Bart Ehrman Blog Readers Forum

A A A
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Min search length: 3 characters / Max search length: 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_TopicIcon
Parchment vs Papyrus in the First Century
Avatar
galemduncan

-1 Posts
(Offline)
1
January 29, 2020 - 10:57 pm

I’m looking for conclusive answers to the following question:

My current understanding is that the Jews made considerable use of Parchment for their scriptures (scrolls) even before the time of Christ.  However I’m seeing authoritative sources saying that Christian Manuscripts for the first two centuries were written on Papyrus exclusively.  So the logical question would  be: why were they not using Parchment?

It seems to me that the answer is simply that Parchment was considerably more expensive than Papyrus and that among them, the early Christians simply didn’t have have the financial resources to pay for the Parchment that would have been required whereas the Jews did (ie: since they were a much older and larger community and in possession of relatively vast financial resources compared to the tiny community of early Christians). 

So I’m wondering if this aligns with the accepted explanation.

-Patrick

Avatar
Robert
7068 Posts
(Offline)
2
January 30, 2020 - 7:37 am
Avatar
galemduncan

-1 Posts
(Offline)
3
January 31, 2020 - 12:06 am

Thanks Robert. I’ve emailed him.

Perhaps the next question would be:

In view of the Diocletian persecutions and the actions of the “traditor” bishops, can we even say that the Christians didn’t use parchment for the first two centuries? In other words, isn’t it possible that they might have created parchment copies but that every last one was turned over by “traditors” in 305? 

Avatar
Robert
7068 Posts
(Offline)
4
January 31, 2020 - 10:47 am
Avatar
galemduncan

-1 Posts
(Offline)
5
February 2, 2020 - 2:13 pm

Reply from Brent Nongbri:

“The first thing to note with a question like that is that all we have to go on are the sources that survive. When we talk about actual surviving physical copies of Jewish literature from before and during the time of Jesus, we are basically talking about the Dead Sea Scrolls. There are other manuscripts that may date from that early period (for instance, the Nash papyrus), but by far the biggest corpus of material is the Dead Sea Scrolls. These are mostly animal skin (leather rather than parchment). I can’t give you the exact proportions off the top of my head, but I can check later. The point is, the Dead Sea Scrolls may be distorting our view of which medium (if any) Jews “preferred” before and during the time of Jesus. When we look to Egypt, for instance, most of the surviving material regarded as “Jewish” from this time period is on papyrus rather than animal skin.
 
Your second question is a good one. Despite what you see written in introductory textbooks and wikipedia etc., There are actually very few Christian manuscripts securely datable to any time earlier than the fourth century. We have the Dura Europos gospel harmony (on parchment) which pre-dates 256 CE and the Kestoi of Julius Africanus (on papyrus, P.Oxy. 3.412), which was copied some time ca. 227- ca. 276 CE (I discuss these in my recent book). So, we don’t really know what the preferences were as far as papyrus/parchment for the earliest Christians. “
 
Avatar
galemduncan

-1 Posts
(Offline)
6
February 4, 2020 - 12:34 pm

I asked Brent for further clarification of his statement on the materials used in creation of the Dead Sea Scrolls and he replied:

“With leather and parchment you’re looking at two different processes. Some of the prep is the same (hair removal) but then leather is tanned while parchment is not tanned but instead dried under tension and scraped. It’s not that one is more advanced than the other; it’s more a case of different purposes. You’re right that parchment is easier to write on, but it’s also more fragile. If parchment gets wet or even damp, it can quite quickly rot. But the tanning process used on leather makes it more resistant to wetness.
The exact processes that produced the writing material used for the Dead Sea Scrolls are still being studied. Different scrolls were produced in different ways, and some scrolls are occasionally described as being a kind of mixture of leather and parchment. More work is needed.”

Forum Timezone: America/Indiana/Indianapolis
All RSSShow Stats
Administrators:
BDEhrman
FreedomBen
evgendob
Robert
Top Posters:
Steefen: 7647
Stephen: 4494
Porphyry: 1835
godspell: 1827
DavidFord: 1326
brenmcg: 1184
BJH1960: 1152
Colin Milton: 1142
JAS: 948
Jarek: 936
Newest Members:
redgreen5
Deb-BertsBlog
MissHoneysuckle
LNCaldwell
ntcartwright
Jltomsik
JackIII
jim2day
mgrandy64
jeffweng
Forum Stats:
Groups: 2
Forums: 13
Topics: 2597
Posts: 45789

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 65
Members: 65746
Moderators: 0
Admins: 4
Most Users Ever Online: 3559
Currently Online: BJH1960, Jimmy
Guest(s) 59
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)