Back to my narrative of how I got interested in biblical studies, and specifically textual criticism. I was just thinking last night about how people (on the blog or elsewhere) sometimes report to me that they have heard my conservative evangelical critics say that I’m not a biblical interpreter (exegete) or a historian, but I’m a textual critic (someone who studies the manuscripts of the New Testament). And I started thinking about all my training in the Bible and the history of early Christianity.
I did three years at Moody studying mainly Bible and theology; I did a two year completion degree at Wheaton majoring in English; I then did a three-year Master’s of Divinity degree at Princeton Theological Seminary; and finally a four-year PhD in New Testament also at Princeton Seminary. Over the course of all those years I must have taken, what? 70 or 75 courses? How many of those courses were on textual criticism?
I had one class at Moody that was maybe ¼ devoted to the topic. And one class in my MDiv program that was ½ devoted to it. And that was all.
My formal training was not in textual criticism. I learned that on my own. To be sure, I had rather good guidance. I went to Princeton …
The Rest of this Post is for Members Only. If you don’t belong yet, JOIN!!! It costs less than 60 cents a week. REALLY. And you get tons for your money. And every penny goes to charity. So JOIN!