As predicted, I began work on my Introduction to the Bible yesterday, and it has been as intense as expected. This is to be a fifteen-chapter introduction of the entire Bible, Jewish Scripture (= Old Testament) and New Testament, Genesis to Revelation (including Apocrypha). What a scream….
The really difficult thing for this book – as for every book – is to make it just right for the audience. My audience in this case is not readers at Barnes and Noble (the general public) and not my colleagues among the scholars. It is 19 year olds and their teachers. What is tricky is the balancing act between the two. For their teachers (who have to be thought of, since they are the ones who decide which textbooks will be used for the courses, and the whole point is to get your textbook used), I have to be knowledgable, scholarly and academically respectable, well organized, clear, and insightful. For the 19 year olds I have to be interesting and worth the trouble of reading (and informative, clear, organized, etc.). The big trick with 19 year olds is writing in a way that is not at all patronizing, treating them as adults, but communicating with them, nonetheless, on their own level, in ways that are clear, interesting and engaging.
Anyway, for the process of writing itself, I anticipated that by the end of the day, each day, I would more or less brain dead. And that is certainly the case. My idea is this. I have fifteen days, and I want to write all eight chapters that deal with the Hebrew Bible. So that’s a chapter every two days. Each chapter is to be about 14,000 words of text. The problem is (well, one of the problems) that in addition to the text itself, I need to provide lots of ancillary materials. I have “boxes” on interesting and related topics – maybe six or seven per page. Each chapter has to begin with a brief summary of what the chapter is about, and end with a glance back at what has just been covered. I have to highlight key terms and provide a list of key terms at the end of each chapter, and to provide brief glossary definitions of each term. I have to make study questions for each chapter. And so on and on.
So it isn’t just a matter of writing the 14,000 words. It’s a matter of writing the 14,000 words and writing all this other material.
My initial plan was to write the text of a chapter on one day and do the ancillary materials the next. But I realized, the day before I started plowing into it, that that would mean fifteen days of solid writing without a break, and I wasn’t sure I could do that. So I’ve devised a new system, and am waiting to see if it will work. It involves spending two days writing a chapter a day, followed by a single day coming up with the ancillaries for both chapters. I’m not sure if that’ll work, but I’m going to give it a try.
I started out yesterday with chapter one, a brief introduction to:
- what the Bible is
- why it’s important to be studied (whether a believer or not, a Jew, a Christian, an agnostic, a pagan, whatever),
- what the main difficulties are that present themselves for studying it (it’s awfully BIG; we don’t know who most of the authors were; it was written over a very long stretch of time – centuries; the different books have widely differing perspectives; it is filled with contradictions, discrepanices, and mistakes; we don’t have the original texts; to understand it we have to situation each book in its own historical context, etc. etc.)
- a brief overview of the history of ancient Israel and early Christianity
- and finally a discussion of religions in the ancient near east and Roman empire.
It took about eight hours to write up, and came in just over 14,000 words, about 42 pages double spaced. Today I wrote chapter 2, on the Book of Genesis
- an overview of its contents (and the problems they pose)
- whether it can be taken as a book of science (NO) or history (NO), or rather, (YES) a collection of myths and legends – which are nonetheless extremely interesting, valuable, important, worth knowing and reading and thinking about
- Sources that lie behind it (who wrote the Pentateuch? The JEDP theory, etc.)
- And the cultural background to some of the stories (other myths from the Ancient Near East)
About nine hours virtually non-stop, another 14,000 words. Tomorrow I tackle the ancillaries. For now, yes, I’m basically brain dead. I’m stopping now. And am just about ready to prepare and then consume a martini roughly the size of Pennsylvania.
For the next couple of weeks, I will probably, among other things, post a few excerpts from my rought draft, on the Members Site.
When you write these chapters, are you basically just writing what you know, and then later going back and adding references and whatnot? Or do you start with what you feel are important books/papers and work them in as you go along? Whatever the case, I feel like with SO much stuff to cover, it would be hard to even know where to begin!!
No, in this case I taught the class at UNC for two years, and did a lot of reading at the time, to get back into the swing of it (my second major in grad school was Hebrew Bible); then I read a lot in the field. When I write I make extensive detailed outlines for each chapter — first a brief outline, then fuller, then fuller, then fullest. And hope the chapters — now organized and thought out — will just right themselves!
haha, brilliant 🙂
I am already interested in this book you’re a writing now.
I’m not sure I can READ 14,000 words a day, let alone compose them. Looking forward to whatever drafts you want to share.
I wonder what a contras/comparison to NT Wright and his work ethic might look like? If I recall, he went into something of a deep depression, when working on his Interpretation of Romans.
Yes, he cranks out the books! But I’m not sure what his routines are. If they’re like mine, then I guess that’s *one* thing we have in common. 🙂
Well, I’ve read much of him. He writes too much…and it includes too many rants. Actually, given modesty is not one of his virtues, he is on some You Tube site telling how he studies!
BTW, might you tell us where you might be speaking soon and not so soon?
I’m on leave in the Fall, finishing up this textbook (then in the Spring I hope to write How Jesus Became God). So I don’t have any speaking gigs lined up just now.
My favorite popular book about the Bible is Isaac Azimov’s Guide to the Bible. But in his case I know he had a team of researchers who did much of the grunt work for him. When he put it all together the writing was lively and engaging just like all the rest of what he wrote, science fiction or otherwise.( The one about the works of Shakespeare is top of the line!) It’s not that I doubt you can pull it off, but I wonder, why? Is it the money? the recognition? or are you like an artist who is demon-driven to express yourself??
Given the pressure you are under I don’t expect an answer right away, but down the line perhaps, you might let me know. I do understand to some extent because I’m a little like you, but you are you all the time, and from the outside looking in it does appear pathological (I’m not being judgmental or negative in saying this), but it reminds me of James Tabor and a few others like him who burn the candle at both ends.
Thanks for listening. Now you can get back to work. dcs
Good questions! But, well, there’s no reason to pathologize it (or me!) 🙂 I’m driven because I absolutely LOVE what I do. I love writing. I love finishing writing. I love publishing. I love teaching. I love giving public lectures. And the more I do, the more I love it. But for what it’s worth, I DO have a life. I hang out with my family, walk my dog, watch sports (way too much sports) (Wimbledon this week; golf every weekend; college basketball; NFL; I’m a junkie), work out, read novels, love to cook, and and and. (And I get more than 8 hours of sleep at night!) It’s just that I’m extremely focused, and whatever I do, I throw myself into it. I can write unusually fast, and I’m unusually intense when I do so. Maybe it’s weird, but it works for me!
Fantastic!
You are a rarity and I like your style.
Can’t imagine how you do it, though I think I can match you item for item when it comes to family life and fun.
I’ve had both volumns sitting on my shelf for over 20 years and have never read them. If you call them your favorite. I guess now would be a good time to read them.
With the number of books you’ve written, you’ve become the Stephen King of biblical scholarship. Enjoy your martini.
Bart, you are a writing machine! And I mean that as a total compliment. I have always enjoyed your writings and I look forward to reading this text.
I know you have your next few books planed out ,but I was wondering if you had any plans to write a book for the general public about the Old Testament?
Only the Introductoin I’m doing now — nothing more planned! Too many other things to write!!
It looks like you have published with Hapers and Oxford, Bart, as well as with some academic publishers. I’m curious: why both Harpers *and* Oxford? What has driven you to work with multiple publishers?
Just idle curiosity. 🙂
I write my trade books with Harper because that’s what they do (and all they do) and they’re unbelievably good at it; all my other books (textbooks, serious monographs) I do with Oxford, because that’s what they do best and they do them extremely well.
Ah. I see. Thank you very much, Bart. That’s helpful. 🙂
What do you think of the work of NT Wright? Have you ever debated him? If so, on what subjects? What do you think of his explanation of heaven and hell.
He is one of the top New Testament scholars in the world, and we end up disagreeing up and down the line on most things! We did have a live debate once, in San Francisco, on trying to explain the problem of suffering if there is a God in charge of the world. I can’t remember if it was recorded or not, but I don’t think so — can’t find it anywhere. Here’s a post that I made a couple of years ago objecting to his characterization of my understanding of early Christianity: https://ehrmanblog.org/charges-and-anti-supernatural-biases-readers-mailbag-august-6-2017/
I am using this textbook and a couple chronological guides to get a sense of the flow of the history behind the documents. Your textbook is phenomenal, along with the suggestions for the deeper dives. I am curious on your outlining process you describe above. Do you do it on paper, use a computer, a combination of the two? The process of organizing thoughts to sentences has been allusive to me. What does brief, then fuller, then fuller, then fullest look like over time? How does this then flow into real writings? A lot of copy and paste? Thanks for your time and the effort you put into these things. Like many others, I benefit much from the knowledge you share.
Peace, Bill
My outlines and thoughts are always on a computer, in a simple word-processing file. I start with a basic outline, say, of each chapter of a book: the topic. Then for each chaper I break the topic into the most important subtopics to be covered. Then the sub-topics into sub-sub-topics. And I keep going till every major point is broken down. Then I reread all the notes on everything I’ve read and start entering the important data in each of the sub-sub-sub ppoints in the outline. It grows and grows At the end, I have a full outline of everything I’m gonig to say, every source I’m going to quote, and I just put it into prose.