I began this short thread with a discussion of the Gospel of Mary Magdalene, where she seems to be Jesus’ preferred follower; I then talked about the idea that there were women apostles in the earliest period of the church – according to Paul himself – and pointed out an old tradition that in fact Mary was the very first apostle.
I want to pick up there, and show how not just in the Gospel of Mary but in other parts of the early Christian tradition Mary and Peter were sometimes portrayed in controversy over who was Number One!
Here is how I discuss it in my book Peter, Paul, and Mary Magdalene.
********************************
As I’ve intimated, this view that Mary was the original apostle – the one commissioned to tell the good news of Christ’s resurrection – is found already in the books of the New Testament. In the Gospel of Mark, it is Mary Magdalene along with Mary the mother of James and Salome who come to the tomb on the third day, learn from a young man there that Jesus has been raised, and are told then to go tell the disciples. In this account, it is true, they say nothing to anyone “for they were afraid” (Mark 16:8). And there is no word here of Christ himself appearing to these women (or to the other disciples, for that matter). But in the later account of Matthew, Mary along with “the other Mary” not only learn of Jesus’ resurrection from an angel at the tomb, they are also instructed to tell the others. Jesus himself appears to the women and commissions them to “tell my brothers (i.e., the men disciples) to go to Galilee; and they will see me there” (Matthew 28:11). We are not explicitly told that the women did what they were told, but we do learn that the disciples made a trip to Galilee and that Jesus appeared to them there – so one can assume that the women fulfilled their commission.
It is in the last New Testament Gospel to be written, John, that Mary herself is singled out as the first to see Jesus raised from the dead. According to this account, Mary comes alone to the tomb, finds it empty, and goes to tell Peter and the “beloved disciple.” They race each other to the tomb to see that Jesus’ body is not there. When they return to their homes, Mary is left outside the tomb, and Jesus suddenly appears to her. She mistakes him for the gardener, and asks where he has taken the body. But then he calls her by name, “Mary.” And she recognizes him: “Rabbouni” (which means “Teacher.” Note: she does not call him “Hubby!”) Jesus commissions her to tell the disciples that he is about to ascend to heaven, and she does as she is told.
Here Mary is the first to be commissioned to proclaim the resurrection. In this account, at least, Mary is the first apostle. It is striking that in other traditions that we have, it is not Mary but Peter who is the first to see Jesus alive after his crucifixion. This is the case, for example, in the Gospel of Luke, where there is no mention of Jesus appearing to the women at the tomb, but several stories of his appearing to his men followers. The first appearance is to Peter, as the disciples proclaim, “He has appeared to Simon” (Luke 24:36). But even here, before Jesus appears to anyone, it is the women – Mary Magdalene along with Joanna, Mary the mother of James, and several other women – who discover the empty tomb and inform the disciples. Somewhat typically, one might think, the men dismiss the women’s account as an “idle story.” It is not until Jesus himself shows up that they believe.
Even more striking is the earliest account of Jesus’ resurrection that we have, found not in the writings of the Gospels but in a letter of Paul, some fifteen or twenty years before the Gospels were composed. In his first letter to the Corinthians, Paul reminds his converts of the message that he had originally delivered to them when trying to persuade them to join him in his faith in Christ:
For I delivered over to you as of first importance what I in turn received, that Christ died in accordance with the Scriptures, and that he was buried; and that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures, and that he appeared to Cephas, then to the Twelve. Then he appeared to more than five hundred brothers at one time…. Then he appeared to James, and then to all the apostles. Last of all, as to a miscarriage, he appeared to me.
It is interesting that Paul never mentions the women discovering the empty tomb. In fact, he never mentions the empty tomb. Or the women at all. Any women. He instead refers to the appearances of Jesus after his death. And all the appearances are to men (unless one wants to argue that the “five hundred brothers” included “brothers and sisters”; but if that’s what Paul meant, at least it is not what he said).
Some scholars have thought that Paul recounted only the stories of Christ’s appearances he knew about. This would mean that the stories about the women at the tomb were not in broad circulation. Others have pointed out that Paul is giving evidence for the Christian claims about Christ. The evidence that he died is that he was buried; and the evidence that he was raised is that he appeared alive afterwards. But since the point is evidence, it is sometimes argued, Paul has restricted himself to naming the men that Christ appeared to, since the testimony of women would not be admissible in a Jewish court.
This may be right, but it’s hard to know. What is clear is that there were two competing traditions in early Christianity. In one set of traditions, Christ first appeared to Mary Magdalene (and possibly other women); in the other he first appeared to Peter (and possibly other men). One of the reasons this is interesting is that we have repeatedly seen through our discussion of Mary that there is a steady stream of stories that show her in competition with Peter. Or at least that show Peter constantly becoming upset by the high status she is given by Christ. And so, in the Pistis Sophia, Peter complains that Mary gets to do all the talking. In the Gospel of Thomas Peter asks that Mary leave Jesus and the disciples, “for women are not worthy of life.” And in the Gospel of Mary, Peter argues, in typically hotheaded fashion, that Mary’s revelation cannot have come from Christ, who would not have revealed his secrets privately to a woman rather than publicly to the men. This contest between Peter and Mary seems to go back to our earliest traditions – some of which claim that he was the first to see Jesus raised from the dead, and others that give the nod to her.
I would’ve assumed Jesus shew favouritism for Peter because of the fact he was one of the twelve to judge the 12 tribes of Israel no? It was also symbolic in this regard was it not?
Maybe I’m looking to hard for a coincidence
I’m not sure. The other 11 also would be judges so it wouldn’t show why Peter in particular was singled out.
Is Mary Magdalene of any importance in Acts of the Apostles? Does she receive the Holy Spirit?
No she doesn’t appear there.
Prof Erhman,
In the 1 Corinthians passage you quoted, it says that ‘[Christ] appeared to Cephas, then to the Twelve’. Did Paul not think that Cephas was one of the Twelve, or did he mean ‘appeared to Cephas, then to [other members of] the Twelve’?
Also, what’s the significance (if any) behind the canonical gospels’ accounts of Jesus not being recognised by his disciples after his resurrection? For instance, Mary Magdalene mistaking Jesus for a gardener, and the two disciples on Emmaeus road. Did they believe that the risen Jesus looked different from his earlier form?
It’s usually thought that he meant Cephas and then to all the others and Cephas together.
The function of Mary Magdalene in these stories is as a new Eve, or as the original Eve only with new insight into sacred mysteries.
Why did Mary Magdalene call Jesus “Rabbuni”?
Because The Old Snake had tempted Eve to eat of the Tree of Knowledge, which in turn led to the Fall.
But in this very moment, Jesus stood before Eve as the true teacher of truth and could give her the Right Knowledge.
Jesus was now ready to give Eve the true knowledge to save both her and all mankind.
Why did Mary Magdalene call the gardener Lord?
Mary Magdalene called the gardener Lord because the “gardener” in this context would be Adam, and because of what God had told Eve when they left Paradise:
Genesis 3:16 “He(Adam) shall rule over you(Eve)!”
In other words: Adam shall be your Lord, Eve.
‘Lord’ can mean “God.” It can also mean “master,” “teacher,” “husband,” “boss” and other things. Here it means something like “master,” with an obvious double entendre.
Thank you for your reply, and stay safe from Covid.
Why is Jesus so impersonal when he addresses Mary and simply says, “Woman, why are you crying?”
Why did he not address her in a slightly more personal tone: “Mary, why are you crying?”
The answer lies in Genesis 3, where God always addresses Eve as the “woman”.
Genesis 3:13 Then the Lord God said to the woman, «What is this that you have done?» The woman said, «The serpent deceived me, and I ate.»
Genesis 3:16 To the woman he said, «I will surely multiply your pain in childbearing;
God does not speak to Eve personally, but to women in general. That is why Jesus also addresses Mary Magdalene in this way.
In light of this, logion 114 from the Gospel of Thomas also becomes both understandable and acceptable.
114: Simon Peter says to them: “Let Mary go out from our midst, for WOMAN are not worthy of life!” Jesus says: “See, I will draw her so as to make her male so that she also may become a living spirit like you males. For every woman who has become male will enter the Kingdom of heaven.”
It is about the temptation the first woman did not resist. But there is hope for her too, says Jesus.
While Paul speaks of appearance according to his own experience, in fact, he also saw the risen Christ, the other tradition would stress its attention to a much more material “appearance.” And this gets worst later in John:
“Then he said to Thomas, -Put your finger here; see my hands. Reach out your hand and put it into my side. Stop doubting and believe.-” (John 20:27)
“Then Jesus told him, -Because you have seen me, you have believed; blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed.-” (John 20:29)
Even if the same Greek word was used, (I don’t know that, since I only know Greek food,) the meaning would be dramatically different.
Therefore any comparison is out of bounds.
With the traditions of the visions of Jesus being raised from the dead, is it your thought that the empty tomb was added to the story since it is more likely that Jesus was put in a common grave?
So therefore, be it Mary, Peter, John, Paul or whoever that had a vision of Jesus raised from the dead, the vision was not at an empty tomb.
Yes, my view is that Jesus did not receive a decent burial at all, but was probably just tossed into a pit or an anonymous ditch that was quickly dug.
Maybe the reason that Mary is given such prominence is that she was in fact the first person to have visions of a risen Jesus. It was suppressed for a time when the male disciples reassert their primacy in all things Jesus. Considering Paul’s support for women having a leadership role in the Jesus movement, I am thinking that he would have mentioned Mary as an eye witness to Jesus’ resurrection if he was aware of it so it was likely that he was not. But then Mary’s role in planting the seed of the idea of Jesus’ resurrection was revived when the gospels started circulating. The gospels gained enough acceptance so that entrenched Mary’s prominence in the Jesus movement alongside Peter. Any thoughts on my speculation? BTW as a historian do you sometimes get frustrated that you don’t have a time machine to go back to the moment when the Jesus movement began so that you could question everyone and get the facts straight on what happened?
Yup, that’s pretty much my view too. And yup, I often think about that time machine thing….
Bart, I commented on your previous post on Mary, but my comments are still “awaiting moderation”.
So, Mary Magdalene is given a smaller role in our earliest sources, Paul and Mark, than in the later gospels. Could this be because, while she was still alive, the Christians needed to give her a low profile to protect her and her benefactions? She funded the movement (Luke 8:1-3) and a persecutor like Saul (Paul), who arrested women as well as men (Acts 9:2), would surely have put an end to that supply of funds if he had learned about it. The twelve had to protect their donors, or give up their preaching and return to their previous jobs.
A similar example of protective silence concerns Mary of Bethany, another wealthy donor. She was famous in the early church (Mark 14:9; John 11:2) but is conspicuously anonymous in our earliest gospels, but is named in John.
Really? I think I’ve approved everything…. I’ll check.
Since both Mary and Peter were favorites of Jesus, isn’t it odd that we have no well-known stories of Jesus serving as peacemaker between them before his death?
I’m not sure Mary was particularly a favorite of Jesus. During his entire ministry, in all four Gospels, she’s mentioned in only one passage (Luke 8:1-3), and there it is in company of two other women (she’s not singled out as being closer to him than the others).
Hi Dr. Ehrman;
On another topic……. today I’ve been doing some research on ‘writing’ particularly as it relates to the Gospel authors most particularly Luke. I can’t seem to find your response to these questions….
– If Luke (not a disciple) was a Physician, shouldn’t he have been able to read and write?
– The same with Mark, not a disciple of Jesus but a companion of Paul. Paul certainly could read and write so what makes you think Mark could not?
1. Not necessarily, no. But if he were a doctor today we would hope he could! 2. If every companion of every literate person was literate, then no one in the ancient world would be illiterate. The odds are that mark could not read and write because he was a Jew from Israel and literacy rates were very low there and then, probably less thatn 5%. And we don’t know of any Jews in Israel from that time who were composing works in Greek. Literally none.
I think Paul was more liberal toward women in the church than those that followed him, who tragically forged the Pastoral Epistles in his name, and I’d like to think Jesus was also that liberal but the Gospels are clear that he had 12 male disciples closest to him, no women. Any chance the idea of 12 male disciples is a later embellishment and that Jesus had close female disciples, too? Or is Jesus like the Buddha and Mohammed in thinking only men should be in charge? And yet pagan religions often featured female gods and prophetesses. Were the pagans ahead of the curve?
Some were. And some were very much behind it….
Actually, I was quite fond of Peter, Paul and Mary – going back to the 1960’s.
Mary being a ‘witness’ to Christ’s resurrection is not the same as Mary being in the Ministry. I have counted 172 itinerant preachers in the NT, none called Mary. Gospels of Mary, gospels of Thomas don’t count – they were considered fraudulent when they were written.
Some of the writings that were canonized were thought by many at the time to be fraudulent and more are thought to be fraudulent today
Hi Dr. Ehrman,
Here’s a theory; Magdala was a town on Lake Gennesaret, wasn’t it? Maybe Mary came along when Peter and the rest began to follow Jesus. Maybe she knew them or worked with them. Surely women helped work with the fisherman, not on the boats but mending nets and preparing the fish. If they knew each other, maybe that was why there is a tradition of rivalry between them.
(BTW, we used your textbook Introduction to the New Testament in a class I took. I really enjoyed and still use it for researching sermons and writings)
Dr. Ehrman one more so others can see? Has anyone come up to with this? For fun? Since I’m a platinum member?
(114) Simon Peter said to him, “Let Mary leave us, for women are not worthy of life.”
Jesus said, “I myself shall lead her in order to make her male, so that she too may become a living spirit resembling you males. For every woman who will make herself male will enter the kingdom of heaven.”
Peter to Mary
For
Not Life
Jesus
Myself
Her To Male
She Become Spirit
Males
Woman
Make Will
Kingdom
Kingdom will make woman males
Spirit become She
Male
To her
Myself
Jesus
Life not
For Mary to Peter
“It is kind of like a letter for Peter to Mary and for Mary to Peter”.
It is Jesus saying myself. Or someone telling Jesus, myself.
People with knowledge knows what it is to be male back then.
It says the kingdom makes
It says she becomes spirit and spirit becomes she.
It is always Jesus said,
Mine are backwards
What are your thoughts on Elizabeth Schrader’s theory that the sisters of Lazarus, Mary and Martha, in Gospel of John may have originally been Mary Magdalene and are there other theories for volatility of the names Mary and Martha in that portion of John? Μαρία, Μάρθα, does it even make ones iota of difference?
Is there any chance you might have Elizabeth Schrader on your podcast? I’d love to see that.
As you may know, she was my student (she just finished her PhD; I was on her committee). I’m not convinced by that particular argument. (Apart from that: Nice joke about the iota!)
In the next edition of the Journal of Textual Criticism there will be an article giving an alternative to Schrader’s Martha theory.
Interesting. Who wrote it?
I did.