I am in Athens just now, heading out on a tour giving lectures on ancient Greek philosophers in relation to the teachings of Jesus and Paul. I came over a couple of days before the tour to spend some time looking around on my own, and had a lovely afternoon at the fantastic Acropolis Museum.
Every time I come to Athens I think of my first time here, for several reasons, but one in particular. It was when I was struck by a realization about the relationship of the highly cultured, sophisticated Greek world and the rise of earliest Christianity, a realization that led to my book The Triumph of Christianity. In many ways it was a sad realization. I talk about it in the Afterword of the book. This is what I said there.
******************************
The idea for this book struck me twenty years ago during my first trip to Athens. For my trip I was particularly keen to explore the archaeological wonders of the city, and most especially the Agora and the Acropolis. In the Agora can still be seen the amazingly preserved temple of Hephaistos, the old Athenian meeting place called the Metroon, the impressively reconstructed Southern Stoa, and dozens of other remains. The Acropolis is home to the glorious Temple of Athena Nike, the temple known as the Erechtheion with its six enormous female statues, the Caryatids, and of course, chiefly, the Parthenon, perhaps the most magnificent ruin of any kind to come down to us from classical antiquity. As a scholar of early Christianity, I was also intent to visit the far less frequented site that stands half way down the hill between the Acropolis and the Agora: the Areopagus. This barren rock outcropping was where the Apostle Paul allegedly delivered his famous speech to the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers upon first arriving in Athens (Acts 17).
This was during Paul’s second missionary journey. He had come to the city alone to preach about Jesus and his resurrection. Some of his original audience wanted to hear more from him. So, as requested, he ascended the Areopagus to speak to a group of philosophers. He started his speech by mentioning he had seen a large number of temples and idols in their city, but was particularly struck by an altar dedicated to “An Unknown God.”
Scholars of early Christianity have long debated how to make sense of such an altar. Possibly it was erected as a back-up measure by a group of pagans nervous not to leave any god out from their collective worship – in case there was one god who had been left unmentioned, unnamed, and unattended in the city. This altar was in that one’s honor.
Paul uses this altar to an Unknown God as a launch pad for the rest of his address. The Athenians may not know who this God is, but Paul does. He in fact is the one God over all, the ultimate divine being, the God who created the heavens and the earth. As the creator of all things he has no need for any physical representation or earthly temple. This is the God who is soon to judge the world and everyone on it through the second coming of his son Jesus, whom God had raised from the dead (Acts 17:16-31).
Paul’s words did not find a welcome acceptance on the Areopagus. It is not that the philosophers there were shocked, dismayed, or challenged. They were simply amused. Paul was relatively uneducated — in comparison to them, at least — and was speaking nonsense about a physical resurrection of the dead. Most of them mocked, though some wanted to hear more later. Paul did make one or two converts.
Today the Areopagus looks much as it did in Paul’s day. There are no buildings on it, no structures of any kind. It is a rocky crag. Its only distinctive features are a plaque embedded in the rock below, giving the text of the speech Paul delivered, and a set of slippery steps leading up to the top. Standing on the rock one can look down to see the magnificent remains of the Agora and look up to see the even more magnificent remains of the Acropolis. It is a spectacular site, not because of anything on the barren outcrop itself but because on both sides can be seen the most important vestiges of one of the most spectacular civilizations the world has ever known. Athens, the home of some of the greatest philosophers, dramatists, artists, architects, and political thinkers of classical antiquity, encapsulated in a gaze downward and upward.
While standing on the site twenty years ago I thought about Paul, his sermon, and his surroundings. Paul was a lower-class artisan and itinerant preacher. From an external, material perspective, nothing stood in his favor. He was widely maligned and mistreated, frequently beaten, sometimes within an inch of his life, and lacking any worldly power or prestige. In many ways he stood on precisely the opposite end of the spectrum from the great cultural heroes of Athens, the heart of Greek civilization.
Then the realization struck me. In the end, Paul won.
What Paul preached that day on the Areopagus eventually triumphed over everything that stood above me on the Acropolis and below me in the Agora. No one, except, probably, Paul himself, would have predicted it. The very idea would have been completely ludicrous. Yet it happened: Christianity eventually took over Western Civilization.
******************************
The reason I considered this realization sad is not because I think it was a bad thing for Christianity to become the dominant religion and culture of the west, but because in the process so much beauty and culture was lost (or destroyed): objects of art and architecture; literature; philosophy, and much more — some of the greatest accomplishments of the human race to that time, bound to disappear with the emergence of the Christian faith that, for centuries, cared little for the advances and glories of pagan Greece. I just think that’s too bad, and very much wish more had been preserved, since what we now still do have is often spectacular — as I’m reminded every time I come here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.Share Bart’s Post on These Platforms
16 Comments
Leave A Comment
It sounds like a humbling site. I was moved by your words having never seen Athens for myself. I get the feeling of being indebted to the countless who’ve lived before, and as well as those who will come after. Both past and future must always be remembered. I aim to stand with one foot in gratitude, and the other in humility. It’s not all about me, or my time. My place is to build and preserve for those who will come after.
And we still today continue to malign opposing opinions that are contrary to main stream Western thinking. I think that most of the world has lost the importance of ” Love One Another” !
So true. Love one another—even the ones we don’t like and who don’t like us. Even our enemies! I am so looking forward to Bart’s next book about the ethical teachings of Jesus. There is a higher standard that we as a whole have slipped away from.
Making me very sorry I couldn’t sign up for this voyage with you.
Like Paul, Gautama, the Buddha, also an itinerant preacher, chose an uninspiring rock output, the Vulture Peak, on which to give many of his sermons. But i wonder if you are correct to accuse Christianity of undermining Greek and Roman culture. Without Christianity and Islam, would the classical order have survived against Nordic paganism or Turkic/Mongol animism?
I don’t think it completely undermined the surrounding culture. It also took a lot from it.
Interesting thoughts. Would you say we are in danger of committing the same mistake now? Greeks abandoned cults of Zeus or Hades realising Olympus was empty and myths just good stories and switched to more abstract philosophical god… And we now abandon Christianity realising there is no creator God either but we’ll lose culture and metaphors we had and we replace it with … exactly… with what.
I don’t think it’s quite the same. Bach, Michaelangelo, and Shakespeare (deeply Christian themselves) are all massive favorites among both Christians and non-Christians.
Mr. Ehrman, if I were in Athens, I could be your personal archaeologist! Back when I was a graduate student, during the Great War, I actually remember an oral examination on the Parthenon and Areopagus (it goes without saying that I nailed it).
Maybe if you have a couple of extra days, you could pay us a visit in Skiathos, a beautiful island (full of tourists) where I’ve been living for the last 4 years. We have amazing monasteries and churches. And legend has it that Paul once visited this place too, and then wrote his last letter – “To the Skiathians”… Nah! Just thought it would be funny to pull a Morton Smith type of con 🤣
I am in the process of going through your excellent course on the genius of the book of acts and it caused me to do some web searching on the life of Paul. In the process of doing that, I ran into numerous websites suggesting that Paul wasn’t martyred in the city of Rome but actually made it to Spain and maybe even setup a church or two there. Some of the websites seem to make a decent case for this. If that was the case, then Paul could easily have died of old age and that would explain why the book of Acts never mentions a martyr’s death for Paul. As you know, verse 28 ends with Paul living in his own rented house there for two years ministering to various people. Although 2Timonthy is a Pauline forgery, it could be argued that it contains a correct tradition of Paul being killed in the city of Rome. So, I have to ask, do you think Paul made it to Spain or do you think he was killed in the city of Rome?
I suspect he never got farther than Rome. 1 Clement suggests he made it to Spain, and it was written in Rome, about 30 years after Paul owuld have died one way or another. But I veyr much doubt the author knew…. Acts seems to suggest Rome was the final stop, and if Paul made it on to Spain you might think there’d be some indication of it in his letters or Acts…
Hi Dr. Ehrman,
I can’t remember just where in the bible Paul (if indeed it was Paul and not some other apologist) answered the question: If God created all things then who created God? To me that is a rather legitimate question that philosophers and theologians have been dealing with for thousands of years. Paul as I recall answered with a petulant sounding blame the messenger argument: Does the pot asked the potter who made thee? does the beast of the field ask who is his master? and so on.
So in my opinion, Paul (or at any rate Christian and/or Jewish apologists) began the destruction of much Pagan art and literature right at that point. It also began the now common conservative Christian method of argumentation by demonizing the critics.
No one in the Bible would even think to ask it. For tehm, God has always been.
¿Profesor, cree que el episodio de Pablo predicando en el Areópago tiene plausibilidad histórica?
In english :
“Professor, do you believe the episode of Paul preaching at the Areopagus has historical plausibility?
(Juan Fra , debes escribir en ingles, puedes usar un traductor o una IA como ChatGPT o DeepSeek para ayudarte)
I”m afraid not. He was alone there, no one was recording it, Luke is writing about it decades later — I don’t htink it’s a historical event.
Thanks for this, as I read gripping each word. then “Paul was lower-class artisan & itinerant preacher. From an external, material perspective, nothing stood in his favor. ”
I never thought lower-class artisan, I thought working class but had access to the emperor as a prisoner. before the vision, I was taught he was aimed for the highest echelons of Supreme Court. But since St Paul was a lower class artisan, slightly higher in class than Jesus, who significantly would listen to him.
Yes there are the few times in the Acts when he was pleading to the judges or rulers.
Living in Shanghai, there was a huge class separation and point of residency [sects]