In late 2024, there was a high-tech expedition funded to the tune of more than 10 million dollars (funds used for sonar and HD cameras).
I’m sure if he were having conversations with AI, Robert would say, you cannot use technology to strengthen understanding. Let’s set up rules to, like NASA, block conviction.
Yes it is. $10 million dollars worth of scientific, documentary evidence is there.
If you want to wait for scholars to change their story, go right ahead.
It’s going to take me more than two months before I can make it official in the second edition of my book.
What is argument against the science of sonar and high density cameras?
Whatever significant comment you have will be used in my second viewing.
I too invested in the James K. Hoffmeier scholarly version but he didn’t have $10 million dollars worth of equipment to investigate the site.
The site has been investigated. What is your counter-investigation?
Discuss your counter-investigation. Rule: no gaslighting allowed.
Scholars are not the only people doing research.
Private independent research, $10 million dollars worth did the research.
Just like I am not prepared to issue my revised book this moment, the Egyptological community of Egyptian museum wings across the world have yet to digest these new findings.
Conferences and textbooks have to digest these new findings.
Well, we saw the pictures in the video.
The findings disprove Hoffmeier, Hoffmeier calls it a bad joke. Gaslight.
His video has 103 thumbs up. While the $10 million documentary evidence has more than 35,000 thumbs up.
Hoffmeier’s denial video is 5 years old.
The documentary evidence video is this year–more current.
Hoffmeier needs to respond to the Quantara video posted Nov. 13, 2025.
The evidence was there before the man died. Then a private team revisited the claim and CONFIRMED what he saw.

The first video asks, “What if this is a global conspiracy?”
I have another question, what if it isn’t? What if it’s just someone wanting to make money by putting together a YouTube video?
One consistent theme in all these sensationalist videos: the experts don’t want you to know. On the other hand, the non-experts want us to know but are only able to give us as evidence what we see in YouTube videos, which is terribly sad considering we are told, “The team documented everything. They took thousands of high resolution photos and high definition videos.”
The best part of the video for me was toward the end and the vanishing evidence (26:14-28:10) and the nurse anesthetist, ** you do not have permission to see this link **
Wow this one is a stinky old hoax, long since debunked. (It actually originated on a satire site and was picked up by credulous, humorless evangelicals. But then, are there any other kind?)
The remains of the traditional Pharoah of the Exodus, Ramses II, lies in the Mummy Room at the Cairo Museum. I’ve seen it myself. Looks pretty good for his age.
C’mon Steefen you can do better than this!

Thanks. Both were great and links as well.
I especially appreciated ** you do not have permission to see this link ** in which we see among other things, his refusal to answer questions because those asking were not sincere. At other times, certain things could not be revealed as he’d been privately asked by unnamed Israeli authorities not to as it would be dangerous for Israeli security.
This ** you do not have permission to see this link ** said to be written by a friend may well contain important insights:
Our team proceeded to the Garden Tomb, whose custodians were expecting our arrival. Wyatt had negotiated cordially and successfully with them. With an assortment of gardening tools we set to work, moving a large pile of rubble and rock which had accumulated where Wyatt had probed earlier. Over several days we were able to excavate our way down into the same cave system that Wyatt had explored two years before. I’m sorry to report that in the end we came up empty-handed. The connecting channel through which Wyatt had claimed to see the furniture was not there. On the final day of excavation, when we could not see the internal cavern landmarks that Wyatt had predicted, Ron himself finally climbed down into the dim space. After a long time he emerged, looking confused. As we waited respectfully to hear his report, he mumbled a few words like: “It’s not the same; it’s changed. It’s not the way I remember it.” There was no opening to be seen, giving a view into an adjacent cavern. There was nothing. In the process of our digging we had come up with a few interesting little objects from Roman times, but they were irrelevant to our main goal.
Our team was disappointed, puzzled, disillusioned. We had enjoyed ten days of close fellowship, with daily shared prayer times, and an excited anticipation of momentous events just before us. Now all those hopes came crashing down. And sadly, Wyatt was not man enough to come clean, to apologize for bringing us on a wild goose chase, or to attempt any kind of explanation. We kept expecting some sort of statement, but he just remained silent, withdrawn. And we were too stunned, and perhaps too sorry for him in his confusion, to demand that he explain.
To this day I cannot give a rational account for the extreme misguidedness that Wyatt revealed. What was happening in his head? His participation in our group worship times had left all of us in no doubt about his sincerity and his devotion to Scripture. He was a competent Bible scholar. He was a brother. Yet he had misled us terribly, and had offered no words of regret or apology or explanation. I have reviewed the whole story many times since then, and am convinced that the church administrator was right: Wyatt might be mistaken, but he himself believed that what he had originally shared was true.
From medical school I remember hearing of a rare state of mind, with a long Latin name, that led its victims to concoct marvelously detailed accounts of events that were pure fabrications, yet which the story-teller himself had come to believe were absolutely true. I am inclined to believe that Wyatt was a florid example of this disorder. He was not a deliberate liar, a fraud. And some of his observations had merit. But I am convinced that some of his “discoveries” were matters which underwent transcription in his mind, and he came to believe as true certain ideas and observations that in fact were his own inventions.
Nice blast from the past. Gulp! Over twenty years ago! I guess bad ideas never die, or if they do, only after a long stint on the YouTube. The king of all these kinds of stories is of course claiming to find Noah’s Ark on Mt Ararat. How many times has that happened?
This would doubtless be a good time to re-recommend a book I mentioned a while back in another thread.
** you do not have permission to see this link **
Great stuff!

The king of all these kinds of stories is of course claiming to find Noah’s Ark on Mt Ararat. How many times has that happened?
If ChatGPT is to be believed, over 100 times! Once is never enough.
In this ** you do not have permission to see this link **, we read of several of the discoveries, including an 1883 April Fool’s Day joke that was taken a little too seriously.
** you do not have permission to see this link **
Looks fascinating.
I told you my position: Hoffmeier has been challenged by a private researcher who raised $10 million and checked the claims of Ron Wyatt. I no longer consider any of Hoffmeier’s scholarly books to be the final word.
If a researcher wants to remain anonymous, so be it, but you want to say because this privacy blocks the source, there’s a problem with the HD camera evidence.
I prefer revealed sources as opposed to anonymous sources.
For me, whether or not an army chased Moses and the Hebrews has no bearing on what happened later with the Hebrews. how they treated people during their “conquest.”
My book spent more time on the feasibility of a Moses timeline. I used Biblical Archeological Review to discuss the fall of Jericho, then moved on to say, Moses did not have a show down with Rameses II which Bart tried to defend via Pi-Ramesses.
In my book, I do address the plagues, also.
It seems plausible that if Bart doubts Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, he also doubts Joseph and his brothers (which I discuss in my book).
THEN, why are these books canonical for Christians? Why is Jesus a new Moses? LOL: Jesus is a new Moses, Bart doubts existed. Well if Bart can chuckle, I can chuckle, too: I doubt Jesus–the New Moses who didn’t exist–existed.
Bart says the Gospel of Matthew has Jesus going up a mountain to give a sermon like Moses going up the Mt Sinai where he’s given the Law.
So what if dead horses and chariots were found at the bottom of the Red Sea?
We’ve found Jericho destroyed (BAR). With or without private research finding dead horses, remains of soldiers, chariots, archaeologists found Jericho destroyed. Manetho speaks of a Moses in his history.
So, if you think there is no evidence to confirm the army of pharaoh chasing the Hebrews, your thoughts are a battle you win while losing the war.
You say others have spoken against the video. The original researcher, Ron Wyatt, was dismissed by scholars. But his claims were re-investigated. And the private investigator said they saw evidence of evidence-tampering. So, there’s a repeat of backing propagandists who hide evidence. “We hid the evidence, therefore, you have no evidence.”
Name THAT fallacy.
BDEhrman
FreedomBen
evgendob
Robert
1 Guest(s)
