According to both Christianity and Islam Jesus has no biological Father and this FACT totally dismisses the Genealogy of Jesus as portrayed in Luke 3:23-38 and Mathew 1:1-16. This Fact can be supported 100% if we read John 7:37-52, where we see that The Jews Denied Jesus was the Messiah and the Prophet of God, even though a handful of them had believed. And the reason was he was not from the House of David OR from the Town of David, Because their scriptures had told them that the Messiah or the anointed one will come from the house of David or from the Town of David. But just from the FACT that Jesus had no Biological Father throws everything that relates him to the house of David to the Bins. and therefore very irrelevant to consider his Paternal genealogy, also the Jews Knew the genealogy of Mary , if Mary was from the House of David, the Jews would not have denied her son being the Messiah and a Prophet.
So what is the Maternal Genealogy Of Jesus, if i may say So?
According to Luke 1:36 Elizabeth the Wife of Zachariah, a Priest According to Luke 1:5 , and Mother to John the Baptist is Mentioned as being a Cousin of Mary ( Relative of Mary in NIV ) again in Luke 1:5, Elizabeth is a Descendant of Aaron. therefore we can conclude that Mary’s Parents were Levites.
In the Quran Mary is addressed as Sister of Aaron in ** you do not have permission to see this link **. A LEVITE.
In conclusion Jesus maternal Genealogy was a LEVITE and that is why the Jews Denied he was a Prophet and their Messiah because in there scriptures the Messiah will come from the house of David he comes from the House of Judah.
Jesus was not from House of David or Judah BUT his maternal Line age was from Levi , therefore A LEVITE…
My personal belief is that this was largely a construction of the early Church, which made its way into Matthew and Luke. We don’t get that from Paul, Mark or John — who are, IMHO, the best sources for the historical Jesus.
Was Jesus’s mother named Mary? Almost certainly.
Was Mary’s husband named Joseph? Probably.
Was Joseph from the line of David? Maybe there was some colorable, theoretical connection; certainly not something clear and distinct.
Maybe. It isn’t hard or noteworthy to be a descendant of a king. I’m a direct descendant of King Henry VII through his bastard Roland de Velville. It is really not any trouble at all. I think it was probably a construction, but who knows. At this point, half of all people on earth are probably descended from royalty.
Stephen said
Chris how many people would have to die before you could ascend the throne?
Well, the whole current royal family, and then a lot of people on the Otis’ male lineage, since I’m on the matrinlineal side. But, for context, there are around five million people alive in the world who are descendants of William the Conqueror. The idea that Jesus was a descendant of David, may be a fabrication, but it would also be so conceivably possible, that it would be of no surprise if he was, and really should not be dismissed, given how we know how royalty was known for fooling around and couldn’t keep their pants zipped up. Also one of his kids was said to have 800 wives… so like, I’m just saying, if even a fraction of that was true, he was going to have several thousands of descendants within like three generations.
Well, the whole current royal family, and then a lot of people on the Otis’ male lineage, since I’m on the matrilineal side.
Well in these uncertain times it would be wise to plan for every eventuality. I suggest you contact the Palace Public Affairs Office, explain the situation (you will want to indicate your awareness of its unlikelihood so as not to seem unreasonable), and ask them if they have some sort of orientation package just to be prepared if the worst happens. Now depending on their sense of humor you could expect a range of responses from receiving an autographed photo of the Queen to being put on the No-Fly list.
Stephen said
Well, the whole current royal family, and then a lot of people on the Otis’ male lineage, since I’m on the matrilineal side.Well in these uncertain times it would be wise to plan for every eventuality. I suggest you contact the Palace Public Affairs Office, explain the situation (you will want to indicate your awareness of its unlikelihood so as not to seem unreasonable), and ask them if they have some sort of orientation package just to be prepared if the worst happens. Now depending on their sense of humor you could expect a range of responses from receiving an autographed photo of the Queen to being put on the No-Fly list.
Or perhaps it would be best not to provide a warning, in case you are planning to shorten that list.
Or perhaps it would be best not to provide a warning, in case you are planning to shorten that list.
In that case it will be interesting to see how long it takes Scotland Yard to figure out the motive. The real question becomes, do you begin with the Royal family or save them for last?
Stephen said
Or perhaps it would be best not to provide a warning, in case you are planning to shorten that list.In that case it will be interesting to see how long it takes Scotland Yard to figure out the motive. The real question becomes, do you begin with the Royal family or save them for last?
I have not really investigated this idea, or put a lot of thought into it . . . . but I presume that it is easiest to start bumping them off from the bottom up. As you get closer to the currently sitting royals, I suspect that the security improves, and if you start at the top, you will be dealing with a lot of the best security for each new level.
BDEhrman
FreedomBen
evgendob
Robert
1 Guest(s)