Members: 66436
Moderators: 0
Admins: 4
Most Users Ever Online: 3559
Currently Online: BJH1960, Robert
Guest(s) 2
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)