When Hebrews 8:10 and Hebrews 10:16 were originally written, did they say:
“my laws… write them”?
“my law… write it”?
Hebrews 8:10
** you do not have permission to see this link **
(Young’s Literal)
because this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel,
after those days, saith the Lord,
giving My laws into their mind,
and upon their hearts I will write them,
and I will be to them for a God,
and they shall be to Me for a people;
(Aramaic Bible in Plain English)
“But this is The Covenant that I shall give to the family of the house of Israel:
After those days, says THE LORD JEHOVAH,
I shall put my law in their minds
and upon their hearts I shall write it,
and I shall be to them a God,
and they shall be to me a people.”
Hebrews 10:16
** you do not have permission to see this link **
(NIV)
“This is the covenant I will make with them after that time, says the Lord.
I will put my laws in their hearts,
and I will write them on their minds.”
(Aramaic Bible in Plain English)
“This is the covenant that I shall give them after those days, says THE LORD JEHOVAH:
I shall put my law into their minds,
and I shall write it upon their hearts,
dukhrana.com, Peshitta tool, EBV with footnotes:
Hebrews 10:16 – “Dit is het Verbond dat Ik na die dagen aan hen geven zal, zegt de HEERE! ‘Ik zal mijn Wet in hun verstand leggen en die op hun harten schrijven,
Ik zal mijn Wet … schrijven – dit is de lezing van de Aramese Peshitta. De lezing van de Griekse NA28, MHT en TR luidt: ‘Ik zal mijn wetten in hun harten geven en Ik zal ze in hun verstand schrijven”.
translate.google.com:
Hebrews 10:16 – “This is the Covenant that I will give them after those days, says the LORD!
‘I will put my Law in their minds
and write it on their hearts,
I will write my Law … – this is the reading of the Aramaic Peshitta.
The reading of the Greek NA28, MHT, and TR reads:
‘I will put my laws in their hearts and I will write them on their minds’.
Andrew Xian Nyhärt, _The One Law Covenant: Recovering the Heart of the New Covenant_ (2025), 186pp., on 57, 61
In Hebrews 8 and 10, the writer quotes Jeremiah 31– the new covenant promise– not from the Hebrew wording but from the Greek Septuagint.
The LXX renders Jeremiah’s “_my law [torati]_” in the singular as “_my laws [tous nomous mou]_” in the plural.
Hebrews cites that Greek wording faithfully.
…
Also worth noting: Hebrews itself, outside the quotation, prefers “law” in the singular when stating the theological shift (Heb. 7:12).
=====================
snips
** you do not have permission to see this link **
Hebrews 7:5 N-AMS
INT: according to the law this is
Hebrews 7:12 N-GMS
NAS: a change of law also.
Hebrews 7:16 N-AMS
NAS: [such] not on the basis of a law of physical
Hebrews 7:19 N-NMS
KJV: For the law made nothing
Hebrews 7:28 N-NMS
NAS: For the Law appoints men
Hebrews 7:28 N-AMS
NAS: which came after the Law, [appoints] a Son,
Hebrews 8:4 N-AMS
KJV: gifts according to the law:
Hebrews 8:10 N-AMP
GRK: Κύριος διδοὺς νόμους μου εἰς
NAS: I WILL PUT MY LAWS INTO THEIR MINDS,
Hebrews 9:19 N-AMS
INT: according to the law by Moses
Hebrews 9:22 N-AMS
INT: according to the law and apart from
Hebrews 10:1 N-NMS
KJV: For the law having a shadow
Hebrews 10:8 N-AMS
NAS: are offered according to the Law),
Hebrews 10:16 N-AMP
GRK: Κύριος διδοὺς νόμους μου ἐπὶ
NAS: I WILL PUT MY LAWS UPON THEIR HEART,
KJV: I will put my laws into their
Hebrews 10:28 N-AMS
NAS: who has set aside the Law of Moses
** you do not have permission to see this link **
“The teaching is rooted in Jesus’ own statements about his death as a ‘ransom’ (Matthew 20:28)”
Is Matthew 20:28 best rendered with:
ransom?
redemption?
salvation?
deliverance?
Matthew 20:28
** you do not have permission to see this link **
(Etheridge) So, the Son of man came not to be served, but to serve,
and to give his life the redemption for many.
(Murdock) even as the Son of man came, not to be served, but to serve;
and to give his life a ransom for many.
(Lamsa) Just as the Son of man did not come to be ministered to, but to minister,
and to give his life as a salvation for the sake of many.
Matthew 20:28 (Berean Literal)
** you do not have permission to see this link **
even as the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve,
and to give His life as a ransom for many.”
Mark 10:45 (Lamsa)
** you do not have permission to see this link **
For also the Son of man did not come to be ministered to, but to minister,
and to give his life as a salvation for the sake of many.
Luke 1:68
** you do not have permission to see this link **
(NIV)
“Praise be to the Lord, the God of Israel,
because he has come to his people
and redeemed them.
(Lamsa)
Blessed is the Lord, the God of Israel;
for he has visited his people
and wrought a salvation for them.
** you do not have permission to see this link **
“Paul, in early writings (e.g., 1 Corinthians 15:3), states he ‘received’ and passed on the doctrine that Christ died for sins”
Is 1 Cor 15:3 best rendered with:
“Christ died for our sins”?
“Christ died on account of our sins”?
1Corinthians 15:3
** you do not have permission to see this link **
(Etheridge) For I delivered to you from the first, according as I had received:
That the Meshiha died for our sins, as it is written;
(Murdock) For I delivered to you from the first, as I had received it;
that the Messiah died on account of our sins, as it is written:
(KJV) For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received,
how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;
While the translator of the Aramaic Revelation into Greek had a very large Greek vocabulary, he was very aware of the text’s curse pronounced on those who might try to tamper with the text of Revelation.
His shoddy Greek grammar contains information about the Aramaic Revelation that would have been lost had he used proper Greek grammar.
atrocious Greek grammar in the Greek translation of Revelation
** you do not have permission to see this link **
Greek Revelation’s mistranslation of the original Aramaic for Rev 2:22 and Rev 10:1
** you do not have permission to see this link **
mistranslation at Greek Rev 1:13
** you do not have permission to see this link **
================
Tau and Omega
The book of Revelation was originally written in not Greek, but rather Aramaic.
When the Aramaic Revelation got translated into Greek, the translator likely interpreted the ‘tau’ as already being an omega, and put down simply the letter Ὦ.
Revelation 1:8 (Aramaic Bible in Plain English)
** you do not have permission to see this link **
I am The Alap and The Tau,
says THE LORD JEHOVAH God,
he who is and has been and is coming, The Almighty.
** you do not have permission to see this link **
Egō Ἐγώ I
eimi εἰμι am
to τὸ the
Alpha Ἄλφα Alpha
kai καὶ and
to τὸ the
Ō Ὦ Omega
see
‘Raphael Lataster,’ _Was the New Testament Really Written in Greek?: A Concise Compendium of the Many Internal and External Evidences of
Aramaic Peshitta Primacy_ (March 2008), 118-120
** you do not have permission to see this link **
I’m awaiting word on whether I have permission to post pro-Peshitta arguments in this thread.
From the owner of another website forum:
From: Daniel B. Wallace …
To: …
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2014 at 04:00:22 PM EST
Subject: your comments on Aramaic NT at danielbwallace.com
I have allowed you to post several lengthy comments about an Aramaic original NT at danielbwallace.com, but it is my policy not to let this blogsite be a place for an individual to advance an ideology or use the site for propaganda. So, you have posted your last comment on this blog.
dbw
“This would suggest you cause issues not just here!”
Acts 17:6 (New Living)
** you do not have permission to see this link **
Not finding them there, they dragged out Jason and some of the other believers instead
and took them before the city council.
“Paul and Silas have caused trouble all over the world,” they shouted,
“and now they are here disturbing our city, too.
“you go from forum to forum testing the patience of the moderators until they tire of your contributions and show you the door?”
No.
But I have been booted from:
the Usenet newsgroup talk.origins (which had auto-moderation, wherein in an automated fashion, one was unable to post posts going to more than 4 newsgroups at a time, e.g. talk.origins alt.atheism talk.atheism sci.skeptic;
the guy in charge of the auto-moderation decided to ban me),
a conservative website for critiquing in minute detail the many flip-flops of the candidate it promoted,
another conservative website,
a pro-Nazis group on gab,
and twitter.
David, all is not lost. Try this: read a book that interests you or watch a video that interests you. Post links here but don’t quote from them. Describe in your own words what the book/video is saying and give your opinion about it. Then invite comments. That’s how discussions get started.
BDEhrman
FreedomBen
evgendob
Robert
2 Guest(s)