Sorting by

×

And Yet Other Apocrypha: 2 Maccabees and Others, Including Psalm 151!

This will be my final post for now on the Old Testament apocrypha.  In it I discuss the final (and particularly intriguing) book accepted in the Roman Catholic church, and a few others accepted in Orthodox Christian circles. Again this all comes from my textbook, The Bible: A Historical and Literary Introduction (Oxford, 2018).   2 Maccabees The book known as 2 Maccabees is another account of the history of the Maccabean Revolt. Its author did not have 1 Maccabees as a source but was writing independently of it. His interest is principally with the events that transpired under the leadership of Judas Maccabeus, so that the book overlaps mainly with 1 Maccabees chapters 1–7. The author indicates that his work is in fact an abridgment of a much longer five-volume description of the revolt by someone named Jason of Cyrene. He has condensed Jason’s work into a single volume. Unlike 1 Maccabees, this account was originally composed in Greek. Whereas 1 Maccabees is a rather straightforward chronicle of what happened leading up to [...]

2025-09-10T13:09:08-04:00October 13th, 2024|Hebrew Bible/Old Testament|

October Gold Q&A – Get Your Questions Answered!

Gold & Platinum Members, Your moment is here—get ready to fire off those questions for the October Gold Q&A! If all goes according to plan, Bart will be recording on October 20 at 7-8pm ET, with the replay dropping later that week. Got something simmering on your mind, or maybe a curiosity brewing? Now’s your chance to ask anything related to the blog. Bart will give it his best shot! How to submit: Shoot your questions over to [email protected], and we will gather them all up for Bart. Deadline: Make sure to send your questions by Friday October 18, 2023—just before midnight (whatever that means in your time zone). Pro tip: Keep it short and sharp! The clearer and more focused your question, the better chance it has of being featured. And hey—zingers are always appreciated! You can join the meeting here: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/85000509720?pwd=qcT3gyDXphxPii5dVHlSmUTuaGpebJ.1 Looking forward to it!

2025-09-10T13:09:24-04:00October 13th, 2024|Public Forum|

Still More Books of the Apocrypha: Wisdom of Solomon, Sirach, and Baruch

In this post I continue discussing the books of the Apocrypha, accepted as part of Scripture by Roman Catholic and Orthodox churches.  These are important books, historically and culturally – but hardly known among Protestant readers.   Here are three more!  Descriptions are taken from my book The Bible: A Historical and Literary Introduction.   The Wisdom of Solomon The Wisdom of Solomon is a book of positive wisdom (recall Proverbs), which claims to be written by the great king of the United Monarchy. In fact it was written many centuries later, by a Jew in the Diaspora, possibly in the first century b.c.e. or the first century c.e. The book celebrates Wisdom as the greatest gift to humans and insists that it involves proper fear and adoration of God, which will lead to eternal reward. Those who lead ungodly lives, on the other hand “will be punished as their reasoning deserves” (5:10). The exaltation of wisdom recalls Proverbs 8, where Wisdom appears as a female consort with God at the beginning of all [...]

2025-09-10T13:09:08-04:00October 12th, 2024|Hebrew Bible/Old Testament|

Some More of the OT Apocrypha: the Letter of Jeremiah, Additions to Daniel, and 1 Maccabees

The OT Apocrypha/Deuterocanonical books are truly fascinating, even if not widely read.  Few people outside of the Catholic and Orthodox traditions knows about the first one; the other two here though are better known and, in fact, historically significant. Some descriptions from my book The New Testament: A Historical and Literary Introduction. ****************************** The Letter of Jeremiah This is one of the shortest books of Apocrypha—it is only one chapter long, and in the Latin tradition of the Roman Catholic Church it is included as the final chapter of the book of Baruch. The book is allegedly written by the prophet Jeremiah, sent to the Judeans bound for Babylonian exile. In exile they will be among people who worship other gods through idols. This book is nothing but an attack on pagan idolatry. The real historical context of the writing is a situation in which Jews around the world were surrounded by idol worship. It may have been produced in the aftermath of the Maccabean Revolt; it appears to have been composed in [...]

2025-09-10T13:09:08-04:00October 10th, 2024|Hebrew Bible/Old Testament|

Platinum Webinar for October: “The Literacy of Jesus: Could the Christian Savior Read and Write?”

Dear Platinum Members, If you missed the live session of this quarter's Platinum Webinar, fear not. We have recorded the talk and it is now available for you to view. This webinar addressed The Literacy of Jesus: Could the Christian Savior Read and Write? Bart covers a lot of fascinating ground in this talk, including: Why this topic is even a question. Context around literacy in ancient societies. What the Bible says (and doesn't say) about Jesus reading and writing. ...and so much more. Please enjoy the lecture here: Platinum Webinar: The Literacy of Jesus (October 2024) Hope to see you next time! -Jen  

2025-09-10T13:09:24-04:00October 10th, 2024|Platinums, Public Forum|

Some of the Old Testament Apocrypha: Tobit, Judith, and Additions to Esther

In my previous post I began to describe the Old Testament Apocrypha/Deuterocanonical books.  In the several posts that follow I will describe the ones commonly accepted by Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches.   These are very interesting books, well worth reading, and, as I've said, canonical Scripture for some parts of the Christian church. My summaries here are taken from my book, The Bible: A Historical and Literary Introduction (Oxford, 2018) ****************************** Tobit Tobit is a work of historical fiction —by which I mean it is a fictional tale set within a real historical context. Originally the book was written in Aramaic, either in the late third century b.c.e. or the early second. The narrative is set in the eighth century b.c.e. in the city of Nineveh, where the hero of the story, Tobit, has been exiled from his town in Galilee during the conquests of the Assyrian king Shalmaneser. In other words, the account is allegedly taking place after the destruction of the northern kingdom of Israel. The story involves two subplots that eventually [...]

2025-09-10T13:09:08-04:00October 9th, 2024|Hebrew Bible/Old Testament, Public Forum|

Introducing the Old Testament Apocrypha

Lots of people on the blog seem to be really interested in early Christian apocrypha -- other Gospels, Acts, epistles, apocalypses that did not make it into the New Testament.  It's a major area of fascination for me as well.  But many folk talk about them as "the Apocrypha" and probably that's not quite right -- that is a designation usually reserved for the "Old Testament Apocrypha," which are not Christian books but Jewish. Many years ago I explained what these books are on the blog, and since I still get asked about them by  members, I thought it would be helpful to over that ground again. I begin with a basic overview taken from my textbook on the entire Bible, Genesis to Revelation, The Bible: A Historical and Literary Introduction, 2nd. ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2018).   ****************************** In addition to the canonical books in the Hebrew Bible, there was other literature written by other Jewish authors that cannot be found there, but that is of great importance for anyone interested in it. [...]

2025-09-10T13:09:08-04:00October 8th, 2024|Early Judaism, Hebrew Bible/Old Testament|

Was the Apocalypse of Peter Originally Considered Part of the New Testament?

In my previous post I pointed out that our earliest list of which books should be considered Christian Scripture (that is, parts of the New Testament), the Muratorian Fragment from the 180s CE, lists the Apocalypse of Peter as a book that was accepted by some Christians.  I've talked about the book on the blog before.  It's extraordinarily interesting.  It is the first Christian account we have of a journey to the realms of the damned and the blessed, where Peter himself is shown by Christ the torments of the one and the glories of the other.  In my recent academic book Journeys to Heaven and Hell, I devote a chapter to explaining why the book in the end did not get included in Scripture but the book of 2 Peter, which was NOT accepted by the Muratorian canon or even known about then so far as we can tell, did make it in. In this post I'll simply explain what we know about the popularity and acceptance of the Apocalypse of Peter [...]

The First Ancient Christian List of the Books (allegedly) of the New Testament

The first church father to name Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John as the four Gospels in the New Testament is Irenaeus, the bishop of Lyons in Gaul (i.e., the ancient forerunner of Lyon, France), in his five-volume work, "Against Heresies" in 180 CE.   He spent significant time in Rome itself before his appointment in Gaul, and he considered the Roman church to be the center of Christendom at his time, but there are no Roman authors before him who say anything about it.  The important teacher / philosopher Justin (who acquired the epithet "Martyr"), from whom we have three surviving writings about Jesus, Scripture, and the truth of Christianity, quotes the Gospels but never indicates who wrote them. There is another (apparent) witness to the fourfold Gospel of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John from Irenaeus’s time, and also appears to be connected with Rome -- and as it turns out, it is the first list of canonical NT books that we have from antiquity.  This comes to us in the fragmentary Latin text [...]

Was the New Testament Canon Really Closed in 367 CE?

If we are talking about the earliest Christian writings -- the subject of my previous three posts -- we naturally want to know when decisions were made about WHEN church father settled on our 27-book canon of the New Testament.  Many people -- including tons of scholars -- set a precise date: 367 CE, in the decision written by the famous theologian Athanasius of Alexandria. Is that right? My first academic publication addressed this question and answered: NO.  Here's how I have talked about the issue and my attempt to overturn the widely held view, from long ago! ****************************** My first semester in the PhD program at Princeton Theological Seminary I had a seminar on the “Canon of the New Testament” with Bruce Metzger.   This was a class that focused on the questions surrounding how we ended up with the twenty-seven books in the New Testament.  Who decided that it would be these twenty-seven books, and no others?  What was motivating these people?  What were the grounds for their decisions?  And when did they make [...]

2025-09-10T13:09:07-04:00October 3rd, 2024|Early Christian Writings (100-400 CE), Public Forum|

Special Webinar Announcement: Hurricane Helene Fundraiser

10/3/2024 Update: Bart has returned safely home and recorded the below video message for you: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDM8_jr6qn0&t=108s Original Post: As many of you know, Hurricane Helene swept through the mountains of Western North Carolina over the weekend, leaving significant destruction in its path. On Sunday, we announced a fundraiser to support relief efforts. We're asking for a suggested donation of $50.00, though any amount is appreciated. Those who donate will be invited to attend a lecture by Bart to be given on Monday October 7th at 7:30pm ET on the topic of: Why Do Disasters Hit? The Bible’s Views. All those who donate and register for the event will be sent a recording of the lecture, so please consider donating even if you're not able to attend live. To the many of you who have already donated, we sincerely thank you for your generosity and look forward to seeing you on Monday. If you missed that email, we're sharing the details here as well. ****************************** Hi from Jen, I hope this message finds you safe [...]

2025-09-10T13:09:08-04:00October 2nd, 2024|Public Forum|

Finding All the Earliest Christian Texts in One Place

How does one decide which books should belong to a collection of ALL the surviving early Christian writings of the first hundred years of the church?  Here I explain my procedure when producing my set of translations with introductions, The New Testament and Other Early Christian Writings: A Reader, 2nd ed. 2004 (Oxford University Press), and explain the other features of book.  This follows on my earlier posts and again is taken from the Introduction to the volume. ****************************** In sum, it is important for modern readers to realize that the book we call the New Testament is actually a collection of books, put together by persons living much later than the actual authors. When "Matthew" wrote his Gospel, he had no idea that someone would eventually combine his book with three others that were more or less like it to form the first section of a canon of Scripture, a canon that was to include a history of the Christian movement, personal letters sent by other early Christians, and an apocalyptic narrative [...]

2025-09-10T13:09:07-04:00October 2nd, 2024|Public Forum|

Why Were Some of the Earliest Christian Books Left OUT of the NT?

How did church leaders decide which books would be included in the New Testament canon?  Why were some let in, but others left out?  Here I continue my discussion as excerpted from the Introduction in my anthology:  The New Testament and Other Early Christian Writings: A Reader, 2nd ed. 2004 (Oxford University Press.) ****************************** The literature that was produced by early Christians served to bind the various Christian communities together. Leaders and groups from one congregation wrote to others; books written in one place for one purpose were taken to another place, copied there, and read by Christians completely unknown to the author and his or her own community. This earliest Christian literature thus provided spiritual, intellectual, and emotional cohesion for communities that were geographically separated. The literature that was produced by early Christians served to bind the various Christian communities together. Leaders and groups from one congregation wrote to others; books written in one place for one purpose were taken to another place, copied there, and read by Christians completely unknown to [...]

ALL the Christian Writings of the First Hundred Years

In 1996 I was struck by the thought that it would be really useful for professors of New Testament to have an anthology of ALL the Christian books written in the first century of the religion, not just a translation of the NT itself.  I looked around and couldn’t find one.  I told my editor at Oxford Press, and he couldn’t believe it.  But lo and behold. So we agreed I should produce one.  I decided that it should be all the surviving books written by Christians during its first hundred years, so 30-130 CE (though the first surviving book was probably not written till 20 years after Jesus’ death), that I would use the NRSV translation for the NT (with permission), and then include all the other books that could be plausibly dated to the period. The idea is that the New Testament contains *some* of the earliest Christian literature, not all of it.  And if anyone is interested in a historical study of the NT, they need to read it in light of [...]

2025-09-10T13:09:07-04:00September 29th, 2024|Book Discussions, Early Christian Writings (100-400 CE)|

Some Interesting Random Questions

I’ve recently answered some queries from readers and thought that the questions were too good not to post for all to see.   They are all on different topics, but interesting ones, and they required different lengths of answer.  Here they are, four of them, a blog Q&A.   Question One: I am writing a blog about how Christians defend biblical inerrancy and I came across an on-line article with this quote. “You have searched the Scriptures, which are true and given by the Holy Spirit. You know that nothing unrighteous or counterfeit is written in them.” —Clement of Rome, letter to the Corinthians, first century Two questions: Was there really a Pope in the first century? What kind of “scripture” could he possibly be referring to in the last decade of the first century?   My Response: This article is giving a passage found in 1 Clement 45.2.  1 Clement is a letter from around 95 CE or so, written by the Christians in Rome to the Christians in Corinth; presumably *someone* [...]

2025-09-10T13:09:07-04:00September 28th, 2024|Reader’s Questions|

Platinum Webinar: Could Jesus Read and Write?

Dear Platinum Members, Our next Quarterly Platinum Webinar is set for Wednesday, October 9, 2023, at 7:30 pm ET. For this talk, I’ll be tackling a question that has been widely debated among scholars and enthusiasts alike: Could Jesus read and write? While many have pondered this over the years, the scholarly evidence and interpretations are far from settled, and there’s more to the story than you might expect. I’ll explore the latest research and perspectives, followed by a Q&A and discussion, where we can really unpack the topic together. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts. Here's the Zoom link: Quarterly Platinum Webinar I hope to see you there. Bart

2025-09-10T13:09:08-04:00September 27th, 2024|Public Forum|

A PROOF of the Resurrection of Jesus. What Do YOU Think?

Do you yourself think there can be empirical proof that Jesus was raised from the dead?  There’s not a right answer – I’m just asking, so you can express your opinion. Last week I held a live Q&A for the Gold Members of the blog (if you’re not familiar with the perks that go along with being a Gold member, check the options out here:  https://ehrmanblog.org/register/ )   There were lots of intriguing questions on a range of topics.  One that I found particularly, well, intriguing was about an argument sometimes used to show that Jesus must have been raised from the dead and that the Christian claims are therefore demonstrably true. The questioner asked what I thought of the argument made by William Lane Craig that the amazing expanse of Christianity, as it began to grow into the world’s largest religion, shows that the resurrection of Jesus must have happened.  How else would one explain the incredible success of the Christian claims?  It must have been based on a miracle. Let me make [...]

2025-09-10T13:09:07-04:00September 26th, 2024|Public Forum|

More About My Book “Did Jesus Exist”

I think what surprised me the most about the vitriolic response I received from (some) mythicists to my book "Did Jesus Exist" was that when I actually spoke or corresponded with them, it became very clear that many knew almost nothing about the Bible, let alone biblical scholarship. I was at a social event for mythicists some years ago now, after I wrote my book.  Even though a lot (most?) of the people there thought I was completely out to lunch, everyone was extremely friendly and affable in person and I had some very pleasant conversations. But often, after small talk and a few jokes, when we'd get to issues or questions, it would be clear that the person I was talking with literally had almost no idea about basic information about the New Testament -- for example what was actually in the Gospels, when they are usually dated in relation to the time of Jesus, what we can say about their authors, what sources lie behind them, and so on -- most [...]

2025-09-10T13:09:07-04:00September 25th, 2024|Book Discussions, Historical Jesus, Mythicism|

My Book “Did Jesus Exist” (an answer to the mythicists)

Is there actually any evidence that Jesus existed?  Are there reasons for thinking he was completely made up?  That  Jesus of Nazareth is actually a myth? I have been providing a series of posts connected with the various books I’ve written for general audiences over the years and now I’ve arrived at my book Did Jesus Exist (HarperOne: 2011).  I wrote the book when “mythicism” was still kind of taking off and most people hadn’t heard about it.  I suppose most still haven’t heard about it, but lots of agnostics, atheists, skeptics, and general-internet-junkies have.  It was so unheard of at the time that my publisher (Harper) was not interested in publishing the book.  They wanted it to come out only digitally, since they were pretty sure that as many people would buy it as would buy a book that mounted the evidence that there really was a successful landing on the moon. But after I wrote the book they decided it would be worth putting into print.  In the end, it got a lot [...]

2025-09-10T13:09:07-04:00September 24th, 2024|Book Discussions, Historical Jesus, Mythicism|

Paul and the Anachronistic Origins of Early Christianity – Part 2 by Dr. Robyn Faith Walsh

Here is the second post by Robyn Faith Walsh, challenging what the majority of scholars think and teach about the relationship of Paul and the Gospels, and the implications for early Christianity.  Again, this is related to her book, which you can find here: The Origins of Early Christian Literature. ****************************** Paul makes sense as a “source” for the gospel writers for several reasons. The first relates to literary practices and social context: given what we know about the processes of ancient authors, it is likely that the gospel writers would have sought out any available material about the Christ movement as they created their works. And the only available writings that we know existed before the gospels are Paul’s letters; that some of these letters even survive to the degree that we have them suggests they were circulated and/or known in some measure. Yet, as discussed in Part 1, it is exceptionally rare to find studies that link Paul directly with the gospels, even if this makes good chronological sense. Paul [...]

2025-09-10T13:08:52-04:00September 22nd, 2024|Canonical Gospels, Paul and His Letters, Public Forum|
Go to Top