0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5 (0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading...

Sad News: The Passing of Marvin Meyer

Yesterday was a sad day for me and for biblical/early Christianity scholarship.   Marvin Meyer passed away, the victim of melanoma.  He could not have been old – maybe in his early 60s.  He was a superb scholar and one of the most generous, affable, energetic, personable scholars you would ever hope to find.  Marvin was the Griset Professor of Bible and Christian Studies at Chapman University and Director of the Albert Schweitzer Institute

I knew about Marvin’s work for many years before I met him.   He was some years older than me and was well established in the field before I showed up on the scene.   I think the first work of his I used was his translation of Coptic Magical Texts.   Coptic is an ancient Egyptian language, in which a large number of important works were translated in antiquity; in many instances, these translations are the only forms of the text that we have available.  This is true of these magical texts that we have, which are fascinating and of real importance for scholars of ancient religion – in part because it is virtually impossible to differentiate between what we call religion and what we call magic.   Scholars for many, many years, of course, have tried to differentiate between them, but the attempts to do so almost always fail.  (You will sometimes hear that magic attempts to manipulate the divine realm but religion humbly makes requests of it; or that magic is allegedly “guaranteed” to work and religion relies on the beneficence of the deities; or… well, you hear all sorts of related things.  But when pushed, none of it actually appears to be true).  (Magic, instead, is the kind of religion that the establishment not agree with and doesn’t buy into.  It is the “Other person’s” religion!)

The best access to how ancient people used magic is through their ancient magic texts (incantations and the like).   But it’s hard to have access to this material if you don’t read the original languages.   Marvin’s translation of the Coptic magical texts was a real boon.

He was especially an expert on the Gnostic Gospels as discovered near Nag Hammadi and elsewhere.  Just a few years ago he published an English translation of all the materials discovered at Nag Hammadi in 1945, a fresh, vibrant translation called The Nag Hammadi Scriptures.  It is one of the two complete translations in English; I highly recommend it.

I got to know Marvin only about ten years ago.  We knew of each other’s work, but really had never had any contact.   We met at a professional meeting and immediately liked each other.  A couple of years later our paths were to cross in a more serious way.   When National Geographic was deciding whether to invest some serious money ($2 million or so) in the newly discovered Gospel of Judas, they asked if I would be willing to help authenticate it.  That’s another long story.  It wasn’t really my field of expertise, but they were insistent and flew me to Geneva with other experts to give them a judgment and to explain how, if authentic, it would be significant for understanding early Christianity (this last bit was to be my contribution).

After National Geographic decided to go ahead with publishing the Gospel and publicizing it, they asked Marvin to be the English translator.   He came up with a terrific translation (again, it was Coptic).   Then he, I, and several others wrote essays on different aspects of the Gospel, and National Geographic published the essays, along with the translation, in a book simply called The Gospel of Judas.   It is still available and worth looking at, for anyone interested in early Christianity and the non-canonical Gospels and  Gnosticism and, well, and all related topics.    Marvin’s essay showed conclusively that the Gospel of Judas was to be understood as a “Sethian Gnostic” work; Sethian Gnosticism was a kind of “classical” form of Gnostic belief and practice.

Marvin was a fireball; a strong personality who was always enthusiastic, and interesting, and interested.   I didn’t know he was ill, and his death has come as a really shock.  I really thought he would be around for another twenty years.   None of us knows when we’ll go, of course, and so it is best always to be ready, to leave nothing done that we really want to have done.   Marvin seems to have lived a good, full life as a scholar, a translator, a professor, and a human being.   But I will miss him and we will all miss not learning more from his scholarship.

image_pdfimage_print

My First Teaching Position
Bible Intro: Nearing the finish line

10

Comments

  1. RonaldTaska  August 19, 2012

    I am sorry about the loss of your colleague and more importantly, your friend. Such people are hard to find. I also appreciate the discussion about religion and magic and how everyone else’s religion, except our own , is “magic.”

  2. Mikail78  August 19, 2012

    It sounds like Dr. Meyer was quite the scholar. I’m sorry for your loss and I send my condolences to you.

  3. ZachET  August 19, 2012

    While listening to your Unbelievable show (which was great) I heard you say that the early Christians did not think Jesus was God. I really don’t understand what you mean as surely in John jesus was called God, and he was also worshiped throughout the synoptics. Also Jesus is referred as God several times in Paul’s writings as well.
    As these are all 1st century writings surely the early Christians did think Jesus was God

    • Bart Ehrman
      Bart Ehrman  August 20, 2012

      My next book will be on How Jesus Became God. So, well, stay tuned! (I think the author of John did see Jesus as divine; but not the other authors you mention. Certainly not the authors of the Synoptics, for example)

  4. maxhirez  August 19, 2012

    BDH fans will recognize Dr. Meyer as your “co-star” from the History Channel’s “Banned From the Bible II.” Sincere condolences to his family.

  5. Timothy M. Teeter  August 19, 2012

    I’m using his Ancient Christian Magic right now for a papyrus text I’m editing. So he lives on in his scholarship. That’s what every scholar hopes for.

  6. maxhirez  August 19, 2012

    My mistake-Dr. Meyer was in BFtB 1, Dr. Ehrman in 2.

  7. Lurchhammer  September 21, 2012

    I’m sorry to hear of his passing, I just found out while trying to do a search to contact him. Like everyone who is looking for spiritual enlightenment, I just wanted to know if he was a Christian in traditional meaning? I just figured that he was so more advanced in biblical study than I am, that perhaps he could give me some insight on the strict biblical condemnations to sin/hell and the salvation of believing in Jesus as God. I realize each must decide in their own heart, but he must have had a well informed decision based upon a balance of his vast biblical knowledge and his heart felt feelings. I wanted to ask these questions without bias or prejudice with no agenda other than my own personal enlightenment, so please don’t be offended by my inquiry, I mean no offense.

    • Bart Ehrman
      Bart Ehrman  September 21, 2012

      Yes, I believe he did consider himself a Christian. But we never talked about it.

      • Robert Wahler  November 7, 2015

        Bart,

        He told me that he was Presbyterian. We talked twice about the Gospel of Judas and he did say he had was dealing with a “health issue”. He has been the one scholar to flat-out encourage me to continue with my work on ‘Judas’ as James in this and in the canonical Gospels. He said “I don’t see any reason to think Judas was the sacrifice”, but then again, two hours on the phone simply isn’t enough time. I dedicated my book to him. Makes me genuinely sad thinking he is gone. I never met him and regret not stopping on my way home to San Jose from meeting Dr. Robert Eisenman in Long Beach in Sept. 2011. I thought about it, but decided there would be other occasion to meet him. What a mistake. You really never know, like you said. I know I could have had him seeing what I see in the Gospels (and Apocalypses from Nag Hammadi) given just a little more time with him. What a great guy.

        How is it that you scholars have all missed the (inverse) correlation of the James Apocalypses to ‘the Betrayal’? I will give you all the time and information on this that it takes to show you that the Gnostics had the original tradition.

You must be logged in to post a comment.