why did paul say that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of god? did he think that it was unholy material? would he have been okay with the belief that yhwh existed as flesh and blood ? since luke has the post ressurected jesus eat fish and then fly off to the heavens, was luke in disagreement with pauls ?
orthodox christians say that they worship 1 person who is fully human and fully god, so then wouldnt this imply that in gods kingdom the 1 person of the son is currently having humanly feelings/pleasures of heaven via human nature communicated to his 1 person?
it seems orthodox christianity is contrary to paul aswell.
“While I would not look to Luke to interpret Paul, I don’t think his account directly contradicts Paul’s idea. The resurrected Jesus in Luke is indeed “flesh and bone,” but he is also rather spiritual and magical, definitely transformed, and incorruptible living in heaven with God.”
thats a good point. i read luke again and i didnt see in his text where he described post ressurected jesus with wounds.
BDEhrman
FreedomBen
evgendob
Robert
1 Guest(s)