Bart Ehrman Blog Readers Forum

A A A
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Min search length: 3 characters / Max search length: 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_TopicIcon
Ann Nyland's Source New Testament
Avatar
paulheeney

7 Posts
(Offline)
1
December 10, 2015 - 11:28 am

Apologies if I’m treading over old ground here but I heard about this on a youtube video discussion recently. The thrust of it was that the modern understanding of ancient Greek has moved on so much in recent years that this book gives a far more accurate, and at times very different interpretation of the NT texts. Before I invest a week in reading it, has anyone here got an opinion on it’s validity/impact? Thanks, Paul

Avatar
gmatthews

498 Posts
(Offline)
2
December 10, 2015 - 8:30 pm

You should ask this question on the blog.  Just ask in the most recent blog entry and Bart will answer as long as you don’t write a book while asking.  He doesn’t answer questions here.  It would seem to me that by doing her own translation of the Bible by herself she’s going to put herself in the cross hairs of just about everyone.

If you want me to ask Bart this question for you let me know.  I only say this because it seems like every time I tell people how to ask him a question no one ever follows through. Laugh I’d like to know the answer to your question as well.  I just read an interview by her and Matthew 11:12 was brought up as an example of a verse that has a questionable interpretation.  Her interpretation makes sense.  Even the NRSV, which I use, has the interpretation that she says is problematic.

Avatar
paulheeney

7 Posts
(Offline)
3
December 11, 2015 - 2:24 pm

Thanks Greg, I’ll give that a try.

Avatar
gmatthews

498 Posts
(Offline)
4
December 11, 2015 - 5:17 pm

I saw Bart’s answer to your question.  One of my thoughts about her is that what she did sounded like Reza Aslan writing his book.  Ie., someone only peripherally related to the subject matter tackling something they aren’t really specialized enough to handle.  This is almost certainly why he’s never heard of her.

Avatar
paulheeney

7 Posts
(Offline)
5
December 15, 2015 - 8:57 am

Hi Greg, I think you’re right, I’ll give it a miss.  Choosing trustworthy literature is not easy in this field, you can read a completely convincing book that dramatically changes your understanding of something, only to find that it’s hugely flawed.  “Zealot” however, the conjecture was all too obvious, and although largely plausible, it had no evidence at all, it just read like a pet theory.

Avatar
gmatthews

498 Posts
(Offline)
6
December 15, 2015 - 3:19 pm

Yes, I know what you mean.  I’ll often put a book I’m interested in on my Amazon wish list.  Think about it for a while, research the author if I don’t already know them and then finally pull the trigger to purchase when I’ve convinced myself they aren’t out on the fringe or a scholar who lets their religion color their research.

Forum Timezone: America/Indiana/Indianapolis
All RSSShow Stats
Administrators:
BDEhrman
FreedomBen
evgendob
Robert
Top Posters:
Steefen: 7647
Stephen: 4494
Porphyry: 1835
godspell: 1827
DavidFord: 1326
brenmcg: 1184
BJH1960: 1152
Colin Milton: 1142
JAS: 948
Jarek: 936
Newest Members:
redgreen5
Deb-BertsBlog
MissHoneysuckle
LNCaldwell
ntcartwright
Jltomsik
JackIII
jim2day
mgrandy64
jeffweng
Forum Stats:
Groups: 2
Forums: 13
Topics: 2597
Posts: 45789

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 65
Members: 65746
Moderators: 0
Admins: 4
Most Users Ever Online: 3559
Currently Online: BJH1960, Jimmy
Guest(s) 57
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)