The new semester started today. Here I am, 58 years old, and still organizing my life around semesters….
In any event, I’m teaching my regular two-course load this semester. My undergraduate class is the Introduction to the New Testament that I teach every Spring, with 240 students; my graduate seminar is a graduate level course basically about the same thing, covering (at a graduate level) the major issues in New Testament studies and the history of the discipline, all with an eye toward pedagogy (i.e., how to teach this material to undergraduates). It will have about ten students.
I’ll have more to say about each course anon. For now, here is my syllabus for the undergraduate class, for your amusement and reading pleasure.
INTRODUCTION TO THE NEW TESTAMENT
Reli 104
Spring, 2014
Instructor: Dr. Bart D. Ehrman
Teaching Assistants: Candace Buckner, Brian Coussens, Shaily Patel, Nathan Schradle
Course Description
This course is designed to help you (a) learn about the New Testament writings and the history of earliest Christianity and (b) develop certain analytical skills that are crucial for any liberal arts education (e.g., in making and evaluating persuasive arguments).
By the end of the course, you should be able to:
(1) Speak intelligently about the contents and message of each book of the New Testament;
(2) Recognize the broad similarities and wide-ranging differences among these books;
(3) Understand why interpreters differ so broadly in their interpretations of them;
(4) See how these books can be used to reconstruct what happened during the life of Jesus and the history of Christianity after his death;
(5) Evaluate other people’s interpretations of these books and their reconstructions of the historical events that they narrate;
(6) Know how to advance your own views (about history, religion, politics, or life as we know it) with greater precision and persuasiveness.
As you may have already inferred, it is not one of the goals of the class either to convert you to a particular religious point of view or to provide ammunition for your assault on the religious views of others (e.g., a pestiferous roommate). It will not, therefore, be taught from a confessional perspective.
All students will be required to understand the points of view advanced in the readings and in the lectures, along with the evidence and/or logic that makes them compelling to others. You will not be required, though, to accept these points of view for yourself. A major part of the class will be devoted to helping you think on your own and to understand why you find particular perspectives persuasive or unpersuasive — even the perspectives of your professor. In particular, all students are urged to approach the issues we address with honesty, openness, and a healthy dose of good humor.
Texts
The following texts are required. (Available in the student stores and also found on Reserve in the Undergraduate Library.)
Bart D. Ehrman, The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings. 5th edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Bart D. Ehrman, The New Testament and Other Early Christian Writings: A Reader. 2nd edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.
On-line guides to reading and instructions for position papers – essential elements for the course – are available online on Sakai.
Course Requirements
Attendance: Yes, indeed, you must grace us with your presence at all class meetings. We will occasionally pass around an attendance sheet or pop a quiz to see if you are alive and well among us; roll will regularly be taken during recitations. If you have a legitimate excuse for missing a recitation, please contact your teaching assistant.
Position Papers: Recitation sections will meet each week (as indicated in the class schedule, below) in order to discuss various aspects of the literature, history, or religion of the New Testament. To facilitate these discussions, you will be expected to prepare a two page (no more!) position paper on each assigned topic. Written instructions for each paper are included on Sakai (under Course Documents). The papers need not be a “finished and polished product.” They are designed simply to compel you to consider the issues and reflect on the problems raised by the topic before we discuss it in class. For this reason, they will not be graded per se, but simply marked “S” (= Satisfactory) if you have done the assignment adequately and “U” (= Unsatisfactory) if you have not. Please note: papers not turned in on time will automatically be marked U, no questions asked. If you cannot attend the class discussion, arrange to have someone bring your paper for you.
Debates: Three of your recitations will take the form of class debates on a controversial topic in the field (March 28; April 4; April 11). Each student will be required to participate in one of these debates, on a team arguing either the affirmative or negative side of the resolution. You will be able to indicate your preference of topic early in the semester (see the schedule below). We cannot guarantee your first choice, but will do our best. Each team will consist of 3-4 members, who will be expected to work together well in advance to prepare their case. The instructor will be happy to give some pointers and suggestions.
You will serve as a judge for the two debates in which you are not personally involved (along with all the other non-debaters) and, to heighten your competence, will be responsible for a regular position paper on the topic. For the debate you are participating in, you are to write a paper arguing for the side you are arguing against in the class debate itself (see instructions on Sakai, under Course Documents [Instructions for Position Papers]).
Exams. There will be a midterm exam based on lectures, readings, and class discussions. The exam will consist of a number of short 100-200 word identifications (terms defined in the glossary and / or taken from the reading). The final exam will consist of shorter identifications and essay questions, and will be cumulative.
Grading
Your grade will be calculated as follows: Attendance, participation, class debates, and position papers 30%, midterm exam 30%, final exam 40%.
Office Hours
The instructor’s office hour is Wed. 2:00-3:00 p.m. If this time is not convenient, please set up an appointment for another time. Office: Saunders Hall 117; Office Phone: 962-3940; Email: [email protected] The teaching assistants will indicate their office hours during your first recitation.
As to which person is best to see concerning the class…. If you want to talk about the content of the lectures, the structure of the class, or the inequities of the universe, any of us will do. If you want advice on studying for exams or writing papers, or if you want to express concerns about a grade, you should first approach your teaching assistant (since s/he will be doing the grading). If for some reason you want to go to the top, however, the boss will be happy to see you.
I will also be holding “informal” office hours every Wednesday 5:30-6:30 p.m., at the Armadillo Grill in Carrboro. This is a chance to come see me outside of the office, to talk about the class, politics, religion, social justice, ACC basketball, or reality as we know it.
CLASS SCHEDULE AND READING ASSIGNMENTS
Jan. 8 Introduction to the Course and Pop Quiz (!)
10 Recitation One: Getting Started (See assignment on Sakai, for this and all recitations)
13 What Is The New Testament? The Early Christians and Their Literature. Reading assignment: NTHI (= Bart D. Ehrman, The New Testament: A Historical Introduction) ch. 1
15 The World of Early Christian Traditions. Reading assignment: NTHI, chs. 3-4 (note: we are skipping ch. 2 for now)
17 Recitation Two: Jesus and the Other “Divine Men”
20 NO CLASS. Martin Luther King Jr.’s Birthday
22 The Traditions of Jesus in Their Greco‑Roman Context. Reading assignment: NTHI, ch. 5
24 Recitation Three: Jesus According to Mark
27 The Christian Gospels: A Literary and Historical Introduction. Reading assignment: NTHI, ch. 6; The NT and Other Early Christian Writings: A Reader, Introduction (pp. 1-6)
29 Jesus the Suffering Son of God: The Gospel According To Mark. Reading assignment: Mark 1-16 (Note: All NT passages are found in The New Testament and Other Early Christian Writings: A Reader; be sure to read the “Introduction” to each book as well); NTHI, ch. 7
31 Recitation Four: Jesus’ Resurrection in Matthew, Mark, and Luke
Feb 3 The Synoptic Problem and Its Significance for Interpretation. Reading assignment: NTHI, ch. 8
5 Jesus the Jewish Messiah: The Gospel according to Matthew. Reading assignment: Matthew 1-16; 23-28; NTHI, ch. 9
7 Recitation Five: Redaction Criticism of Luke: The Trial Before Pilate (Luke 23:1-25)
10 Jesus the Savior of the World: The Gospel according to Luke: Reading assignment: Luke 1-12; 21-24; NTHI, ch. 10
12 Luke’s Second Volume: The Acts of the Apostles; Reading assignment: Acts 1-17; NTHI, ch. 11
14 Recitation Six: Jesus, Nicodemus, and the Samaritan Woman.
17 Jesus, the Man Sent from Heaven: The Gospel according to John; Reading assignment: John 1-21; NTHI, ch. 12
19 The History of the Johannine Community; 1, 2, and 3 John; NTHI, ch. 13a (pp. 198-207)
21 Recitation Seven: The Gospel of Peter and the Synoptics
24 The Rise of Christian Gnosticism. Reading assignment: The New Testament and Other Early Christian Writings: A Reader, pp. 116-30 (i.e., The Gospels of Thomas, Peter, and Infancy Thomas); NTHI, ch. 11b (pp. 207-16)
26 The Historical Jesus: Sources, Problems, and Methods. Reading assignment: NTHI, chs. 15-16
28 Recitation Eight: The Bizarre Sayings of the Gospel of Thomas; NTHI, ch. 14
March 3 Jesus the Apocalyptic Prophet. Reading assignment: Matt 5-7; 13; Mark 12-16; NTHI, chs. 17-18
5 The Deeds of the Apocalyptic Jesus. Reading assignment: NTHI, ch. 18
7 Recitation Nine: MIDTERM EXAMS
8-16 SPRING BREAK; Hit the Beaches and Take a Book.
17 From Apocalyptic Prophet to Divine Redeemer. Reading assignment: NTHI, ch. 19-20
19 Paul: the Man, the Mission, and the Modus Operandi; Reading assignment: 1 Thessalonians 1-5; NTHI, ch. 21
21 Recitation Ten: Paul’s View of THE END
24 Pauline Ethics: the Love Commandment. Reading assignment: 1 Corinthians 1-16; NTHI, ch. 22a (pp. 339-54)
26 Pauline Ethics: Other Criteria of Behavior. Reading assignment: 2 Corinthians 1-13; Philippians 1-5; Philemon; NTHI, ch. 21b (pp. 354-71)
28 Recitation Eleven: DEBATE ONE. Resolved: The Apostle Paul’s Views of Women Were Oppressive (Reading assignment: NTHI, ch. 26)
31 The Gospel according to Paul. Reading assignment: Romans 1-16; NTHI, ch. 23
Apr 2 In the Wake of the Apostle: The Deutero-Pauline Epistles. Reading assignment: 2 Thessalonians, Ephesians; 1 Timothy; NTHI, Ch. 25a (pp. 397-410)
4 Recitation Twelve: DEBATE TWO. Resolved: Paul and Jesus Advocated Fundamentally Different Religions (Reading Assignment: NTHI, ch. 24; George Bernard Shaw essay in Sakai).
7 The Rise of Christian Anti-Semitism; Reading assignment: Hebrews 1-13; Barnabas 1-10 (in The New Testament and Other Early Christian Writings: A Reader); NTHI, ch. 27
9 Christians and Empire; Reading assignment: 1 Peter 1-5; Ignatius to the Ephesians, to the Trallians, and to the Romans; Martyrdom of Polycarp (The New Testament and Other Early Christian Writings: A Reader); NTHI, ch. 28
11 Recitation Thirteen: DEBATE THREE. Resolved: The New Testament Condemns Modern Practices of Homosexuality. (Reading assignment: essays by Dale Martin and Richard Hays on Sakai)
14 In the Wake of the Apostle: The Pastoral Epistles. Reading assignment: 1 and 2 Timothy; NTHI, ch. 23b (pp. 410-20)
16 Early Christian Heretics. Reading Assignment: 2 Peter; 1 Clement; Ignatius to the Magnesians, to the Smyrneans; and to the Philadelphians (The New Testament and Other Early Christian Writings: A Reader); NTHI, ch. 29
18 NO CLASS. School Holiday.
21 The Early Christian Apocalypses. Reading assignment: Revelation 1-22; Apocalypse of Peter (The New Testament and Other Early Christian Writings: A Reader). NTHI, ch. 30.
23 The Text of the New Testament. Reading assignment; NTHI, ch. 2 (finally, we come to ch. 2!).
25 Recitation Fourteen: Who Cares?
Makes me long to be a student again!
Me, too! There’s nothing my 9th grade history teacher would like more than to see me back in his class! Perhaps I’d pass with something better than a “D”. Maybe a D+, or something.
Me too, I’d love to be attending such a course from a non-confessional perspective. But we are very fortunate in being able to obtain the text books (they stock these in my local Blacwells bookshop in Oxford) and Bart teaches a similar course in the Great Courses, which I will do once I’ve finished my Calculus course 🙂
I bet your students rate you highly. How about sharing with us their comments on your course at the end of term feedback forms?
Some students do — but not all! This past semester was, from my perspective, the single most interesting semester teaching I’ve ever had. And the evaluations were just … normal! Go figure….
In the unlikely event that you run out of things to do, you may teach *us* a course… Like a one week course… No?
(the chances of this happening are probability outside our solar system – very remote…)
Thanks for the posts on Aslan’s book!
Interesting idea. But sounds like a lot of work! 🙁
I am almost your age very busy with large software development projects (and next week taking a intensive New Testament Greek course during annual leave, sadly NOT from a non-confessional perspective, so wondering what they’ll think when I don’t turn up to the short worship sessions before and after the class each day) and understand your comment about age above. It is amazing how much harder it gets just to keep going for hours and hours a day, despite really enjoying it.
I can tell your members have grown over the months. The number of questions on each post seem to be increasing a lot. As a suggestion to my fellow members, please limit the length of your questions. Four to six paragraphs to ask a question or state a theory? Really? You may need your own blog. Thanks to Dr. Ehrman for his time.
Bless you, my son.
Brad,
Sometimes it takes that. Prof. Eisenman says the case is made in the details (for James as Qumran R.T.). I make the case that ‘Judas’ was James, inverted. Same problem. It cannot be done persuasively in a few sentences! I still await substantial comment from Bart, or you. judaswasjames.com for details (part of them!)
Can you see the guilt and shame written all over my face?
Many thanks to Bart Ehrman, indeed!
1. Wow!
2. It really looks advanced for undergraduates.
3. I really the like the idea of having the students write a paper supporting the opposing view that they debated.
4. The issues of women and gays brings in topics of current interest. Super idea.
5. With regard to Paul, I have been reading Tabor’s book and blogs on Paul and Jesus. Do you have any comments concerning that book? If so, it might be worth a few blogs.
I’m afraid I haven’t read Tabor’s book.
Looks interesting – Do we get a chance to do the introductory quiz?
Today!
I’m glad my answers won’t count towards my final grade….
lol
I keep hearing about this amazing quiz that you give your introductory students. Is there a quick link to It? I would love to see these other questions, and see how I do.
Think I’ll repost it.
Just curious – this seems like a pretty tough course. Is it taken mostly by students who are at least considering making Religion their major? If not, is it required for any specific type of degree? Or is it an elective, not required, but chosen over some other possibilities by students who think it will give them a better-rounded education?
It’s a lower-level course, usually with First-year students and Sophomores, though some upper-class folk take it. It *is* an elective, but it fulfills a requirement in the curriculum: every student has to take a course dealing with history before 1700, and this meets that requirement.
This got me wondering about books, and you I think are uniquely suited to answer these questions.
1.When I went to university, Professors who required the use of texts they’d authored all made it clear that they donated the proceeds from our schools sales of their books to charity, though the school didn’t strictly require them too. What is your policy on that and does UNC have any ethical rules or guidelines?
2.My experience of eBooks does not seem the same as reading paper texts. I’m wondering if any of your classes have turned to electronic books yet and if so if you’ve noticed any trends in student performance you could relate to that factor.
3.Will the academic publishing industry change (survive?) as eBooks become the norm? Certainly it makes sense to not kill trees in the pursuit of the dissemination of information about disciplines that can completely change in the course of a semester (imagine being the author of a physics text last year!) Will Professors and universities take to distributing electronic versions of their texts without the expense and trouble associated with paper or is the system strong enough to bully academia at large into preserving its ways?
I have a comparable policy, but I don’t publicize it. On e-books, as it turns out, undergraduate don’t *want* them for textbooks. Publishers have tried and tried, but students, for courses, want hard copy. And so, yes, the academic publishing world is doing absolutely fine.
Wow, really? I worked at a bookstore sophomore year through graduation and people treated me like Satan himself over the cost and buyback prices and policies of books, even though I was just a foot soldier. I guess students are determined to never be happy!
This is excellent on so many levels.
I think I’m going to have to get me one of these:
The New Testament and Other Early Christian Writings: A reader.
And one of those: NTHI
When you get around to teaching Apocalypse of Peter, which one is it? Gnostic Apocalypse has a description of mystic meditation in the first dialogue section. It is a perfect description of how to perform Surat Shabd Yoga. “Hands raised [on the head], and hearing the people praising you”. Following that is a indictment of Pauline teaching (what you study). What starts it off is a paragraph that ends in the three denials BY CHRIST of Peter, the reverse of the canon — like everything else in it, a reversal of truth.
The Greek/Ethiopic one.
The gnostic one is perhaps not as sensational with walking and talking cross and all, but much more valuable. The passage right up front in it having Christ deny PETER 3 times, not the reverse, is very telling. It is in context of inner vision being denied Peter, which would be bad enough for Peter, but gospel authors had to invert it into a denial BY Peter, as if he was a coward. This alone is an indictment of the historicity of the canon, as what purpose would it serve the gnostics to diss one of their own? The Christ denial tradition *preceded* the canon.
Then, right after the denial, is the dialogue section with a description of how to meditate. Hands raised — on the head! — I do this myself, Bart. You cover eyes and right ear (think ‘Malchus’) to hear and see within. Following that is the castigation of the Pauline church, and the “evil cunning man with a manifold dogma, and they will be ruled without law”. One, two, three punch right out of the gate with the amazing Apocalypse of Peter.
http://gnosis.org/naghamm/apopet.html
Sant Mat, Nag Hammadi and Gospel of Judas all have parallels to this. I can tell you all about them. “Apophasis” Logos, Region never called by any name, five kings slain (Joshua 10, gJudas) as desires … much more …
Bart, I can tie all these traditions together. I want so much to show it all to you, if you will only let me.
The gnostic Apocalypse of Peter (paragraph one – Christ denies Peter 3 times, and the dialogue on meditation)
http://gnosis.org/naghamm/apopet.html
I have established a base for the remnant whom I have summoned to knowledge. Therefore be strong until the imitation of righteousness – of him who had summoned you, having summoned you to know him in a way which is worth doing because of the rejection which happened to him, and the sinews of his hands and his feet, and the crowning by those of the middle region, and the body of his radiance which they bring in hope of service because of a reward of honor – as he was about to reprove you three times in this night.”
And as he was saying these things, I saw the priests and the people running up to us with stones, as if they would kill us; and I was afraid that we were going to die.
And he said to me, “Peter, I have told you many times that they are blind ones who have no guide. If you want to know their blindness, put your hands upon (your) eyes – your robe – and say what you see.”
But when I had done it, I did not see anything. I said “No one sees (this way).”
Again he told me, “Do it again.”
And there came in me fear with joy, for I saw a new light greater than the light of day. Then it came down upon the Savior. And I told him about those things which I saw.
And he said to me again, “Lift up your hands and listen to what the priests and the people are saying.”
And I listened to the priests as they sat with the scribes. The multitudes were shouting with their voice.
When he heard these things from me he said to me, “Prick up your ears and listen to the things they are saying.”
And I listened again, “As you sit, they are praising you”.
____________________
“As you sit” is meditation! The “robe” is the ‘covering’ of the eyes, hands are placed over them to exclude outside light. They are involved also in “hearing what the people are saying” (the Word, or Sound, Apophasis Logos) because the right thumb is placed over the ear (born of the spirit, John 3:8), same as Malchus has his *right* ear ‘cut’ by the sword of the disciple’s spirit, in symbolic initiation. This is Mysticism (‘Gnosticism’).
Bart
Have you ever thought about videoing your lectures and offering this as a correspondence course?
Nope! There would be contractual issues, since I have courses that I’ve done on all these topics with the Teaching Company (also known as The Great Courses).
I would love to take a class like this one. I graduated from college 40+ years ago and live in Costa Rica, so a live class isn’t feasible. Here’s what I have done in lieu of that:
– Ordered your book “The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings”, 5th edition.
– Purchased your 24-lecture course “New Testament” from Great Courses:
– Downloaded all materials from Dale B. Martin’s “Introduction to the New Testament History and Literature” and have accessed all 26 of those free “Yale Open Courses” video lectures at http://oyc.yale.edu/religious-studies/rlst-152. His course uses your NTHI text.
Question: Without going into the details of exactly what I want, does using this combination of resources seem reasonable to you?
Thanks.
It’s a terrific combination — it should give you exactly what you’re looking for, I should think.