Sorting by

×

The Letter to the Colossians, in a Nutshell

We continue in this series that explains each book of the New Testament “in a nutshell” by turning to the letter to the Colossians.  This is a book that claims to be written by Paul, but as we will see in the next post, there are very good reasons for thinking Paul himself did not write it, but that it was written in his name by a later follower claiming to be Paul. For now, we are interested in the letter itself, it’s major themes and emphases. I begin by trying to explain the book in 50 words. The letter to the Colossians, allegedly written by Paul from prison, praises the Christians in Colossae and warns them against false teachers who urge them to follow the Jewish law, live strictly ascetic lives, and worship angels; for this author, Christ alone represents the godhead and deserves to be worshiped. Here now is a fuller account of the main features of the book. ****************************** “Paul” is in prison for preaching the gospel (Col 4:3). While there, he [...]

2025-05-19T11:14:38-04:00May 22nd, 2025|Paul and His Letters|

Some Interesting Questions of the Week

I've started posting questions and responses from readers.  Here's another set of particularly good ones.   QUESTION: I recently read your book Jesus Interrupted and have become interested in your work. In it you discussed the potential forgeries contained in the Pauline letters and New Testament but it didn’t seem to mention much about the Old Testament. I noticed you did say that the New Testament was your specialty but was wondering if there was any evidence you were aware of that the Old Testament contains similar situations and which books. RESPONSE: Yes, my book was just about the NT, not the entire Bible.  Most of the books of the OT are either anonymous (Genesis through 2 Kings, e.g.) or written in the authors’ actual names (most of the prophets starting with Isaiah).  Others are attributed to a person who didn't write them.  Proverbs, for example, does not claim to be by Solomon.  In cases like this, since the author himself doesn't claim to be the person to whom the book is later [...]

2025-05-19T11:06:32-04:00May 21st, 2025|Reader’s Questions|

How Athens Made Me Rethink….

I am in Athens just now, heading out on a tour giving lectures on ancient Greek philosophers in relation to the teachings of Jesus and Paul.  I came over a couple of days before the tour to spend some time looking around on my own, and had a lovely afternoon at the fantastic Acropolis Museum. Every time I come to Athens I think of my first time here, for several reasons, but one in particular.  It was when I was struck by a realization about the relationship of the highly cultured, sophisticated Greek world and the rise of earliest Christianity, a realization that led to my book The Triumph of Christianity.  In many ways it was a sad realization.  I talk about it in the Afterword of the book.  This is what I said there. ****************************** The idea for this book struck me twenty years ago during my first trip to Athens.  For my trip I was particularly keen to explore the archaeological wonders of the city, and most especially the Agora and the Acropolis.  In [...]

Some Intriguing Questions about Paul’s Letters

QUESTION: I was wondering how scholars look at situations like Galatians 2:6-10 , specially the part of the text that states “they added nothing to my message” or “all they asked is we should continue remembering the poor”. My primary question is do scholars like yourself believe that the early disciples & James/Jerusalem Church saw eye to eye with Paul on all matters? As a secondary, why does Paul go into disputes later in Galatians 2 if they agreed on everything as mentioned in Gal 2 earlier? The passage of “adding nothing to my message” makes it seem like Paul had some gospel and read every single point to the disciples of which they agree with it all, large and small, and then lived happily ever after. What is the historical context?   RESPONSE: We obviously have only Paul's side of the story. But it seems pretty clear that he is speaking about his main concern/issue connected with his gospel, that gentile converts do not have to convert as well to Judaism, [...]

2025-05-19T10:51:37-04:00May 18th, 2025|Paul and His Letters|

Is the “Christ Poem” of Philippians Really a Poem? When Did Jesus Really Become “Equal” With God?

This is my second and final post on the "Christ-poem" of Philippians 2.   Many years ago when I talked about the poem, a reader (who apparently knew Greek!) objected that the poetic lines I suggested don't actually work. Below I'll give his question and my response.  But then I'll move on to an even more important issue: how the poem understands who Christ was before he became human and after his resurrection.  If Christ was divine before the incarnation, how could he be made more divine afterward?   First, the question I received about whether this is some kind of poem.  Or rather, the objection that was raised? This ‘rhythmic structure’ just does not work in Greek. The first ‘stanza’ with three ‘lines’: Who, although he was in the form of God Did not regard equality with God Something to be grasped after; In Greek the ‘third line’ is only one word and it appears in the middle of the ‘second line’, after only the first word of the so-called second line. There are a few [...]

2025-05-19T10:46:39-04:00May 17th, 2025|Early Christian Doctrine, Paul and His Letters|

The Death and Afterlife of Jesus: A Historical Reconstruction Part II – Guest Post by Platinum Member Mark Reichert

Here now is Platinum blog member Mark Reichert's second part of his two-part reflections in which he offers his own reconstruction of what might have happened after the crucifixion. So what do I think really happened? There is no way to know for sure but I can put together a story that seems plausible and makes sense to me. I believe Jesus and his following traveled to Jerusalem for Passover during the governorship of Pontius Pilate. How large a following I do not know though enough for it to be considered a “following.” Once there, he came to the attention of Roman and/or Jewish authorities in a negative way. Either he said, or someone accused him of saying, that he was “King of the Jews.” I highly doubt the account in Mark that states Jesus was bound by Jewish priests and elders and brought before Pilate. This would be like Palestinian authorities turning a Palestinian man over to the Israeli army for execution, unlikely to happen. If Jewish authorities had a problem with Jesus, they [...]

2025-05-19T10:38:11-04:00May 16th, 2025|Public Forum|

The Most Widely Discussed Passage of Philippians

To conclude this mini-thread on Philippians, which is part of my maxi-thread Nutshell Summaries of each of the books of the New Testament, I would like to provide two posts on the passage of this small book that is discussed by scholars (far) more than any other, the "Christ-poem" of 2:6-11, where Paul indicates that Christ was first a divine being in the heavenly realm who then came to earth as a human to die for the sins of others, and then was exalted to an even higher position than before, when God made him the Lord of All. It's a remarkable and much-debated passage.  At the least one can say that it shows that Paul --even though he is our very earliest Christian writer -- held to some kind of "incarnation" Christology.  Christ was a divine being who became human. Before quoting the passage, I should say that one of the reasons it has been so widely studied by scholars is that it has long been though to be a previously-existing composition [...]

2025-05-19T10:42:31-04:00May 15th, 2025|Early Christian Doctrine, Paul and His Letters|

Luke and John “At a Glance” and Controversial Questions

As I indicated a few posts ago, I have decided to add a feature to my discussion of each NT book some of the additional materials I present in my New Testament textbook the books I discuss.  These are (a) rapid fire summaries of each book that I call “At a Glance” and (b) a set of study questions that challenge students to take a position on key aspects of the book, that I call “Take a Stand.” Here they are now for the Gospels of Luke and John.   The Gospel of Luke AT A GLANCE: Luke was probably written around 80–85 c.e., by a Greek-speaking Christian living outside of Palestine. Among his sources were Mark, Q, and L. He dedicates his book to an otherwise unknown person, “Theophilus.” Theophilus may have been a Roman administrative official, or the name may be symbolic, referring to the Christian audience as those “beloved of God.” A comparative method of analysis, which considers Luke’s similarities with and differences from other Gospels, reveals several distinctive themes. [...]

2025-05-19T10:40:05-04:00May 14th, 2025|Canonical Gospels|

Philippians: For Further Reading

Here is an list of readings on Philippians, most of the books relevant to all the undisputed Pauline epistles, with a couple of commentaries specifically on this significant, short letter.  One benefit of serious commentaries is that they always begin by discussing major critical issues in understanding a book: authorship, date, historical context, major themes, disputed issues, and so on. I devote a fuller discussion of Philippians in my textbook, Bart Ehrman and Hugo Mendez, The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings, 8th ed. (Oxford University Press, 2024), ch. 20.  That’s a good place to start for a fuller exposition of what I have given here in my nutshell posts.  If you have an earlier edition of the book, it will be pretty much the same, except for the expanded bibliography.    ****************************** Aune, David. The New Testament in Its Literary Environment. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1987. Includes a superb discussion of the practices of letter writing in Greco-Roman antiquity as the social context for Paul’s epistles. Beker, J. Christiaan. Paul the Apostle: [...]

2025-05-19T10:39:04-04:00May 13th, 2025|Public Forum|

The Death and Afterlife of Jesus: A Historical Reconstruction Part I – Guest Post by Platinum Member Mark Reichert

Today, Platinum blog member Mark Reichert offers the first part of a compelling two-part reflection on one of the most well-known—and debated—stories in history. It’s part historical reconstruction, part personal inquiry, and entirely worth the read. According to the Gospel of Mark, the Jewish preacher Jesus was crucified by Roman Governor Pontius Pilate in Jerusalem the day before the Sabbath (Friday) during the holiday period of Passover. After about 9 hours on the cross Jesus “gave up the ghost.” The Roman centurion in charge of the crucifixion said “truly this man was the son of God.” A supporter and onlooker, Joseph of Arimathaea, asked Pilate for the body of Jesus. After consulting with the centurion, Pilate relented and Jesus was removed from the cross. Joseph then took the body, wrapped it in linen and laid it in a tomb carved out of rock and blocked with a stone. Early in the morning following the Sabbath, Mary Magdalene and two other women came to anoint his body. They found the stone removed and the body of [...]

2025-05-12T09:33:16-04:00May 12th, 2025|Public Forum|

Philippians: Who Wrote It, When, and Why?

Now that I have provided a nutshell summary of the letter to the Philippians in my previous post, I can move into the questions of authorship, date, and motivating purpose (who, when, and why). Philippians is almost always considered a Pauline letter, one of the seven “undisputed” epistles.  There seems very little reason to doubt it.  The letter is filled with Pauline themes and thoughts; it uses his typical kind of writing style; its concerns line up with what we find in others of his writings; and the presupposed historical circumstances are perfectly in line with what we would expect. As I’ve indicated, the letter claims to be written from prison, but we do not know where.  The “where” matters a good bit for the “when,” since if it was written, as many have argued, from Rome, then it must be toward the end of Paul’s life (since he went there after all his other known journeys and was apparently martyred there), so in the early 60s.  If it was written from somewhere else – [...]

2025-05-05T10:59:25-04:00May 11th, 2025|Paul and His Letters|

Philippians in a Nutshell

In this thread summarizing each book of he New Testament, I come now to the book of Philippians, one of my favorite Pauline epistles since I first started reading the New Testament seriously when I was 17!  The first biblical verse I memorized (apart from the Lord’s Prayer!) was Philippians 1:21:  “For me, to live is Christ and to die is gain.”    I memorized it because it was oh, so short. But once I did that, I realized I could maybe memorize some other favorites from the NT.  And started doing that.  Philippians was the first book I memorized in its entirety (again, as a teenager).  (It too is short!) I’ve never tried to summarize it in 50 words, so here’s my first attempt.  If you know it well yourself, give it a shot.  For now, here’s what I’ve come up with:   Paul writes the gentile Christians in Philippi from prison (we don’t know where), thanking them for sending much needed funds, urging them to remain joyful in their faith whatever the circumstances, exhorting [...]

2025-05-05T10:51:41-04:00May 10th, 2025|Paul and His Letters|

May 2025 Gold Q&A

Dear Gold & Platinum Members, Mark your calendars—our monthly Gold & Platinum member Q&A is here!It’s your chance to ask Bart anything related to the blog’s deep dive into early Christianity. He’ll tackle as many of your questions as possible in an exclusive, hour-long session. This month’s Q&A will be recorded live on Wednesday, May 28 at 2pm ET.Can’t join us live? No worries—the full recording will be sent straight to your inbox afterward. If you’ve got a question, send it along to our CEO, Jen Olmos, at [email protected] by end of day Monday, May 26th (whatever time zone you’re in is fine). Zoom link for this session: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84148923573?pwd=ZLvLEeWHMFJR3gjxcvjYJql9cXrTsz.1 Meeting ID: 841 4892 3573 Passcode: 862655 Short, to-the-point questions will be given priority. Please try to limit your questions to a few sentences at most. Looking forward to seeing you all there!

2025-05-08T16:06:14-04:00May 9th, 2025|Public Forum|

Matthew and Mark “At a Glance” with Controversial Questions

It occurred to me that another nice resource for this “Nutshell” Series might be some of the additional materials I present in my New Testament textbook for each of the books I discuss.  Two separate items I provide there are (a) rapid fire summaries of each book that I call “At a Glance” and (b) a set of study questions that challenge students to take a position on key aspects of the book, that I call “Take a Stand.” I’ll present these on the blog in the same canonical sequence as I’ve provided the Nutshell posts. Here they are for the Gospels of Matthew and Mark. The Gospel of Matthew AT A GLANCE Matthew’s Gospel was written in Greek, around 80–85 c.e. Its author, later thought to be the tax collector mentioned in Matthew 9:9, in fact left his identity anonymous; he must have been a Greek-speaking Christian, probably from outside Palestine. Among his sources were Mark, Q, and M. By studying his additions, omissions, and alterations of Mark (i.e., by doing [...]

2025-05-06T12:06:54-04:00May 8th, 2025|Public Forum|

Ephesians: For Further Reading

Here is an annotated list of books on Ephesians, most of them relevant to all the Deutero-Pauline epistles (that is, the letters that are assigned a “secondary” standing in the New Testament collection of Paul’s letters because scholars doubt they were actually composed by Paul himself) with a couple of commentaries specifically on Ephesians.  One benefit of serious commentaries is that they always begin by discussing major critical issues in understanding a book: authorship, date, historical context, major themes, disputed issues, and so on. ****************************** Beker, J. Christiaan. The Heirs of Paul: Paul’s Legacy in the New Testament and in the Church Today. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress, 1991. A clear assessment of the theology of the Deutero-Pauline, especially in light of the views embodied in the undisputed Paulines. Ehrman, Bart D. Forged: Writing in the Name of God—Why the Biblical Authors Are Not Who We Think They Are. San Francisco: Harper One, 2010. An account of the phenomenon of literary forgery (pseudepigraphy) throughout the early Christian tradition that asks how and why a [...]

2025-05-05T21:59:45-04:00May 7th, 2025|Forgery in Antiquity, Paul and His Letters|

Some Important Questions From Blog Readers

Here are some questions I have received recently from readers: QUESTION: I’m curious about when Paul’s letter were compiled and by whom? It seems almost miraculous that, in that time period, letters sent to various destinations around the Mediterranean could somehow be gathered up together in one place. What are the earliest fragments or complete copies we have?   RESPONSE: It's an unusually complicated issue, and it has vexed scholars for a very long time.  But there is nothing miraculous about it per se. The letters of Ignatius (somewhat weirdly, we have seven of those too), were also collected at some point, and they too were sent to a wide range of places.  But how it happened (in either case) is the tricky question. With respect to Paul, we already a references to his letters in 2 Peter 3:16, where the anonymous author (without telling us which ones he knows) calls them Scripture! And Ignatius himself, (around 110) mentions Paul’s letters. Our earliest relatively full manuscript of the letters (called P45) comes from [...]

2025-04-29T09:55:26-04:00May 6th, 2025|Paul and His Letters, Reader’s Questions|

Does a Different “Writing Style” Show (convincingly?) That Ephesians is a “Forgery”?

When I have talked about the “disputed” Pauline letters, the ones that scholars have argued were not written by Paul (even though the author claims to be Paul), I have pointed out that one reason for thinking so is that the writing style of, say Ephesians, is significantly different from what you find in Paul’s “undisputed” letters, such as Romans and 1 Corinthians. Some readers have asked whether this argument is compromised by the fact that so many of Paul’s letters claim to be “co-authored.”  Colossians, for example, claims to be from Paul “and Timothy” but 1 Corinthians from Paul “and Sosthenes.”  If they were jointly authored, wouldn’t we expect differences in writing style?  So how convincing is this argument? Good question.  I deal with it in my book Forgery and Counterforgery (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013) pp. 212-13.  The book is written for scholars, but this particular discussion is not particularly difficult.  Here is what I say about the issue there.  You’ll notice that I adopt a rather polemical tone!  Ah, I was [...]

2025-04-29T09:45:01-04:00May 4th, 2025|Forgery in Antiquity, Paul and His Letters|

Can We Trust You When You Say “Most Scholars” Think Something?

As I've pointed out, most critical scholars do not think that Paul actually wrote the letter to the Ephesians, even though the author claims to be Paul.  We will see that is true for five other Pauline letters.  I should stress: the fact that most critical scholars think something does not mean they are right.  For millenia, "most scientists" agreed the sun revolved around the earth, but that was not evidence.  Apart from whether scholarly views are right, why should you think that I myself am right when I say "most critical scholars" think one thing or another?  Have I taken a survey? I dealt with a similar question on the blog years ago.  This was in response to my similar claim that "most scholars" don't think John the son of Zebedee wrote the Gospel of John.  It was in response to a reader's question and follow up.  I'd say pretty much the same thing today, about Ephesians.  Here's what I said back then: ****************************** I have received a particularly interesting question that has led to a [...]

2025-04-28T14:14:45-04:00May 3rd, 2025|Bart's Critics, History of Biblical Scholarship|

Ephesians: Who Wrote the Letter, When, and Why?

Now that I have summarized the major themes and emphases of Ephesians (in the previous post), I can move to the issues of who wrote it, when, and why. The “Who” is the big question in this case, with the “when” and “why” depending on our answer. As I indicated in the earlier post, broadly speaking Ephesians sounds like something that Paul could have written, since it addresses a number of themes known from Paul’s seven undisputed letters:  salvation coming by the death and resurrection of Jesus, the unity of Jew and gentile in the church, the need for strong ethical standards and behavior, etc.  There would, of course, be differences with a letter of this sort, since unlike Paul’s other letters that are addressed to specific situations of specific churches, and this appears to be  a circular letter in which the author addresses no specific problem, such as moral improprieties or false teachings, and therefore offers no specific resolutions. But even taking into account the different kind of letter it is, is it likely [...]

2025-04-28T14:04:45-04:00May 1st, 2025|Forgery in Antiquity, Paul and His Letters|
Go to Top