
Hello! I am hoping someone might be able to help me understand Tobit a bit— i was reading Chapter 14 and it talks about Jerusalem and the Temple being destroyed—then everyone will be able to return, and then a temple would be rebuilt. It then goes on to mention that after an appointed time, a more grandiose temple would be allowed to be built. what is Tobit talking about here? And because this book was written in the second century BCE there was an existing temple, but it wasn’t like Solomons. So is Tobit stating that the current temple standing at the time of the writing isn’t sufficient and that eventually a better one will be built when the Messiah comes or is this regarding a third temple? Or is there some verification somewhere that the people living in this time period of the early second second century BCE were unhappy with the current lesser temple that had been built after they returned and expected a better one to replace it someday soon?
I know that in the Bible there is no mention of a third temple, but wasn’t sure if Tobit is speaking to that. Could Tobit also be trying to add in prophecy to support Ezekiel‘s temple not yet being built in his time and is that what he is talking about?
Any help that anyone can provide on this information would be greatly appreciated. I am just trying to discount this as some type of proof that there were writings about a third temple being rebuilt.
Welcome Kris!
Even though scholars generally agree that Tobit was written in the late 3rd to early 2nd century BCE, the events described in the story take place during the 8th-century BCE, during the Assyrian exile (around 722 BCE). So, the prophesy of the Temple being destroyed is about the First Temple, and the prophesy of the temple being rebuilt is about the Second Temple. The biblical book of Daniel is similar in being about ancient times but actually written much later.
I’m not completely familiar with the idea of a Third temple except that it is associated with the Parousia, the “End Times”. But then you also have traditions that indicate there is no need for another Temple since God will be present with his people in the Kingdom.
Hope that helps.

For me, i grew up in a very fundamentalist religion and things like the temples were indicators of the end of the world. Being in this type of religion really messed me up so i have tried to find discrepancies to show myself not to worry about these kinds of things. I always took comfort in the fact that the bible never mentions a third temple. It freaked me out when i found out Tobit might.

Kris said
For me, i grew up in a very fundamentalist religion and things like the temples were indicators of the end of the world. Being in this type of religion really messed me up so i have tried to find discrepancies to show myself not to worry about these kinds of things. I always took comfort in the fact that the bible never mentions a third temple. It freaked me out when i found out Tobit might.
Hi Kris,
Welcome to the forum!
I don’t know much about Tolbit. I have heard that there were actually two temples in the 2nd Temple period. One built by the Jews newly returned from Babylon, and then one built by Herod.
I’ve had some confusion about “the end of the world” messages that we get in the bible myself. Realize, however, that at the very end of the bible, in the book of Revelation, there is the New Jerusalem. The New Jerusalem is like 1,500 miles cubed; it is a very big place. There is also the inside of the NJ and the outside of it as well. The earth is still here. – – I’ve wondered and have even been told, by a preacher’s wife that “the end of the world” actually means the end of worldliness or a kind of worldliness, or “the end of the world as we know it,” so to speak.
I’ve also been told that “fear of God” should actually be translated as “awe of God”.
Sorry that I don’t know more, but I hope this helps.
Welcome again to the forum.

BDEhrman
FreedomBen
evgendob
Robert
1 Guest(s)
