In my previous post I talked about what it takes to write and publish a scholarly book.  Most people who aren’t scholars aren’t thinking that way.  They want to publish a book for a broader audience to get their ideas out there.  How do you do that?

These days it can be done relatively simply by self-publishing.  I know almost nothing about how that works, other than that people do it all the time (more books get published that way than with trade-book publishers, I believe).  But I can say something about what it takes to get a book published with a professional publisher.

That, as it turns out, is really tricky, for reasons some people may not expect.  It involves a weird Catch-22.

In most academic fields — whether astronomy or biblical studies — trade books (that is, books for a broader readership) have normally been published by scholars who want to communicate with non-scholars.  The problem is that most scholars are not particularly adept at doing that  — they have difficulty explaining their area of research in simple, compelling language that is both interesting and informative (that’s always seemed a bit weird to me since most of these scholars teach 19-20 year olds.  Why aren’t they adept at communicating?  Isn’t that their job??).

Since publishers know that about scholars (oh boy do they know it…), they are normally reluctant to publish a trade book by a scholar unless they (the scholar)  already has a trade book published that has sold well.  But, uh, how’s that supposed to happen if a publisher won’t publish their first book?  Welcome to the Catch-22.  I have roughly 963 colleagues/friends/acquaintances who have complained to me about this.  I certainly get it.

The problem is that most scholars are not particularly adept at doing that  -- they have difficulty explaining their area of research in simple, compelling language that is both interesting and informative (that's always seemed a bit weird to me since most of these scholars teach 19-20 year olds.  Why aren't they adept at communicating?  Isn't that their job??).

As a result, scholars normally have to get a literary agent to represent them to a publisher to convince the publisher that the scholar will write a really good book.  BUT — ready for this? — literary agents normally won’t take on a scholar for a trade book unless… the scholar has already published a trade book.  Catch-22 Part 2.  This is not a problem most of you will have since few of you are scholars — your problem, though, if you want to publish a book is related, as I’ll explain.

But first I should say I didn’t have the problem, because I snuck into trade publishing through the back door.  I had no interest in writing a trade book and had to be cajoled into it.  When I published Jesus: Apocalyptic Prophet of the New Millennium (my first trade book) I had already written and published three scholarly books, edited a fourth, and published both a textbook  and two anthologies of ancient texts.

The publisher who asked me to write the trade book (Oxford) already had a pretty good idea of what they were getting.  Once I wrote that book, I got asked by another press to write another trade book, and it went from there. (That, I suppose, is the other way scholars can sneak into trade publishing, by doing lots of other kinds of publishing first.)

For someone who is not already a known author, about the only way to get a publisher even to take a look at a book proposal is — here is Catch-22 Part 3 — to hire a literary agent who will push the book idea with a publisher.  And, as with Part 2, it’s almost impossible to get an agent unless you’ve published a book…

A bit more on that.  Agents are a kind of go-between for authors and publishers; in most cases they help authors devise an idea, craft the book, shape the book, write the book, and publish the book.   An agent can represent a book to publishers to get them to agree to publish it.  Most publishers will not even *look* at a book prospectus unless it is represented to them by an agent.   And so for most first-time authors, it is necessary to get an agent.

But getting an agent at all – let alone getting one with any track record of success – is itself a daunting challenge for an author who is a completely unknown quantity.  Agents make their living off of author royalties (normally an agent gets about 15%).  They too do not have time for projects that are going to make no money.  They much prefer to work with authors who are certainly going to get books published, hopefully with serious advances on royalties (the “advance” is the dollar amount given before the book is written as part of the contract, based on what the publisher hopes will be the number of sales; once [if!]  the authors share of the profits equal the advance) then the additional funds come to the author at set periods).  And so agents too do not spend a lot of time with potential authors whom no one has ever heard of before.

That is especially the case because agents get contacted a lot.  For my trade books with Oxford and Harper, I didn’t have an agent.  I just negotiated my contracts myself.  Things changed when my editor at Harper (with whom I had contracted and written six of my books) left the editorial world to become an agent and convinced me to partner up with him as my agent. Roger (his name) one time told me that he received something like 50 requests a month from authors/potential authors to represent them.  But he could take on only 6-8 new clients a *year*.  OK, then.

About the only way to break into publishing as an unknown quantity, therefore , is to write such a bang-up prospectus for a book, and, say, have a chapter to accompany it, to send to a bunch of agents in hopes that one of them will decide to represent the book.  [You may wonder how to find an agent.  So do I !  I suppose you look them up on the Internet?  The problem is that LOTS of agents require a fee and then do nothing to try to sell your book.  But hey, they do pocket the fee! )

If an agent does take on the task, almost always the book would have to be completed before a publisher would look at it.  It would have to be drop-dead amazing to the agent before it would even get a look by a publisher.  An agent would have to represent it and would have to convince a publisher to take a chance.  It very rarely happens.

So all of this is highly daunting, obviously.  And it may not seem fair. But it’s simply the reality of the situation.   Getting published for the first time is extremely hard if you’re a budding scholar just off your PhD; it is even harder for someone who is not a published scholar, who simply wants to get a book published with a reputable press.

On the other side of things, though, there is always the Internet!

Over $2 Million Donated to Charity!

We have two goals at Ehrman Blog. One is to increase your knowledge of the New Testament and early Christianity. The other is to raise money for charity! In fact, in 2022, we raised over $360,000 for the charities below.

Become a Member Today!

2026-06-20T20:40:21-04:00June 23rd, 2026|Public Forum|

Share Bart’s Post on These Platforms

8 Comments

  1. nanuninu June 23, 2026 at 3:26 pm

    I’m thinking about writing a book for Mormons titled The Late Great Planet Kolob.

  2. GeoffClifton June 23, 2026 at 4:53 pm

    Thanks, Dr Ehrman. A bit depressing really.

    May I ask two off topic questions, please?
    1. What study Bible would you recommend?
    2. Matthew 7:6 – what did Jesus actually mean about casting pearls before swine? Was he suggesting that you shouldn’t proclaim his message to Gentiles? (My Bible study group have struggled with it). Thanks.

    • BDEhrman June 26, 2026 at 8:09 am

      I still think the Harper-Collins Study Bible is the best one available.

      Yeah, it’s a stranger verse: it sure sould like he’s saying that you should not share your understanding of God’s truth with those who aren’t willing to accept it. Or does he mean gentiles? (who eat pork)? Either way — it seems precisely contrary to what he says elsewhere. So that opens up a variety of options. Surely he is’nt saying don’t preach to the godless. Could he mean don’t waste all your spiritual wisdom on people who have no time for it? Seems possible. Or in the context of Matthew, since he thinks that the mission is not supposed to go to the gentiles until after his death (“I have come to preach only to the lost sheep of Israel” — but then at the end he tells his discples to go into all the world and convert everyone), is it instruction for what the disciples should be doing now in the present, before he dies? That seems possible too…

  3. GeoffClifton June 23, 2026 at 5:14 pm

    Having just read your post Dr Ehrman, I happened to turn on the TV and saw a famous person talking about his first book. I guess that, if you are well known (or rich) enough, the publishers will publish whatever you want to write.

    • BDEhrman June 26, 2026 at 8:10 am

      I’m afraid most of the major publishers of tradebooks are owned now by larger conglomerates who focus rather intensely on the bottom line than on expertise and quality.

  4. shinji June 24, 2026 at 6:22 am

    I am deeply grateful that scholars like you pursue PhDs and publish books that make your research accessible to ordinary people like us.

    In Japan, there is a serious problem: the average salary of those who hold PhDs in the humanities is reportedly lower than that of people with only an undergraduate degree. Technical and scientific degrees are often regarded as practical and economically valuable, while degrees in the humanities are seen as having little monetary value.

    I find this very foolish and shortsighted. Education in the humanities deals with the most fundamental questions, including how human beings discern what is right. In a democratic society, is that not an extremely important matter?

    I do not wish to go further into contemporary politics here, since that is not the purpose of this blog, but I cannot help feeling deeply concerned about the future of our world.

  5. pstrst June 25, 2026 at 12:12 pm

    I’m a professional author, writing books for young readers. Regarding agents — no legitimate agent should charge a fee to read your submission. The American Association of Literary Agents has information on its website about agent professional ethics.

    I spent 2 years researching and writing a biography of a 12th-century samurai, using only primary and academic sources, and felt was like a Master’s program in Japanese history. But not a PhD.

    I had left my prior agent and tried to sell SAMURAI RISING by myself via proposal and sample chapters, but unseccessfully. So I wrote the entire manscript. (I don’t recommend this, it’s not economically rational!) When I resubmitted after completion, the first editor who saw it grabbed it, and it was became an American Library Association Notable Book. Happy ending.

    Your blog, Professor Ehrman, aided my research. My subject (Minamoto Yoshitsune) lived 800 years ago. The criterion of dissimilarity was immensely helpful in separating what was likely historical from what was likely invention. Forty years separated Yoshitsune’s death from the first written accounts of his life– about the same time gap as between Jesus’s death and Mark’s gospel.

    • BDEhrman June 28, 2026 at 10:52 am

      Great! And nice ending.

Leave A Comment