Bart Ehrman Blog Readers Forum

A A A
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Min search length: 3 characters / Max search length: 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_TopicIcon
Census in Luke's Gospel, really a Loyalty Census from 2 BCE
Avatar
sssboa

7 Posts
(Offline)
1
January 23, 2021 - 6:41 am

I read an article where a professor of history/theology from a catholic university claims:

When the text of Luke’s Gospel is carefully translated we obtain: …that census preceded the one when Quirinius governed Syria.

Quirinius was mentioned by Luke for a purpose, because he oversaw in Palestine the general census called for the entire Empire in 6 CE. That census ignited Jewish rebellion in Galilee, which precipitated creation of Zealot Party. For Jewish heritage that census became a traumatic memory, but that way it was a permanent reference point in Jewish history. And that reference point is used by Luke, but to place the birth of Jesus in the context of a census preceding the census of Quirinius. 

That earlier census was a general loyalty referendum for the whole Empire. Beginning of 2 BCE was the cumulation of several Roman and caesarian anniversaries (e.g. 25th anniversary of the Caesar’s reign). For that occasion in the whole Empire a referendum was called – with an act of loyalty and deification of the Caesar. Herod tried to use that census to deepen loyalty of his subjects. That way he stirred unrest in the kingdom, which is mentioned by Josephus Flavius: When the whole Jewish nation swore allegiance to the Caesar and the King, only they (Pharisee), and there were over 6 thousand of them, declined giving the oath (History of Israel, 17.2.4). It’s a very important testimony for historians.  

As ordered, men were obliged to travel to the place of birth and offer there a silver coin. That’s why Matthew writing his gospel for Jews, is silent about journey to Bethlehem, its circumstances and reasons. For Jews those were painful and disturbing memories. If the pious Pharisee boycotted the loyalty census, why the righteous Joseph and godly Marie did not do the same? So it was better to skip over facts that were able raise such questions. [end of quote]

Please tell me what you think about the concept that the census the holy family is going to is that loyalty event around 2 BCE. Personally I find it hard to believe. 

Avatar
Robert
7123 Posts
(Offline)
2
January 24, 2021 - 1:48 am
Forum Timezone: America/Indiana/Indianapolis
All RSSShow Stats
Administrators:
BDEhrman
FreedomBen
evgendob
Robert
Top Posters:
Steefen: 7786
Stephen: 4602
Porphyry: 1852
godspell: 1827
DavidFord: 1424
BJH1960: 1205
brenmcg: 1184
Colin Milton: 1142
JAS: 948
Jarek: 936
Newest Members:
Auntiejack56
giventerry
brokinrhythm
Thurly
dsorrent7
iam.vernon.b.rose
israelam
Abw2026
StephenJ
AnnaH
Forum Stats:
Groups: 2
Forums: 13
Topics: 2616
Posts: 46472

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 65
Members: 65923
Moderators: 0
Admins: 4
Most Users Ever Online: 3559
Currently Online: 2380, Judith, Porphyry
Guest(s) 45
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)