
I’m currently reading John Collins The Apocalyptic Imagination and have just come across The Similitudes of Enoch for the 1st time.
I guess I have always assumed that salvation by faith was a Pauline invention. But if the Similitudes were written around the same period, this could suggest there was something in the zeitgeist.
So my question is, do we know anything about how righteousness by cultic practice became transformed into righteousness by faith?

Allow me to expand a little.
Here is a short section from Collins on The Similitudes of Enoch:
Righteousness is rather an attitude of rejecting this world and having faith in the Lord of Spirits and the Son of Man. Faith here involves both belief in the existence of the Lord of Spirits and the Son of Man, and trust and dependence on them for salvation. We should note that the Similitudes do not explicitly refer to keeping the law or distinguish between Jew and Gentile.
If we assume a dating of the similitudes of mid 1st century CE, then we’re talking about a very similar period to Paul. I am intrigued by how recognisable the concept of righteousness through belief here is to Pauline theology.
So, exploring the idea that righteousness by faith was not a purely Pauline invention… where did the idea come from? At some point in history one of the ancient religions must have shifted focus from cultic practice to become more faith based. I would be sceptical that this was just a phenomena in Jewish apocalyptic thinking.
As a complete lay person, my main research tool is goggle… so…

Dougiebarker said
I’m currently reading John Collins The Apocalyptic Imagination and have just come across The Similitudes of Enoch for the 1st time.I guess I have always assumed that salvation by faith was a Pauline invention. But if the Similitudes were written around the same period, this could suggest there was something in the zeitgeist.
So my question is, do we know anything about how righteousness by cultic practice became transformed into righteousness by faith?
I’m becoming convinced that nothing Paul taught was original.
BDEhrman
FreedomBen
evgendob
Robert
