Okay, the “angels” / the “fallen angels” weren’t just non-physical. They were physical: therefore, extraterrestrial, @Stephen.
Read the history of the conquest of Peru.
dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.nLE2OF3eURklAk7MJQVg0yR4LQoItKyIH6Ku12Fm9FiwbbzUlGEuGMJ5FVNG3yveR5FnzxmJd9ysVLZdLxutk4zlTIWtRgf–dvNlg0_qaN6lrWEolD_EBsJA9wuka9946eaJjtQE1-gPYJskU01bjnKk1He_m-e0FiX9InNHECgOsakBUHZV0_x2wbyve4DxictBW0EIxaW-s2AUOCykRTzEHX72zyNQXEx05MLgOk.UW1ImzaxnmONbhaFvcdcBBye_hDuiR2rZNh3jS1NZBQ&dib_tag=se&keywords=the+conquest+of+peru&qid=1755983344&sprefix=%2Caps%2C109&sr=8-2
dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.nLE2OF3eURklAk7MJQVg0yR4LQoItKyIH6Ku12Fm9FiwbbzUlGEuGMJ5FVNG3yveR5FnzxmJd9ysVLZdLxutk4zlTIWtRgf–dvNlg0_qaN6lrWEolD_EBsJA9wuka9946eaJjtQE1-gPYJskU01bjnKk1He_m-e0FiX9InNHECgOsakBUHZV0_x2wbyve4DxictBW0EIxaW-s2AUOCykRTzEHX72zyNQXEx05MLgOk.UW1ImzaxnmONbhaFvcdcBBye_hDuiR2rZNh3jS1NZBQ&dib_tag=se&keywords=the+conquest+of+peru&qid=1755983378&sprefix=%2Caps%2C109&sr=8-1
Well, apprarently, Powell the Darwin proponent was wrong about Isolationism in Ahthropology.
“The Red Hair Giants came from over the sea.”
The giants came to North America with the Phoenicians.
The person Clayton of Redacted interviewed was Timothy Alberino, author of
Birthright: The Coming Posthuman apocalypse and the usurpation of Adam’s dominion on planet earth.
“Alberino’s insights into the biblical narrative will shatter your paradigm!”
Message to self: that is how you can do the new cover of Historical Accuracy:
Historical Accuracy
of the Bible
Steve Campbell
1
Jesus is Decius Mundus who sacrificed himself for the world (Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews 18.3.4)
referencing Decius Mus, the son who sacrificed himself for victory, 295 BCE (History of Rome, Books 8-10 by Livy)
2
The biblical God does not evidence creating and ruling across all advanced civilizations .
3
Jesus is a composite character of historical and theological hero fiction.
= = = = =
Steefen:
Apparently, the fallen angels and the Nephilim were an advanced civilization.
So, God was over those physical extraterrestrials.
= = = = = = = = = = = =
dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.M52fL8LS3pEA3nkQOzLqGTdjvabuj9GgKkuCUM7AOVD9c4SI9InqH-LRDwBQeIjPbq25FxkN0gJLJbzhh3UESspECKRol8V8oxAnBsao0bnj_Yii7R7hvb9qtzpGQG4vPhcvIifxr_uKgeaUy6c4_YNOFoHYlGphePyJ5YaFI9gUsP6NWuss3HCzqwz7Uy6-KjFqIRNFgLtHE-qpUt05Wi0CAsz0BNV9nXIraRp6HI0.M6VTb3FJq_ilhqIfQjZH2wC5khlKIHoTx-EqraD_IrY&dib_tag=se&keywords=timothy+alberino+books&qid=1755984161&sprefix=Timothy+Alb%2Caps%2C128&sr=8-2
= = = = = = = = = = = =
Birthright by Timothy Alberino
2,719 ratings averaging 4.8 out of 5 stars
Timothy Alberino
Known as the modern-day Indiana Jones, Timothy Alberino is a consummate explorer. His inquisitive mind and insatiable appetite for adventure have led him all over the planet in search of lost cities, lost civilizations, hidden treasures, and legendary creatures. He is also an avid researcher and published author whose scholarly pursuits are as daring as his expeditions. After years of rigorous study, Alberino has garnered an expansive knowledge base that enables him to dissertate with authority on a wide variety of esoteric topics, including theories on alternative history; ancient mythologies, megalithic architecture; giants, Bigfoot, and other cryptids; UFOs and alien abduction; transhumanism and emerging technologies; occult conspiracy; and Christian eschatology. He currently resides in Montana with his wife Jasmine and their five boys.
517 ratings averaging 4.8 stars
Question:
The Anunnaki appear to be giants in art of Ancient Sumer.
They are the same height as giants, 10 to 15 feet tall.
With the giants being Nephilim, were the Anunnaki the Nephilim?
Timothy Alberino treats the Anunnaki and Nephilim as distinct traditions:
Anunnaki: Mesopotamian gods—divine but not human-like hybrids.
Nephilim: Human-divine hybrid giants from Hebrew and Enochian traditions.
Alberino doesn’t merge them; rather, he sees the Nephilim narrative (via Enoch) as revealing a lost, antediluvian history that may metaphorically echo across cultures—but he’s less focused on Sumerian myth directly connecting to the Nephilim story.
= = =
Steve Campbell, Biblical Criticism / New Testament Criticism author
is beginning to think the Synoptics were re-writes of Enoch I theology.
Just as Livesey believes there was a Marcion school that produced the Pauline Letters,
there was a school that produced the Synoptic gospels. The Son of Man is a re-write of Enoch I.
Slavic Enoch, Enoch II written before AD 70.
So, you’re saying Mark, Matthew, and Luke had copies of at least Enoch 1 if not Enoch II as they wrote the Synoptic Gospels. Well, that’s greater than the Q Hypothesis.
cc: Gnostic Informant MythVision Podcast Bart D. Ehrman History Valley [via Facebook] from FB Page: The Greatest Bible Study in Historical Accuracy
Anu → cosmic giant (30+ ft).
Enlil / Enki → towering gods (15–30 ft).
Lamassu → guardian giants (15–20 ft).
Enkidu / Gilgamesh → giant-like men (12–15 ft).
= = = = = = = =
Why These Heights Fit With Global Giant Traditions
Peru (Nazca, Paracas, etc.): Reports of skeletons between 12–15 ft, often linked with elongated skulls and royal burials.
Sardinia: Hundreds of accounts of skeletons 9–12 ft, tied to Nuragic megalith builders.
Afghanistan: The Kandahar giant incident (reported by soldiers) describes a humanoid around 12–15 ft.
North America: Mound builder skeletons (Smithsonian reports from the 1800s) often in the 8–12 ft range.
These ranges line up with Enkidu/Gilgamesh and the Lamassu scale, whereas the upper-tier gods (Anu, Enlil) belong in the titanic 20–40 ft category.
Support from Scholarship
James Charlesworth, Loren Stuckenbruck, George Nickelsburg, Darrell Hannah and others have argued that the Son of Man in the Gospels draws heavily from Enoch.
The Dead Sea Scrolls confirm the Enochic writings were treasured by some Jewish sects in the Second Temple period.
The Parables of Enoch (1 Enoch 37–71) and 2 Enoch both predate or overlap the Synoptics.
= = = =
Steefen:
What ??? What parables of Enoch overlap the parables of Jesus?
Answer:
Judgment separation parables → Wheat & Tares, Sheep & Goats (Matthew 13, 25).
Afterlife divisions → Rich Man & Lazarus (Luke 16).
Heavenly books/treasure → Luke 10:20, Matt 6:20.
Banquet imagery → Wedding Feast parables (Matt 22; Luke 14).
Son of Man enthroned → Mark 13; Matt 24–25.
Summary of Overlaps showing what I’m beginning to believe is right ! ! !
The Parables of Enoch are not simple agrarian parables like “the sower” but rather apocalyptic parables/visions. Still, the overlap with Jesus’ parables is unmistakable: both use imagery of banquets, separation of righteous and wicked, afterlife divisions, heavenly books, and the Son of Man enthroned in judgment.
= = = =
Well if I’m putting in the Cicero material into the second edition of Historical Accuracy, I have to put in the Parables of Enoch material.
I think this is more important than gospel writers sharing themes with Cicero.
We’re all in agreement?
Yes.
Comment 27
This complete edition of the Book of Enoch includes all three versions bearing the name of the fabled pre-Flood patriarch: 1 Enoch (R. H. Charles, 1917), 2 Enoch (W. R. Morfill, 1896), and 3 Enoch (Hugo Odeberg, 1928). A scholarly introduction of the texts, as well as extensive commentary on the Book of the Watchers (1 Enoch 1-36), is supplied by acclaimed author Timothy Alberino, whose unique insights into the Enochian tale will enrich (and challenge) your paradigm of the antediluvian world. The incredible events recorded in 1 Enoch are vividly brought to life in a series of conceptual scenes accompanied by full-color illustrations.
Sorry @Robert, you have to make connections of facts.
Like I said, like a newspaper editor, things come across my desk and I have to make editorial decisions to share them or not.
Your days of calling my posts bizarre are over.
Use your brain. What does it mean to you so people can have a discussion as opposed to you and your gang disparaging me.
There is one source of demons?
I doubt it.
Does the Holy Bible and Enoch I&II call the Nephilim and their children space aliens?
Spirit guides are not fallen angels.
Spirit guides are not demons.
Robert’s patience is indeed astounding. But Steefen, so is the way you deal with even simple questions, politely framed. I would expect someone who thinks of themselves as an argument specialist to actually make arguments instead of statements that are to be accepted as fact, and if questioned on these, either moves on to something else or goes on to attack the person’s reading level or suggest they start using their brain.
I’d be happy to be corrected, but it certainly appears your preference is to engage in monologues, not dialogues.
BDEhrman
FreedomBen
evgendob
Robert
1 Guest(s)