Bart Ehrman Blog Readers Forum

A A A
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Min search length: 3 characters / Max search length: 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_TopicIcon
Book recommendation for a mythical understanding of Jesus
Avatar
notforcing

1 Posts
(Offline)
1
April 12, 2024 - 9:34 am

While I greatly appreciate Dr Ehrman’s scholarship, I find he engages in virtual polemicism when writing about the mythical understanding of the Jesus movement origins. I’d like to explore this topic further, can someone suggest one or more books by accredited, peer reviewed authors that make the case for a mythical origin?

Thanks,
Daniel

Avatar
Robert
7102 Posts
(Offline)
2
April 12, 2024 - 10:32 am
Avatar
Porphyry

1835 Posts
(Offline)
3
April 12, 2024 - 2:53 pm

Perhaps worth noting that “most credible” doesn’t necessarily mean “very credible”.

Carrier might be the most serious of the mythicists, but he is generally regarded as a crank who is very definitely outside the mainstream of scholarship.

Avatar
Stephen
4548 Posts
(Offline)
4
April 12, 2024 - 3:26 pm

The reason Carrier is “serious” is because he’s one of the few mythicists who realize that you still have to explain how Christianity, which certainly exists, first came into being without Jesus. Most mythicists seem to think their work is done simply by raising questions about Jesus’ historicity. To actual historians the real question is how Christianity came to be, not “Did Jesus exist?”

Avatar
sberry

45 Posts
(Offline)
5
April 26, 2024 - 7:20 am

> Perhaps worth noting that “most credible” doesn’t necessarily mean “very credible”.

His work is peer-reviewed.

I know this, because he says so on every page.

Avatar
Jarek

936 Posts
(Offline)
6
April 27, 2024 - 5:36 pm

Robert Wipper Rome and early Christianity

Avatar
jebib

1 Posts
(Offline)
7
August 9, 2024 - 4:12 pm

Dr. Carrier highlights his work is peer reviewed but doesn’t explain what that means. Certainly the implication is agreement with the hypothesis, argument and conclusion. But what if its limited to attesting everything is simply internally consistent?

Avatar
Robert
7102 Posts
(Offline)
8
August 9, 2024 - 5:30 pm
Avatar
Porphyry

1835 Posts
(Offline)
9
August 9, 2024 - 5:39 pm

Certainly the implication is agreement with the hypothesis, argument and conclusion.

That is decidedly not what peer-review is supposed to confirm. In practice it might sometimes (bad articles get pushed through because the reviewers are just cheerleading the conclusion, or strong but controversial articles get torpedoed because the conclusion gets the reviewers’ panties in a twist), but in theory, peer review should just determine that the research is sufficiently serious to merit being read–whether the reviewer agrees with the conclusions or not.

Forum Timezone: America/Indiana/Indianapolis
All RSSShow Stats
Administrators:
BDEhrman
FreedomBen
evgendob
Robert
Top Posters:
Steefen: 7710
Stephen: 4548
Porphyry: 1835
godspell: 1827
DavidFord: 1349
BJH1960: 1189
brenmcg: 1184
Colin Milton: 1142
JAS: 948
Jarek: 936
Newest Members:
Rory
DavidTharp
1stadam1stantiochian
Socoflyer
rbaird120
JosephusButJoDontBelievePhus
StoosterRooster
philohistor
LindaW
Erinmprater
Forum Stats:
Groups: 2
Forums: 13
Topics: 2606
Posts: 46054

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 65
Members: 65837
Moderators: 0
Admins: 4
Most Users Ever Online: 3559
Currently Online: BJH1960
Guest(s) 72
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)