Bart Ehrman Blog Readers Forum

A A A
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Min search length: 3 characters / Max search length: 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_TopicIcon
The Kingdom of Righteousness vs Herod's Kingdom and Augustus's Empire
Avatar
godspell

1827 Posts
(Offline)
21
May 16, 2019 - 6:09 am

You shouldn’t quote people as authorities if you don’t believe most of what they tell you.  🙂

Avatar
Steefen
7942 Posts
(Offline)
22
May 21, 2019 - 11:52 pm

Steefen said
Jesus was wrong about Theology.
Being wrong about Theology factors into being wrong about Religion, Faith, and personal salvation.

Jesus was wrong about Politics.
Being wrong about Politics factors into being wrong about the notion of a sacred country, a sacred Constitution, values, and moral clarity.

Jesus was wrong about Justice in the context of a Kingdom of Righteousness.
Jesus celebrating Yom Kippur is not mentioned in the gospels, yet, he is a figure of atonement for sin. There is flawed justice when personal responsibility and all other influences of human behavior are not wedded to atonement, punishment, and rehabilitation.

Jesus was wrong about Human Biology and he was wrong about Religion (the Hebrew Bible), how serious the God of Moses and the Prophets was against consuming Body and Blood.
Being wrong about blood in the digestive system vs. the circulatory system is a huuuuge wrong.
As for consuming blood, the God of the Torah said He would turn his face away from someone who does that.
As for consuming a human body, the Hebrew Bible stated that happens when a people are seiged and defeated.
Therefore, Jesus’ Holy Communion is a sacrament of defeat and alienation from God.  

The Judeo Christian God needs to be right about Theology, Religion, Eschatology, Politics, Justice, Human Biology.

If one is going to subscribe to a god rolling out a universal Kingdom of Righteousness/Heaven/God, a non-violent integration into the existing political structure (Roman empire patron – Roman territory client structure) would be the way to go.

 

We cannot have a Father and Son or a Trinity that flunks these subjects.

Avatar
godspell

1827 Posts
(Offline)
23
May 22, 2019 - 6:00 am

So you’re saying we can EITHER live in an earthly realm administered by God that an itinerant rabbi imagined OR in a political system based on military conquest that was ultimately conquered by that rabbi’s ideas, and has not existed in any form since the fall of Constantinople in 1453?

Avatar
Steefen
7942 Posts
(Offline)
24
May 24, 2019 - 1:14 pm

Steefen said

Steefen said
Jesus was wrong about Theology.
Being wrong about Theology factors into being wrong about Religion, Faith, and personal salvation.

Jesus was wrong about Politics.
Being wrong about Politics factors into being wrong about the notion of a sacred country, a sacred Constitution, values, and moral clarity.

Jesus was wrong about Justice in the context of a Kingdom of Righteousness.
Jesus celebrating Yom Kippur is not mentioned in the gospels, yet, he is a figure of atonement for sin. There is flawed justice when personal responsibility and all other influences of human behavior are not wedded to atonement, punishment, and rehabilitation.

Jesus was wrong about Human Biology and he was wrong about Religion (the Hebrew Bible), how serious the God of Moses and the Prophets was against consuming Body and Blood.
Being wrong about blood in the digestive system vs. the circulatory system is a huuuuge wrong.
As for consuming blood, the God of the Torah said He would turn his face away from someone who does that.
As for consuming a human body, the Hebrew Bible stated that happens when a people are seiged and defeated.
Therefore, Jesus’ Holy Communion is a sacrament of defeat and alienation from God.  

The Judeo Christian God needs to be right about Theology, Religion, Eschatology, Politics, Justice, Human Biology.

If one is going to subscribe to a god rolling out a universal Kingdom of Righteousness/Heaven/God, a non-violent integration into the existing political structure (Roman empire patron – Roman territory client structure) would be the way to go.

 

We cannot have a Father and Son or a Trinity that flunks these subjects.  

Jeffrey Siker
Still, rather than seeing Jesus as an ontologically perfect human being, I would propose another way of approaching this troubling Jesus, a way that accepts the actual humanity of Jesus. Rather than human perfection, I would argue that Jesus provides a pattern of transgressive faithfulness that redefines both faith and sin.

Steefen
How would you strengthen your proposition with claim/s of Jesus’s transgression/s?

Avatar
godspell

1827 Posts
(Offline)
25
May 24, 2019 - 1:18 pm

You know, prescriptions can be renewed.

I’m just saying.  

Forum Timezone: America/Indiana/Indianapolis
All RSSShow Stats
Administrators:
BDEhrman
FreedomBen
evgendob
Robert
Top Posters:
Steefen: 7942
Stephen: 4750
Porphyry: 1913
godspell: 1827
DavidFord: 1594
BJH1960: 1333
brenmcg: 1184
Colin Milton: 1142
JAS: 948
Jarek: 936
Newest Members:
Xhcbsbaus
Gertrude Mary
MindoverMatter42
kevincoyote
RobertJames
Whereistheb
aeq
rodriguezwatchman
DevoraHaIvri24
mdjeg1
Forum Stats:
Groups: 2
Forums: 13
Topics: 2639
Posts: 47493

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 65
Members: 66107
Moderators: 0
Admins: 4
Most Users Ever Online: 3559
Currently Online: Judith, Robert
Guest(s) 32
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)