Sorting by

×

Jude, The Denigration of Angels, and the Followers of Paul

In my previous post I tried to show that the pseudonymous author of the book of Jude appears to be attacking an understanding of the Christian faith endorsed by members of Paul’s churches sometime after his death – that is, he is not attacking Paul head-on, but the views that had developed after Paul’s day to an extreme he would have himself strongly objected to.  I summed up this view with this paragraph.  The alleged opponents of Jude argue that: Antinomian activities (actively sinful lives) demonstrate the full grace of God, which alone brings salvation – see how GRACIOUS God is?  He’ll save you by faith even if you are an immoral Cretan! Or at least the author of Jude portrays his opponents as making that argument.  Whether they did so or not is anyone’s guess; but it does give one pause that Paul himself was falsely accused of something similar already decades earlier (as he indicates in Romans 3:8). In any event, this charge against what appears to be a (post-)Pauline position [...]

2025-10-05T08:09:56-04:00October 7th, 2025|Catholic Epistles, Paul and His Letters|

Seventy Years on This Planet and One Fundraiser: You’re Invited

Today I'm celebrating one of those birthdays that ends in a zero. Yes, October 5th marks my 70th spin around the sun.  Ouch.  Or... Yay! For reasons that escape me, people keep insisting that reaching such an age is an accomplishment. Personally, I think of it more as an accident, but an accident worth marking if it can do some good in the world. And that’s what I’d like to do with all of you. A Birthday Fundraiser To celebrate, we’re announcing a special fundraiser here on the blog to support the charities that all your membership fees already go to. This time, I’ll be giving a live online lecture, and you’re invited.  It will be called "How Things Change: Major Archaeological and Scholarly Discoveries in my Fifty Years of Research" Here’s the idea: The lecture will talk about how much more we know now (and what different things scholars think now, since I devoted myself to this field in the mid 70s. Wanna come?  We're asking for a donation -- not for me (though [...]

2025-10-05T10:47:11-04:00October 5th, 2025|Public Forum|

Does Jude Attack Pauline Christians?

In my previous two posts I’ve tried to show why the short letter of Jude appears to be forged in the name of Jesus’s own brother Jude.  That naturally leads to the question of why someone would do that – not just in general (why write a forgery!):  there were lots of early Christian forgeries, just as there were lots of Jewish, Greek, and Roman forgeries, all done for a range of reasons, which I lay out in my book Forged.  But why was this particular book forged, and when, and how would we know? I deal with that problem here based on (and sometimes lifting from!) my discussion in my book Forgery and Counterforgery (Oxford University Press, 2013), reworked and reworded to avoid some of the crazy jargon and in-house talk that scholars often use in order to show that they are … scholars. It would be helpful, first, though, to summarize what I’m going to try to demonstrate.  Short story:  the book of Jude was forged at the end of the [...]

October 2025 Gold Q&A Announcement

It's that time again, Gold & Platinum Members! Our October Gold Q&A is scheduled for Saturday October 25th at 3pm Eastern. You know the drill. Submit your burning questions for Bart to [email protected] by the end of the day Thursday October 23rd. Jen will compile them and hand them off to Bart, who will do his best to answer as many as he can over the course of an hour. Remember: Preference will be given to questions that are short and to-the-point. Want to attend live? Here's the Zoom link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87053453027?pwd=jnCfSJM9XHiU42drYxrqnjgjctONJo.1 Meeting ID: 870 5345 3027 Passcode: 135440 Can't join us live? No problem. The meeting will be recorded. Jen will send out the replay within a day or two. We look forward to seeing you there!  

2025-10-02T23:34:16-04:00October 3rd, 2025|Public Forum|

Unpacking 1 Enoch, the Apocryphal Writing Quoted by Jude

In my previous post I began to describe the Jewish apocryphal book 1 Enoch, the only apocryphon clearly quoted in the New Testament, and apparently quoted as an authoritative Scripture (Jude 14-15).  Here I pick up where I left off, describing what the opening section of the book, the “Book of the Watchers” is all about.  The apocalyptic strain of the book is here obvious from the outset. ****************************** After a short poem the author launches directly into his account of the coming judgment by describing a future theophany to (literally) end all theophanies. The Great Holy One will come from his dwelling and the eternal God will tread from thence upon Mount Sinai He will appear with his army, He will appear with his mighty host from the heaven of heavens. All the watchers will see and quake, and those who are hiding in all the ends of the earth will sing; All the ends of the earth will be shaken, and trembling and great fear will seize them (the watchers) [...]

2025-10-02T10:08:03-04:00October 1st, 2025|Afterlife, Early Judaism|

1 Enoch: The Scripture Quoted by Jude

In my posts on Jude (In a Nutshell) I pointed out that the book quotes the apocryphal Jewish writing known as 1 Enoch.  Many of you will not be intimately familiar with this intriguing book, so I thought I should spend a couple of posts explaining what it is. I have taken the following from my book Journeys to Heaven and Hell (Yale University Press, 2022);  I discuss 1 Enoch there because it does indeed narrate a visit to the realms of the dead by a mere mortal – unlike anywhere in the Hebrew Bible.  Here is what I say there, in a slightly edited version.  (This will take two posts.) ******************************* The Hebrew Bible never describes the realms of the dead.   Samuel is temporarily summoned from death at Saul’s request, but he does not describe what it was like (2 Samuel 28); Elijah ascends to heaven, but we never learn what he sees there (2 Kings 2); Ezekiel has a vision of the throne room of God, but not the dwelling places [...]

2025-10-02T09:58:38-04:00September 30th, 2025|Afterlife, Early Judaism|

Jude as Pseudepigraphic (i.e., forged)

I concluded my previous post by indicating that a number of Christian readers/leaders in the ancient world considered Jude not to be authentic – that is, that it was a forgery written in the name of Jesus’s brother by someone else.  Here I continue the discussion, again taken from my study, Forgery and Counterforgery (Oxford University Press, 2013) ******************************                Modern times have seen a healthy split among scholars who see the book as authentically written by the brother of Jesus and of James, and those who consider it forged.[1] Numerous factors give the palm to the latter group.  For one thing, book gives every indication of being  produced relatively late in the first century, after the “age of the apostles.”  The apostles themselves are referred to as living in the past, and as predicting the “last time” when the author is now living – differentiated from the time of the apostles themselves (Jude 17-18). Moreover, the author speaks of “the faith” as the content of the body of knowledge that makes [...]

2025-09-26T13:47:56-04:00September 28th, 2025|Catholic Epistles, Forgery in Antiquity|

Book of Jude: Who Wrote it? When? And Why? (part 1)

In my previous post I explained the major themes and emphases of the letter of Jude, including some of its most intriguing and even unexpected features (e.g., quoting apocryphal tales/texts as seemingly authoritative scripture).  In this post and the next I will deal with the thorny questions of who actually wrote it, when, and why. Since it claims to be written by “Jude, the brother of James” it is traditionally been understood to have been penned by Jesus’s own brother, Jude (Mark 6:3).  Is that right? As I’ve done a few times before, I’ve decided to provide a longer and more nuanced discussion in this case about whether it is in fact a forgery.  The following is drawn from my book Forgery and Counterforgery  (Oxford University Press, 2013).  I’ve edited it in places to make it more accessible to broader audiences.  This will take two posts. ****************************** Jude is the shortest forgery of the New Testament, and like many of the others, it is filled with invective against its opponents, even if [...]

2025-09-26T13:55:30-04:00September 27th, 2025|Catholic Epistles, Forgery in Antiquity|

Heaven, the Hedonic Treadmill, and Homer (Simpson) Platinum Post by Douglas Wadeson MD

I'm happy to post this guest contribution from Platinum member Doug Wadeson. He raises a question most of us probably haven’t thought much about: if eternity is endless bliss, would we actually enjoy it? Or would it get… boring? --------------------------------------------------- My favorite TV series is the old Twilight Zone by Rod Serling.  There is an episode in which a small-time crook named Rocky Valentine is shot and ends up in a beautiful place.  Everything is at his fingertips: food, booze, money, women.  He wins every time he gambles.  He gets every beautiful woman he wants.  He doesn’t understand how he deserved all this.  But he becomes increasingly frustrated: it’s all too easy; he gets no kicks from it.  I won’t spoil the ending – you might want to look for the episode the next time SyFy or another channel has a TZ marathon: “A Nice Place to Visit” from season 1, written by Charles Beaumont.  Let’s just say he has a rude awakening about the reality of his situation.  I think this raises a valid [...]

2025-09-27T15:35:32-04:00September 26th, 2025|Public Forum|

The Letter of Jude in a Nutshell

We come now in this “New Testament in a Nutshell” series to the penultimate book of the canon, the short letter of Jude.  I begin by giving a one-sentence ,fifty-word summary of the book, before, in this post, explaining more fully its themes and emphases.  The letter of Jude warns its unnamed readers of ungodly teachers who promote lawless living and who, along with their followers, will suffer the severe condemnation of God on the day of judgment, just like other apostates discussed in Scripture, both humans and angels, who turned to lives of disobedience.  It is clear at the outset that this letter is principally is concerned with false teachers who have invaded the Christian community.  As he says: Beloved … I find it necessary to write and appeal to you to contend for the faith that was once for all entrusted to the saints. For certain intruders have stolen in among you, people who long ago were designated for this condemnation as ungodly, who pervert the grace of our God [...]

2025-09-25T13:21:12-04:00September 25th, 2025|Catholic Epistles|

Cleopatra, Virgin Births, and Professional Scribes: More about antiquity…

Here are yet three more excellent questions I have received from blog readers, all of them both interesting and important. QUESTION: I recently came across a rather bold and curious linguistic claim regarding the term ‘Paraclete’ within the Gospel of John, and I was hoping to ask your opinion of it. To be exact, it theorizes that the word “Parakletos” may be translated as “praised in excess over” or “glorified in excess over”. Apparently, according to this claim, the word “kleos” (κλέος) translates to “glory” or “renown”. An example cited to support this theory is the Queen Cleopatra, whose name is the Latinised form of the Ancient Greek Kleopatra, meaning “glory of her father”, derived from ‘kleos’ meaning “glory” and ‘pater’ meaning “father”. So, according to this theory, if we adopt the meaning of “praise” or “glory”, then the verbal adjective ‘kletos’ can be translated as “praised” or “glorified”. The resultant alternative literal translation apparently renders ‘parakletos’ as “praised more than/in excess over” or “glorified more than/in excess over”.  If I may ask, in [...]

2025-09-21T10:23:54-04:00September 24th, 2025|Reader’s Questions|

Questions on Forgeries, Historical Errors, and Alterations of Texts!

I'm catching up on posting some of the very interesting questions I've received from blog readers.  This will take a couple of posts.  Here are three excellent ones, all going to the heart of what it means to engage in a historical/critical assessment of the New Testament.   QUESTION: Hey Bart, I have a question about the acceptance of the Deutero-Pauline epistles. If they were written while Paul was still alive, it seems like he would have said those weren’t his, and to knock it off. If they were written after Paul had died, it seems like his closest companions would have said that Paul had already died, the epistles were fake, and to knock it off – especially if the epistles were written years after Paul had died. So my question is, why were the Deutero-Pauline epistles accepted? RESPONSE: It was nearly impossible for authors in the ancient world to know which books were forged in their name and circulated, except by accident.  If someone in, say, Smyrna, forged a book [...]

2025-09-21T10:13:33-04:00September 23rd, 2025|Reader’s Questions|

A New Way to Support the Blog: Become a Blog Steward

When I started the blog back in 2012, I had two main goals. The first was to take the historical study of the New Testament and early Christianity out of the academy and make it available to anyone who wanted to learn. The second was to do some good with it. From the very beginning, every membership fee has gone straight to charity. That’s now added up to more than $3 million for organizations fighting hunger, homelessness, and more. But here’s the reality: because every membership fee is passed directly to charity, the blog itself doesn’t keep a penny to cover its own expenses. Running this site costs money (staff, technology, infrastructure, growth). Those costs have only ever been met by a handful of generous supporters working quietly behind the scenes. Without them, there would be no blog, no community, and no charitable giving. Now we’re opening that small group of supporters more formally, and inviting you to become a Blog Steward. (You can proudly call yourself a BS’er!) What It Is A Blog Steward [...]

2025-11-12T15:13:27-05:00September 22nd, 2025|Public Forum|

Some Reflections on Our (My) Finitude and the Fear of Death

I have come up with a new way of thinking about our finitude, about the fact that we all die and (in my view) that’s the end of the story.  At least I think it’s a new way.  I don’t recall ever hearing or reading it.  If it is a common view, or a least a view that is out there (and/or long has been!), I have no doubt some of you will tell me. First, some background: My new (to me) thought is predicated, as I just indicated, on my personal opinion that death is the end of the story for each of us, an opinion many of you will heartily disagree with.  I began to hold this opinion when I became an agnostic/atheist some thirty years ago or so.  I don’t think we have souls  that are somehow separate from our physical/material beings or that will live on after we die.  I think this bodily existence is all we will ever have. Many people find that view deeply depressing and [...]

2025-09-21T10:06:19-04:00September 21st, 2025|Public Forum|

The DeuteroPauline Epistles “At a Glance,” With Questions for Reflection

In this post I give an executive summary (“At a Glance”) of the Deutero-Pauline letters (2 Thessalonians, Ephesians, and Colossians) and then provide some questions for deeper reflection on these books that claim to be written by Paul but are widely considered by critical scholars to be penned by later followers claiming to be him.   AT A GLANCE: The Deutero-Pauline Epistles The Deutero-Pauline epistles are 2 Thessalonians, Ephesians, and Colossians. Critical scholars debate whether or not Paul wrote these books. 2 Thessalonians sounds like 1 Thessalonians in some ways, but its understanding of eschatology—particularly when the end will come (not right away, according to this book)—does not sound Pauline. Colossians responds to a group of false teachers who promote a kind of Jewish mysticism; its writing style and theology seem quite different from Paul’s—especially with respect to its understanding of the resurrection of believers (which it takes to be a past event). Ephesians is a circular letter dealing with the relationship of Jew and Gentile in the church. Again, the vocabulary, [...]

2025-09-25T13:20:01-04:00September 20th, 2025|Forgery in Antiquity, Paul and His Letters|

1, 2, and 3 John: For Further Reading

Now that I have discussed the themes, emphases, authors and occasions of the “Johannine epistles” (1, 2, and 3 John) I can provide some suggestions for further reading.  These are all important works written by scholars for non-scholars.  I have given brief annotations for each book to give you a sense of what it’s about and so help you decide which, if any, might be worth your while. I have divided the list into three sections: Books that provide important discussion of one or more of these Catholic epistles, and of the problem of persecution dealt with in 1 Peter. Commentaries that give lengthy introductions to all matters of importance about the book of Acts and then go passage by passage to provide more detailed interpretation (that’s where you can dig more deeply into “what does this particular word actually mean?”; “what is the real point of this passage”; how does this passage relate to what Luke says elsewhere in his two-volume work or to what we can find in other parts of the New [...]

2025-09-18T23:14:30-04:00September 18th, 2025|Public Forum|

2 John and 3 John in a Single Nutshell

In this post I continue my summaries of the books of the New Testament “In a Nutshell” by turning to the letters of 2 and 3 John.  Because these are so brief, I will deal with them together in a single post, explaining their themes and emphases and exploring the question of who wrote them, when, and why.   For a one-sentence, fifty word summary of the two together, how ‘bout this:   2 and 3 John are letters by an author called the “elder,” the first addressed to a community and the other to one of its prominent members, warning against believers who preach a false understanding of Christ and who refuse to welcome Christian travelers because they disagree with their views.   I can now move on to a more extensive overview of these two books. On one level, they are not nearly as difficult to read as, say, the Gospel of John. Each of them is short and direct, taking up only a page each, about average for most [...]

2025-09-17T10:59:10-04:00September 17th, 2025|Public Forum|

The Weird Textual Variant of 1 John 4:3: False Teachers Who “Loose” Jesus?

This post will be about a couple of intriguing textual variants in our manuscripts of the New Testament, including the use of a four-letter word (literally) in 1 John.  To set the stage, let me remind you that in my previous post I discussed an early Christian understanding of Christ that I called “separationist,” because it divided Jesus Christ into two: the man Jesus (who was completely human) and the divine Christ (who was completely divine).  According to most proponents of this view, the man Jesus was temporarily indwelt by the divine being, Christ, enabling him to perform his miracles and deliver his teachings; but prior to Jesus’ death, the Christ abandoned him, forcing him to face his crucifixion alone. This separationist Christology was most commonly advocated by groups of Christians that scholars have called “Gnostic.”  As you may know, te term Gnosticism comes from the Greek word for knowledge, “gnosis.”  It is applied to a wide range of groups of early Christians who stressed the importance of secret knowledge for salvation.  According to most [...]

2025-09-15T18:47:02-04:00September 16th, 2025|Early Christian Doctrine, New Testament Manuscripts|

Was Jesus Christ Two Beings, One Human (Jesus) and One Divine (Christ)?

Just to show how strange and, uh, detailed scholarship can be even in New Testament studies, I want to conclude this small thread on the five-chapter book of 1 John by discussing a textual variant in its text that I was obsessed with for years.  It involves how different manuscripts word just one verse (1 John 4:3), and in fact just one word in that one verse, which is, as it turns out, only a four-letter word.   Early in my career I wrote a 22-page article on this word.  Ha! (I guess that's over five pages per letter....) The word is "LUEI" (in Greek) and it means "to loose."  It is found as an alternative reading for 1 John 4:3, which in nearly all our surviving textual witnesses says (I've highlighted the key words): "Every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not of God.  This is the spirit of the antichrist, of which you heard that it was coming and now is in the world already."  I talked about the meaning [...]

1 John: Who Wrote It, When, and Why?

In my previous post I provided a summary of the main themes and emphases of 1 John; now I can turn to the question of Who, Why, and When. They question of “who wrote it” has long been discussed, and almost always in relationship to the Gospel of John.  Neither book mentions the name John; neither identifies its author; and neither refers directly to the other.  Even so, as I pointed out in my discussion of John (see: https://ehrmanblog.org/the-gospel-of-john-who-wrote-it-when-and-why/ ), the Gospel was from early times said to have been written by John the son of Zebedee.  And since 1 John (along with 2 and 3 John) seemed so similar in many ways to the Gospel, it was assumed to have been written by him as well.  Hence the titles they received, as the Epistles of John. Among the shared themes of the Gospel and Epistles of John are the following: The images of light and darkness (1 John 1:5–7; 1 John 2:9–11; cf. John 8:12; John 12:46) The new and old commandments [...]

2025-09-15T18:34:42-04:00September 13th, 2025|Catholic Epistles|
Go to Top