25 votes, average: 4.80 out of 525 votes, average: 4.80 out of 525 votes, average: 4.80 out of 525 votes, average: 4.80 out of 525 votes, average: 4.80 out of 5 (25 votes, average: 4.80 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading...

Is the Qur’an More Reliable than the New Testament?

I often get asked questions about the Qur’an, and I almost always do not answer them, most because I can’t answer them.   I’m not an expert on the Qur’an, and tend to talk only about things I have done serious and sustained research on.  Otherwise I’m just spreading stuff I’ve heard, and I’m no more authoritative on that than anyone else.  So what’s the point of my talking about it?

But one question that I get frequently, especially from Muslim readers, is about the manuscript tradition of the Qur’an in relation to the New Testament.  Even though I’m not an expert on the manuscript tradition of the Qur’an (oh boy am I not an expert), I know enough to answer with some authority this particular question.

The question is whether it simply isn’t true that the Qur’an is more reliable than the New Testament.   What the questioner almost always means by that is that the ancient manuscripts of the Qur’an tend to be amazingly similar to one another.  Virtually identical up and down the line.   Scribes kept it the way it was, without changing it.  That’s in contrast to the New Testament, where scribes changed it all the time, often in insignificant ways and sometimes in rather startling large ways, either by accident or on purpose,

So, by comparison, isn’t the Qur’an more reliable?

In almost every instance when I get asked the question, if I pursue it with the person, what they really mean is…

To see the rest of this post — and all the other posts on this blog — you will need to belong to the blog.  Hey, it don’t cost much! And every penny goes to help those in need.  So why put it off?  Join up!

You need to be logged in to see this part of the content. Please Login to access.


Tracking Down Stolen Manuscripts: Guest Post by Jennifer Knust
Is There a Way to Know if a Manuscript is the “Original”?

98

Comments

  1. Avatar
    Abdullah Alturki  July 19, 2019

    I agree with you that the Quran being transmitted accurately does not prove what it says is true. However, I think the point that Muslims would try to make is that if a book is the last revelation from God, then, it makes sense that it has to be preserved. Otherwise, people would be lost since the last revelation is corrupted.

    Meaning, while it’s true that the Quran being preserved does not prove it is the last revelation from God, it’s certainly compatible with the claim and if, like the bible, it was changed and tampered with, it would not be a candidate for being the last universal revelation.

    Other Muslims would also say that the Quran being preserved is a fulfillment of the declaration in the Quran claiming that God would preserve it:

    Quran 15:9 Indeed, it is We who sent down the Qur’an and indeed, We will be its guardian.

You must be logged in to post a comment.