Here I continue my thread on interesting aspects of the Hebrew Bible not known to most people I meet at a cocktail party.  (OK, I never talk about the Hebrew Bible at a cocktail party.  But if I did, I’m pretty sure this would never come up.)

Among the many other things interesting about the law of Moses in the Hebrew Bible is that many of the laws found there can be found in much older law codes – centuries earlier – in other parts of the Ancient Near East. 

Everyone knows about the “Ten Commandments.”  Even Christians who think the Law of Moses no longer is binding on them (because, they say, Christ “abolished the law”) (which isn’t true, but it’s what they say) claim that the Ten Commandments are valid (it’s usually not clear why these apply but the other laws don’t), even if they don’t know what they are (how many people can actually list them?).

And they in fact willingly break one of them all the time: anyone who has done any work on a Saturday is guilty!   When my undergraduate students tell me they keep the Ten and I ask them if they have ever had a job on Saturday they usually end up admitting that they try to follow the “nine commandments” – but that somehow doesn’t sound as catchy.

Among the many other things interesting about the law of Moses in the Hebrew Bible is that many of the laws found there can be found in much older law codes – centuries earlier – in other parts of the Ancient Near East.  When the Code of Hammurabi was discovered 125 years ago, it caused quite the stir.  It was written long before the Pentateuch, but some of the laws sure sound familiar.  Why is that??

Here are two of the side-boxes found in my textbook, The Bible: A Historical and Literary Introduction, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press).

BOX 5.3 THE NUMBERING OF THE TEN COMMANDMENTS

The term “the Decalogue” literally means “the ten words.” But what are the ten words? You would think that everyone would agree on what they were. But, as it turns out, they don’t. There are in fact three major ways of numbering the ten words, and depending on your own religious tradition (if you have one), you are probably accustomed to one or the other and may be surprised to find out that not everyone agrees with you. There is a traditional Jewish numbering, a different numbering accepted by most Protestant churches and the Eastern Orthodox churches, and yet another numbering accepted by the Roman Catholic and Lutheran churches. They work like this:

Jewish Protestant and Orthodox Catholic and Lutheran
I am the LORD your God who brought you out of Egypt 1 (prologue) 1
You shall have no other gods before me 2 1 1
You shall not make idols 2 2 1
You shall not make wrongful use of the Lord’s name 3 3 2
Keep the Sabbath day holy 4 4 3
Honor your father and mother 5 5 4
Do not murder 6 6 5
Do not commit adultery 7 7 6
Do not steal 8 8 7
Do not bear false witness 9 9 8
Do not covet your neighbor’s (various) things 10 10 9 and 10

 

 

 

BOX 5.4 THE CODE OF HAMMURABI

  • The various corpora of legal materials in the Hebrew Bible—the Covenant Code, the Priestly Code, the Holiness Code—were not unique in the ancient world; far from it. Many peoples had their own legal systems, and in some ways those of other peoples were remarkably similar to those of the ancient Israelites. None is more famous than the Code of Hammurabi, which long predated the corpora found in the Hebrew Bible. Hammurabi was a king of Babylonia in the early part of the eighteenth century c.e. His law code was inscribed on an eight-foot- high stele made of basalt, discovered in 1901. It contains 282 laws, some of which will sound familiar to those who have read their Hebrew Bibles (with striking differences as well). Here are some samples (Taken from Martha T. Roth, Law Collections from Mesopotamia and Asia Minor, 2nd ed. (Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1997).

 

  • 130: If a man pins down another man’s virgin wife who is still residing in her father’s house, and they seize him lying with her, that man shall be killed; that woman shall be released.
  • 131: If her husband accuses his own wife (of adultery), although she has not been seized lying with another male, she shall swear (to her innocence by) an oath by the god and return to her house.
  • 195: If a child should strike his father, they shall cut off his hand.
  • 196: If an awilu (= freeperson) should blind the eye of another awilu, they shall blind his eye.
  • 197: If he should break the bone of another awilu, they shall break his bone.
  • 198: If he should blind the eye of a commoner or break the bone of a commoner, he shall weigh and deliver 60 shekels of silver.
  • 199: If he should blind the eye of an awilu’s slave or break the bone of an awilu’s slave, he shall weigh and deliver one-half of his value (in silver).
  • 209: If an awilu strikes a woman of the awilu class and thereby causes her to miscarry her fetus, he shall weigh and deliver 10 shekels of silver for her fetus.
  • 210: If that woman should die, they shall kill his daughter.

Over $2 Million Donated to Charity!

We have two goals at Ehrman Blog. One is to increase your knowledge of the New Testament and early Christianity. The other is to raise money for charity! In fact, in 2022, we raised over $360,000 for the charities below.

Become a Member Today!

 

2026-09-18T11:13:39-04:00September 22nd, 2026|Hebrew Bible/Old Testament|

Share Bart’s Post on These Platforms

15 Comments

  1. Helen Young September 22, 2026 at 7:21 am

    Is there any idea if these people had any kind of prison system?

    The next question might be: What is the history of prison systems globally and in the Middle East?

    • BDEhrman September 30, 2026 at 3:05 pm

      I don’t know about that period. We have a lot more information for the Roman period that the NT is in.

  2. Helen Young September 22, 2026 at 7:44 am

    Does being the first people to have a written code of law, mean that they were the first people to actually have a code of law?

    Just because a person or people have written something down, or were the first people to write something down, does that mean the idea(s) originated with them?

    • BDEhrman September 30, 2026 at 3:06 pm

      There were certainly laws that were not codified. It’s kinda like England. They definitely have a constitution but not a written one. (Whcih strikes many Americans as a bit hard to comprehend)

      • Helen Young October 2, 2026 at 1:15 pm

        I’ve never heard of this. Could you explain it a bit? – Thanks

        • BDEhrman October 2, 2026 at 2:29 pm

          Yeah, it’s odd for most Americans. But the constitution of England involves long standing tradition and precedent, not a written document. To one’s possible surprise, it doesn’t lead to more problems that we have interpreting it, just somewhat different problems.

  3. Serene September 22, 2026 at 7:35 pm

    Yay Dr. Ehrman! The Orthodox yeahiva Ohr Somayach puts Hammurabi and Abraham in the exact same decade, not coincidentally. In scripto continua, *Hammurabi* is the Lord of Abraham.

  4. shinji September 22, 2026 at 8:13 pm

    Bart, one thing I find fascinating is Prince Shōtoku’s Seventeen-Article Constitution in Japan, traditionally dated to 604 CE. In extremely simplified form:

    1. Value harmony.
    2. Respect Buddhism.
    3. Obey authority.
    4. Act properly.
    5. Judge fairly.
    6. Reward good and punish evil.
    7. Know your duties.
    8. Work diligently.
    9. Be sincere.
    10. Control anger.
    11. Reward and punish fairly.
    12. Do not exploit the people.
    13. Know your responsibilities.
    14. Avoid jealousy.
    15. Put public duty first.
    16. Consider the people’s needs.
    17. Discuss important matters together.

    What strikes me is how different this is from the Ten Commandments, even though both are ancient moral frameworks. Shōtoku’s code focuses much more on social harmony, administration, public duty, and proper governance, whereas the Ten Commandments are framed primarily as divine commands concerning one’s relationship with God and other people. This seems to illustrate how strongly moral and religious systems can reflect their particular cultural and historical settings.

  5. shinji September 22, 2026 at 11:55 pm

    I’m sorry for so often bringing up Asian culture in a forum devoted to questions about early Christianity, but…As another example, Ashoka ruled the Mauryan Empire in ancient India in the third century BCE (approximately 268–232 BCE). His edicts promoted the following principles:

    1. Respect life and avoid unnecessary killing.
    2. Honor parents, elders, and teachers.
    3. Treat slaves and servants kindly and help the poor.
    4. Respect other religions.
    5. Practice honesty, humility, and moderation.
    6. Value good deeds above rituals.
    7. Administer justice fairly and treat prisoners humanely.
    8. Provide medical care for people and animals.
    9. Govern for the people’s welfare.
    10. Prefer moral persuasion to military conquest.

    Read alongside Japan’s Seventeen-Article Constitution, traditionally attributed to Prince Shōtoku in 604 CE, these principles suggest to me a shared ethical outlook across parts of Asia: harmony, moral character, and responsible government. Their Buddhist influences may partly explain this resemblance.

    I find their tone quite different from that of the Ten Commandments, which profoundly influenced Western thought. Of course, neither Asia nor the West has a single moral tradition, but the difference in emphasis is striking.

  6. Ludivine 173 September 25, 2026 at 5:40 am

    Ça c’est pas tout à fait exact je crois ,d’après mes sources Le Code d’Hammourabi, composé vers 1750 av. J.-C., est généralement considéré comme antérieur aux Dix Commandements, habituellement situés entre le XIIIᵉ et le XIIᵉ siècle av. J.-C. …

  7. SteveHouseworth September 27, 2026 at 12:59 pm

    I like 131 better than Numbers 5:11-31 which references what I term ‘the adultery dirt drink’, i.e. if a woman is SUSPECTED of adultery the husband can take her to the synagogue where the priest sweeps up some dirt, mixes it in water then the woman drinks it. If she is guilty the child resulting from infidelity is aborted. The big question is why the dirt is considered so consecrated? Would ancient Jews have understood WHY the dirt had that power/ability? Just weird.

    I never heard a pastor base a sermon on Numbers 5:11-31. Hmmm!

    Certainly some of the laws are modified and are found in writings not associated with the ten commandments. How many Jewish laws are there, 631?

    Regarding 195: Interesting there is no qualification if the father is a horrible, unfair and immoral person and the son is defending himself. Not asking you to justify the Hammurabi law, Bart. 🙂

  8. Tom48 September 28, 2026 at 4:06 pm

    The historians/theologians/textual critics seem to have no problem considering Hebrew borrowings from Mesopotamia, but seem to ignore any possibility of borrowings from Egypt. Yet the book of Exodus is all about the Hebrews in Egypt – did they (supposedly) live in Egypt for generations without absorbing anything from Egyptian culture? That seems unlikely. Moses, if he existed, was an Egyptian, and supposedly founded the Hebrew culture. Monotheism came from Egypt. The ten commandments came from the Egyptian Book of the Dead. The idea that god(s) care about how humans treat each other comes from the Egyptian concept (and goddess) of Ma’at. The idea of a judgement after death comes from the Egyptians. The idea of the “resurrection of the body” seems to come indirectly from the Egyptians. Even the idea of genital mutilation comes from the Egyptians.

    There were undoubtedly borrowings from Mesopotamia, but I have never understood why Egypt is so completely ignored.

    • BDEhrman September 30, 2026 at 4:29 pm

      I wouldn’t say that possibility has been ignored. There is a ton of scholarship devoted to it. It is not talked about as much publicly simply because the parallels to other Ancient Near Eastern religions and cultures are more striking than the parallels to Egyptian religions and cultures, as those who studied the fields have by and large discovered. And many of the apparent similarities to Egyptian religion, say, either are not as similar as they seem on the surface or are similarities shared with numerous other cultures as well. Each of the instances you name are worth looking at in detail in that light.

  9. EricL1 October 12, 2026 at 2:20 am

    Shouldn’t that be 18th century BCE, not CE? I thought CE indicated CURRENT ERA, and BCE BEFORE CRRENT ERA.

    The 18th century of the current era would NOT long predate Moses.

    Eric Ladner
    Tacoma, WA

    • BDEhrman October 14, 2026 at 6:53 pm

      This was probably a scribal corruptoin of the text.

Leave A Comment