Bart’s Blog

Rene Salm at the SBL (2)

0
In my post yesterday I began to explain why René Salm’s claim that Nazareth did not exist in the days of Jesus is dead wrong and is rejected by every recognized authority –  whether archaeologist, textual scholar, or historian; whether Jewish, Christian, agnostic, or other .   Here is my second and final post on the subject, again, with apologies to those who have read it already, lifted from my treatment in Did Jesus Exist?

 

*****************************************************************************************************************

Salm also claims that the pottery found on the site that is dated to the time of Jesus is not really from this period, even though he is not an expert on pottery.  Two archaeologists who reply to Salm’s protestations say the following:  “Salm’s personal evaluation of the pottery … reveals his lack of expertise in the area as well as his lack of serious research in the sources.”  They go on to state: “By ignoring or dismissing solid ceramic, numismatic [that is, coins], and literary evidence for Nazareth’s existence during the Late Hellenisitic and Early Roman period, it would appear that the analysis which René Salm includes in his review, and his recent book must, in itself, be relegated to the realm of ‘myth.’”

Another archaeologist who specializes in Galilee, Ken Dark, the Director of the Nazareth Archaeological Project, gave a thoroughly negative review of Salm’s book, noting, among other things, that…

FOR THE REST OF THIS POST, go to the Members’ Site.  If you don’t belong yet, JOIN ALREADY!!!

 

 

 

Print Friendly

Response to Carrier
Rene Salm at the SBL (2) (For Members)

p5rn7vb

You must be logged in to post a comment.