I continue now with the lecture I gave on “forgery” in the ancient world, delivered at a conference in Quebec a couple of weeks ago.  I had planned for this to be the last post, but I will have one more after this, the conclusion of my lecture where I deal with the ancient ethics of lying.  In this one I talk about a brilliant recent attempt to argue that it was not (always) a deceitful practice to claim to be a famous person when writing a work in antiquity.



One of the most recent erudite and impressive attempts to defend at least one group of ancient pseudepigraphers comes in the study I mentioned earlier by Irene Peirano, a classicist at Yale, in her published Harvard dissertation, The Rhetoric of the Roman Fake: Latin Pseudepigrapha in Context.   Most of this important book provides detailed analyses of highly literary Roman pseudepigrapha, including pseudo-Virgil.  But she begins with a defense of her view that such works do not involve intentional deceptions but self-conscious “imitations” of the alleged author’s own work, neither meant nor received by informed readers as attempts at deceit.

Peirano’s study focuses on …

The rest of this post is for blog members only.  If you are not yet one of the Chosen Few, you can, in fact, choose to be one.  Join up!  Cost is incredibly reasonable, benefit is fantastic.  Significant cost-benefit analysis.  And since all the money goes to charity … why not?