Sorting by

×
Skip to content
Engaging Discussions about Early Christianity
  • All
    Generic filters
  • Join Now!
  • Login
  • Account
The Bart Ehrman Blog Logo The Bart Ehrman Blog Logo The Bart Ehrman Blog Logo
  • Join!
  • Recent Posts
  • Forum
  • About Blog
    • Overview
    • Charities We Support
  • About Bart
    • About Dr. Bart Ehrman
    • Question for Bart?
    • Facebook Page
    • Bart’s Main Website
    • Speaking Schedule
    • Bart’s Books
    • Great Courses
    • YouTube Channel
    • Twitter Feed
  • Help
    • Support FAQ
    • Contact Support
2 votes, average: 4.50 out of 52 votes, average: 4.50 out of 52 votes, average: 4.50 out of 52 votes, average: 4.50 out of 52 votes, average: 4.50 out of 5 (2 votes, average: 4.50 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this.
Loading...

Question on Mistakes in Ancient Sources

May 15, 2012

BDEhrman2020-04-03T19:43:15-04:00May 15th, 2012|Reader’s Questions|

Share Bart’s Post on These Platforms

FacebookXRedditLinkedInTumblrPinterestEmail
Click for the Previous Post Click for the Next Post

6 Comments

  1. Mikail78 May 16, 2012 at 2:38 amLog in to Reply

    Hey Bart, two days ago, I had a Christian apologist attempt to make the argument that the statements in the gospels about how many angels and/or men at the empty tomb really are not contradictions (two of the canonical gospels say there were two angels and/or men at the tomb, and the other two canonical gospels say there was one man and/or angel at the tomb). He tried to explain this contradiction away by saying that if there were two angels/men at the empty tomb, then there had to be at least one angel/man at the empty tomb, therefore there is no contradiction!

    Now, Bart, I’m certainly not very smart and I realize how stupid I am every day. But even and idiot like me could tell this guy’s explanation was full of you know what.

    The lengths that the faithful will go to preserve the inerrancy of their “holy books” can be quite amazing.

    • BDEhrman May 16, 2012 at 10:13 pmLog in to Reply

      Yes, that is a standard explanation: if there were two angels, then Luke confused them as being two men, Matthew mentions one angel (without denying that there was a second), and Mark mentions one man (confusing the angel for a man and not mentioning the second one). The length to which some interpreters will go to avoid discrepancies! (Ask him, next time you see him, how he explains whether the disciples go to Galilee to see Jesus –as Matthew explicitly narrates — or whether they did not go anywhere but stayed in Jerusalem until after the ascension –as Luke explicitly states)

  2. AdamPanacci May 16, 2012 at 12:44 pmLog in to Reply

    This is not a question, just a comment. I’ve found that many who hold that the Bible is inerrent suggest that holding otherwise involves merely arbitrarily picking and choosing from the Bible what one wants to believe and discarding what one doesn’t like. However, in one of your books (Jesus: Apocalyptic Prophet, I think) you show the historical criteria scholars use to “critically examine these sources to ferret out the information that can be accepted as historically reliable and to determine, to some degree at least, which stories are apocryphal, legendary, and exaggerated.” Yes, it is not a perfect system that produces perfect results (as there continues to be much debate!), but it is nonetheless a helpful one.

  3. fergmcb May 16, 2012 at 1:51 pmLog in to Reply

    Even if your uncle had participated in the battle of bulge, your mother would be unlikely to call him for corroboration before sharing one his stories with your niece. Imagine how much harder it would be for someone writing in, say, Rome to track down the beloved disciple to proof-read his Gospel even if the thought had occurred to him – or her in the case of “Luke” 😉

  4. wawawa May 15, 2020 at 1:36 pmLog in to Reply

    OFF TOPICS:
    Dr. Ehrman:
    Are your familiar with Edmond Bordeaux Szekely writings ?
    Is he credible?
    Thanks

    • BDEhrman May 17, 2020 at 11:01 amLog in to Reply

      I”m afraid I’m not.

Leave A Comment Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Posts

  • The Pastoral Epistles of 2 Timothy and Titus in a Nutshell June 15, 2025
  • The Pastoral Epistle of 1 Timothy in a Nutshell June 14, 2025
  • In the Weeds with the Author of 2 Thessalonians June 12, 2025
  • 2 Thessalonians, The Modern State of Israel, World War III, and the Return of Jesus June 11, 2025
  • 2 Thessalonians: For Further Reading June 10, 2025
  • Time to Vote: Help Choose the Next Platinum Post! June 9, 2025
  • 2 Thessalonians: Who Wrote It, When, and Why? June 8, 2025
  • 2 Thessalonians in a Nutshell June 7, 2025
  • Interesting Questions from Readers (5/27/2025) June 5, 2025
  • 1 Thessalonians and the Coming Rapture June 4, 2025
  • 1 Thessalonians. For Further Reading June 3, 2025
  • 1 Thessalonians: Who, When, and Why June 1, 2025
  • 1 Thessalonians in a Nutshell May 31, 2025
  • June 2025 Gold Q&A May 30, 2025
  • Interesting Questions from Readers May 29, 2025

Categories

Archives

Full Blog List Archive

Click Here for all Posts in a List Format

Stripe Credit Card Donation

No Account Required

Credit and Debit Cards Processed: Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, AmericanExpress, Diners Club, JCB, UnionPay, ApplePay, and GooglePay.

Processing ...

Paypal Donations

Since April 2012, this blog has raised over $1,000,000 for charity. You can help too! Any one-time donation to the Bart Ehrman Foundation helps conquer hunger and homelessness. The optional form on the right allows recurring donations! Please Note: These free will donations are not counted toward membership fees.

Paypal Recurring Donations

Schedule recurring donations to Bart's foundation using the form below.
Copyright 2021 The Bart Ehrman Blog   |  By Artios Media  |  Privacy & GDRP  |  WCAG 2.1 Compliant  |  
The Bart Ehrman Blog is a service of the BART EHRMAN FOUNDATION, a 501(c)(3). Donations are tax-deductible.
FacebookXYouTubeRssLinkedIn
Page load link
Comment Rules

  • Each blog member is allowed to make 2 comments a day.
  • Comments posted must be limited to 200 words or less.
  • All comments will be moderated by the post author before release.
  • Please post respectful comments even when you have strong opinions.
  • Please keep your comments relevant to the issues discussed in the post.
  • If you would like to ask a question, simply ask it in your comment.
  • Please ask only one question per comment posted.

Go to Top