I would like some ideas for making this blog better. Do you have any?
As you know, the blog really has two functions. On one hand, the idea behind it is to disseminate as widely as possible the views, perspectives, evidence, arguments, and conclusions of scholars who devote their lives to the study of the New Testament and the history of early Christianity.
As the disseminator-of-such-things-in-chief, I think we are doing a pretty good job with that. The blog covers lots and lots of topics: the historical Jesus; the New Testament Gospels; the life, theology, and writings of Paul; the other writings of the New Testament; the Apostolic Fathers; the early Christian apocrypha (books that did not make it into the New Tesament); the formation of the Christian canon; heresy and orthodoxy in early Christianity; persecution and martyrdom of Christians; early Jewish Christian relations; the conversion and life of Constantine; and … and lots of other things. We basically cover everything that I know anything about, and the only things we don’t cover are (a) topics of no relevance to the area of Christianity in Antiquity and (b) topics I don’t know anything about. OK, so there are a lot of the latter, but there’s only one of me.
I continue to post 5-6 times a week, at about 1000 words (slightly more usually) a post. That’s a lot of content. People comment on the posts and I post the comments after reading them. The only comments I don’t post are ones (a) that are completely irrelevant to the purposes of the blog; (b) that are offensive or mean-spirited and lacking, generally, in etiquette; and (c) that are proselytizing, promoting personal religious views in order to convince and convert others. When I get asked questions on comments (which happens ten or fifteen times a day, I suppose) I try to answer them. Usually my answers are direct and to the point rather than expansive. I wish I had more time!
For comments that require extensive treatment there is another regular feature of the blog, the Weekly Readers’ Mailbag. Virtually every week I handle two or three (sometimes just one) question at relatively greater length. On occasion, a question leads me to start a new thread.
Another feature I’ve started is to re-post a post from years past. I do this maybe once every two weeks or so. The assumption is that most blog members will not have read the post, or if they did, say three or four years ago, they won’t remember it. I never remember it myself, and I actually wrote the thing!
In addition, I post audio and video posts, lectures or interviews I’ve done.
All the posts are available to paying members of the blog. Once a week or so I will make an open post, available to everyone, member or not. This is mainly meant to entice people into joining, showing them what they could get 5-6 times a week simply by shelling out a bit of dosh. It’s not much dosh – about fifty cents a week, or a dime a post. Pretty good value I should think.
So the blog has developed significantly over the years and I think that it fills its first major function really well. This function is intimately connected to the second function, the one that is of most importance to me and the one that I am most concerned about. That is to raise money for charity.
Even though I enjoy disseminating knowledge about the New Testament and the history of early Christianity simply for the sake of doing so, I would not be doing so if it did not involve fund-raising for causes I am concerned about, principally supporting charities that deal with poverty, hunger, and homelessness. It simply takes too much of my time, energy, and resources! But it’s worth it for the sake of the charities.
On that front, we have done amazing work over the past four and a half years. For the first four years, we grew and grew, and raised more and more money each year, from relatively modest beginnings in 2012. In 2015 we raised $120,000 for charity. Amazing.
But now we are no longer raising more. In fact we are raising less. We are not raising hugely (bigly?) less, but somewhat less. But I want the blog to grow! Hence my concerns.
I would like to ask you for three things.
- First, I would like any ideas you have that would make the blog better and more attractive to potential members. I welcome all ideas! Let me have them.
- Second, I would like any ideas you have for raising more funds, any ways to increase the amounts we bring in. (Ways of “monetizing” what we have available here, or what I myself can do in connection with it)
- Third, I’d like to encourage you to make a donation to the blog on top of your membership fees. Many of you simply cannot do so, and I completely understand. I appreciate very much that you have sacrificed some hard earned cash to join in the first place! May your tribe increase! Others of you can make a small donation. Yet others can make a large one. Possibly you can make a very large one. All donations, small and large, are welcome and encouraged and received with real thanks and appreciation. The donation you make provides encouragement to me to keep the whole enterprise going, and even more important goes directly to charities helping those in need.
If you want to speak to me directly about making a donation, simply zap me an email (no need to post your questions or concerns or issues to everyone on the blog, unless you want to). But if you have suggestions for improving the blog or for using it to raise funds, go ahead and just make a comment here. I appreciate all the comments I get.
And I appreciate your joining me on this venture. I’m hoping we can blast out the year in style!
I just want to say that I’ve been glad, lately, that you *are* still posting long Comments. I hope you won’t change that.
I believe recurring is correct–
http://grammarist.com/usage/recur-reoccur/
Yes, of course it is. But that *isn’t* what’s showing up on the bottom of the page! It’s misspelled as “reccuring.”
Got it! Thanks.
Syllabi for courses? Reading lists? How about discussions on the study of religion in general to understand how the study of christianity fits in?
I understand this means more work, or probably hiring. With or without I’m hooked.
Hi Bart
The quality of the blog might be an issue when it comes to retaining members but I don’t think it’s the issue for recruiting new ones. Simply put, the blog is a steal for anyone who is open minded and interested in the subject so I’m guessing the problem is publicity.
A lot of people interested in the New Testament end up watching Yale course with Dr Dale Martin on YouTube so I would recommend some form of cooperation with him. If you post something with him where you promote the blog it would likely turn up as a suggested video for people watching the course.
Anyway, that’s my two cent on the issue (or whatever the expression is)
Good idea. This is how we found out about the blog even though we watch almost everything Dr. Ehrman posts and prints.
Hi Bart
So far as the blog goes, no changes are necessary for me: it is great just as it is and my fear is that any changes will not be for the better. My other interest in this area is the Old Testament from a historical perspective but I suspect that this is outside your field of expertise (although I am sure that you will know more about it than most of us).
Turning to your charity question: a while back you asked for additional donations, which I, and I am sure many others, responded to. If that did not work as well as you had hoped it will not be because members were unaware of your plea. Also, members probably have their own pet charities which will take up some of their time and money. That leaves expanding the membership: I have suggested incentives previously, such as a discount on a book of yours etc. either for the member recruiter and/or for the new member. I have approached my friends but, alas, I am the only one of my social circle sufficiently interested in the New Testament period of history to spend time reading and occasionally commenting on blog posts.
Dr. Ehrman, alas, it seems the best way to get more members would be to get more contraversial. Human beings are animals and we always like a good fight. But I know you take your role as a scholar and an academic very seriously, so I can’t see you heading more in the Richard Carrier or Bill O’Reilly direction.
If you were to come to me in my daytime job as a multi-media consultant, I would advise you to get your blogs linked in as many online aggregators as possible. (Aggregators are websites that specialize in pulling in content from all over the Internet and sharing it on one convenient website. Most aggregators specialize in specific type of content, such as news, politics, entertainment, images and memes, fitness, gaming, etc. Examples of aggregators would be Reddit, Imgur, Metafilter, etc.) Many news sites, such as the Huffington Post are blog aggregators, where outside experts and bloggers can contribute to or link to their personal blogs.
So, if you’re serious about blowing up your blog, my expert advice to you would be the following:
1. Research those websites that you find acceptable to promote your blog (i.e. make sure they don’t promote views or content that you find objectionable). One place I would definitely start is Patheos.com, which actually specializes in blogs about religion and spirituality. I would also contact the religion editors of well-respected news sites, such as Huffington Post, New York Times, Washington Post, etc. etc. Believe me when I say the religion section editors of those news outlets would bend over backwards to work with you.
2. Once you’ve contacted those outside outlets, offer to let them post one of your “open to everyone” blogs once, twice, three times, four times a month. It’s up to you. (Personally, I would recommend twice a month, so if you so choose you can increase it to once a week or reduce it to once a month without a drastic change.) Now, here’s the thing. Those blog posts, the one you send out to everyone, that one has to be really, really, really juicy. Because that’s what the big guys want. They want juicy content. I don’t mean necessarily contraversial or salacious. I mean, it’s stuff that could otherwise be newsworthy. For example, if you wrote a blog critical of Reza Aslan’s book (back when it was a NYT bestseller), that would most definitely have been newsworthy (“Author of ‘Misquoting Jesus’ Critical of Aslan’s New York Times Bestseller “). That’s a perfect example of a “newsworthy” blog post. So you give them the juicy newsworthy blog in order to get clicks for the aggregator, and the rest of your everyday blogs are the stuff you usually write about.
3. So you have the attention of the aggregators and their readers, what do you do now? You use that opportunity to promote your daily blog, of course, to pull in more members. Add in a line like: “If you want more from Dr. Bart Ehrman, become a member of his daily blog! Only such and such dollars a year.” And so on. You’re just getting your foot in the door with the free, twice monthly juicy blog. The purpose is to make more people aware of the regular blog and to draw them into becoming members.
4. So you’re probably thinking “that’s a lot of work”. Well, it is. But trust me when I say if you put in the work (or, more advisable, hire a publicist to do the work for you), your memberships will SKYROCKET. Just think for a second that a guy like Aslan probably knows, at best, 5% of what you know about the history of Christianity, but I’d bet your blog has, at most, 5% of the readers that Aslan has for his online articles and blogs. There’s no reason you can’t steal some of his readers. It’s just a matter of letting them know you’re here.
On point 4. Yes I am!!!
LOL! Well, if you are ever inclined, you know the option is there.
I nominate talmoore for Blog Publicist.
What you say about controversy makes sense. As it is now, Bart’s blog is a one-man show. It can use some new blood, but the format is not conducive to allowing others to introduce other points of view. Bart is the only one who can introduce new threads and new topics. It is not clear whether he would welcome other contributors.
For reasons that should not need explaining, I was giving a lot to certain political causes over the past year.
That did not work out as planned. Understatement of the Millennium.
Once I’ve made up some ground, financially speaking, I would be honored to contribute to this blog, on top of my membership fee.
Improvements to the blog–I like the improvements that were made from the last time you asked for suggestions. One thing that might be more user friendly is to have the most recent posts show up at the top rather than the bottom. The current posts only show at the top when I’m under the mobile function. Otherwise, it always begins with Greco Roman Religions.
Raising money–Maybe take donations or member sign-ups directly through Facebook. I think some people have said that PayPal isn’t available in some countries? FB does charge a fee. I believe they send you the funds once it reaches a hundred dollars. Something like that.
How about a debate on the blog? Charge a special price for viewing it or making comments/asking questions about it. You could even set it with a donation goal to be reached at a specific time. If the goal is reached, the pledge for donations is taken out at the time to begin the debate.
Is it possible to include photos in the blog- of archaeological sites connected to what you are discussing?
For more revenue, would you consider signing copies of your new books and charge a fee for your charities- this would work better with in-person book signings, otherwise you must deal with postage.
Starting with 2017 perhaps bump up the blog cost to $30 or $35.
I’m often interested in the difference of opinions from both conservative and liberal scholars on a particular issue. Sometimes you will say ‘Most critical scholars think x’, and there are times I would also like to hear what bible believing scholars think, and why.
This is an excellent blog. One possible suggestion of mine to maybe attract some more readers is a “news” section discussing archaeological discoveries and excavations regarding early Christianity and other Biblical scholarship, if there isn’t one already ? Much of the areas which need to be fully excavated for research have not been, and currently can’t be, due to geopolitical concerns in the Levant (e.g. the Temple grounds in Jerusalem, the area of the Jordan river valley in Jordan, the Golan Heights, etc.), but some are being excavated.
I’m wondering…do you usually get some new members for the Blog when one of your books comes out? This next book, in particular, may be “different” enough to attract people who haven’t read your previous ones!
I looked at “Jesus before the Gospels,” and saw that you gave a great plug for the Blog – but, perhaps necessarily, in a part of the book some readers might skip. Would there be any way to plug it in a more prominent place?
I’ve never figured out a way to track it!
Dr. E-have your IT guy look into whether this plug-in is compatible with your version of WordPress if you’re really interested in user stats: https://wordpress.org/plugins/wp-statistics/
Have exchanges, dialogues, and debates on the blog with other scholars over various points of disagreement.
For example, invite on NT Wright. Have him on to debate on the nature and meaning of apocalyptic literature and verses in the New Testament (e.g. Wright believes in a literal return of Jesus in the future, but he argues most New Testament verses that have been thought to refer to the “second coming” have been misattributed. He argues most of the apocalyptic verses should be understood metaphorically, as theological language that often isn’t referring to a literal second coming or literal stars from the sky, but to political events in the near future of the writer). Having him on to spar with you over several posts would be a treat!
I’ve tried lots and lots of times to get others to post on the blog for me, and almost *never* will anyone do it. Too much effort for them!
If I may prof, but I believe this is one of the hurdles we must traverse to increase your readership, perhaps.
From my perspective, the level of intellectual rigour on this blog has set the bar somewhat high for intellectual engagement. I continue to search high and low for something similar to your blog without success.
To post an entry here would demand excellence, which, for you, may demand some effort, but is doable in one hour’s sitting. But, for someone who may have a different point of view, knowing that this audience here has been well-schooled, educated, and critical, perhaps this would be a demanding task.
For instance, imagine that I held a PhD in New Testament and Early Christianity, and through my research I disagree that Mark’s (or was it Mathew’s) gospel portrays an adoptionist christology. How shall I begin to blog my understandings amidst these Ehrmanian acolytes?
Mind you, I believe many, if not all, of us would appreciate an alternative view steeped in intellectual rigour.
I will take your question to be rhetorical! Thanks for the kind words.
Speaking from the world of Webtech, the usual path towards expanding a blog is to invite other writers to contribute. I for one would love to read some other perspectives from NT scholars whom you respect and trust, even (or perhaps especially!) when they don’t completely agree with you. 😉
Perhaps you could lure in a few guest posts one month and see how it goes…
I’ve tried lots and lots of times to get others to post on the blog for me, and almost *never* will anyone do it. Too much effort for them!
“I’ve tried lots and lots of times to get others to post on the blog for me, and almost *never* will anyone do it. Too much effort for them!”
Um, wow! Seriously?! Effort is working 12-16-24 hours at a time, out in the elements, like digging ditches to fix busted pipes or restoring mass outages of electricity and water for the public. Effort is putting your life on the line time and time again because a drug addict decides to be combative by hitting, kicking, biting, punching, stabbing, or shooting you. Or the effort put forth by those trying to save someone who’s teetering between life and death. Posting for a blog, on an occasion or two when asked, is not that much effort. If that’s the way they feel about it, then, maybe I can’t put forth the effort to buy any more of their books.
Well, “effort” comes in many packages. For most people, coming up with a post they would be happy with would take two or three hours, and almost everyone I know is incredibly time-challenged!
Okay, well, what about asking a newer scholar who may need some exposure for their career?
Yeah, tried that a bunch too!
I get that time is an issue. It is for all of us though. If my phone doesn’t have at least 20 *important* emails waiting on me, or buzzing because I need to deal with *emergency* calls about the latest curriculum, and text after text after text, then it isn’t a day. If I’m not continually dealing with these things, then my phone is dead, my computer is dead, or I’m dead.
It’s not even about blogging so much as it is helping another person. If they can’t do that, then they are literally *wasting* their time.
There are occasions that some of the members of the blog here post some very interesting and astute comments. One wonders if they could muster a primary blog piece on occasion? These folks may not be at the level of standing as academic peer to you, but given you’ve not been able to get those folks to contribute…
Personally I find your dismissal of Jesus as not likely having any association with the Essenes as being an inadequate dismissal. I’d personally love to see someone that could dive into that subject in earnestness, credibility of effort, and a passion to make a case. (Josephus ranks them as the 3rd most significant sect of Jews in 1st century Palestine and they seemingly get no mention in the New Testament? I don’t really think so…)
Interesting idea. I wonder how I could choose one or two without seeming to slight others….
Essenes: OK, sounds like I need to devote a couple of posts to this to explain the logic!
The only other thing I can think of is that maybe another scholar would be willing to share a post from their own blog and let you post it to this one. If you didn’t want to scour the internet for relevant posts, then have a couple of volunteers do that for you. I’d be willing to help with that, and maybe several others too.
Interesting idea.
I like Rogers idea too. Patheos has some excellent bloggers who may be willing to post (or share their post) on your behalf. They’re not scholars, but they appear to blog professionally and have different channels: evangelical, unfundamentalism, progressive Christian, atheism, Buddhism, etc…
Of course, this would only be occasionally right? 🙂
Hi.
I like Greg’s idea. Is there a way one can post a paper in PDF format and have it discussed in the forum?
I’m not sure. Are you thinking of a paper one of you writes?
Yes.
Hello Bart,
I have just finished reading your last book, Jesus Before the Gospels. Your study of how memory works is very interesting. I have been working on the disciples’ memory problem in Mark. Right after the second collective meal, Jesus has an encounter with some Pharisees who come asking for a sign. He disregards them and leaves by boat to the other side of the lake. He then warns the disciples about the yeast of the Pharisees. What comes next is perhaps the most difficult text in the Gospel of Mark. In that text, we are told that the disciples had a dual problem: They could not understand and they could not remember.
The fact that the memory problem is mentioned in the text sounds very modern. I am working on a paper on this topic. It might be interesting if I could upload a formatted version of the paper that can be downloaded and printed.
Good luck with your article! I’ll check to see if we can download an article on the Forum.
I really enjoy and have learned lot from this blog; both your posts and others’ comments are well thought out and written.
I would recommend you open it to occasional guests posts, maybe once a month or every other month, the guests could be for instance other scholars or a graduate student of your choosing.
There is no way this blog can be better than it already is. Period.
Yeah, am thinking Bart has hit the point of diminishing returns per any additional effort. He’s already gone way beyond most blogs that exist in respect to what this blog offers.
I would appreciate a periodic overview of principle ideas contained in each theme such as what was completed about Mythicists. I’m trying hard to keep up and organize complex and frankly new ideas. Also, I think for new people who aren’t familiar with radical scholarship (and I do mean radical in the contrast with commonly held fundamentalist teachings), posting over and over gain an overview of your foundation concepts … including overviews of your main NY Times best sellers. As a newbie (i feel at times I’m still treading water 🙂 it would help me put the pieces together. For example, it seems to me chronologically that Misquoting Jesus came after Apocalyptic Jesus because Jesus was crucified and later Christians had to rationalize why this happened and still fulfill something of Jewish prophecy given that his death didn’t fit the Jewish expectation of a Messiah? (Am I correct? This is a question)
Yes, chronologically what I deal with in Jesus: Apocalyptic Prophet is prior to what I deal with in Misquoting Jesus.
Thank you Dr. Ehrman .. it just didn’t understand this and am only recently better grasping the chronology. It’s kind of a jigsaw puzzle or a tree with many branches.
Bart, I stand ready to pay a higher membership fee, and made a modest donation this morning. … Just read on the web that charitable donations by non-corporate individuals drop off at least 2% during a presidential election year.
Bless you. May your tribe increase!
Your membership fee is quite low, considering the amount of work that goes into this site. While I wouldn’t recommend raising it, since that would make it less accessible to a lot of people, perhaps you could make your current fee a minimum and at least give the option (and maybe gentle encouragement) for higher contributions while people are registering and/or renewing. I’m sure at least some people would be honourable enough to give a little more if the suggestion was right there in front of them, they knew where the money was going, and they could afford it. Sending people an email once a year at renewal time suggesting another donation is an additional possibility. I don’t think those two little hints would be nagging people overly much about money.
Say, I’m being picky, but I find myself looking at the bottom of the screen right now. Will you *ever* correct the misspelling of the word “recurring”? It makes the Blog look unprofessional!
I don’t see what you’re seeing. Are you seeing the word “recurring” or some other word?
??Ohhh yeah… you’re right! It’s been a work in progress. I brought it up when it was still “reocuring.” That evolved into reoccuring…now reccuring. I call that *close enough.* It’s a quirky thing like–Greco Roman Religions. Greco Roman Religions is my arch nemesis….
One thing that might be worth keeping in mind is that extra donations is hard to motivate for people outside America. If you live in a country less wealthy than USA (most countries) it is more reasonable to give money to poor people in other places where poverty is due to lack of money or lack of democracy.
Yup, I completely understand!
There is a service/program called MyChange that allows purchasers anywhere who use credit cads to round up the purchase to the next whole dollar and have the rounded-up amount contributed to the charity of their choice. All this would require of you is to sign up for the program and promote it prominently on your website and raise extra money for the charities the site supports. MyChange describes itself this way:
From the MyChange website:
MyChange was born to give busy, forward-thinking people the simplest way to feel good by doing good. First, the app is everywhere you go: on your phone and on the web. Second, it’s a breeze to use: Just sign up, choose the organizations or campaigns you want to support, and set a total monthly donation limit. That’s it. The app does the rest, RoundingUp your transactions to the nearest dollar, and splitting the change among the causes you select.
https://www.mychange.com/discover
Interesting. Thanks.
Some blog members might not make extra donations because coming up with an extra lump sum might put them off. But if a bunch of people had $2/month each sent to your non-profit that would almost double their annual contribution.
Also, any of us on Facebook could ask our Facebook friends to look into your blog, even if the percentage of people who are that interested in the subjects you cover is very small.
I would suggest a premium membership that gives the member a personal detailed response a couple of times a year. I’m new to the blog and find it very interesting. I have several of The Great Courses lectures, read a few of your books and watched many of Utube debates and interviews yet I know I don’t know as much as I want to and don’t know how to get there. Maybe there is an online option for an up charge to access to educational guidance / materials. When you do live debates subscribers can access live streaming and you take questions from them? How about sending email updates of what the raised funds are used for a few times a year and an option to contribute additional amount. I like “adopting” financial support of a few kids in Cambodia. We get emails including a few photos. Keeps us involved and we see the results of the children growing up and being educated. How about a yearly campaign marathon blog like a telethon. Maybe you could get some guests to join you for that. You split proceeds to charities of choice.
Bart – I have been a blog member for about 3 months and enjoy it quite a bit. Other than some technical website improvements, I have no suggestions. Regarding the fee, I for one would have no issue with charging more. As an example, I give Wikipedia $50/year and I log into your blog more often than I do Wikipedia. Regarding just sending you more as a donation, I (like you, it seems) donate to local charities, food banks, etc. where I know the line between my donation and the people for whom it is intended is the shortest. Thanks again, and the merriest of holidays to you and yours!
It’s great the way it is, especially the way you keep it scholarly, but here are some things I would be interested in:
1. Informal reviews and recommendations of other books in your field, both new and from the past.
2. Exploration of more and better ways to disseminate, among the general (Christian) public, the results of critical scholarship.
3. Careful consideration of “what the ‘historical’ Jesus would/might do” in relation to specific contemporary issues. This might encourage more donations.
4. Differences among critical scholars on specific issues and questions.
5. I think people who are seriously questioning their Christian beliefs and/or have changed them are especially attracted to the blog. That could increase membership. Discussions of your own transformation and reader responses must be especially interesting to such people. Perhaps discussion of recent books and public figures who have gone through similar experiences would be interesting too. But I doubt that you want to proselytize as opposed to giving people things to think about – and I agree.
6. Commentary on contemporary developments in “Christian atheism”?
7. Most responses to a blog – both those of readers and your responses to readers – show up shortly after you post a blog – usually before your next posting. However, it’s not clear to me that that there’s an easy way to identify later responses without going through the earlier ones.
Might some of your graduate students be interested in getting some experience communicating to a lay audience by summarizing some of their findings from their theses and dissertations? This would allow you to expand the content domain a bit and your effort would be reduced from writing the posts to serving as editor of the posts. In addition, the author could have the task of making a first review of the comments that are submitted in response to the post and you could be consulted if something seemed controversial.
Lastly, I have really liked the tradition that started a few years back of people donating a membership to be given to those who are interested in the blog but don’t have the resources. I hope you will do this again this year as a way of expanding your base and getting some additional donations before the end of the year.
I’ve tried several times with my grad students — to no avail!! They are too busy trying to get their own work done…
This is a great blog and I have no suggestions. It is a real blessing for those of us who have found no other place to learn such things. To tell you the truth, I now find it hard to find the time to read entire books so this daily blog is just the right fit for me. I would also encourage readers of the blog to work through the 60 or so Ehrman youtube videos.
A Thanksgiving Quote from the singer James Taylor about the gratitude question of whom to thank: “To whom we give it is a big question but just go ahead on and do it. Gratitude is the way to an improved attitude, dude.”
(in Sunday’s “News and Observer.” )
My wife and I donate monthly to charities thru her work and they match up to $1,000 per year. If you can find someone or some charity that will match funds dollar for dollar, you just doubled the donation amount.
Interesting idea!
My old company also provided this benefit; I think they matched 100% of a donation (with a cap) to a non-profit of the employee’s choice. Could be worth looking into/promoting.
Go continue my previous post, I just entered ‘charties that will match contributions’ in a search engine and they are out there. What about the university, would they match? Many companies will match because it is a benefit for them come tax time as well.
I think you have an excellent blog and also significantly, the comment sections are very good. To raise more money, one thing you could try is to sell tickets to a “Dinner with Bart” event similar to Warren Buffet. Probably couldn’t get the $100,000 per seat he commands, but I’d imagine there may be a number of readers who’d gladly pay $400 – $800 (or more) a head to dine in a small group with you! Just a thought 🙂
Very interesting idea! Maybe I’ll try it!
Bart – I was going to suggest the same thing (“dinner with Bart”). I, for one, would be very interested in that if you come to NYC, and I know others who might be as well (depending on cost, of course). Richard Dawkins does this, btw.
Thanks so much for the effort you put into this blog. The access you’ve given us to someone of your caliber is really unbelievable.
Bill
I have donated above the membership fee as much as I can, I’ve also bought more than one of your books, but I realize what you’re looking for is a way to scale this out with minimal extra effort on your part (since you’re already stretched thin).
There are a handful of suggestions that you get each time, but I wonder if having some video testimonials from diverse blog users would entice others to join. Any infomercial is replete with these because they work.
Ask people who can create 30-60 second videos themselves to send them to you so you don’t have to worry about doing any of the work. They can then submit them and you decide which ones are best to use. Then you could have them prominently on the home page. Have an atheist, an academic, a Christian fundie, a liberal Christian, et al. I think maybe many Christians don’t realize that they can learn on here too.
The other thing. Do you email a newsletter? I imagine most of the previous subscribers could be convinced to rejoin if they were to receive an email reminding them about what they’re missing. I imagine it’d be easier to get them to rejoin than it would be to find new subscribers (that’s almost always true in business).
Hi Bart —
I maintained a well-received blog (http://www.weylmann.com) for 12 years, which dealt with science, religion and politics, among other things. Upon the election of Donald Trump, I stopped posting altogether, the reason being that I now perceive politics and religion to be largely the same thing — mostly dogmatic, unthinking nonsense. Since I now live in a post-fact, post-reason America, what good does it do to blog anymore?
I would encourage you, however, to expand your postings to include reflections on science and politics and their connection with Christianity. Yes, I realize you’re not a scientist or a politician, but their connection with Christianity cannot be ignored — many if not most American Christian evangelicals today reject climate change and other evidence-based science, with enormous potential consequences on our country’s direction (for example, did you ever comment on the “Ark Encounter”, etc.?)
Well, it;s just a suggestion, as you requested. BTW, like many others, I’ve read all of your books. God bless you always!
Yes, that would probably sell! The problem is that I know nothing about science and I’m doing my best to keep the blog from being one-sidedly political (which it would be if I started commenting on politics!!)
That may indeed be a factor in dwindling interest. I am finding that few Christians care what any Bible text really means. Conservatives who think the Bible is important still prefer to stick with whatever their echo chambers tell them they should think about a particular passage. Polarized politics reinforces that rut mentality. Good insight, but sad.
I went to the Ark Encounter. Not sure if I should insert a laughing face or crying face here.
I found your offer to us to make a donation and receive a copy of your new book a full 12-18 months prior to publishing an EXCELLENT deal and I thoroughly enjoyed it! I live in Omaha, and I was about to mention something similar to the Warren Buffet eBay lunch auction as was mentioned above. Personally, I would LOVE that opportunity! I know that more enhances the relationship between you and us current members more than gaining additional members, but it could be a GREAT talking point during an interview to really drive home your personal commitment to the blog on account of the charity that is accomplished through it. A once or even twice a year dinner auction would be…the ticket!
I had a natural reluctance to spend money to participate in a blog. But the instant I saw that the ‘cost’ was a donation to a neutral charity that no one could possibly object to, that hesitation evaporated. Yes, this is a truly unique opportunity.
By now, 90% of your longer comments have already been answered on your blog, with thoughtful, informed, well-crafted responses. You could save time by linking to them, or at lest cut-paste from them.
A visitor to your blog should see what you just wrote. The donations to charity, including the membership and additional donations, help motivate you to spend your time this way. As I appreciate the value of the blog, the mindset includes the realization that it may take more than just the membership to keep you here.
Just putting it out there, and it might be controversial, but there are plenty of people in the world raising money for charity. As far as I am aware there is no one of your caliber disseminating scholarly views of biblical studies in an easy to understand and engaging format. I personally see your talent for communicating knowledge as being of more value to humanity than the money you raise. Especially given that the most vocal people on the bible are normally evangelicals who are not scholars. If you were to keep the money and keep spreading knowledge that would be no bad thing.
Thank you for all you do.
Could you provide your subscribers with a link to embed in their websites, emails, social media pages, etc., promoting the blog? I already share links to your open posts so friends will hopefully read them, like them, and subscribe.
Do you mean a link to the blog itself (which they already have) or to a specfic post that promotes what the blog is and does?
I’m sure you already do this, but perhaps put a bug in other professors of NT ears to put your blog as a resource for their students. Not much else I can offer I’m afraid since I think this blog is absolutely wonderful as is. I really don’t follow any other blog out there.
How about short debates or discussions (in written form) between yourself and your colleagues in the field of biblical studies (not suggesting full-on debates like the ones in which you participate with proof-texting polemicists in the fundygelical camp) ?
I don’t know how this works exactly but if you had your own or your non-profit had its own virtual bookstore on Amazon and people bought your (and other) books there rather than on the larger entity Amazon, that might direct a few cents per purchase to the charity. Since you or someone is already doing some bookkeeping on the charitable donations, there might not be much additional work. Someone could set this up for you. People on the blog could buy there along with whoever else could be encouraged to purchase your books there (we could all email anyone we know with such interests) as well as books you’ve recommended such as some of the Anchor Series, your own text book on the New Testament, the Harper Collins Study Bible, or
J. Christiaan Beker, Paul the Apostle
Wayne Meeks, The First Urban Christians
Dale Martin, The Corinthian Body
Albert Harrill Paul the Apostle
William Harris, Ancient Literacy
You also wrote, For the Gospels and Jesus, I think E. P. Sanders is absolutely groundbreaking and essential. Among the best in the field are Dale Allison, Paula Fredriksen, Amy-Jill Levine; highly controversial but always interesting is John Dominic Crossan. For Paul’s life and letters, again, E. P. Sanders. But also people like John Barclay, J. Louis Martyn, and Dale Martin. For early Christian Gnosticism: Bentley Layton, Karen King, David Brakke, and Marvin Meyer. For early Christian apocrypha: Francois Bovon, Tony Burke, Paul Foster. For New Testament manuscripts (textual criticism): Eldon Epp, Mike Holmes, and David Parker
Catherine Hezser, Literacy in Roman Palestine
Robert Stein’s book on the Synoptic Problem
books on fundamentalism by George Marsden
Introductions to the OT/Hebrew Bible by Michael Coogan and by John Collins
Finkelstein and Silverman, The Bible Unearthed
Richard Friedman, Who Wrote the Bible? (revised)
Nils Dahl, The Crucified Messiah
J. Z. Smith, Drudgery Divine
John Collins, The Scepter and the Star
etc.
You have some interesting commentators. It might be nice if you could pick a commentator and have them tell us a little about themselves and what brought them to this blog.
What I would like is if the default notification for new comments was set to send email notification when someone replies to my comment. Because I always forget to change it.
I assume you’re still looking for ways to increase blog memberships without doing any more work than you already do… I have an idea that I’d like to run by you… I’d basically just promote your blog as a great place to get critical scholarly evidence… even though you’re a liberal atheist and I’m pretty much the opposite… I still understand that when it comes to evidence… we all have to be honest about what we can say is probably true (e.g. Jesus died on a cross under Pilate)… and then admit that our conclusions are our beliefs (e.g. that Jesus rose from the dead)… I like how you explained it… agnosticism is epistemological and atheism/theism is belief… in that sense we’re all agnostic by default… and our “theism” (or lack thereof) is a matter of what we personally find most convincing (i.e. faith)… long story short… I’d like to buy one blog membership per month and then give it away to one of my viewers… I’d like to buy many more but funds are tight.. but I will buy more as I can… all I’d need is some kind of public acknowledgment that you’re okay with me doing it that I can show to my viewers… A quick phone call (Skype would be even better) that I can record so people get a sense for who you are… some of the fundies I deal with think you’re the devil… so a quick little back and forth… mostly of me saying your scholarship is legit and not outside of the mainstream at all… and that you’re not some enemy of Christians like they think… and that they could learn a great deal from you and still keep their faith (as I have)… and then about the blog and how the money goes to charity… basically a 5-10 minute phone call I can use would be enough… or like I said… Skype… We could try it for a few months and see if it works… worst case scenario is you sell a few memberships to me that I give away… best case scenario is people buy more memberships in addition to the few I buy… IDK… it’s up to you obviously… but I think it’s a good idea! If you’re interested let me know. Thank you, sir. [email protected]
sounds like an interesting idea. I could do a quick phone conversation either tomorrow (Monday Dec. 19) or in the morning of Tues Dec. 20 (I’m leaving the country that afternoon for a couple of weeks).
Tomorrow will work for me if we can do it after 12pm PST (I’ll be at work until then—but any time after that I can do). Please let me know the details (e.g. should I email you my number?, etc.).
I could talk ca. 3:15 EST (so 12:15 your time). Email me and I’ll give you my number.
A couple suggestions if I may:
– make the profile pages more useful: show users a list of posts they have made, show them their subscriptions (right now this is hard to find unless you know your way around wordpress)
– the “bigger/wider” search bar on this page takes you to a page that doesnt exist instead of displaying results: https://ehrmanblog.org/member-landing-page/
– it would be nice to be able to see not only latest posts, but also latest active posts where users have posted comments
– For those of us who are members already it would be nice to have something like this page set as our main page: https://ehrmanblog.org/member-landing-page/
Because very often, for example when clicking on “home” in the member forum, we are taken to this page https://ehrmanblog.org/
– Lastly, I would highly recommend the use of HTTPs, an SSL certificate costs around $100-500/year (depends what type you go for) and would not only secure communication for users and maintain their privacy and protection from fraud, it would also help your search engine ranking as it is increasingly becoming a ranking factor for Google.
Thanks. I’ll look into these.