This semester I am teaching my PhD seminar in precisely the topic I’ve been discussing for the past number of weeks, New Testament textual criticism. Here, for your reading pleasure, is the syllabus for the class.
Reli 809: New Testament Textual Criticism
Instructor: Bart D. Ehrman
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Fall 2015
Course Description
This class focuses on one of the foundational disciplines of biblical studies. New Testament textual criticism has experienced a significant resurgence over the past twenty years or so, as scholars have begun, again, to recognize its importance for exegesis, theology, and the history of Christianity, and have realized, contrary to general perception, how much of real significance is yet to be done in the field.
Your work for this seminar will assume sundry forms. A substantial portion of it will be devoted to the study of a significant textual problem, on which you will write a term paper. The basic task, of course, is to establish the earliest form of the text. But most of the interesting textual problems in the New Testament involve other issues as well — e.g., the exegetical significance of a passage, the theological or canonical shape of the book in question, the relationship of the transmission of the text to the social or theological situation of its transcribers, and, on the more nuts-and-bolts level, the circumstances relating to palaeography and the transmission of hand-written texts in antiquity.
It would be impossible to jump into the study of a particular text-critical problem without being thoroughly grounded in both theory (how this kind of study can be done) and the history of the discipline (why these methods have developed). Without such a grounding, text-critical judgments will at best appear arbitrary and, more typically, plain wrong-headed. And so a considerable portion of our semester will be devoted to establishing the necessary methodological and historical foundation for your subsequent text-critical work.
Course Requirements
— Attend all class meetings
— Do all the assigned readings
— Collate small portions of sample manuscripts (one papyrus, one majuscule, and two minuscules) for our second class meeting (Aug. 31)
— Write a 10-page, single-space summary of F. J. A. Hort’s Introduction to The New Testament in the Original Greek for our fourth class meeting (Sept. 21)
For most weeks, consider at length the problems surrounding particular textual variants (given in the reading schedule below), by looking at the various apparatus, reading Metzger’s Textual Commentary, and digging around in other commentary and journal literature on your own.
– Make a 20-minute oral presentation summarizing and evaluating a major monograph in the field (chosen from those listed below), accompanied by a 1000-1250-word book review to be distributed to all the members of the class (your oral presentation is to be based on the written review, it is not to be a simple reading aloud of the review). Presentations will be on November 2 and 16.
— Make another 20-minute oral presentation discussing a recent development in the field. Presentations will be on November 9. Here are the options:
- Projects Digitizing Manuscripts;
- Developments of Computer Technology (collation programs, etc.)
- Use of Conjectural Emendation
- Coherence Based Genealogical Method;
- Developments within the IGNTP (International Greek New Testament Project) and/or the INTF (Institut für neutestamentliche Textforschung).
— For your term paper, you are to analyze in depth one of the variants that we discuss in class over the course of the semester, or any other variant reading that you choose, based on your reading (with professorial veto; please check with me before doing substantial preparatory work).
- Your choice of variant must be made by Oct. 19 (to allow you ample time to work on it.) The following weeks, in class, we will discuss the progress you’re making and the issues that are arising.
- Submit your final paper on Friday Dec. 4.
— Attend that evening a festive occasion at the instructor’s house, where you and your colleagues will be treated to culinary delights (pizza and beer, e.g.) and intellectual discourse.
Textbooks:
(In addition to a Nestle-Aland 28th edition)
Kurt and Barbara Aland, The Text of the New Testament: An Introduction to the Critical Editions and To the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism, tr. Erroll F. Rhodes. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1989.
Bart D. Ehrman, The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture: The Effect of Early Christological Controversies on the Text of the New Testament. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University, 2011.
Idem. Studies in the Textual Criticism of the New Testament. NTTS; Leiden: Brill, 2008.
Idem, and Michael Holmes, The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research: Essays on the Status Quaestionis. 2nd ed. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 2012.
Kim Haines-Eitzen, Guardians of Letters: Literacy, Power, and the Transmission of Early Christian Literature. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Fenton John Anthony Hort and Brooke Foss Westcott, Introduction to the New Testament in the Original Greek. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1882; reprinted Peabody Mass: Hendrickson, 1988.
Bruce M. Metzger and Bart D. Ehrman, The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration, 4th ed. New York: Oxford, 2005.
Bruce M. Metzger. A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament, 2nd revised edition. London: United Bible Societies, 2005.
Office Hours
Flexible. Let’s do coffee.
CLASS SCHEDULE AND READING ASSIGNMENTS
Aug. 24: Introduction to the Field
Aug. 31: Palaeography; Collation; The Use of Critical Apparatuses
Assignment:
Metzger, Text, pp. 3-94; Alands Text, pp. 222-79; “Introduction” to the Nestle-Aland 28th ; Collate portions of speciman manuscripts.
Variant Readings to Consider: 1 John 5:7-8; 1 Thess. 2:7
Sept. 7: NO CLASS. Labor Day. Labor on Westcott and Hort!
Sept. 14: The History of the Discipline Up To Westcott and Hort; Basic Methods of MS Classification; Standard Text-Critical Criteria
Assignment:
Metzger, Text, pp. 137-94; Alands Text, 1-47; Ehrman and Holmes, Text of the NT, chap. 24 (J. Hernandez).
Variant Readings to Consider: Mark 16:9-20; John 7:53-8:11; Luke 23:34
Sept. 21 : Westcott and Hort: Summary and Evaluation.
Assignment:
Ten-page single-space summary of Westcott and Hort
Sept. 28: Since Westcott and Hort: Debates over Method
Assignment:
Ehrman and Holmes, Text of the NT, chaps. 20, 25-27, (E. Epp; D. Wallace; J. K. Elliott; M. Holmes); Metzger, Text, 272-79; 300-343; Idem. Textual Commentary; Alands, Text, 48-71; 280-316..
Variant Readings to Consider: Luke 3:22; 22:43-44; 1 John 4:3
Oct. 5: The Greek Manuscript Evidence
Assignment:
Ehrman and Holmes, Text of the NT, chaps. 1-4 (E. Epp; D. Parker; B. Aland and K. Wachtel; C. Osburn)
Variant Readings to Consider: Luke 22:19-20; John 1:18; 1 Tim. 3:16
Oct. 12: The Early Versions and Patristic Citations
Assignment:
Metzger, Text, 94-125; Alands, Text, 171-221; Ehrman and Holmes, Text of the NT, chaps 5-8, 13-16 (U. Schmid, P. Williams, P. Burton, C. Askeland, R. Mullen, H. Houghton , S. Brock; P. Head)
Variant Readings to Consider: Mark 1:41; John 20:31; 1 Cor. 14:34-35
Oct. 19: Manuscript Classification.
Assignment:
Ehrman and Holmes, Text of the NT, chap. 19 (J.-F Racine); chap. 20 (Eldon Epp); Bart D. Ehrman, “Methodological Developments in the Analysis and Classification of New Testament Documentary Evidence,” Idem, “The Use of Group Profiles for the Classification of NT MSS”; Idem, “A Problem of Textual Circularity: The Alands on the Classification of NT MSS” all in Studies in the Textual Criticism of the New Testament
Variant Readings to Consider: Mark 1:1; 15:34; Heb. 2:9
Oct. 26: Scribal Tendencies
Assignment:
Ehrman and Holmes, Text of the NT, ch. 17, 18 (J. Royse; K. Haines-Eitzen); Ehrman Orthodox Corruption, chs. 1-3
Variant Readings to Consider: Luke 24:51; Rom. 6:1; Matt. 1:16
Nov. 2: Scribes and Readers. Oral Presentations (monographs).
Assignment
Harry Gamble, Books and Readers (peruse); Kim Haines-Eitzen, Guardians of Letters: Literacy, Power, and the Transmission of Early Christian Literature.
Variant Readings to Consider: Luke 8:3; Mark 6:3; Rev. 1:5.
Nov. 9: Major current projects and technologies, and the status of the “original” text. Oral presentations.
Assignment:
Ehrman and Holmes, Text of the NT, chs. 21-23 (T. Wasserman; J. Krans; M. Holmes).
Nov. 16: Historical Influences on the Text: Theological Controversies. Oral presentations (monographs).
Assignment:
Ehrman, Orthodox Corruption, chs. 4-6
Nov. 23: NO CLASS. SBL
Nov 30: Historical Influences on the Text: Women in the Church and Pagan Assaults on Christianity. Oral presentations.
Assignment:
Ehrman and Holmes, Text of the NT, chs 28 (B. Ehrman)
Books for Oral Presentations/Reviews
Epp, Eldon. The Theological Tendency of Codex Bezae Cantabrigiensis in Acts. SNTSMS 3; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1966.
Hurtado, Larry. The Earliest Christian Artifacts: Manuscripts and Christian Origins. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2006.
Kannaday, Wayne. Apologetic Discourse and the Scribal Tradition: Evidence of the Influence of Apologetic Interests on the Text of the Canonical Gospels. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2004.
Krans, Jan. Erasmus and Beza as Conjectural Critics of the New Testament. NTTS 35; Leiden: E. J. Brill, 2006.
Metzger, Bruce. The Early Versions of the New Testament: Their Origin, Transmission, and Limitations. Oxford: Clarendon, 1977.
Parker, David. Codex Bezae: An Early Christian Manuscript and Its Text. Cambridge: University Press, 1992.
Parker, David. Introduction to the New Testament Manuscripts and their Texts. Cambridge: University Press, 2008.
Royse, James. Scribal Habits in Early Christian Greek Papyri. NTTSD, 36. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 2007.
Zuntz, Günther. Text of the Epistles: A Disquisition on the Corpus Paulinum. Schweich Lectures, 1946; London: Oxford University, 1953.
Oy. I’m tired just going through the Syllabus. Congratulations on your organization and the challenges you can present your students with because of the years you’ve spent diversifying your fields of interest within New Testament studies and your commitment to help us lay people understand the issues.
Side question- do grad students in religious studies end up getting most of their tuition paid for by research institutes or their departments like engineers and hard scientists, or do they pay out-of-(mom and dads’)-pocket?
Yes, it’s a department in the humanities, and students get funding for their programs (or else they would never come). Most places provide funding for 5 years.
Damn. Make sure your undergrads know that. If I’d known that was how it worked I would have picked a different major and been a better student.
The class is only for grad students: no undergrads allowed!
Sorry-I meant the undergrads in your intro classes. I spent more time at a paying job than at study thinking grad school would be even more expensive.
I’m teaching my first college course! It’s Basic Writing: Paragraphs and Essays. It’s a non-credit course preparing students for their first credit-bearing English class. What do students lack the most when it comes to writing for your class?
Everything. But especially the ability to express themselves clearly, cogently, and correctly.
Sorry to go off topic here, but were you aware of the response of Harvard’s Karen King in the most recent BAR magazine to their article on the Gospel of Jesus’ Wife? There are also letters on the article from Simcha Jacobovici (whining about his treatment in BAR), James Tabor and others. There was also a recent article on Live Science Journal online about the text. It seems to be getting interesting again with Prof. King responding positively to a BAR letter writer who asked if it was possible that the GoJW was a legitimate copy created by the same copyist copying not from Codex Qau, but from another codex with line lengths double those of Codex Qau. I’m not sure I follow what he’s saying exactly, but the letter writer suggests that perhaps the codex from which the GoJW originates is an heretofore unknown archetype.
Yes, I think to most experts that seems like a stretch.
I’m impressed with myself to discover I own 3 of the books you list for oral presentations!
Wow! Quite a course!
It’s still not clear to me, unless there is the new discovery of ancient texts, what else needs to be done in the field of textual criticism.
I’ll be explaining!
Looks intense. How many students are taking this?
Six this term.
How many other courses does a Ph.D. student typically take in the same semester he or she takes your seminar?
Usually two others.
Wow! May I assume that students take only this course for the semester? Just kidding. That is pretty intense between papers, presentations and reading…or is it because I have been out of school for so long? Interesting!
It’s probably because you haven’t taken PhD seminars!! It’s a quantum leap.
It looks pretty daunting. I daresay it is comprehensive. How many Ph.D students will you have in such a seminar?
There are six in this one.
Wow! I just prefer reading the Blog, that’s too much like work!
Well it took me longer than I’d like to admit to work out which variant you found interesting in Luke 8.3. What a wonderful homophone blunder! 🙂
And your syllabus is utterly mouthwatering, and not just for the beer and pizza. If I ever inherited/won/acquired enough money to be able to retire to North Carolina…