Sorting by

×

Discussions and comments about Bart’s latest book.

Critical Problems With the Bible, in a Nutshell

What's it like for a devoted seminary student to be confronted with critical problems of the Bible for the first time?  Here I continue the discussion with an excerpt from my book Jesus Interrupted (HarperOne, 2009). ****************************** For students who come into seminary with a view that the Bible is completely, absolutely, one hundred percent without error, the realization that most critical scholars have a very different view can come as a real shock to their systems. And once these students open the floodgates by admitting there might be mistakes in the Bible, their understanding of Scripture takes a radical turn. The more they read the text carefully and intensely, the more mistakes they find, and they begin to see that in fact the Bible makes better sense if you acknowledge its inconsistencies instead of staunchly insisting that there aren’t any, even when they are staring you in the face. To be sure, many beginning students are expert at reconciling differences among the Gospels. For example, the Gospel of Mark indicates that it was [...]

2024-09-05T11:20:20-04:00September 14th, 2024|Book Discussions|

What Seminarians Learn About the Bible (Often to Their Surprise)

In this post I explain how prospective pastors and teachers beginning work in seminaries and divinity schools start learning things about the Bible they never would have imagined – or if they did imagine it was only to reject out of hand.  As with the previous post, this is an excerpt from the first chapter of my book Jesus Interrupted: Revealing the Hidden Contradictions in the Bible (and Why We Don’t Know About Them), (HarperOne, 2009). ****************************** The approach taken to the Bible in almost all Protestant (and now Catholic) mainline seminaries is what is called the “historical-critical” method. It is completely different from the “devotional” approach to the Bible one learns in church. The devotional approach to the Bible is concerned about what the Bible has to say—especially what it has to say to me personally or to my society. What does the Bible tell me about God? Christ? The church? My relation to the world? What does it tell me about what to believe? About how to act? About social responsibilities? How can [...]

2024-09-05T11:22:54-04:00September 12th, 2024|Book Discussions|

Jesus Interrupted: My Most Thorough Explanation of Critical Scholarship on the New Testament

What do professional scholars know about the Bible, what do religious professionals (ministers, e.g.) learn about it in seminary/divinity school, and why don't they (usually/normally/ever) tell their congregations about it?  That is the topic of my book Jesus Interrupted (Harper One, 2009).  I consider it my most thorough overview of the range of problems found in critical scholarship on the Christian scriptures. In this thread of posts I've been explaining the topics/contents/ideas of my various books in case anyone wants to read/reread them.  In many ways I consider this one the most important: it deals with contradictions, divergences, forgery, problems of using the Gospels to know about the historical Jesus, how/why we got this canon of Scripture, the later theological creations of Christian thinkers that most readers wrngly assume are in the New Testament, and ultimately the question of whether it is possible to know all this material and yet still be a believer. I've decided to excerpt the opening chapter of the book to give a good sense of what it's about -- this will take [...]

2024-09-03T13:42:07-04:00September 11th, 2024|Book Discussions|

Jesus’ Followers in History and Legend

I continue here describing my book Peter, Paul, and Mary Magdalene  (Oxford University Press, 2005), with a final excerpt from the Introduction.  In my previous post I discussed how historical accounts and literary fictions mix in the accounts we have of these three key followers of Jesus.  I pick up from there: ****************************** Some scholars would argue that we ourselves are not so different from the storytellers of the ancient world, that when we recount what happened in the past, we too do so not merely to show what “really” happened, but because what happened is important to us, today, for our own lives.  That is to say, at the end of the day, no one has a purely antiquarian interest, an interest in the past for its own sake.  Instead, we are interested in the past because it can help us make sense of the present, of our own lives, our own beliefs, values, priorities, of our own world and our experience of it.  If this view is right -- and I [...]

My Book on Peter, Paul, and Mary Magdalene

The only book I've written because I wanted to use the title is Peter, Paul, and Mary Magdalene: The Followers of Jesus in History and Legend.  It was a blast to write.  One could argue that in one respect or another these three were historically the most significant followers of Jesus (whether they were in their own day or not is another question).  In my view they are the only followers of Jesus that we can say with relative certainty that they *claimed* to have seen him raised from the dead (a controversial view on all sides).  And most intriguing, there are lots of extraordinary legends about them that survive and that, in fact, are still believed by many people today, for example that Peter was crucified upside down; Paul was beheaded; and Mary was a prostitute.  And those are just among the more tame accounts. It's also interesting to figure out what we can actually know about them historically.  Hence my book, which devotes six chapters to each figure. Here is how I describe the book [...]

My Edition of the Apostolic Fathers

Since I often get asked about topics I've written about, I have been doing a long thread discussing the various books I've published.  For the next several posts I'll talk about my edition of the "Apostolic Fathers Volume 1" and "Apostolic Fathers Volume 2" for the Loeb Classical Library (Harvard University Press, 2003).  The "Loeb" series provide bi-lingual editions of ancient Greek and Latin writings.  "Bi-lingual" means that the original (Greek or Latin) text of the writing is on one side of the page with an English translation on the other side.  These are designed for students and scholars who know the ancient languages at least to some extent, as a way of helping them study the texts even if their knowledge of the languages is not as good as it could be (when is it ever?). So these volumes are probably not for most blog readers!  But the General Introduction I provided to the two volumes is reasonably accessible and explains what these writings are, where they came from, and why they are important.  [...]

How I Almost Published “Lost in Transmission”

I can't end my discussion of my book Misquoting Jesus without telling one of my favorite publishing stories.  OK ... without *repeating* it.  I've given it on the blog before, but it's been some years.  It was originally a response to a question about how trade books get their titles, and my explanation that "Misquoting Jesus" was NOT the title I wanted. ****************************** QUESTION: Dr, Ehrman, can you explain a little how you go about choosing a title for your trade books? Is it a collaborative effort between you and your agent or publisher? Can it be a difficult process where the title can change as the book progresses?  And if so,, can you give just a couple examples when you had decided on a title (could you name the original title ) and changed the title to the book that finally appeared at our local book store ?   RESPONSE: In earlier posts I discussed the strategies behind giving a title to a scholarly book.   When it comes to trade books, written for popular [...]

2024-08-12T10:28:42-04:00August 13th, 2024|Bart’s Biography, Book Discussions|

Why I Wrote Misquoting Jesus

My book Misquoting Jesus was the biggest surprise of my career.  No one thought (as colleague scholars frequently told me, somewhat emphatically, in advance) that a book like this would go *anywhere*.  A discussion of changes made by scribes while copying the manuscripts of the New Testament?  What?  Even New Testament experts were and are by and large simply uninterested in the field, considering it a technical, detailed, and incredibly dull enterprise.  My friends in graduate school thought i was an odd-duck for wanting even to study the matter, let alone devote a lot of my scholarship to it.  And to think about writing a  book for non-scholars about it?  Yikes. I've been devoting posts to explaining the various books I've written, and so now it's time to hit this one.  This will take will take three posts, all excerpted from the Introduction to the book (Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why (Harper, 2005).  In this opening bit I give the autobiographical background to why I originally got [...]

Interested in Textual Criticism? Probably My Most Useful (Edited) Book

Many people on the blog are interested in textual criticism, the field that examines our surviving manuscripts of the New Testament to figure out what the authors originally wrote and to see how and why their writings came to be changed by later scribes.  One of the most important books I've published was one I didn't write (!), an edited collection of essays by leading scholars in the world on various aspects of the topic.  The book was for academics, but some of you might be interested in what it was all about.   I was asked about it many years ago on the blog, and thought reposting the question and response would be a good way to introduce it here.   QUESTION: Dr. Ehrman, in your first and second edition of The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research: Essays on the Status Quaestionis that you co-edited with Dr. Michael Holmes, what was your role in editing, especially since some articles were beyond your admitted expertise? RESPONSE: This is actually a [...]

2024-08-09T09:37:30-04:00August 7th, 2024|Book Discussions, New Testament Manuscripts|

More Major Issues Confronting the Early Christians.

What were the major issues, concerns, and debates confronting the earliest Christians?  My book After the New Testament: A Reader in Early Christianity (Oxford University Press, 2nd ed, 2015) addresses these issues.  I've explained the book in my two previous posts.  Here is my third, again giving an excerpt from the General Introduction, explaining the rubrics I used in the book to cover the vital topics of Christian Origins, chapter by chapter.  At the end I provide a bibliography for further reading, books that cover the history of the period broadly and competently. ****************************** Christians of all theological persuasions in the second and third centuries realized that having a set of books deemed authoritative or “scriptural” could not, in itself, provide guidance over what to believe or how to behave.   Books needed to be interpreted in order to be understood, and to be understood correctly.  And the early centuries of the church witnessed numerous debates over just how books were to be read and used.  Among the debates was the question of whether a [...]

Major Issues in the Earliest Christian Centuries (In my Book After the New Testament)

What were the key issues, controversies, developments, and concerns of the Christian communities of the first three centuries?   These are the topics considered in my book After the New Testament:  A Reader in Early Christianity (Oxford University Press, 2nd ed, 2015). In the previous post I explained that the book is a collection of most of the most important writings from the second and third centuries -- the period right after the books of the New Testament were themselves written.  Here I talk about the various themes that I used to organize my collection, themes that I judged to be the most significant for anyone trying to understand Christianity in earliest times.  This will take two posts. ****************************** By way of introduction to this collection of ancient Christian writings, I should say a word about the nature of the rubrics I'll be using and the logic of their sequencing.  This need not entail a lengthy discussion: each chapter begins with a sketch of the important historical aspects of the topic, and each individual [...]

My Most Helpful Book? After the New Testament: A Reader in Early Christianity

What happened in early Christianity just *after* the period of the New Testament?  It's an unknown period for most people, but of vital importance for anyone interested in the Christian religion.  For the next three posts I'll explain by discussing my book devoted to the topic, After the New Testament: A Reader in Early Christianity (Oxford University Press, 2nd ed, 2015) In some ways, I think After the New Testament is the most *useful* book I've ever done.  It is an anthology of important ancient Christian texts in readable English translations, each with introductions that explain what they are about and why they matter.  Some of these are texts you may have heard of.  Some, I bet not!  But they are all important and intriguing. In these posts I will explain my book by excerpting the General Introduction, which introduces readers to the fascinating world of Christian Origins and shows it's importance and the problems its study poses for scholars. ****************************** General Introduction (Part 1) Over the past century and a half, archaeological [...]

What If Another Christianity Had Won?

If only one form of early Christianity won the contest for domination, what were the results -- what the gains and losses from that "triumph"?  And what would have happened to world history if things had gone in another direction?  This is my third and final post on my book Lost Christianities, taken from its Introduction (Oxford Press, 2003).   ******************************* The Stakes of the Conflict Before launching into the investigation, I should perhaps say a word about what is, or at least what was, at stake.  Throughout the course of our study I will be asking the question: what if it had been otherwise?  What if some other form of Christianity had become dominant, instead of the one that did?[1] In anticipation of these discussions, I can point out that if some other form of Christianity had won the early struggles for dominance, the familiar doctrines of Christianity may never have become the “standard” belief of millions of people around the world – including the belief that there is only one God, [...]

More Lost Christianities

In my previous post I discussed the wide variety of early Christianities and their ranging views.  Here I consider some aspects of the Scriptures known and used by these various groups.  Again, this comes from the Introduction to my book Lost Christianities (Oxford Press, 2003). ****************************** The Lost Scriptures The Gospels that came to be included in the New Testament were all written anonymously: only at a later time were they called by the names of their reputed authors, Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.  But at about the time these names were being associated with the Gospels, other Gospel books were becoming available, sacred texts that were read and revered by different Christian groups throughout the world: a Gospel, for example, claiming to be written by Jesus’ closest disciple, Simon Peter; another by his apostle Philip; a Gospel allegedly written by Jesus’ female disciple Mary Magdalen; another by his own twin brother, Didymus Judas Thomas.[1] Someone decided that four of these early Gospels, and no others, should be accepted as part of the canon [...]

Lost Christianities

How diverse was early Christianity?  I had been transfixed by this question for a long time when I decided to write a trade book, Lost Christianities.  It was a blast to write and in some ways launched my career of writing for general audiences.  My earlier book Jesus, Apocalyptic Prophet was definitely directed to that crowd, but it was with Lost Christianities that I started kicking broader communication to a wider readership into gear. Here's I'll excerpt by explanation of the book in its Introduction (from Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture and the Faiths We Never Knew. Oxford University Press, 2003).  This will take three posts. ********************* It may be difficult to imagine a religious phenomenon more diverse than modern-day Christianity.  There are Roman Catholic missionaries in developing countries, who devote themselves to voluntary poverty for the sake of others, and evangelical televangelists with twelve-step programs to assure financial success and prosperity.  There are New England Presbyterians and Appalachian snake handlers.  There are Greek orthodox priests committed to the liturgical service of God, replete with set [...]

More Lost Scriptures

How did we get our books of the New Testament, and what do we know about the ones that were "left out"?  Here I continue my Introduction to my book Lost Scriptures, as started in my previous post. ****************************** When was this New Testament finally collected and authorized?  The first instance we have of any Christian author urging that our current twenty-seven books, and only these twenty-seven, should be accepted as Scripture occurred in the year 367 CE, in a letter written by the powerful bishop of Alexandria Egypt, Athanasius.  Even then the matter was not finally resolved, however, as different churches, even within the orthodox form of Christianity, had different ideas -- for example, about whether the Apocalypse of John could be accepted as Scripture (it finally was, of course), or whether the Apocalypse of Peter should be (it was not); whether the epistle of Hebrews should be included (it was) or the epistle of Barnabas (it was not); and so on.  In other words, the debates lasted over three hundred years. [...]

Lost Scriptures

I was reluctant to write my first trade book (Jesus the Apocalyptic Prophet: see previous post), and had to be dragged into writing my second.  I just wanted to devote myself to technical scholarship.  But, well, I yielded in the end, and I'm glad I did. My second trade book ended up being two books.  I had agreed to write about the "heretical forms" of Christianity and their Scriptures, but then my publisher, Oxford University Press, talked me into not only doing that study (Lost Christianities) but also an accompanying anthology of texts, Lost Scriptures.  Once again I was reluctant (!) but I lost out again, and again I'm glad.  It's been the better selling of the two books, to my great surprise. Here I'll explain what it contains, taken from the Introduction to it (OUP, 2003).  This will take two posts. ****************** General Introduction Even though millions of people world-wide read the New Testament -- whether from curiosity or religious devotion -- very few ask what this collection of books actually is [...]

2024-07-08T11:45:59-04:00July 11th, 2024|Book Discussions, Christian Apocrypha|

My First Trade Book: Jesus, Apocalyptic Prophet

I have started a thread discussing the books I've written for broader audiences.  My first actual "trade book" was Jesus: Apocalyptic Prophet of the New Millennium (Oxford University Press, 1999) (uh, that would be 25 years ago!).   Here is how I explain the book and it's raison d'etre in the Preface.   In case you wonder -- I still hold the same basic views of Jesus now that I did then, and still find the arguments I adduce convincing. ****************************** Preface When anyone has asked me why I’m writing a book about the historical Jesus, I’ve usually replied, “Well, it’s about time someone did.” Actually, at last count there were something like eight zillion books written about Jesus.  And those are just the ones written by scholars.  A good number of these, mainly the lesser known ones, are written by scholars for scholars to promote scholarship; others are written by scholars to popularize scholarly views.  The present book is one of the latter kind.  I really don’t have a lot to say to scholars who [...]

2024-07-08T11:50:00-04:00July 10th, 2024|Book Discussions, Historical Jesus|

How Can We Possibly Know a Scribe’s Intentions? My Most Important Theoretical Reflection

Can we know what a scribe intended to do when he changed the text? Is it actually possible to know what anyone INTENDS?  Isn't that technically impossible, unless we get into their minds somehow?  I had to deal with this issue in the Orthodox Corruption of Scripture and there I laid out the theoretical premises I have/had, to allow me to say that a scribe intended to change a text.  It's a view that most readers completely overlooked, including a bunch of my critics. *********************** Intentionality as a Functional Category The other theoretical claim that I made in Orthodox Corruption involved the broader concept of what it means to describe a scribal alteration of the text as “intentional.”   I have been deeply interested in the question of “intention” for many years, as a philosophical problem (there is considerable philosophical discourse on it, of course), an issue in literary interpretation (especially since Wimsatt and Beardsley’s famous “Intentional Fallacy”), and, naturally, as it relates to scribes. Most textual critics have unproblematically talked about scribal changes being either accidental [...]

2024-07-10T12:29:21-04:00July 9th, 2024|Book Discussions, New Testament Manuscripts|

Are Scribes of Texts Actually Authors?

In my overview of the responses to my book The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture in the Afterword I wrote of the 2nd edition, I began to address some major questions.  In the book I argued that scribes of the New Testament intentionally changed the text in places in order to make it more orthodox in its theology or to circumvent its use by "heretics" who had other views.  That raises a question:  are scribes who change the text to make it say something different actually *authors* instead of mere copyists?  Here's how I discuss the issue at the beginning of my Afterword. ************************ I see no need here to restate the original thesis of The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture.  There is one issue connected with it, however, that has not been clear to some of its readers that does need to be addressed.  In the book I never claimed and certainly never meant to claim that the majority of all textual variants in the tradition were “intentional” (a term I will be discussing [...]

2024-07-12T08:16:36-04:00July 7th, 2024|Book Discussions, New Testament Manuscripts|
Go to Top