In my previous post I talked about two of the known Jewish sects from the days of Jesus in Palestine. The idea that there are specifically four sects comes to us from the late-first-century Jewish historian Josephus, whose many volumes of writings (e.g., on the Jewish War and on Jewish Antiquities – the latter a history of the Jewish people from biblical times up to his own day) are our principal source of information about Judaism at the time. In addition to the Pharisees and Sadducees, Josephus mentions the “Essenes” and a “Fourth Philosophy.” Here is a summary of what these groups stood for, again taken from my introductory textbook on the New Testament.
**************************
The Essenes are the one Jewish sect not mentioned in the New Testament. Ironically, they are also the group about which we are best informed. This is because the famous Dead Sea Scrolls were evidently produced by a group of Essenes who lived in a community east of Jerusalem in the wilderness area near the western shore of the Dead Sea, in a place that is today called Qumran. Although the term “Essene” never occurs in the scrolls, we know from at least one ancient authority, the Roman writer Pliny the Elder, that a community of Essenes was located in this area; moreover, the social arrangements and theological views described in the Dead Sea Scrolls correspond to what we know about the Essenes from these other accounts. Most scholars are reasonably certain, therefore, that the scrolls represent a library used by this sect, or at least by the part of it living near Qumran.
The discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls was completely serendipitous. In 1947, a shepherd boy searching for a lost goat in the barren wilderness near the northwest shore of the Dead Sea happened to toss a stone into a cave and heard it strike something. Entering the cave, he discovered an ancient earthenware jar that contained a number of old scrolls. The books were recovered by bedouin shepherds. When news of the discovery reached antiquities dealers, biblical scholars learned of the find, and a search was conducted both to find more scrolls in the surrounding caves and to retrieve those that had already been found by the bedouin, who cut some of them up to sell one piece at a time.
Some of the caves in the region yielded entire scrolls; others contained thousands of tiny scraps that are virtually impossible to piece back together, since so many of the pieces are missing. Imagine trying to do an immense jigsaw puzzle, or rather dozens of immense jigsaw puzzles, not knowing what the end product of any of them should look like, when most of the pieces are lost and those that remain are all mixed together! All in all hundreds of documents are represented, many of them only in fragments the size of postage stamps, others, perhaps a couple of dozen, in scrolls of sufficient length to give us a full idea of their contents.
Most of the scrolls are written in Hebrew, but some are in Aramaic. Different kinds of literature are represented here. There are at least partial copies of every book of the Jewish Bible, with the exception of the book of Esther, and some of them are fairly complete. These are extremely valuable because of their age; they are nearly a thousand years older than the oldest copies of the Hebrew Scriptures that we previously had. We can therefore check to see whether Jewish scribes over the intervening centuries reliably copied their texts. The short answer is that, for the most part, they did. There are also commentaries on some of the biblical books, written principally to show that the predictions of the ancient prophets had come to be fulfilled in the experiences of the Essene believers and in the history of their community. In addition, there are books that contain psalms and hymns composed by members of the community, prophecies that indicate future events that were believed to be ready to transpire in the authors’ own day, and rules for the members of the community to follow in their lives together.
Sifting through all of these books, scholars have been able to reconstruct the life and beliefs of the Essenes in considerable detail. It appears that their community at Qumran was started during the early Maccabean period, perhaps around 150 B.C.E., by pious Jews who were convinced that the Hasmoneans had usurped their authority by appointing a non-Zadokite as high priest. Believing that the Jews of Jerusalem had gone astray, this group of Essenes chose to start their own community in which they could keep the Mosaic law rigorously and maintain their own ritual purity in the wilderness. They did so fully expecting the apocalypse of the end of time to be imminent. When it came, there would be a final battle between the forces of good and evil, between the children of light and the children of darkness. The battle would climax with the triumph of God and the entry of his children into the blessed kingdom.
Some of the scrolls indicate that this kingdom would be ruled by two messiahs, one a king and the other a priest. The priestly messiah would lead the faithful in their worship of God in a purified temple, where sacrifices could again be made in accordance with God’s will. In the meantime, the true people of God needed to be removed from the impurities of this world, including the impurities prevalent in the Jewish Temple and among the rest of the Jewish people. These Essenes therefore started their own monastic-like community, with strict rules for admission and membership. A two-year initiation was required, after which, if approved, a member was to donate all of his possessions to the community fund and share the common meal with all the other members. Rigorous guidelines dictated the life of the community. Members had fixed hours for work and rest and for their meals, there were required times of fasting, and strict penalties were imposed for unseemly behavior such as interrupting one another, talking at meals, and laughing at inappropriate times.
It appears that when the Jewish war of 66–73 C.E. began the Essenes at Qumran hid some of their sacred writings before joining in the struggle. It may well be that they saw this as the final battle, preliminary to the end of time when God would establish his kingdom and send its messiahs.
The “Fourth Philosophy”
When Josephus writes about Judaism for a Roman audience, he describes each of the sects that we have discussed as a “philosophy,” by which he means a group with a distinctive and rational outlook on the world. He never gives a name to the fourth sect that he discusses but simply calls it the “fourth philosophy.” The tenets of this philosophy, however, are clear, and they were manifested in several different groups that we know about from various ancient sources. Each of these groups in its own way supported active resistance to Israel’s foreign domination.
The view that characterized these sundry groups was that Israel had a right to its own land, a right that had been granted by God himself. Anyone who usurped that right, and anyone who backed the usurper, was to be opposed, by violent means if necessary. Among those who took this line in the middle of first century were the Sicarii, a group whose name comes from the Latin word for “dagger.” These “daggermen” planned and carried out assassinations and kidnappings of high-ranking Jewish officials who were thought to be in league with the Roman authorities. Another group that subscribed to this philosophy, somewhat later in the century, were the Zealots. These were Jews who were “zealous” for the Law and who urged armed rebellion to take back the land God had promised his people. More specifically, based on what we find in Josephus, Zealots were Galilean Jews who fled to Jerusalem during the Jewish revolt around the year 67 C.E., overthrew the priestly aristocracy in the city in a bloody coup, and urged the violent opposition to the Roman legions that ultimately led to the destruction of Jerusalem and the burning of the Temple in 70 C.E.
Hmm, the Fourth Philosophy reminds me of reading Reza Aslan’s “Zealot: The Life and Times of Jesus of Nazareth.” The book was a runaway best seller, but heavily criticized by many scholars, including Bart. It’s been a few years since I read it, but from what I remember Aslan was trying to make a case that Jesus was some sort of nationalist like the Fourth Philosophy.
I had some Qs on how Jesus likely celebrated the Passover with his disciples. In Mark 14:22-26, Jesus says a “blessing” after picking up the bread, gives “thanks” after picking up the cup, and sang a “hymn” with his disciples before going to the Mount of Olives. He also said that the bread symbolized his body and the wine was his blood of the covenant.
Based on scholarly opinion about Jewish Seder practices in Jesus’s day, and assuming this meal truly was a Passover meal, what words would Jesus have likely used for the blessing and the giving of thanks? What was the likely hymn sung at the end of the meal? What was the Jewish symbolism for the bread and wine, before Jesus invested them with new meaning? I know the modern Seder has some very specific symbolism and rituals for these things, but I don’t know if scholars believe they extend all the way back to Jesus’ day.
We don’t know much about the actual ceremonies at the time. Some scholars have argued that the Great Hallel was sung then; I’m not sure if there’s solid evidence for that or not. What’s clear is that in Jesus Last Suppoer, he is taking the symbolic foods of the meal and instilling new symbolic significance in them.
Jesus as God in the New Testament, now there is Jesus as God in Archaeology.
https://youtu.be/ZMQ1V5ylF5E?si=nUfgRkTNu-zsoMrq
https://aleteia.org/2024/11/27/megiddo-mosaic-earliest-evidence-of-jesus-proclaimed-as-god
Chat GPT:
The inscription “The God-loving Akeptous has offered the table to God Jesus Christ as a memorial” is found on a stone table associated with early Christian worship, specifically in a Christian house church in Megiddo, Israel. This discovery is significant for understanding early Christian practices.
Approximate Date
The table and its inscription are dated to the third century CE, around 230–240 CE.
= = =
Steefen:
Col 2:9: For in him all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form.
I wonder if the priestly and kingly messiah was the inspiration for presenting Christ as both high priest and king in some NT books? Maybe they were trying to make a case to the Essences that Christ fulfilled both messianic roles?
My sense is that the various messianic views were held in various groups, not just among the essenes. (In part, possibly, because priests as well as prophets were “anointed”)
Just from reading the OT it seems like there was a lot of disagreement amongst the Jews- obedience to the law vs Levitical sacrifices, which holy mountain was the most sacred, views on the afterlife, canonical books, etc.
Do you think there were other prominent Jewish sects in the 1st century not mentioned by Josephus?
I’ve heard scholars argue for a post 70 dating of the Gospels because they depict a form of Judaism without the temple. But I wonder if there was a pre 70 AD sect of Judaism that focused on a return to Eden where God’s spirit would dwell on Earth without being relegated to a Temple and that the Jesus movement was a part of this already established ideology? It would make sense of some of Jesus’ teaching (ie divorce), Paul’s teaching that our body is a temple for the Holy Spirit (1 Cor 6:19), and the mission of early followers of Christ to take the message to the nations with a special focus on them receiving the Holy Spirit. Thoughts?
I would think there were other groups, yes. The Gospels all presuppose the existence of the Gospel in the days of Jesus but do appear to know the temple was destroyed. I’m not sure there’s any evidence the Gospel writers know of a non-Christian Judaism without the temple. But there were certainly Jewish groups that did not depend on thetemple for their religious views — e.g., the Essenes.
Josephus himself was general of the Jewish forces in Galilee, until surrendering in AD 67 to the Roman army led by Vespasian after the six-week siege of Yodfat, the second most bloody and the second longest battle of the revolt, surpassed only by the Siege of Jerusalem. He must therefore himself have been an adherent of the fourth philosophy. This may be to do with why he doesn’t name it. Perhaps he was traumatised by what happened and became utterly disillusioned with the fourth philosophy and hence his work for the Romans in documenting Jewish history.
Hi Bart. You say that preparation day of passover was also the first day of unleavened bread feast. Mark 14:12 also seems to say this, but if you read Leviticus chapter 23 or Exodus chapter 12, this brings contradictions. I base my logic on the idea that day would start at twilight. What’s your opinion on this ? The only choice to solve contradictions is to say that mark was using the start day as morning instead of evening. Would appreciate your inputs.
I’m not sure I said that? I did say that hte day of Preparation was the day before Passover. I’ve always found the exact connection to Unleavened Bread to be a bit confused. But yes, Mark 14:12 does seem to say explicitly that the Day of Preparation was also the first day of the Feast of Unleavened Bread.