In addition to my nutshell summaries of each book of the New Testament, I have been providing a post that gives additional materials I present in my New Testament textbook. These are (a) rapid fire summaries of each book that I call “At a Glance” and (b) a set of study questions that challenge students to take a position on key aspects of the book, that I call “Take a Stand.”
Here they are now for the book of Acts. I hope the summary “at a glance” makes sense, and that you can nail the questions.
BOX 17.8 The Book of Acts
- The book of Acts is the second of a two-volume work by the author of Luke. Like the first volume, it is dedicated to an otherwise unknown “Theophilus.”
- These books have been traditionally ascribed to Luke, the traveling companion of Paul; there are, however, reasons to suspect this tradition.
- Like the Gospel of Luke, the book was probably written around 80–85 c.e.
- A thematic approach to the book reveals several prominent themes:
- The Jewish origins of Christianity, its fulfillment of the Jewish Scriptures, and its continuity with Judaism.
- The portrayal of Jesus as a Jewish prophet, rejected by his own people.
- The consequent movement of the religion from the Jews to the Gentiles and a concomitant geographical shift from the holy city of Jerusalem to the ends of the earth.
- The proclamation to Jew and Gentile alike of salvation through the repentance of sins and the forgiveness of God, with Gentiles who accept this offer of salvation not needing to adopt the ways of Judaism.
- The delay of the time of the end to make this Christian mission a possibility.
- The “rightness” of this religion in both the divine sense (it came from God in fulfillment of the Scriptures) and the human one (it did nothing to violate Jewish custom or imperial law).
- The complete unity and harmony of the church as guided by the apostles, who agree on every issue and resolve every problem through the direction of the Spirit.
- Ultimately, the hand of God directing the course of Christian history behind the scenes, from Jesus’ own life and death to the life and ministry of the apostles he left behind.
TAKE A STAND
- List five similarities that strike you as interesting between Peter (in Acts 1–12) and Paul (in Acts 13–28). What similar things do they do, say, and experience? Is that simply coincidence, or do you think Luke is going out of his way to make their missions reflect each other? If the latter, why is he doing that?
- Suppose we did not have any information about Paul other than what can be found in the book of Acts. What does he say to non-Christians to get them to convert?
- Suppose you wanted to sum up the major points that Luke is trying to make about the spread of Christianity in the book of Acts. What would you say?
You must be logged in to post a comment.Share Bart’s Post on These Platforms
6 Comments
Leave A Comment
On the first question
Both raised someone from the dead:
Peter at Joppa (9:36-43)
Paul at Troas (20:7-12)
They gave the Spirit through the laying on of hands:
Peter at Samaria (8:14-17)
Paul at Ephesus (19:1-6)
Paul’s vision (chapter 9)
Peter’s vision (chapter 10)
Peter’s imprisonment (chapter 12)
Paul’s imprisonment (chapter 16)
Peter’s speech (chapter 2)
Paul’s speech (chapter 13)
Peter healed a cripple (3:3-10)
Paul healed a cripple (14:8-10)
Healed by Peter’s shadow (5:15)
Healed by Paul’s garment (19:11-12)
Hi Wayne
In relation to Peter’s and Paul’s imprisonments, there are also notable parallels in the narratives that are worth highlighting:
Both heroes were condemned in order to please the populace (Acts 12:3–4; Acts 16:22).
God was prayed to (Acts 12:5; Acts 16:25).
Both heroes were freed from their chains through divine intervention (Acts 12:7; Acts 16:26).
There is also a significant difference in how the stories unfold —a difference with clear theological implications:
The Jewish authorities continued the persecution.
All the Jewish soldiers who guarded Peter were executed.
(Acts 12:19)
The Roman authorities stopped the persecution.
The Gentile jailer was saved by Paul and then converted along with “all who were in his house” (thus receiving eternal life).
(Acts 16:33-39)
Finally, it is interesting to contrast this with what happened to Jesus:
He was condemned in order to please the populace (Luke 23:18).
God was prayed to (Luke 22:40–41).
He was executed, but raised by God.
I have been searching in the Bible wondering about the word, “Blessing”. I see many times when the translated word relates to spiritual gifts which is something different than what I am hearing today as some people speak of having the comforts of life as Gods way of showing favor to them over other people.
Yes, I suppose it depends on what a person is looking for to be “blessed” by God. These days, it is often expressed in crassly material terms. It was in antiquity too, but often in the New Testamnet it refers to what will happen when the current order is destroyed and God brings in a good kingdom, where there will be peace and goodness, and no need for materialistic competition.
Ah good eye!!
80 to 85 composition date seems implausible to me given Luke’s evident redactions and additions. Also seems pretty plausible Acts and Luke knew Josephus. Also some evident anti-Marcion content.