And so, we have come to the end of another year. Most of us will spend at least a bit of time just now reflecting on our lives and our past year. I’d like to take a minute to reflect, as well, on the year we’ve had on the blog.
My sense is that the blog has been and still is going strong. This past year I have made something like 300 separate posts – so nearly six a week. Almost always these posts are around 1000 words – sometimes more, but rarely less. Most of the posts are written fresh every day, though often I do post something of relevance that I have previously published.
I’m starting to find that I want to post on something that I’ve already posted on, but by and large I have resisted the urge. I do think, though, as time goes on, that it won’t matter much if I cover similar ground to what I dealt with, say, two years ago. There are people who join the blog anew all the time (every day, in fact), and some people drop off, and I don’t expect much of *anyone* to spend all their time reading old posts (let alone remember something I wrote two years ago. Usually *I* don’t remember!) In any event, I don’t *think* I’ve had any repeats yet. If I have, no one has mentioned it. (If I vaguely remember posting on something, I usually search to see….)
On average I read and approve, and often provide a brief reply to, about 150-160 comments per week – so maybe something like 7000 or 8000 this past year.
We have made some significant improvements to the blog this past year, thanks mainly to my ally and computer assistant, Steven Ray, without whose incredible skill and hard work this entire endeavor would collapse on itself in about four minutes. It is unbelievably complicated, running one of these things, when there are not only posts but tons of other things (including Paypal) to contend with. If you need to hire someone for any of your computer needs – Steven is your man.
Among the improvements (many of them have been silent, and simply have made things easier and better), we have gotten *rid* (thank goodness) of the practice of having two separate posts a day, one for members and the other for non-members (a truncated version of the former, enough to “tease” people into wanting to join to get the full scoop). Instead, Steven has devised a way for me to do one post, only part of which can be seen by those who do not belong to the blog. And – possibly even more important — we have started a “discussion forum” where people can address topics they want and converse among themselves, with one another, instead of only through me.
I think this discussion forum is good stuff, and I’m very pleased with it. I anticipated more activity on it than we are getting, but I’m not at all complaining – more activity means more work, since I have set it up that I have to approve every post, every time. The posts have been superb and my main concern – that people would violate every conceivable norm of courtesy and tact (as usually happens in such fora) – has proved, so far, to be completely unfounded. This forum has provided an outlet for people to express their views, challenge the views of others, and exchange ideas in a thoughtful and enlightening fashion. Many thanks to all who have participated.
All in all, the blog obviously takes a lot of my time. I try to keep my blog activity to about an hour a day, and usually am successful. But I constantly ask whether it is worth it. I’m an unusually time-conscious person. I map out what I’m going to do, virtually hour-by-hour, every day. Drives my wife nuts. But I’ve been like this for over thirty years. So, the deal is that I’m putting in something like 300-350 hours a year on the blog. It doesn’t seem like much if it’s just an hour a day, but if you calculate a full work-week as 40 hours (I don’t, and I know many of you don’t; but still, supposing that was the calculation, in the hopeful thought that someday that *will* be the work-week ), that means that I am spending eight or nine weeks of my year on the blog. That’s eight or nine weeks that I could be doing something else: research, writing, working out, reading novels, going to films, listening to music, walking my dog, thinking deep thoughts, watching football… OK, it would be research and writing. And more work outs.
So is it worth it? Well, sometimes it doesn’t feel like it. But two things keep me, and the blog, going. The first, obviously, is you. I am able, with this blog, to communicate with you what I think is important information and thoughts and reflections and ideas and opinions about topics of mutual interest: the NT, the historical Jesus, the history of early Christianity, the manuscripts of the NT, early Christian apocrypha, the Hebrew Bible, and lots of other things. And the reactions I get back from you by way of feedback are encouraging and make me want to keep at it.
But the primary thing, as I’ve always said and always will say, is that the blog is set up to raise funds for charity, and this is really what keeps me going. So how are we doing in that department? The reality is that we are doing better and better. We are not yet where I want to be (and I suppose, by definition, we never will be). But we are making great strides.
This past calendar year we did terrifically well. We raised $72,000 for charity. So congratulations to us!! That is about a 20% increase over the previous year. And you can crunch the numbers yourself – it is just about $200 per day, each and every day, all of if money going to deal with problems of hunger and homelessness. That’s really what keeps me going. Most of that money comes from subscription fees to the blog. But a chunk of it comes from donations that many of you have so generously provided to the blog. I can’t thank you enough.
I want to increase the subscriptions to the blog. I’d like you to give gift subscriptions. I’d like you to tell your family, friends, colleagues, co-workers, neighbors, dog-walkers, bank tellers, insurance agents, car dealers – everyone in your life – about the blog, and try to get them interested. I also want to increase the donors and donations to the blog. Remember, donations are completely tax deductible, and every penny goes to good causes. And indirectly keeps the blog going, since as long as we’re raising serious money, I’m going to keep at it. If you have bright ideas either for how to increase our membership or to increase our donations, please do let me know!
Let me end again by thanking each and every one of you for joining and participating in the blog. It’s been a good year. I hope our good fortune will continue in the year to come. All best wishes for a Happy New Year!
I think you’d see more activity on the forums if you had someone else to help you approve the posts. We can tell you’re traveling when the posts take more than 24 hours to get approved. For me my desire to continue a conversation with someone is stifled when it takes over 24 hours for the reply to appear. It’s like playing chess by mail — something I have no desire to do. I’m not complaining because I’ve read a number of things on the forum that are interesting, but if you want to look for it to grow more then you need to find some way to get the posts approved faster, or better yet in my opinion, let it go unmoderated with one or two people with the ability to delete or hide posts that go overboard. From what I’ve seen though I believe that everyone who posts can be relied on to be civil.
Great idea. I’m thinking about allowing posts simply to post as soon as someone puts them up, instead of referreeing them all. I can go back later and delete any that are out of line. Thanks,
A suggestion on the forum (which by the way I don’t read) to reduce time you need to spend on the forum: Have a big prominent button that allows users to report abuse. Over time, you may find that you don’t need to read forum posts at all unless they have been reported by users. As well as identifying the out-of-line post, the reporting system should tabulate statistics against users – those who consistently have their posts reported should be warned. Posts that have been flagged by many users automatically get hidden (like the comment system on amazon). You can later decide to delete or approve resetting the flags.
Tabulate statistics on users. Allow users to “like” and “unlike” (different from reporting) a post. Those who have posted a lot of likeable posts over time without ever having been reported posting offensive content, should be contacted to see if they can volunteer as moderators for reported posts. Hence in the long-run, with a band of moderators, your direct involvement with the forum is kept a minimum.
In the unsolicited advise department:
Speaking as someone whose done a fair amount of moderating lists, let me just say that this plan (deleting “problematic” posts after the fact) is not as helpful or simple as it sounds.
In short, there are two problems here.
First, once the “problematic” post is out there, other folks will have seen it and –depending on the nature of the post– may likely have already responded to it (possibly in an even more “problematic” way) before the moderator has a chance to notice the original As a result you will likely find yourself not only removing the original post, but the posts of everyone who responded to the original post (and the responses to the responders (and the responders to the responders to the responders … etc))
(And a hard and fast rule of the Internet is that *any* request to posters to simply ignore inappropriate posts will, I assure you, be ignored.)
Second, you speak of deleting occasional, single inappropriate posts. Sad to say, but i’m afraid that this may likely be woefully overly optimistic. The number of posts that a devoted Troll can put up on unmoderated site in a short time can be truly astonishing.
Moreover the history of the list –as a relatively civil group– is due, no doubt, in no small part to the fact that is currently moderated. Were this to change (I.e. To an unmoderated list) I think, sadly, that you will find that the nature of the content of the posts will likely change as well. If you do make such a change, I hope I’m wrong; but I think the odds are on my side.
OK, thanks for the advice and warnings.
Thank you so much for doing the blog. I read and learn from every one. It is a breath of fresh air to read research that is done honestly and without being driven by a desired conclusion.
1) How about this idea: allow readers to rate a post e.g. “fair”, “good”, “excellent”, “mind-blowing”. Display aggregate rating and number of ratings. Readers – if they want to search through archives, can locate the most highly rated posts. You can get sense what sort of posts and topics interest readers the most.
2) Other than refraining from posting comments & questions, how can your readers minimise the time you need to spend on the blog?
3) Have you posted many articles on the charities this blog supports, how you evaluated why these charities produce most results for your buck? Beefing up the philantrophy page would be good – people tend to be more ready to donate when they feel they understand the charity. Include more graphics – barcharts of money donated each month along with number of subscribers, hence give sense of progress.
4) Your books have a reference to your website, but not this blog. Why not advertise your blog in your trade books? Your homepage on amazon does not refer to your website nor the blog. Why not include reference to one or both?
1. Interesting idea. I’ll think about it. 2. Not sure! 3. Yes, over the years, it’s all there. Good idea. 4. I’ll look into it.
A 40 hour week is your target??!!
You need to move to Europe, Bart: none of us works 40 hour weeks. 🙂
Happy new year.
And those six-week holidays!! The U.S. is *way* behind….
Professor Ehrman,
You are appreciated more than you will probably ever know. I look forward coming home from work and reading the next post on whatever topic you may be discussing. Keep up the great work on the blog!
Hi Bart,
Thank you for the blog and the forum. I believe that you are the only critical historical scholar who does this. It has been very interesting and informative to me. I also really appreciate that you put so much time into it and then donate the fees to feed the hungry. Wow, that’s awesome.
Near the beginning of your post today, you mentioned that you were concerned about posting something that you have previously posted. This is not a problem for me and here’s why. I’ve read you book, “Jesus, Interrupted” about 5 times now (it’s one of my favorites) and each time I read it, I discover either something new or a different way of looking at something that you said. Even though I read the exact same words, each time I read this book, as I learn more about this topic in between readings, I get something different from them.
Thanks again
John
Thanks for your thoughtful hard work. You help us focus on big and little historical issues. Tell UNC that you teach worldwide (including to 70 year olds) and make up for the recent (sports) scandals.
Ah, sports scandals. Don’t even get me started!!
Dr. Ehrman,
Thank you for all that you have shared on your blog and through your blog in 2014. I look forward to following your blog and to helping to support your chartible causes in 2015. Happy New Year!
Dear Bart:
I have been a subscriber for much of 2014, so if you have thought it worthwhile to reflect, I think I might return the courtesy.
First, I am astonished that you do put some much time and effort into the blog. As you say, an hour a day adds up to a pretty considerable commitment. I personnally would not hesitate to keep my subscription going if you provided three blogs a week. (That’s still a work-month of effort, which is still significant.)
Second, I find the way you handle your topics to be interesting and enjoyable. Having a number of entries on the same topic is a good way of doing things and, I expect, helps keep the time commitment down in that you’re building on a previous post rather than starting from scratch. I find your expositions on expansions on material previously published, in either the trade or academic spheres, very good as well. Additional thought and reflection is never a waste of time. Usually I understand things a trifle better after you provide a bit more detail or explanation via the blog.
Finally, I find your response to a significant percentage of the comments remarkable. Again, the commitment to reading the comments and making, albeit generally pithy, observations on the comments is time consuming and wholly commendable. I quite see how a number provide grist for the mill, others no doubt help you refine your approach to your own writing on a given topic, and others are thought provoking for yourself. Others are perhaps less helpful, but live and let live. The whole operation has some of the features of typical university class save the ‘students’ don’t have to hand anything in and can remain content to merely dabble and babble.
As for the charity side, that is a nice touch. I quite understand your motivation and wish this aspect of the operation well. I’ll sign up again when my year expires, but I donate to local charities here in Saskatchewan. There will never be any end to the need, as you note.
All the best for 2015,
Ian
Happy New Year, Dr Ehrman. I truly hope you do continue with the blog because it’s a really invaluable resource and allows the rest of us to keep up to speed with what’s going on in areas that we’d otherwise struggle to find information on. Your dedication to the blog has inspired me to get my act together and be more-proactive in my own blogging. I thought posting once a week was enough. You put me to shame. I’ve also linked to your site from mine and I recommend it whenever I can.
So… any hunch on how YHVH is properly pronounced? 😉 Little question for the New Year.
It’s probably Yahweh.
Thanks,
Hi Bart, Your blog would be more acceptable to the faithful if your stance was not so negative. May I ask you, how many of the writers of the NT. were men of faith? So how can a lone scholarly man; even of your calibre bring some kind of balance to the blog: after all, you have made the scriptures of faith your lifelong object of reticule, destructively finding faults at every corner. Please consider that there is another way to expose faults in scripture and that is constructively: you should try to step-in the mind of the writers to find what is falsely attributed to them. In my book “The Way God Told It” you will find the God given reasons why we must think in the positive based on the true knowledge of understanding. Happy new year Bart.
My view is that the only people of faith I’m attacking are fundamentalists. And so if anyone feels attacked, well — that’s the math!
I agree, fundamentalists that refuses to use basic common sense puts themselves at risk to be manipulated by unprincipled men, whom often are themselves victims of such men; deceiving and been deceived. They have made the scripture their object of worship, and have inadvertently drunk the leaven within.
Bart,
As one who has been involved in fundamentalism all my life, I can say that you do not offend me. “Perhaps” that is because “maybe” I’ve never been a “true believer”(????)….not sure about that, but I have always wanted facts and proof, rather than blind faith, but have never been in a lifestyle and place where I can openly seek the truth. Over the past year, I have read an enormous amount of information online, including several of your books, as I am in a place where I still am searching these things out “underground”. It is really difficult. I find you to not be offensive at all and especially compared to many other high-profile atheists/agnostics. The ones I find offensive and that I do not continue to study are those who use their voice as a political tool under the guise of atheism. I believe you are opening my eyes to truths that I’ve suspected all along. Thank you for all you do. As others have voiced, I too hope that you save time for yourself and your family. Much gratitude to you.
Happy New Year Dr. Ehrman! Thanks for sharing your world with us.
Happy New Year and congrats on the blog! I’ve learned so much!
Quick off-topic question no.462… I was just re-checking some info on the dating of Daniel and stumbled across this statement on Wikipedia: “Daniel’s exclusion from the Hebrew Bible’s canon of the prophets, which was closed around 200 BCE, suggests it was not known at that time” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Daniel#Authorship)
I was curious what this ‘close of the Hebrew Bible around 200BCE’ might be referring to. Was there a specific declaration by a particular sect of Jews who “closed” the canon (whether this was accepted by other Jews or not)? Daniel is included in the Septuagint, right? So it can’t be referring to that…
It is commonly thought that the “prophets” was a completed canon by around 200 BCE, so that when later Jews wanted to include Daniel among the Scriptures it had to go somewhere other than the prophets. The reasons for this date: the Prologue to Sirach seems to presuppose a set collection of prophets, as does the NT.
Thanks for such a detailed summary. Great to get that kind of info and the personal aspects!
Happy New Year!!!! Honestly, I (certainly we) cannot thank you enough for what you are doing. This blog is truly one of my favorite places to unwind each day. The effort you put into it is clearly on the extreme side, but your consistent dedication is made more than evident by this blog’s quality. I can say without a doubt in my mind that it is the best blog I have ever read and probably will read for a very long time. So, for what it’s worth, thank you so much.
Happy New Year everybody and many thanks to my anonymous benefactor for my membership!
Thank you for the kind comments, Bart. Where it has been a magnanimous year for the blog and a pleasure to serve you and the readership. You dedication to this endeavor is mind-bending and inspiring to say the least. I thought I was organized and driven, but am wimpy at best compared to your daily regiment. It is your scholarship and you as a person that drives this blog, the technology is merely the runners on a sleigh. Your wit and humor, your cordial way of communicating without belittling what some would consider trife or infinitely redundant questions. Clearly your years of working with young students have befitted you with the tenacity and long-suffering of an Agnostic Saint (oxymoron?). I genuinely hope that you may slot time for ‘The Bart Ehrman Blog’ for the next decade at minimum. The readership will be endless, and interest level never regressing. It is certainly worthwhile. Your selfless compassion for the destitute as well as sharing valued scholarship without limit, reveals an earnest man worthy of respect.
Steven Ray
Technical Support
The Bart Ehrman Blog: The History & Literature of Early Christianity
https://www.ehrmanblog.org
Hello Steven. Thanks for all the work you do on this blog. The technical aspects keep improving.
It’s been a good year for the blog and I continue to tell all I know about it. Keep going, but you don’t have to work yourself to death. The length of the blogs is just right, but I don’t think many would begrudge you if you blogged less frequently because of your time constraints. 300 original posts a year is admirable, but a hell of a lot of work for you. I read all of the blogs and repeats, if they occur, are very infrequent. It is very difficult to get those in the real world to seriously discuss such subjects so this blog is a real blessing for those of us who think that this subject is just too important not to be carefully and thoroughly examined…..
Dr. Ehrman,
I have an idea for making more money for the blog but PLEASE KEEP THIS PRIVATE BETWEEN US AS IT MAY BE TOO WEIRD.
You could set up a kind of lottery for those interested and able to travel to Chapel Hill (or wherever you decide) for lunch or dinner at a restaurant.
Warren Buffet does something like that, I think.
By charging $5 per chance, and with several thousand members, it might be worth a try. You could limit the time to an hour. If it sounds like something you would consider, then you could simply say one of your blog members suggested it.
If you were to decide to try this, I’m telling you upfront I’d buy as many chances as possible. That homeless student dropped out of college so there’s would-be “church” money that could go for chances. If I won, I would see if my son and his friend who teaches at Duke could join us. It would be very special for me to have that sort of opportunity to meet you.
Please do not worry about me being one of those groupies who is going to start following you around. It’s not like that at all.
Judy
Sorry — I decided *NOT* to keep this private. It’s a very interesting idea and I want to hear what others think. My question: suppose we raffle off chances at $5 a pop. And then would the person have to pay to come to Chapel Hill and have dinner with me? Seems like only people with serious means could pull that off. Many could afford the raffle ticket but not the trip. (If I had 20,000 people on the blog, maybe tehre would be a better chance?) Is another option to set a high amount for the privilege? And do it for anyone who could afford it and wanted to? And/or have a yet higher amount (this would need to be a huge amount — probably about $5000!) for me to fly and have dinner with them in their place?
Rather than an “individual” meeting would it be practical to do something like a series of “A Day with Bart Ehrman” gatherings at various places around the country? Say, with a relatively limited group-size, possibly when you were “in the neighborhood” anyway (e.g. In conjunction with a near-by SBL meeting or lecture)?
I’d be interested in either/both options.
Thanks for all your hard work. You’ve created a great blog that serves great causes. Your recent posts on 2 Thessalonians are among some of my favorites since I didn’t find the case so compelling as given in your popular text. It was good to see the full case made. I hope you’ll do that kind of post again from time-to-time especially since, if you can use excerpts, this might not add to your workload. I don’t know how you get all this done in one hour per day, but the result is fantastic.
Happy New Year!
I just want to say that I, for one, see no problem at all with your revisiting previous topics. There are bound to be a lot more new and interesting questions!
Gal 2:10 At the Jerusalem Council conclusion with Peter, James, and John, the “pillars”, sending Paul and Barnabus on their way: “They only asked us to remember the poor, the very thing I also was eager to do.”
Anything that group could agree on represents groundbreaking consensus.
Dear Professor Ehrman,
I’m so grateful that you invest time into this blog despite your busy schedule. It has been transformative for my understanding of not only early Christianity, but also for me in my own spiritual journey. I’d also like to add that I appreciate your patient teaching style and the sincerity of your own truth-seeking no matter where it leads, it is inspirational to me. I also feel good that in some small way I can be a part of helping those less fortunate than me. I think your blog is a win-win for everyone.
P.s. I find it ironic that you seem more Christ-like to me than many of the self-identifying so called believers.Thank you again and I hope you have a great 2015.
Thanks!
I for one want to thank you for the time you have invested in your blog. Actually I am amazed at your attention to this blog. I have asked friends to sign up which they have done so it is not only a matter of a gift but spreading the word. I have many of your books (including scholarly works and textbooks) many of which I loan out to friends, almost all of your “Great Courses” which I watch while I am on my Norditrack elliptical everyday (thanks–makes the time go fast). I wish you well and hope that this is another great year for not only the blog but for you and your wife.. Take care.
Is it worth it?
To us, the readers?
I can obviously only answer for myself, but I can’t believe I am alone. And the answer is, simply, yes. There are those of us on whose lives your work has had and continues to have an enormous impact.
To you? Again, obviously only you can answer this.
You say that sometimes it is not clear that it is. And I can see how this could be true, given — as you’ve made clear– the huge effort and the great amount of time this ‘blog takes from your already staggering workload.
I would ask one thing. Please give some thought to what we, as the readers, might do to help and, more specifically help make this ‘blog continue to be worth it.
OK, thanks.
Happy New Year, Bart.
I sense a bit of questioning in your post, as if you wonder whether continuing this blog is worthwhile. I am going to tell you emphatically that it is! Here’s why:
1. Raising approximately $10 per word posted is wonderful! The recipients of funds raised by this blog are doubtless very appreciative.
2. We the members get access to your thoughts, which probably encourages many (like me) to research more in depth the issues you raise.
3. You are giving a positive face to atheism/agnosticism. My biggest issue with many anti-religious people I have met is that they love to argue their positions and oppose believers, but are not seen doing good or giving back to their communities.
4. I enjoy the posts of many of the members here – there are so many bright, highly informed folks who follow you and contribute to an excellent ongoing discussion.
Keep it going, Bart. This project is well worth your time – and we members would definitely miss reading what you have to say.
Happy New Year! Thanks for opening my eyes and mind to all that is wrong with organized religion. I was a devout Catholic until I was around 70 yrs. old, and then all the scandals came to light. It was suggested that I take your courses on the NT (The Teaching Company) through your series on VHS cassettes. There is no going back for me now, but I wish I didn’t have this painful side effect of missing the comradeship and “family” of church life. But, I cannot be a hypocrite and go to church just to have that friendship. It was suggested that I do this, that many people don’t believe in the religion part, only the social part. Alas, I just can’t do that. Please keep sending your messages! Trudy
Congratulations on a very successful development of the blog! I have one small idea for improvement. What about a full-text search function for the archives? Let’s say I want to find all posts containing the word ‘hegesippus’. A list of all posts containing this search key appears, and clicking on one list item brings me to the post, displaying member content or not, depending on status.
It’s there already. Go to the upper right hand corner of the page and click on the magnifying glass: you can search all the posts for any key word.
Bart, I have read all of the above posts and by all accounts: ” You must be a saint” ??????????????? I also hope now or in the future that, it is; or it will be certain. Luke 6:26.
A suggestion on topic to post:
Have you posted anything about NT authors’ view(s) on hell? Some fundamentalist and evangelical circles love debating and preaching about hell, citing proof-texts from the NT regarding Jesus & Paul’s views on hell – what happens to unbelievers after they die. I just came across a debate on Unbelievable radio show on the eternal-torment view versus annihilationist view of hell. Critical scholars tend to discuss more about Jesus & Paul’s apocalypticism – what happens to wicked & idolatrous people in their lifetime when the imminent end-times arrive, among other things (though Paul does talk explicitly about the afterlife – bodily resurrection, judgment, refining fire). There is no neat extrapolation of apocalypticism to what it implies about post-mortem hell. Still, they are related notions, both are about judgment and the consequences at some point in the future for people’s actions. How can critical scholars weigh in on the debate on NT views of hell – in the main, does the eternal-torment or the annihilationist fit more comfortably with Jesus & Paul’s views? And how about author of the 4th gospel’s de-apocalypticised view – those who believe in Jesus will have “eternal life”, so what is he implying about what would happen to people who will not have eternal life?
Several have asked about this. I may devote a post or two to it.
Prof. Erhman,
I have found your blog an enjoyment, and especially appreciate that you take time from your busy schedule to engage with your readers. I especially enjoy your work as I am a recent graduate (history BA) because you approach subject matter in a way I find familiar and at the same time stimulating. The ability to engage with you regarding your posts is an excellent resource for us with a curious mind but unable to find the time/resources to go back to university.
Thank you and Happy New Year!
This blog is your idea and you should be congratulated for the educational purpose on one hand and the social responsibility of it – this is really important and I just want to motivate you to continue with your engagement. Every day your posts on this blog will have an impact to people’s life and you should be proud of that! Please remember this throughout 2015!