Sorting by

×

Galatians in a Nutshell

Galatians in a Nutshell   Paul’s letter to the Galatians is one of the most important and intriguing books of the New Testament, in parts not difficult to understand and in other parts densely packed with meaning, and therefore heavily disputed (check out Galatians 2:17-19 or 3:19-20 some time; if you think either is obvious, I can assure you your obvious interpretation is very much disputed!).  It is only six chapters long, but there’s a lot in there.   I had a friend in graduate school who wrote an entire dissertation to unpack just one verse (3:1). How to summarize it in one sentence of 50 words?  If you’re familiar with the book, give it a shot.  Here’s one attempt at it: Paul’s letter to the Galatians strenuously argues that being right with God comes to all people, Jew and gentile, only by faith in Christ, not by doing what the laws of Moses requires of Jews as the people of God, such as circumcision and observing sabbath and Jewish holy days.    I can now [...]

2025-04-15T11:42:11-04:00April 20th, 2025|Paul and His Letters|

Proof that Luke Used Matthew? And Interpolations in Luke about the Virgin Birth.

I continue to get terrific questions from readers.  Here are two rather tough ones on the Gospel of Luke, with my responses.   QUESTION: This is a question of whether there is some good evidence that Luke used Matthew (rather than both of them using the hypothetical Q source.) How do you explain the fact that Matthew and Luke add the very same five words to Mark’s story of Jesus being hit by the soldiers at his trial before the Jewish authorities, both using the Greek word for “hit”, a word which neither one of them uses in any other passage in their respective Gospels? Coincidence? Q didn’t have a Passion Narrative so they could not have gotten it from that source. Mark 14:65 “Some began to spit on him, to blindfold him, and to strike him, saying to him, “Prophesy!” The guards also took him and beat him.” Both Matthew and Luke add to this Markan passage: “Who is the one who hit you?” Matthew 26:67-68: Then they spat in his face [...]

2025-04-17T09:34:33-04:00April 19th, 2025|Canonical Gospels|

Interpolations and Textual Variants in the New Testament

In my previous post I indicated that among the five letters that may have been cut and pasted together to make up 2 Corinthians is one that some scholars suspect Paul did not write.  If not, how did it get in 2 Corinthians with fragments of letters he did write? To remind you: this is what I said about it there: The paragraph found in 2 Corinthians 6:14–7:1 seems odd in its context. The verse immediately preceding it (2 Corinthians 6:13) urges the Corinthians to be open to Paul, as does the verse immediately following it (7:2). But the paragraph itself is on an entirely different and unannounced topic: Christians should not associate with nonbelievers. Moreover, there are aspects of this passage that appear unlike anything Paul himself says anywhere else in his writings. Nowhere else, for example, does he call the Devil “Beliar” (v. 15). Has this passage come from some other piece of correspondence (possibly one that Paul didn’t write) and been inserted in the midst of Paul’s warm admonition to [...]

Taking 2 Corinthians to Pieces….

I've mentioned several times in these posts on 2 Corinthians that scholars are reasonably confident that it is made up of two letters of Paul that have been cut and spliced together (chs. 10-13 was the first chronologically; chs. 1-9 later), and I've pointed out that some think it is made up of four or five letters.  It seems that since I'm on the topic, and will not be again for a long while, I should repost a blog that I've done within living memory (as opposed to twelve years ago) since it deals directly with the topic. Before explaining the situation, I should say that when I first heard in graduate school that 2 Corinthians was made up of five different letters, all spliced together, it struck me as a bit crazy, but as I looked at the evidence I began to see that it made a good bit of sense. I should also say that if what is now one letter is actually parts of five letters, written at different times [...]

2025-04-15T11:06:20-04:00April 16th, 2025|Paul and His Letters|

2 Corinthians: For Further Reading

This annotated list of readings on 2 Corinthians will look very familiar to those of you who have looked carefully at the list for 1 Corinthians I gave earlier.  That is because many books deal with both together, either on their own or as a part of a broader discussion of Paul and his letters. I devote a fuller discussion of 2 Corinthians in my textbook, Bart Ehrman and Hugo Mendez, The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings, 8th ed. (Oxford University Press, 2024), ch. 20.  That’s a good place to start for a fuller exposition of what I have given here in my nutshell posts.  If you have an earlier edition of the book, it will be pretty much the same, except for the expanded bibliography. Here is an annotated bibliography of books that will deal with 2 Corinthians.  ****************************** Aune, David. The New Testament in Its Literary Environment. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1987. Includes a superb discussion of the practices of letter writing in Greco-Roman antiquity as the social context for Paul’s [...]

2025-04-17T23:23:41-04:00April 15th, 2025|Paul and His Letters, Public Forum|

2 Corinthians: Who Wrote It, When, and Why?

Now that I’ve given a 50-word summary of the book of 2 Corinthians and a fuller discussion of its contents “in a nutshell,” I can turn to the questions of “Who, When, and Why.” As with Romans and 1 Corinthians there is not a lot of debate about who wrote the letter: it is one of Paul’s undisputed epistles and there are no real doubts about its authorship among the majority of critical scholars. As to when: the letter dates to some time not long after 1 Corinthians – maybe a matter of months?  And so it too is usually dated to the mid 50s. But the issue is complicated by the fact that we appear to have at least two letters that have been spliced together, and these were written at different times.  They were written for very different reasons.  And so to make sense of the “why” of 2 Corinthians, I’ve decided to give the play-by-play of the sequence of events that we can reconstruct of Paul’s history of the community – from [...]

2025-04-17T23:27:25-04:00April 13th, 2025|Paul and His Letters|

2 Corinthians in a Nutshell

In this series of posts have been summarizing each book of the New Testament, in canonical sequence, “in a nutshell.”  I have now come to 2 Corinthians, a book less-frequently read and known than 1 Corinthians. Have you read it?  Do you know it?  If so, try to give a summary of it, in one sentence of fifty words.  Here’s my attempt.   In 2 Corinthians Paul explores the history of his checkered relationship with the church in Corinth, recounting both his gratitude that they have turned back to him in friendship and loyalty after earlier having rejected him, and severely upbraiding them for questioning his apostolic authority and following other “super apostles.”   Now I will try to unpack the letter at greater, though still nutshell, length. ****************************** One of the great values of 2 Corinthians is that it allows us to trace in some detail the relationship Paul had over a period of time with his converts who made up the church in Corinth.  The book was written after 1 [...]

2025-04-08T11:23:42-04:00April 12th, 2025|Public Forum|

Platinum Webinar: April 29th

Get ready for our exclusive quarterly Platinum webinar—an intimate Zoom gathering where Bart connects directly with Platinum members for deep dives and candid conversation. Mark your calendar: Tuesday April 29, at 7:00 PM EDT This time, Bart will be tackling a fascinating topic:“A Massively Successful Heretic:  Marcion and His Followers”Come ready to think critically—and bring your questions! There’ll be time at the end for live Q&A. Zoom link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/85955376715?pwd=9brAdbgug38PQScu1FW4FeJYcPHY3h.1 Can’t make it live? No worries. We’ll record the session and post it afterward so all Platinum members can watch on their own schedule. Don’t miss this chance to engage with Bart and fellow Platinums in real time!

2025-04-10T22:27:28-04:00April 10th, 2025|Platinums|

Questions on Jesus’ Eschatology, Mark’s Accuracy, and Why Genre Matters

Here are some questions I've recently received from blog readers on various intriguing topics, and my responses. QUESTION: Thanks for the extremely helpful distinction between apocalypticism and eschatology. I would appreciate clarification on another distinction, namely the distinction between “consistent” eschatology and the “realized” eschatology promoted by C.H. Dodd. If I understand correctly, the “consistent” eschatology of Schweitzer argues that Jesus’s teaching consistently refers to the Kingdom of God being something that was coming in the future, at the end of time. This contrasts to “realized” eschatology, in which Jesus is understood as saying that the Kingdom of God has been fully realized in the present, through Jesus’s person and ministry, and that no future expectation is required. Am I correct in this understanding? If my understanding is correct, would you agree that the realized eschatology argument seems to be a case of “special pleading,” invoked because the proponents of it don’t like the idea of Jesus getting his apocalyptic eschatology so desperately wrong?! I mean, if many Jewish people at the time of Jesus [...]

2025-04-08T11:14:23-04:00April 10th, 2025|Public Forum|

One of the Most Misunderstood Verses of Paul: Flesh and Blood Will Not Inherit the Kingdom

Now that I've discussed the major themes and emphases of 1 Corinthians, explained when and why Paul wrote it, and given some bibliography to check out if you decided to dig deeper, I'd like to explain the one passage of 1 Corinthians I get asked about more frequently than any other. It involves Paul's view of the future resurrection of the dead.  I have repeatedly stated on the blog that Paul believed that ultimate salvation did not entail dying and your soul going to heaven or hell or any other kind of purely "spiritual" existence, but an actual bodily resurrection that, for the saved, would lead to a bodily existence for all time in the presence of God. How is *that* supposed to work?  And didn’t he say that “flesh and blood” would NOT inherit the kingdom (1 Corinthians 15:50)?  Here I explain how Paul understood it was all to happen. This is taken (slightly edited) from my fuller discussion in my book Heaven and Hell: A History of the Afterlife (Simon & Schuster, 2020). [...]

2025-04-08T11:08:42-04:00April 9th, 2025|Public Forum|

1 Corinthians: For Further Reading

Since Paul’s letter of 1 Corinthians is so central to the modern study of Paul, most of the scholarly books written about Paul for general audiences will either deal directly with it or be in part based on it. I devote a fuller discussion of 1 Corinthians in my textbook, Bart Ehrman and Hugo Mendez, The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings, 8th ed. (Oxford University Press, 2024), ch. 20.  That’s a good place to start for a fuller exposition of what I have given here in my nutshell posts.  If you have an earlier edition of the book, it will be pretty much the same, except for the expanded bibliography. Here is an annotated bibliography of books that will deal with 1 Corinthians, most of them as part of their overall discussion of Paul and his letters.  For direct discussion of 1 Corinthians in particular, see especially the book by Dale Martin (The Corinthian Body) and the two commentaries.  ****************************** Aune, David. The New Testament in Its Literary Environment. [...]

2025-04-08T10:58:19-04:00April 8th, 2025|Public Forum|

Do We Have the Lord’s Supper All Wrong? Platinum Post by Douglas Wadeson MD

  Scholars debate whether the apostle Paul invented the Lord’s Supper (aka the Eucharist or Communion) or merely inherited it from earlier disciples.  Here is what he says: For I received from the Lord that which I also delivered to you, that the Lord Jesus in the night in which He was betrayed took bread; and when He had given thanks, He broke it and said, “This is My body, which is for you; do this in remembrance of Me.”  In the same way He took the cup also after supper, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in My blood; do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of Me.”  For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until He comes. 1 Corinthians 11:23-26 Our earliest gospel Mark has Jesus saying, “Take it; this is My body…This is My blood of the covenant…” Mark 14:22, 24 Now, whether Paul was saying that he received this directly from Jesus or merely that it was [...]

2025-04-07T10:21:59-04:00April 7th, 2025|Public Forum|

1 Corinthians: Who, When, and Why?

Now that I have summarized the major themes and emphases of 1 Corinthians in the previous post, I can address the more specific questions of authorship, date, and purpose. 1 Corinthians is one of the seven undisputed Pauline letters – which, of course, does not mean that no one has ever disputed its authorship, only that the solid critical consensus is that Paul wrote it.  Its writing style, themes, mode of argumentation, presupposed historical context, theological views, and most everything else cohere well with what we can establish as Pauline, so in this case (unlike letters such as Ephesians or 1 Timothy) there is little reason to doubt its authorial claim. As is true of all of Paul’s letters (and the ones forged in his name!) 1 Corinthians begins (as did nearly all ancient personal correspondence), with the writer stating his name and indicating to whom he is writing: Paul, called to be an apostle of Christ Jesus by the will of God, and our brother Sosthenes, To the church of God that is in [...]

2025-04-08T10:53:53-04:00April 6th, 2025|Paul and His Letters|

Help Shape the Future of the Blog!

I have a special request to make of all members of the blog. It won’t cost you a dime, but could help bring in thousands. It involves a bit of participation on your end that should be simple but fruitful. Can you help? Here’s the deal. Those of us who produce the blog (Jen, the whole team of volunteers, and I) are very excited that we are moving into its next phase. The blog has done amazing things till now, as you know: over $3 million raised over its lifetime, $580,000 just this past year. Greater things are ahead, as it just gets better and better. We are confident of that because, as you may also know, we have hired an impressive development team, DesignHammer, to create a new, better, and more creative Blog platform that will allow us to accomplish a lot more and a lot more efficiently. The basics of the blog will be the same – I’ll post 5-6 times a week, members at the silver, gold, or platinum levels will be [...]

2025-04-08T10:50:37-04:00April 4th, 2025|Public Forum|

1 Corinthians in a Nutshell

I continue now in my thread of providing “nutshell” overviews of each of the books of the New Testament by moving on to one of the favorite Pauline letters for many readers, Paul’s first letter to the Corinthians. In 1 Corinthians Paul deals with a number of ethical issues confronting the Christian community.  Among its many gems is one of the favorite passages of the entire Bible, the “love” chapter of 1 Corinthians 13, which has been read at roughly 99.9% of all weddings in the history of humanity.  One of the big surprises of actually studying the book is that what this chapter is not discussing anything about a wedded couple having many years of marital bliss.  In fact, it’s not about marriage but, well, using one’s spiritual gifts in the church.  Go figure. 1 Corinthians is Paul’s second longest surviving letter (next to Romans) and is difficult to summarize briefly, in part because it deals with so many issues, one-by-one.  Have you read it?  Ever think about it?  If not, no problem.  Keep [...]

2025-04-08T10:49:22-04:00April 3rd, 2025|Paul and His Letters|

Two Fundamental Questions: How Do You Date a Manuscript and How Do you Know the Meaning of a Word?

Among the  interesting questions I've received recently from blog readers, two strike me as especially key for understanding how scholars make the claims they do; one of the questions challenges whether I have grounds to make one of the claims I do!  Good questions.  Some grounds (say, of coffee) are better than others.  Here are the questions and my responses. ****************************** QUESTION What is the process to assign a year to a text? For example, when you say that the earliest text of Matthew that we  still have comes from 375 CE where do you get that date? Do the authors of the texts write the year? Thanks! RESPONSE: I don’t think you are asking when the text of Matthew itself was written (which was 80=85 or so) but when this particular manuscript (the earliest one that contains Matthew) was produced.  And so that’s what I will answer. There is a discipline called palaeography (literally "ancient writing) that dates manuscripts, mainly on the basis of handwriting analysis.  Since everything in antiquity was [...]

April 2025 Gold Q&A

Dear Gold & Platinum Members, It’s that time again—your monthly Gold (and Platinum!) member perk: our exclusive Q&A session. You send in the questions—on anything connected to the blog’s focus on early Christianity—and Bart will answer as many as he can in an exclusive hour-long recording. This month’s session will be recorded live on Easter Sunday, April 20 at 2pm Eastern.Can't make it live? The recording will be sent out to all Gold and Platinum members shortly afterward. Yes, Easter Sunday. What better day to explore the history behind the traditions, stories, and texts that shaped it? If you’ve got a question, send it along to our CEO, Jen Olmos, at [email protected] by end of day Thursday, April 17 (whatever time zone you’re in is fine). Zoom link for this session: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84608863838?pwd=ZldMQms81Obf5aMyLu1TwV4NndkbwT.1 Meeting ID: 846 0886 3838 Passcode: 017087 Remember, short, to-the-point questions work best. Questions that are just 1–2 sentences will be given priority Looking forward to another thoughtful round of Q&A.

2025-04-01T15:25:10-04:00April 1st, 2025|Public Forum|

Guest Post by Dr. Paul Fredriksen Part III: The Conversions of “Christianity”

  This is the third and, alas, final post by Paula Fredriksen, William Goodwin Aurelio Professor of Scripture, emerita, at Boston University, on her new book Ancient Christianities: The First Five Hundred Years. As you'll see, it is smart, interesting, and accessible.  You can find it most anywhere you buy books. ****************************** Why should it matter, to have a historical grasp of the origins and development of early  Christianities?   For those of us who value history, the answer is obvious: better to have a clear vision of  the past rather than a blurry one. But because we still live with the consequences of events that  happened in the first through fifth centuries, I think that a more adequate understanding of that  past matters. Having a clearer sense of what those events were and were about gives us some  critical purchase on where we find ourselves, now.  Eusebius gave us our first history of the church. The traditional story, hung from his  scaffolding, is still familiar. Jesus, said Eusebius, inaugurated a new religion separate from [...]

2025-04-08T10:42:09-04:00April 1st, 2025|Public Forum|
Go to Top