I’ve been excited about this coming weekend’s conference (New Insights into the New Testament) for eight months now. If you haven’t signed up yet, here’s your chance.
You can sign up here: https://www.bartehrman.com/new-insights-into-the-new-testament-conference-2024/
This annual conference is not directly connected with the blog per se, except to the extent that I do both and both are focused on spreading biblical scholarship to a wider non-scholarly audience.
We mean to do that in a big way at the conference.
- The topic: Paul and His Letters
- 10 of the best New Testament scholars in the world
- Each giving a 50 minute lecture with 10-15 minutes live Q&A
- Over the course of two days (Sat Sept. 21 and Sun Sept. 22)
- We will transform it into a video course with additional materials for all who come.
- And for all who purchase a ticket but choose not to come to the live lectures.
- And additional features for all:
- An Attendee Mixer for all who want to come, remotely, to see and talk with presenters (in break out rooms; you choose whom you hang out with) on Friday evening Sept. 20
- My own play-by-play analysis of the presentations indicating what I thought (agreements and disagreements), on Tuesday Sept. 24
- A Round-table discussion with several of the scholars on the question of whether Paul ever changed his mind about his theological views, on Thursday Sept 26
- A Hot-Topic discussion between two of the scholars on the question of Paul’s sexual ethics (and whether they differed for Jews and Gentiles!)
Interested? https://www.bartehrman.com/new-insights-into-the-new-testament-conference-2024/
Not sure if it’s up your alley? Check out what some of the papers will be dealing with.
Dr. Jason Staples
Not by Faith Alone: Paul’s Gospel Wasn’t What You (Probably) Think
The apostle Paul is often interpreted as preaching a gospel of “salvation by faith alone,” a message of salvation through God’s forgiveness due to Jesus’ death on the cross opposed to the idea of salvation by works. This view, however, badly misunderstands Paul’s message.
Far from preaching that people are saved “by faith alone” (a phrase that only appears once in the Bible, where it is preceded by the word “not”) and that works have nothing to do with salvation, Paul proclaims that everyone will be judged based on works, and only those who do what is right will be vindicated in that final judgment. The question then is how one becomes a doer of justice, and that is ultimately what Paul proclaims: a gospel of transformation through which previously unjust people can become doers of justice and thereby be saved in the end.
Dr. Joel Marcus
Reformer or Renegade? Paul, the Law, and the Jewish People
Paul was Jewish by birth, but did he remain Jewish in practice and conviction after converting to Christianity? And what was his attitude towards his fellow-Jews—both those who shared his Christian convictions and those who did not?
Did he think a Jew had to convert to Christianity to gain acceptance before God? What did he think the future of the Jewish people was? And did he think that there was any continuing role for the Torah = Law of Moses in Christian life? We will examine the somewhat mixed signals Paul sends on these topics, which have implications for contemporary Jewish-Christian relations.
Dr. Jenny Knust
The Apostle Paul’s Sexual Vocabulary
From “man-beds” and “soft men” to “prostitutes” and “virgins,” Paul had a lot to say about sex. What his words meant, however, is far from clear.
Revisiting the Apostle’s instructions to the Christ followers in Corinth regarding nature, celibacy, and the dangers of desire, we will reconsider what these words meant and then came to mean, especially in English.
Dr. Paula Fredriksen
Paul and Pagan Gods
Many gods lived in the Roman Empire. All ancient peoples, including Jews and, eventually, Christians knew this to be the case. Exploring the ways that Jews dealt with the gods of others while remaining loyal to their own.
Tthis lecture will concentrate particularly on the apostle Paul. If “monotheism” means “belief that only one god exists,” then Paul – like his contemporaries – was not a monotheist. Pagan gods in fact played an important role in Paul’s presentation of Jesus as God’s final warrior, the Davidic messiah.
Dr. James Tabor
Paul’s Greatest Idea and How it was Superseded
Paul’s idea of elevating humans to divine status, with the man Jesus as the firstborn of many glorified “children of God” to come, is at the very core of what he calls “his Gospel,” as reflected in his seven early letters.
It centers on “second Adam” Christology that was corporate and collective—focusing on the concept of “glorification” understood as metamorphosis. In subsequent writings attributed to Paul, Jesus is seen as a preexistent divine agent of Creation, and in the interests of a so-called “high Christology,” his glorification and exaltation were viewed as singular and unique, culminating in both Arian and Nicean perspectives.
Dr. Bart Ehrman
Visions of Grandeur: Paul and the Plan of God
Paul believed the death and resurrection of Christ were part of God’s eternal plan of salvation as predicted by the prophets of Scripture. The law of Moses had been given as an interim measure to guide Jews into righteousness but only the atoning sacrifice of his Son could bring true reconciliation. Paul maintained that since the law was not a means of salvation, redemption was available to all, law-observant Jews and non-observant gentiles alike.
More than that, Paul believed God had chosen him personally to take this message of universal salvation to “all the nations.” Christ had appeared to him after the resurrection and appointed him “the” apostle to the gentiles. Paul and his mission were thus also part of the eternal plan of God. In this lecture I will argue that Paul also saw himself as the one predicted by the prophets of in Scripture to be God’s ultimate messenger of redemption, described in Isaiah as the “light to the gentiles,” chosen to bring “salvation … to the ends of the earth” (Isaiah 49:6). From the “foundations of the world,” God had planned to use Paul for the salvation of humankind.
I hope you can come! https://www.bartehrman.com/new-insights-into-the-new-testament-conference-2024/
Hey there! I’m really looking forward to this. You know I’m always up for a bit of fun. Even though it’s not really my thing, I love diving into mysteries. Balancing my studies and work as a heavy civil grading superintendent keeps me pretty busy, but I’ll definitely make time for this. I’ll work on my homework either before or after the event. By the end of this week, I’ll get the elite package. I’m especially excited about the round table discussion, and I can’t wait to hear the take on the “Paul and Pegan gods” topic. Count me in for sure!
I will purchase the course when it’s fully complete as a package
I’m excited to be attending this conference! In preparation, I’ve been studying some of the discrepancies between Paul’s teachings and the teachings of Jesus as presented in the Gospel accounts. It does seem to me that Paul was a bit grandiose at times.
I’ve got to get the fundamentals right before moving on!
Dear. Bart Ehrman
I need your help with an answer
In Galatians 1:16, Paul describes his experience when he met the risen Jesus.
“When it pleased God to reveal him in me.”
This means that Jesus was manifested in Paul.
Speaking in tongues => the presence of the Holy Spirit (within) => the Holy Spirit is “the Spirit of Jesus”.
Tongues itself means “the spirit of Jesus (the Holy Spirit) was manifested in him.”
If we look at it that way, wouldn’t tongues be the most likely explanation for Paul’s experience of Jesus’ resurrection in light of the words of Galatians?
However, not only do few scholars, even very liberal ones, make a direct connection between tongues and the resurrection experience, but most scholars claim that Paul’s experience of seeing the resurrected Jesus was a vision, dream, or profound spiritual experience.
If so, then
1
Why don’t theologians connect speaking in tongues to the resurrection experience?
2
Galatians 1:16, “He was manifested in me.”
How do you interpret Paul’s resurrection experience?
How do you explain this phrase besides speaking in tongues?
3
How do you think Paul experienced the risen Jesus?
I think a large part of the issue is the translation you are using of 1:6. The proposition EN does indeed mean “in” but Paul often uses it in similar grammatical contexts to mean “to” — and when read in the context, that appears to be the meaning here. It is not some kind of mystical interior experience but a revelation of truth (that Jesus was raised and its significance for the plan of God for salvatoin). Paul himself never connects the Spirit to this revelatory moment; his other references to it are about Jesus appearing to him (1 Cor. 15) and “haveing seen Jesus” (1 Cor. 9), not to an indwelling of the Spirit. Moreover, he appears that the indwelling comes at baptism, not conversion in understandings. Tongues for him is a gift of the Spirit 1 Cor. 12, but that comes at baptism.
Dear Mr. Bateman
I don’t speak English very well, so I’m using a translator.
Therefore, I didn’t fully understand your answer.
Please check if my understanding is correct.
1
Acts 16:7 / Romans 8:9 / Galatians 4:6 / Philippians 1:19
These verses refer to the Holy Spirit as the Spirit of Jesus.
In Acts 2, the Holy Spirit (the Spirit of Jesus) came upon them and the disciples spoke in tongues.
But you said that speaking in tongues (the Spirit of Jesus) and Galatians 1:16 (Jesus is manifested in me) are not related.
Did I understand you correctly?
2
You said that Paul’s experience of Jesus’ resurrection was not tongues, but a visual manifestation that he could see (1 Corinthians 9:1 & 15:8).
Did I understand that correctly?
IN Acts 2 the Holy Spirit is not Jesus’ own spirit but the Spirit sent from God. And yes, Galatians 1:16 does not refer to Paul speaking in tongues — it is a reference to his seeing Jesus alive after his death.
Bart:
Have you posted your recorded Sunday lecture “Visions of Grandeur: Paul and the Plan of God”?
If so, how can I access it?
If not, when will it be available?
PWF
Texas
Yes, it will be available to those who get the recordig of the conference. We are not planning on releasing it (or the other lectures) separately, but it’s an interesting question. If we do we’ll let folk know.
Bart: Robert Clifton Robinson is a Christian apologist blogger, and he has a response today to some recent posts of yours: “Impeaching The Assertion Of Bart Ehrman That Paul Knew Very Little About Jesus.”
https://robertcliftonrobinson.com/2024/09/27/impeaching-the-assertion-of-bart-ehrman-that-paul-knew-very-little-about-jesus/
I doubt you want to spend any time in a small internet backwater, but FYI.